t;/home/dmn/.local/bin/rbt", line 8, in
sys.exit(main())
File
"/home/dmn/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rbtools/commands/main.py",
line 207, in main
command.run_from_argv([RB_MAIN, command_name] + args)
File
"/home/dmn/.local/lib/python3.10/site-packages/rbtools/comm
#> /usr/bin/rbt post --debug
Unexpected error loading command post: name 'platform_system' is not defined
On Thursday, January 20, 2022 at 9:14:07 AM UTC+2 David Trowbridge wrote:
> Can you run with --debug and send the output?
>
> David
>
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at
.7)
Please help
-Dan
--
Supercharge your Review Board with Power Pack:
https://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
Want us to host Review Board for you? Check out RBCommons:
https://rbcommons.com/
Happy user? Let us know! https://www.reviewboard.org/users/
---
You received this message because yo
but those apparently didn't store them in the right place.
Unable to connect to a repository at URL
'https://rmfile02.routematch.local:8443/svn/RouteMatch' Server SSL
certificate verification failed: issuer is not trusted
On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 8:43:33 AM UTC-5, Dan Holme
do i have to uninstall subvertpy? how does RB know to use one or the
other? is there a config switch?
On Wednesday, November 26, 2014 8:34:38 AM UTC-5, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2014-11-26 at 05:31 -0800, Dan Holmes wrote:
> > subvertpy. felt like the
subvertpy. felt like the instructions favored that one.
On Tuesday, November 25, 2014 6:21:26 PM UTC-5, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> Are you using the pysvn or subvertpy backend?
>
> -David
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 9:19 AM, Dan Holmes > wrote:
>
>> I switched
I switched to Ubuntu but am still having SVN connection problems. I went
back over the installation for SVN python tools and it said it was all
installed. What am i missing?
from the apache error.log
[Tue Nov 25 17:14:27.246518 2014] [:error] [pid 8713] ERROR:root:SVN:
Failed to get repositor
On Ubuntu 14.04.01 server, following the instructions i get the following
error(s) when i run the easy_install ReviewBoard command. I haven't yet
tried to run it yet so i don't know if this is fatal but i thought i would
throw this out here before i lost the error messages.
Installing pilprin
have read
what i can find on this and it seems to have been fixed. I don't know what
to try next.
Anyone know what i can try next?
thanks
dan
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbc
We use a coding style where we use tabs, and tab size is 4 spaces.
How do I get RB to use that scheme on tabs (it shows 8 spaces for tabs now).
I'm using RB 1.7.1.6
Thanks,
Dan
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosti
Ah ok. We'll use the "Depends On" link.
Thanks Christian!
Dan
On Thursday, June 26, 2014 11:50:43 AM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> Sorry, there’s no way to do this. A lot would need to change to allow it
> to happen.
>
> What I’d recommend
Hi there,
Is there a way to post a single review request that spans multiple repos
(using git)? I.e. one review request that contains relevant changes for 2+
repos instead of one separate review board request for each respective repo.
Thanks,
Dan
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http
Hammond - chri...@beanbaginc.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
>
> On June 4, 2014 at 10:12:52 AM, Dan Jackson (danjac...@googlemail.com
> ) wrote:
>
> In addition to this, I added some extra debugging to the get_file()
erver/MacServer/NativeMacUsbInterface.cs'"
Hope this helps.
On Wednesday, 4 June 2014 14:30:14 UTC+1, Dan Jackson wrote:
>
> Christian,
>
> Thanks for your help. I'm running Subvertpy on Lighttpd.
>
> Adding that line to subvert.py and then restarting the server results in
> the
..cats out the expected contents of the file.
I'd appreciate any other suggestions you might have.
On Tuesday, 3 June 2014 19:58:08 UTC+1, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> Are you using PySVN on the server, or Subvertpy?
>
> Internally, we're running the equi
terface.cs
(working
copy)
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
However, when I run rbt post --debug I get:
>>> RBTools 0.6
>>> Python 2.7.5 (default, Mar 9 2014, 22:15:05)
[GCC 4.2.1 Compatible Apple LLVM 5.0 (clang-500.0.68)]
>>> Running on Darwin-13.2.0-x86_64-i386-64bit
>>
Hi Christian,
re: rbssh - If I try to invoke "rbssh" directly it seems to connect to the
sshd on port 22 of the remote host even though I'm telling it to use port
7999. Ex:
rbssh vi-stash.lab.vi.local -l git -p 7999 -s ssh
Is there any way to better debug what "rbssh&quo
?False
*2014-04-29 21:22:29,992 - DEBUG - - Ciphers agreed: local=aes128-ctr,
remote=aes128-ctr*
2014-04-29 21:22:29,992 - DEBUG - - using kex diffie-hellman-group1-sha1;
server key type ssh-rsa; cipher: local aes128-ctr, remote aes128-ctr; mac:
local hmac-sha1, remote hmac-sha1; compression: l
don't show
any connection attempt being to port 7999.
Shall I file a bug?
Thanks,
Dan
On Tuesday, April 29, 2014 12:25:26 PM UTC-7, Christian Hammond wrote:
>
> Hi Dan,
>
> We don't use OpenSSH for talking to the repository. We use our rbssh
> instead. This shouldn&#x
d_rsa
debug2: we sent a publickey packet, wait for reply
debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg ssh-rsa blen 279
debug2: input_userauth_pk_ok: fp
*ba:ac:4e:3f:e8:a0:e2:55:a5:91:60:d0:07:07:09:3b*
debug1: read PEM private key done: type RSA
debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey).
Authenticated to vi-sta
and just counting on having a logged
in instance.)
On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 6:28:19 PM UTC-4, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> I think the issues with setup-repo and list-repo-types are just a simple
> bug with our command-line handling.
>
> -David
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at
h the p4 client files in it as well.
Dan S.
On Wednesday, April 23, 2014 5:58:37 PM UTC-4, David Trowbridge wrote:
>
> Right now, rbtools is not well suited to posting review requests for
> submitted changes without a working directory. This should work fine if you
> create a p4 client
The current directory does not contain a checkout from a supported
source code repository.
I know the old p4 server means I don't have the shelve option. We are
currently pushing changes
to a development branch then merging that into a release branch. Is there
some tric
, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 11/11/2013 07:21 AM, Dan Porter wrote:
> > For those wanting to run RBTools under EL5 (which is unfortunately our
> > main production environment still), attached is an unofficial package we
> > use at our company. It's built from standard sou
you are viewing
the review or diff.
Dan
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
found
However if I do an svn info from the reviewboard host it responds
properly.
Any ideas on what I'm missing here?
Dan
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Dan Dumont wrote:
>
>> I set https, but it never seemed to stick.
>>
>> Not sure if you
fusing whatever is
building the urls.
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> Glad you got it working. I haven't really been available much this weekend.
>
> Thanks for the bug report. Should be an easy fix. However, I haven't seen
> that o
SetEnv HTTPS on
In the apache config worked like a charm though.
I did end up filing this issue
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=2639
I'm not sure yet if this will cause problems now that I've solved the
redirect https issues.
On Sat, Jun 16, 2012 at 11:56 PM,
at the the border.
Would be nice if you guys could just return protocol relative urls
//reviewboard.apache.org/etc...
Any advice on where to stick that config setting to force https urls?
On Saturday, June 16, 2012 11:16:27 PM UTC-4, Dan Dumont wrote:
>
> Request URL:
> https://review
. status: "pending"
10. summary: ""
11. target_groups: []
12. target_people: []
13. testing_done: ""
14. time_added: "2012-06-17 02:58:19"
2. stat: "ok"
Is there a setting I'm missing that controls the protocol?
Do you use a protocol
relative url? //reviews.apache.org/path/to/api
or do you build it off of some variable in the config?
On Saturday, June 16, 2012 9:37:11 PM UTC-4, Dan Dumont wrote:
>
> Didn't touch the apache config.
> It's a http -> https redirect (no ide
Didn't touch the apache config.
It's a http -> https redirect (no idea why the browser isn't simply
following it, do ajax requests eat the 301 errors? I can't remember).
This is a brand new draft.
On Saturday, June 16, 2012 9:31:26 PM UTC-4, Christian Hammond wrote:
&
Hi Christian,
I got things mostly up and running again by reconstructing the sql tables
in a new 1.5.5 install and then upgrading that.
Having some difficulty at the site though. Many different api problems it
looks like.
I can't publish drafts, getting a 301:
OPTIONS /api/review-requests/53
positories populated.
Thanks again!
Dan
On Jun 11, 2:41 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> It looks like either there was a problem syncing the database initially or
> the database was wiped. Assuming you don't have anything of value in there
> yet, try nuking the database and starting over.
it owned by root but I think it should be accessible to the
apache user
The files I put inside the directory are:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 12219 Jun 6 07:24 __init__.py
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 15044 Jun 6 07:24 __init__.pyc
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 2806058 Jun 6 07:24 _pysvn_2_4.so
Restarted the webserver and nothing changed there. No Javascript
errors are coming in the UI
In Authentication I see:
Standard Registration
Active Directory
LDAP
NIS
X.509 Public Key
Legacy Authentication Module
Dan
On Jun 7, 9:42 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> You shouldn't
pysvn installation part. Assuming
I have corrected it now, do I just need to create a new ReviewBoard
site via rb-site install /var/www/newsite? Would that populate the
dropdown list correctly?
Dan
On Jun 6, 1:53 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> This sounds like the installat
hat is the problem or is
there some other cause of having an empty dropdown list there?
Thanks!
Dan
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
-~--~~~~--~---
This is Oracle Enterprise Linux 6:
# uname -a
Linux slc01ozq 2.6.32-100.28.5.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Wed Feb 2 18:40:23
EST 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
On Jun 4, 3:59 am, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> That's a new one. It's hard to tell from those logs what exactl
Still hung here, anyone have any ideas?
On May 30, 12:05 pm, Dan Miller wrote:
> I'm having issues getting my ReviewBoard site up and running and
> wanted to see if anyone has encountered this before or has ideas on
> what I can try to resolve it.
>
--
Want to help the Rev
g
libgmp >= 5 to avoid timing attack vulnerability.
[Wed May 30 03:01:55 2012] [error] _warn("Not using mpz_powm_sec.
You should rebuild using libgmp >= 5 to avoid timing attack
vulnerability.", PowmInsecureWarning)
Any ideas on what I've done wrong and how I can resolve the
continued smoothly.
Dan
On May 24, 2:40 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> It is looking for 1.3.1 specifically. RB 1.6.x won't work with Django 1.4.
>
> This looks like some temporary downtime issue with their server. I can
> accesswww.djangoproject.co
My installation was crusing along until it got to www.djangoproject.com.
I'm not sure if it's that easy_install is looking for version 1.3.1
and the latest version is 1.4 (perhaps something moved - I'm not very
familiar with how the internals work here).
Anyways, any ideas of how I can move past t
"We're shutting down the v1 and v2 APIs on May
1. Oh, and if you don't already have an API Token, then I guess for you,
the APIs are shut down now." Brilliant.
-- Dan
>
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/d
that GitHub has removed the API Token
in preparation for this change? If so, that sort of answers my first
question, since ther repository setup page on ReviewBoard is asking
for an API Token.
Thanks in advance for any info anyone can give.
Best,
Dan
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Don
I have the same problem that only if setting reviewboard as root it
works, otherwise (set it in sub directory) it says "The page you were
looking for does not exist."
On 9月14日, 上午9时08分, Den Mark wrote:
> That's right. The problem is fixed by setting it to root. But I would
> disable that configu
-U. Then try the upgrade again.
I gave that a try and django_evolution was upgraded from 0.6.2 ->
0.6.4 but to no avail unfortunately - I'm still seeing the same error
on rb-site upgrade: column "basedir" of relation "diffviewer_diffset"
already exists.
Any other suggest
uck between a rock and a hard place of my
own making. Any advice on how I might proceed would be very much
appreciated.
Cheers,
Dan Brook
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
Happy user? Let us know
Ah, I suspected that it might be in the database.
Thanks,
Dan
On May 11, 2:54 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> It fixes all future ones going forward. We need to reset the broken 1.6 beta
> 1 counts, which I'm still trying to figure out the best way to do. It'll
> happen by th
views. I've noticed it slowly decrementing since we
installed 1.6 beta 1 :)
Dan
On May 10, 3:03 am, "Ashithraj Shetty"
wrote:
> Upgraded to the latest release. Big bad box is not seen anymore J
>
> -Ashith
>
> From: reviewboard@googlegroups.com [mailto:reviewboard@googleg
hanges as they are in progress to your own
repository or branch. There is no harm in doing this, but every
benefit for people to see the progress being made before it is
finished.
Dan
On Apr 26, 2:41 am, Alexander Solovets wrote:
> Hello, Review Board members!
>
> My name is Alexan
t). For example:
Doesn't work:
$ git clone https://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard.git; cd
reviewboard.git
$ git diff
Works:
$ git clone https://github.com/reviewboard/reviewboard.git; cd
reviewboard.git
$ git diff HEAD^..HEAD
Dan
On Mar 25, 2:20 am, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Really?
're trying to log in with.
You'll want to examine your LDAP object to make sure it has
objectClass=User and mailNickname=foo, of course.
--
Dan Young
Multnomah ESD - Technology Services
503-257-1562
--
Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
http://www.reviewboard.org/d
quot;)
Also, FWIW, the open() function is deprecated in favor of
initialize(), which uses the LDAP URL syntax where the port number
_is_ set using a colon trailing the hostname, like this:
l = ldap.initialize("ldap://x.x.x.x:389/dc=example,dc=org";)
For reference:
http://www.python-ldap.or
it works
> correctly on your end?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Dan wrote:
> > Hi Christian,
>
it works
> correctly on your end?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Dan wrote:
> > Hi Christian,
>
it works
> correctly on your end?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Dan wrote:
> > Hi Christian,
>
it works
> correctly on your end?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Dan wrote:
> > Hi Christian,
>
it works
> correctly on your end?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com
> Review Board -http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 12:29 AM, Dan wrote:
> > Hi Christian,
>
Hi Christian,
You mean post a review request to http://reviews.reviewboard.org/?
On Jan 13, 1:33 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Dan,
>
> You're correct, this is a bug, and your fix looks fine. We'll have to
> get that fix in. Want to post a review request?
>
> Ch
},
"name": "local-android"
}
}
from the data structure of the json, we can see that use "url =
rsp['links']['info']['href']" of course will get a array key
exception.
should use url = rsp['repository']['li
A more correct and readable json than last post, the indent for "name"
in the last post is wrong.
{
"stat": "ok",
"repository": {
"path": "http://192.168.1.131/svn/Android";,
"tool": "Subversion",
"id": 2,
"links": {
"info": {
"hre
Hi
Here I have a problem with postreview.py when publish a review
request, could anyone please have a look?
My enviroment is Reviewboard 1.5.1 and SVN. I downloaded postreview.py
from
https://github.com/reviewboard/rbtools/blob/184334a7a5ddc24172ae2aa0364f13aabe037470/rbtools/postreview.py,
and
Hi All,
Following the guide of
http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/1.5/admin/installation/windows/,
I installed the reviewboard and created a site.
But when I access the site, it said "Manual server updates required",
and ask me visit
http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/wiki/RequiredServerU
Have you found solution to this problem,
I have the same problem now.
Could anyone give some hints?
Any help will be highly appreciated.
On Dec 1, 3:59 am, Travis wrote:
> Trying to install Reviewboard 1.5.1 on Windows XP SP3 with Apache 2.2
> and mod_wsgi. Below is my apache error log. In my b
Have you found a solution to this problem?
I have the same problem too. :-(
Could someone give some hints?
Any help will be highly appreciated!
On Dec 1, 3:59 am, Travis wrote:
> Trying to install Reviewboard 1.5.1 on Windows XP SP3 with Apache 2.2
> and mod_wsgi. Below is my apache error log.
-user/
Dan
On Oct 13, 1:00 pm, Ian Battersby wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We're running ReviewBoard 1.5 and have AD authentication working via
> the Python ldap module but wondered if there might be a way to
> authenticate the user via NTLM and Apache so they don't have to log i
silly follow up, but how do you apply that upgrade?
thanks
On Oct 6, 1:45 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Upgrade to the latest Djblets nightly. This has been fixes but didn't
> make the release. We'll have a fix out soon.
>
> Christian
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, O
hi,
we're getting the error below when trying to access api url's (the
repository listing in particular). we installed RB 1.5 on an ubuntu
10.04 server.
Any clues as to what i did wrong?
Thanks,
Dan
Exception thrown for user USERNAME at https://localhost/api/json/repositories/
1L
nfortunately, you'll likely need both sides
(server and client) upgraded before being able to use Mercurial
effectively. That said, the Mercurial support that *has* been
implemented only covers a few use cases, so more input is greatly
appreciated.
--
~Dan
pgpDN5IEs8oeF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
(PS the "explicit evidence" is for the FDA and our internal quality folks
> > but is applicable to any regulated environment, e.g. FAA, DOD, others?)
> >
> >
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user? Let us know at http://www.reviewboard.org/users/
> -~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> reviewboard+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/reviewboard?hl=en
FWIW, something like what's described here is the most frequently
requested "feature" from folks at my workplace w.r.t. RB. If chipx86
and trowbrds are okay with exploring the idea, I'd be willing to help
with design and implementation.
--
~Dan
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
a diff via the web work correctly for Bazaar
(I haven't tested Bazaar support)? You'll want to make sure that's in
good shape before starting down this road.
Dan
On Aug 16, 4:47 am, Gustavo Narea
wrote:
> Anyone? :/
>
> On Aug 11, 5:14 pm, Gustavo Narea
> wrote:
>
>
t know
anything about how Clearcase works on Linux, but I'm guessing the
assumption that all vobs are mounted under vobs/ might not be true...
Dan
On Aug 10, 6:47 am, Chetan wrote:
> As suggested by you i enabled logging to debug clearcase error. I
> given the log information when
sensibly.
Dan
On Aug 9, 11:06 am, Shambhu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After making some minor modification to resolve below error,
> post-review script is able to proceed further. But now it hangs at
> diff upload. It is not showing any error or warning. I tried to upload
> diff
te on the GSOC git project. I
thought the students were required to show progress... If it doesn't
go anywhere, we definitely need to add some better handling for more
distributed workflows.
Dan
On Aug 10, 7:59 am, Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> On 08/09/2010 02:32 PM, Yang Zhang wrot
ry, but it should be easy to make it if it doesn't.
Dan
On Aug 6, 5:48 pm, Yang Zhang wrote:
> I'm trying to automate post-review to run on a git repository --
> ideally on each commit (on the "client" side), but on each push (on
> the central repo) would do too if ne
uate other options.
Dan
On Jul 22, 4:27 am, Igor wrote:
> On Jul 18, 7:25 pm, Jan Koprowski wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Igor wrote:
> > > Hi,
>
> > > I have same ClearCase setup as described in patch of Jan Koprowski -
> > >http://re
g anywhere.
Nonetheless it would be better to start with these changes as a
baseline rather than debugging the existing broken code. Jan will need
to comment if he's interested in doing this. I can't do it easily
myself since RB doesn't upload full git patches right now...
Dan
On Jul 1
feedback on the applicability of a patch
* the ability to expand and comment on the areas around the
submitted diff's hunks
I can appreciate that this imposes fairly big limitations on what
one can post to ReviewBoard. I'll defer to the RB team on why this
is the case.
--
~Dan
pgpNVLRMDyQTW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
I felt I should cross-post since I'm trying to infect core python developers
with ReviewBoard goodness. Original and related threads are at:
http://groups.google.com/group/the-fellowship-of-the-packaging
Cheers,
--
~ Dan
- Forwarded message from Dan Buch -
Date: Sat, 1
though ;)
Clearly the Mercurial features still need ... more work ;)
/me invokes "patches welcome", runs away
--
~Dan
>
> --
> Want to help the Review Board project? Donate today at
> http://www.reviewboard.org/donate/
> Happy user?
can relate wrt ye olde $DAYJOB. I speak for my coworkers when I say
that the many hours you've sunk into ReviewBoard and RBTools are very
much appreciated.
Cheers and thanks again,
--
~Dan
>
> Christian
>
>
> On Saturday, June 26, 2010, Dan Buch wrote:
> >
> >
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 09:41:02AM -0700, Gordon Morehouse wrote:
> On Jun 24, 9:12 pm, Dan Buch wrote:
> > IIRC there's some naive logic in the remote Mercurial repo client inside
> > Reviewboard that screws up the number/presence of some '/' chars. I think
>
lic release
of RBTools doesn't *actually* support plain ol' Mercurial usage, although it
*does* have good support for hgsubversion. Another recently-accepted patch
fixes this (for the most part,) and a dist which includes it is available
here:
http://github.com/meatballhat/rbtools/do
he review is
based.
> We already have CGIT configured. How I can re-sue CGIT here?
>
> Should I say PATH
> ashttp://mobcom-git.sj.broadcom.com/cgi-bin/cgit.cgi/git_repos/repo_too...
> and will it work?
>
> Thanks for your great help..
>
> Kunjal
>
Dan
> On Jun 16,
aster.
Dan
On Jun 11, 1:03 pm, Jan Koprowski wrote:
> When I told this I
> meanhttp://www.reviewboard.org/docs/codebase/dev/getting-started/#getting...
>
> On Jun 11, 4:37 pm, Jan Koprowski wrote:
>
>
>
> > Read this. All what You need is download raw diff and use patch
t the earliest version of Mercurial supported by hgsubversion?
--
~Dan
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 10:46:42PM +0200, Gilles Moris wrote:
> On Friday 14 May 2010 03:15:35 pm Dan Buch wrote:
> > Howdy all,
> >
> > I'm working on this patch:
> >
> >
2.5/site-packages/Django-1.1.1-py2.5.egg/django/
db/models/fields/__init__.py", line 210, in get_db_prep_lookup
return [self.get_db_prep_value(value)]
File "/usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/Django-1.1.1-py2.5.egg/django/
db/models/fields/__init__.py", line 361, in get_db_pre
Howdy all,
I'm working on this patch:
http://reviews.reviewboard.org/r/1464/
chipx86 recommended I post to the group about which version of Mercurial
I should target. Thoughts?
Cheers,
--
~Dan
pgpjsInCwnJdI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
That's what I thought. But I'm sure we can come up with some solution.
Presumably we only have to have a one-time performance penalty per
file, if we're intelligent about it. Also, have you considered any
alternatives to pygments?
Dan
On Apr 21, 3:17 pm, Christian Hammond wrot
ub.com/djs/reviewboard/tree/pygments
For the Obj-C issue, RB is currently using get_lexer_for_filename, but
there is also a guess_lexer API that presumably would yield better
results...
Dan
On Apr 20, 3:41 pm, Christian Hammond wrote:
> Hi Tim,
>
> We use a Python module ca
Unfortunately I don't think the original author monitors the mailing
list, so we'll need to do some experimentation on our own. I can try
to help, but I don't keep a Clearcase RB setup active so I can't
easily test things out.
Dan
On Mar 11, 1:10 am, Jan Koprowski wrote:
&g
oard -http://www.reviewboard.org
> VMware, Inc. -http://www.vmware.com
>
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 1:32 PM, Dan Savilonis wrote:
> > I would generalize Stephen's idea and just call it general support for
> > distributed vcs workflow since RB isn't really built aro
arisons, but Rietveld and Gerrit just seem much more lightweight
and snappy.
Dan
On Mar 9, 10:03 pm, Stephen Gallagher
wrote:
> It was discussed in another thread, but I think it would be great to improve
> the git support by handling patch-sets in post-review.
>
> The idea would
ns in ClearCaseClient methods, but it appears able to
generate this kind of path. I also remember the original review for
this change had screenshots of extended paths and an option to shorten
then, so he seemed to expect this kind of craziness.
Dan
On Mar 10, 12:33 pm, Jan Koprowski wrote:
> Hi !
&g
How do you have the server configured? The server needs to point to a
dynamic view where it will be able to access the file revisions
specified via extended path notation.
Dan
On Feb 17, 10:15 am, eeiths wrote:
> Ok, i got to spend a little time at this today.
>
> looks like postr
u'd submit the first patch
directly, then the second patch with a parent diff of the first patch,
then the third patch with a parent diff of the sum of the first two
patches.
Dan
On Feb 4, 10:33 am, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Feb 4, 10:20 am, Dan Savilonis wrote:
>
> > post-r
http://github.com/reviewboard/rbtools
You can submit reviews against rbtools in the same location as
reviewboard reviews.
Dan
On Feb 4, 9:57 am, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Where can the RBTools source be checked out? I have a few
> contributions I'd like to make.
>
>
her currently.
Also, see issue 1229 for some explanation on how RB currently handles
diffs and why it doesn't fit perfectly with git patchsets.
Dan
On Feb 3, 4:36 pm, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Reviewboard is a great tool, but it's lacking in a couple places
> regarding Git.
>
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
