Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13272#issuecomment-221641399
**[Test build #59282 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59282/consoleFull)**
for PR 13272 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13272#issuecomment-221641407
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13284#issuecomment-221641136
I comment out the failed case. There is no other failures. As mentioned by
@shivaram , we can try to fix the pipeRDD in a separate JIRA. I suspect it is
related
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13272#issuecomment-221640245
**[Test build #59282 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59282/consoleFull)**
for PR 13272 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13272#issuecomment-221639155
one more round of negative tests, then this is good to go.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user sitalkedia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13107#issuecomment-221638365
@rxin - We have seen this issue go away when we limit the pointer array
size within 1G. Updated the PR to set that as a default value.
@davies - There is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13298#issuecomment-221637482
**[Test build #59281 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59281/consoleFull)**
for PR 13298 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13298#issuecomment-221637148
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13296#issuecomment-221631478
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13294#issuecomment-221635222
Thank you for review, @srowen .
Yep. Those are all I've seen in `core/src/main/scala/../rdd`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13298#issuecomment-221631904
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13296#issuecomment-221631466
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13296#issuecomment-221631201
**[Test build #59278 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59278/consoleFull)**
for PR 13296 at commit
GitHub user lfzCarlosC opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13298
typos fix for files in [mllib] and [streaming]
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
fixed typos for source code for component [mllib] and [streaming]
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#discussion_r64603279
--- Diff: docs/ml-advanced.md ---
@@ -4,10 +4,85 @@ title: Advanced topics - spark.ml
displayTitle: Advanced topics - spark.ml
---
-#
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#discussion_r64602664
--- Diff: docs/ml-advanced.md ---
@@ -4,10 +4,85 @@ title: Advanced topics - spark.ml
displayTitle: Advanced topics - spark.ml
---
-#
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#discussion_r64602162
--- Diff: docs/ml-advanced.md ---
@@ -4,10 +4,85 @@ title: Advanced topics - spark.ml
displayTitle: Advanced topics - spark.ml
---
-#
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#discussion_r64601181
--- Diff: docs/ml-advanced.md ---
@@ -4,10 +4,85 @@ title: Advanced topics - spark.ml
displayTitle: Advanced topics - spark.ml
---
-#
Github user huaxingao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13287#issuecomment-221617823
@rxin Sorry, I didn't notice your comment until this morning. Reformatted
the description. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13297#issuecomment-221612556
**[Test build #59280 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59280/consoleFull)**
for PR 13297 at commit
Github user vruusmann closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13293
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
GitHub user vruusmann opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13297
[SPARK-15523][ML][MLLIB] Update JPMML to 1.2.15
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15523
This PR replaces PR
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13283#issuecomment-221606617
Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13296#issuecomment-221598197
**[Test build #59278 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59278/consoleFull)**
for PR 13296 at commit
Github user vruusmann commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13293#issuecomment-221600087
I'll go and read Apache Spark docs about PR guidelines. Looks like I missed
this deps thing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13293#issuecomment-221598223
**[Test build #59279 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59279/consoleFull)**
for PR 13293 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13293#issuecomment-221597616
Jenkins test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13296
[YARN][Doc][Minor] Remove several obsolete env variables and update the doc
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove several obsolete env variables not supported for
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13296#discussion_r64585570
--- Diff: conf/spark-env.sh.template ---
@@ -40,10 +40,6 @@
# - SPARK_EXECUTOR_CORES, Number of cores for the executors (Default: 1).
# -
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13293#issuecomment-221598788
**[Test build #59279 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59279/consoleFull)**
for PR 13293 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13293#issuecomment-221598803
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13293#issuecomment-221598377
You'll need to run dev/test-dependencies to update the deps files.
Are the exclusions definitely not needed? You would know best.
Are there any
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13293#issuecomment-221598797
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13293#issuecomment-221597567
Jenkins add to whitelist
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-221585022
@shivaram, I did not mean SQL row UDF. It's something like below:
```
dapply_row <- function(x, FUN, schema) {
dapply(x, function(x) {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221586554
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221586546
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221586539
**[Test build #59277 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59277/consoleFull)**
for PR 13165 at commit
Github user sun-rui commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-221586542
@shivaram, I did not mean SQL row UDF. It's something like below:
```
dapply_row <- function(x, FUN, schema) {
dapply(x, function(x) {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221585787
**[Test build #59277 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59277/consoleFull)**
for PR 13165 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13295#issuecomment-221585662
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#discussion_r64576800
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/client.R ---
@@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ generateSparkSubmitArgs <- function(args, sparkHome,
jars, sparkSubmitOpts, pack
combinedArgs
GitHub user mhnatiuk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13295
[SPARK-15294][SPARKR][MINOR] Add pivot functionality to SparkR
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added pivot functionality to SparkR
## How was this patch
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221576056
@shivaram and @sun-rui I addressed the comment, added a test for this PR
and fixed some tests not working on Windows due to path separator.
This PR also
Github user sun-rui commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#discussion_r64576193
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/client.R ---
@@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ generateSparkSubmitArgs <- function(args, sparkHome,
jars, sparkSubmitOpts, pack
combinedArgs
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221581990
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221581253
**[Test build #59276 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59276/consoleFull)**
for PR 13165 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221581975
**[Test build #59276 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59276/consoleFull)**
for PR 13165 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221581986
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221577659
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221577653
**[Test build #59275 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59275/consoleFull)**
for PR 13165 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221576970
**[Test build #59275 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59275/consoleFull)**
for PR 13165 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13165#issuecomment-221577662
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13264#issuecomment-221564246
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13264#issuecomment-221563986
**[Test build #59274 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59274/consoleFull)**
for PR 13264 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13264#issuecomment-221564250
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13294#issuecomment-221556317
Ok, a little random as a set of changes but unobjectionable. Are there more
unused imports?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10187#issuecomment-221551531
@kapilsingh5050 could you close this PR please? I think this can live
outside of Spark core as a separate repo, and could be listed in Spark packages.
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13294#issuecomment-221546279
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13294#issuecomment-221546281
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13294#issuecomment-221546078
**[Test build #59273 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59273/consoleFull)**
for PR 13294 at commit
Github user gt-rocker commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10187#discussion_r6457
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/metrics/sink/OpenTsdbSink.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,165 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13264#issuecomment-221539959
**[Test build #59274 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59274/consoleFull)**
for PR 13264 at commit
Github user lgieron commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13264#discussion_r64552539
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/storage/StorageTabSuite.scala ---
@@ -179,6 +179,25 @@ class StorageTabSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user devaraj-kavali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11996#issuecomment-221531103
@kayousterhout, can you have look into this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user jurriaan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13267#discussion_r64547155
--- Diff: sql/core/pom.xml ---
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
com.univocity
univocity-parsers
- 2.1.0
+ 2.1.1
---
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896#issuecomment-221528445
@hvanhovell yeah, it is up-to-dated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user lgieron commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13264#discussion_r64545642
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ui/storage/StorageTab.scala
---
@@ -59,7 +59,15 @@ class StorageListener(storageStatusListener:
Github user hvanhovell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10896#issuecomment-221525267
@maropu I'll take a look today. Is the description up-to-date?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#issuecomment-221524890
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#issuecomment-221524891
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#issuecomment-221524773
**[Test build #59271 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59271/consoleFull)**
for PR 13262 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13285#issuecomment-221524784
@GayathriMurali
1, Please clear the change for ```ml-features.md``` which is irrelevant to
this issue.
2, We can use ```include_example``` tag to directly
Github user jurriaan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13267#discussion_r64544204
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/readwriter.py ---
@@ -787,6 +787,9 @@ def csv(self, path, mode=None, compression=None,
sep=None, quote=None, escape=No
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13294#issuecomment-221524171
**[Test build #59273 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59273/consoleFull)**
for PR 13294 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#issuecomment-221523746
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13294
[MINOR][CORE] Fix a HadoopRDD log message and remove unused imports in rdd
files.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR fixes the following typos in log
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#issuecomment-221523749
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#issuecomment-221523625
**[Test build #59270 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59270/consoleFull)**
for PR 13262 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221522960
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221522855
**[Test build #59272 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59272/consoleFull)**
for PR 9192 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221522961
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user yanboliang commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#issuecomment-221521088
@sethah @jkbradley Thanks for your comments! I addressed most of the
comments and responded inline.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13286#issuecomment-221520294
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#discussion_r64541660
--- Diff: docs/ml-advanced.md ---
@@ -4,10 +4,85 @@ title: Advanced topics - spark.ml
displayTitle: Advanced topics - spark.ml
---
-#
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13286#issuecomment-221520299
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13286#issuecomment-221520107
**[Test build #59268 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59268/consoleFull)**
for PR 13286 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#discussion_r64541319
--- Diff: docs/ml-advanced.md ---
@@ -4,10 +4,85 @@ title: Advanced topics - spark.ml
displayTitle: Advanced topics - spark.ml
---
-#
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9192#issuecomment-221519516
**[Test build #59272 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59272/consoleFull)**
for PR 9192 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#discussion_r64541027
--- Diff: docs/ml-advanced.md ---
@@ -4,10 +4,85 @@ title: Advanced topics - spark.ml
displayTitle: Advanced topics - spark.ml
---
-#
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#discussion_r64540348
--- Diff: docs/ml-advanced.md ---
@@ -4,10 +4,85 @@ title: Advanced topics - spark.ml
displayTitle: Advanced topics - spark.ml
---
-#
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13293#issuecomment-221516043
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#issuecomment-221516131
**[Test build #59271 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59271/consoleFull)**
for PR 13262 at commit
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#discussion_r64539181
--- Diff: docs/ml-advanced.md ---
@@ -4,10 +4,85 @@ title: Advanced topics - spark.ml
displayTitle: Advanced topics - spark.ml
---
-#
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#discussion_r64538677
--- Diff: docs/ml-advanced.md ---
@@ -4,10 +4,85 @@ title: Advanced topics - spark.ml
displayTitle: Advanced topics - spark.ml
---
-#
GitHub user vruusmann opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13293
[SPARK-15523][ML][MLLIB] Update JPMML to 1.2.15
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-15523
## How was this patch
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13262#issuecomment-221514935
**[Test build #59270 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59270/consoleFull)**
for PR 13262 at commit
Github user burness commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13116#issuecomment-221513002
@hvanhovell yeah, I agree with your opinionï¼ Thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13292#issuecomment-221512348
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13292#issuecomment-221512346
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
501 - 600 of 685 matches
Mail list logo
