Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22838
I merged to master/2.4 . The key parts here already passed individually.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22852#discussion_r228536180
--- Diff: docs/security.md ---
@@ -6,7 +6,20 @@ title: Security
* This will become a table of contents (this text will be scraped).
{:toc
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22852#discussion_r228536280
--- Diff: docs/security.md ---
@@ -6,7 +6,20 @@ title: Security
* This will become a table of contents (this text will be scraped).
{:toc
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22852#discussion_r228535892
--- Diff: docs/security.md ---
@@ -6,7 +6,20 @@ title: Security
* This will become a table of contents (this text will be scraped).
{:toc
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21588
So, let's say we decide to only support Hive 2.3.x+, as a precursor to
this. We could already eliminate a lot of the Hive tests, right? that might be
useful in its own right as they take tim
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22815#discussion_r228396856
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -434,6 +388,7 @@ read.orc <- function(path, ...) {
#' Loads a Parquet file, returning the res
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22838#discussion_r228363727
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/integration-tests/dev/dev-run-integration-tests.sh
---
@@ -103,4 +104,4 @@ then
properties=( ${properties
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22838
I'll spin it one more time just to try to get a green light, but I agree,
this change really isn't even testable by the exis
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22840
Yeah ... I read that as being about the source tree from the repo. But it
does say only "... like the ones distributed by the project". OK I think this
is fin
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22840
Hm, I'm not dead-set against it, though it seems a little deceptive; you
won't actually get the exact binary distro out, and that's what the script
purports to do. (Arguably, why d
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22840
Hm, but then you haven't created a completely valid binary release; it's
missing licenses. As I say, I don't know that the binary release tarball must
be exactly recreatable from the
Github user srowen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22829
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22838#discussion_r228311880
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -2654,6 +2654,16 @@
kubernetes
+
+resource-managers/kubernetes/core
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22838#discussion_r228316418
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -2654,6 +2654,16 @@
kubernetes
+
+resource-managers/kubernetes/core
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22829#discussion_r228285511
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -2656,7 +2656,8 @@
kubernetes
resource-managers/kubernetes/core
-resource-managers
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22829
[SPARK-25836][BUILD][K8S] For now disable kubernetes-integration-tests
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For now make building and running kubernetes-integration-tests
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22723
BinaryFileRDD uses the `minPartitions` input from the user. See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-22357 I think the logic is more
complex and already takes some account of
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22815#discussion_r228233269
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.util.ExecutionListenerManager
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22815#discussion_r228232993
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -434,6 +388,7 @@ read.orc <- function(path, ...) {
#' Loads a Parquet file, returning the res
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22826
[SPARK-25760][DOCS][FOLLOWUP] Add note about AddJar return value change in
migration guide
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add note about AddJar return value change in
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22690
Actually sorry for the ignorant question @HyukjinKwon but is there a
migration guide for things outside SQL and MLlib? those are the two I've found.
This one isn't specific to those two
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21816
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22690
Yeah let me go back and add a note about several recent changes like this.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22747
It seems like a bug fix more than anything, and I assume we wouldn't
document every single one, but don't object to mentioning it if that's
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
Whoa, never seen a JVM crash like that!
```
[CodeBlob (0x7f6fc018add0)]
Framesize: 2
Runtime Stub (0x7f6fc018add0): handle_exception_from_callee Runtime1
stub
Could
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21933
Yeah this can be closed; we updated to 4.1.30
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22819
[BUILD] Close stale PRs
Closes #22567
Closes #18457
Closes #21517
Closes #21858
Closes #22383
Closes #19219
Closes #22401
Closes #22811
You can merge this pull request
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
OK, I ran an SBT test earlier and indeed it's kind of a glaring warning. I
think I've changed my mind, if it does harmonize versions and avoid a wa
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22663
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22815#discussion_r227972751
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/SQLContext.R ---
@@ -343,7 +343,6 @@ setMethod("toDF", signature(x = "RDD"),
#' path <- "path/to/f
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22729
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22815
[SPARK-25821][SQL] Remove SQLContext methods deprecated in 1.4
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove SQLContext methods deprecated in 1.4
## How was this patch
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18390
If the label-specific metrics are already exposed in the multiclass metrics
output, why do we need this too?
---
-
To
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22723
I don't think that's necessarily true. This forces the default to be the
minimum, which is a behavior change and not obviously what the
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22729#discussion_r227818211
--- Diff: project/MimaExcludes.scala ---
@@ -55,9 +59,12 @@ object MimaExcludes {
ProblemFilters.exclude[DirectMissingMethodProblem
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22730
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22144
@tgravescs yes, I didn't say it was normal or good, but that it's not
forbidden. Ex: no more Java 7 support in Spark 2.3. The point was: if this
change were on purpose, then no it's n
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22144
@markhamstra I do think there's an unspoken but legitimate consideration
here, and that's that there is also a cost to not shipping the N thousand other
things users are waiting on in th
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22668
(I did the same thing 2 weeks ago)
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22144
So, some particular functionality worked in Spark 2.1, but didn't work
starting in 2.2. If anything, that was the breaking change. (I wonder if it was
on purpose, or documented, but, what'
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22668
@shivusondur @felixcheung looks like this test fails:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/view/Spark%20QA%20Test%20(Dashboard)/job/spark-master-test-sbt-hadoop-2.7/5070/testReport
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22805#discussion_r227431599
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/integration-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/integrationtest/backend/docker/DockerForDesktopBackend.scala
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22805#discussion_r227431063
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/integration-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/integrationtest/backend/docker/DockerForDesktopBackend.scala
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22805#discussion_r227429686
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/integration-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/integrationtest/backend/docker/DockerForDesktopBackend.scala
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22805#discussion_r227429795
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/integration-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/integrationtest/backend/IntegrationTestBackend.scala
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22805#discussion_r227430300
--- Diff:
resource-managers/kubernetes/integration-tests/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/k8s/integrationtest/backend/docker/DockerForDesktopBackend.scala
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22803
What does this affect, though? those are just nullability annotations and
don't result in behavior changes in the code, at all right? I don't know if
it's worth managing them to t
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22796
Yeah, maybe the better question is, what brings in this dependency? I took
out the declaration and all exclusions for `io.netty:netty` and checked
dependencies and it's basically Zookeeper (
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22754#discussion_r227168292
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeSorterSpillWriter.java
---
@@ -62,6 +62,8 @@ public UnsafeSorterSpillWriter
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22796
Well I think we want to remove the direct dependency on 3.x right
@dongjoon-hyun ?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22662
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22796#discussion_r227046597
--- Diff: dev/deps/spark-deps-hadoop-2.7 ---
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ metrics-graphite-3.1.5.jar
metrics-json-3.1.5.jar
metrics-jvm-3.1.5.jar
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22784
Hm, as a general comment, is this going to scale? This is making a
potentially huge sparse data set dense, and computing a PCA via SVD. I get the
idea that it's better to have some option than
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22425#discussion_r227001346
--- Diff: dev/tox.ini ---
@@ -14,6 +14,8 @@
# limitations under the License.
[pycodestyle]
-ignore=E226,E241,E305,E402,E722,E731,E741
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22425#discussion_r227001114
--- Diff: dev/lint-python ---
@@ -99,6 +104,29 @@ else
echo "flake8 checks passed."
fi
+# Check python document style, ski
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22383
Yeah, I think we just can't do this unfortunately. It was worth looking
into.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-uns
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22765
That's probably fine.
As an aside, I think we can remove all instances of Netty 3.x in the code
base, if any, now that Flume is
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22757
Merging this to master as a 'hotfix' for a pretty optional component
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: review
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22756#discussion_r226023867
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/clustering.py ---
@@ -335,20 +335,6 @@ def clusterCenters(self):
"""Get the cluster centers, repres
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22732
At this point I think you both know more than I do about this, so go ahead.
To the limits of my understanding it sounds reasonable
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22757
CC @Fokko - unfortunately the build didn't catch this one because it didn't
know enough to trigger Kinesis tests.
---
--
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22757
[SPARK-24601][FOLLOWUP] Update Jackson to 2.9.6 in Kinesis
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Also update Kinesis SDK's Jackson to match Spark's
## Ho
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22729
I think it's a legit failure. It touches a Kinesis test, and that has
triggered what I assume is an existing problem in the Kinesis integration. It
looks like it didn't like the fact that
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22727
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22744
Merged to master/2.4
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22732
That's a good point, but that was already an issue right? it isn't
introduced by this change at least?
---
-
To unsu
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22753
Merged to master/2.4/2.3
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22732#discussion_r225764876
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/UserDefinedFunction.scala
---
@@ -81,11 +81,11 @@ case class UserDefinedFunction
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22745
Is this a separate PR because this part is pretty separable, and you think
could be considered separately? if it's all part of one logical change that
should go in together or not at all, the
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22732#discussion_r225735714
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/UserDefinedFunction.scala
---
@@ -81,11 +81,11 @@ case class UserDefinedFunction
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22670
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22732#discussion_r225693558
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/UserDefinedFunction.scala
---
@@ -81,11 +81,11 @@ case class UserDefinedFunction
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22383
Oh, hm:
```
Serialization stack:
- object not serializable (class: java.util.Optional, value:
Optional[x])
- field (class: scala.Tuple2, name: _2, type: class
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22732#discussion_r225602236
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/UserDefinedFunction.scala
---
@@ -73,27 +73,27 @@ case class UserDefinedFunction
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22747
Interesting, this was changed a long time ago, with the claim that it was
needed to match Hive:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4586#discussion_r28394029 Maybe it's
changed again? CC @a
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22747
I tend to agree, but I wonder if it returns a row with 0 to emulate
something else like Hive?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21816#discussion_r225546659
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/rest/StandaloneRestSubmitSuite.scala
---
@@ -83,6 +83,26 @@ class StandaloneRestSubmitSuite extends
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22732#discussion_r225393919
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ScalaUDF.scala
---
@@ -39,29 +40,29 @@ import
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22731
I'm going to merge this back to 2.3, as I had merged the original change
back to 2.3
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: re
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22730
Hm, am I right that SparkR and Pyspark only use the accumulator v2 API?
then indeed I think this all works.
---
-
To unsubscribe
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22731#discussion_r225337806
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileScanRDD.scala
---
@@ -106,15 +106,16 @@ class FileScanRDD
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22733
CC @sujith71955
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22731#discussion_r225325506
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileScanRDD.scala
---
@@ -106,15 +106,16 @@ class FileScanRDD
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22730#discussion_r225286458
--- Diff: core/src/test/java/test/org/apache/spark/JavaAPISuite.java ---
@@ -186,7 +184,7 @@ public void randomSplit() {
long s1 = splits[1].count
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22730#discussion_r225286762
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/AccumulatorSuite.scala ---
@@ -256,7 +110,7 @@ private[spark] object AccumulatorSuite
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22414
... look at the test failure at
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/4374/testReport/org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.analysis/AnalysisErrorSuite
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22732#discussion_r225281705
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2137,36 +2137,27 @@ class Analyzer
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22732#discussion_r225280838
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2137,36 +2137,27 @@ class Analyzer
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22732#discussion_r225280977
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -2137,36 +2137,27 @@ class Analyzer
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22732#discussion_r225278704
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ScalaUDF.scala
---
@@ -39,29 +40,29 @@ import
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22732#discussion_r225279364
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/AnalysisSuite.scala
---
@@ -314,24 +314,24 @@ class AnalysisSuite extends
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22732#discussion_r225280125
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/UserDefinedFunction.scala
---
@@ -73,27 +73,27 @@ case class UserDefinedFunction
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22732#discussion_r225280432
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/UDFRegistration.scala ---
@@ -124,8 +124,10 @@ class UDFRegistration private[sql] (functionRegistry
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22732#discussion_r225278847
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ScalaUDF.scala
---
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ import
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22414
I get it, but this becomes inconsistent, right? other invalid window values
aren't handled the same way.
---
-
To unsubs
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22730
Note this doesn't yet figure out what has to change in Pyspark, SparkR.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-uns
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22731#discussion_r225262559
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileScanRDD.scala
---
@@ -106,15 +106,16 @@ class FileScanRDD
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22703
So far looking good to those who have looked, and it passed Maven and SBT
tests. I think this will help reduce complexity a bit (and test time in some
cases), so will go for it tomorrow
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22730
[SPARK-16775][CORE] Remove deprecated accumulator v1 APIs
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Remove deprecated accumulator v1
## How was this patch tested
501 - 600 of 15393 matches
Mail list logo
