ld be good if the RPC could say to authors
> ahead of time how the authors should interact with the PR (just as they
> are told how to respond to AUTH48 email).
THe suggestion mechanism has some limits: it can't edit any text that wasn't
already touched.I'm curious ho
Jean Mahoney wrote:
> Hi all,
> On 7/8/25 10:31 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> Jay Daley wrote: > The AUTH state is not a
>> new state but an existing one - see >
>> https://authors.ietf.org/en/rfc-publication-process for the full state
we use it".
These are not terrible things, but again, I'd rather it happen earlier if
possible.
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
tally boils down to not
drinking enough beer with others. We want to be a value-based culture, and
that means establishing principles, not proceedures
[%]- no, not my dad. He died in 2003. My dad's best friend.)
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT co
t a diagram
itself. Both so that I can zoom better, but also so that I can extract the
diagram for a slide, etc. I usually wind up diving into the XML or HTML and
yanking the part out into a file.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson
Eliot Lear wrote:
> Not an RFC yet, but see draft-ietf-scim-device-model. While it's not
super
> obvious, the reference should probably be
> https://spec.openapis.org/oas/v3.1.1.html.
and you used YAML rather than JSON representation.
--
Michael Richardson , Sand
HTML table is generally accessible for screen readers, which know how
to
> tab between cells. Is the CSV for people who use the TXT file? Or maybe
I'm
> misunderstanding?
It would all be tables, but the source form might be CSV.
--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Work
t, I don't see anything in the References that refers to the
specification. This is really the core of my question.
--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
r
that exposes the files as resources.
I like this as an idea.
--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
rfc-interest mailing list
WG's NIPC document.
--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-interest@rfc-editor.org
To unsubs
> A fourth path has been suggested: using a formal language to describe
> diagrams. UML was suggested as a possibility. I have not yet found
> convincing evidence that UML alone is sufficiently accessible to people
> with visual disabilities.
UML is useless to me.
Too com
er.
I think that this is the right message: let us help you.
--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
rfc-interest mailing list -- r
high production values.
kramdown has many ways to "shell out" to get nice swim diagrams, and other
things. We probably need a few more popular choices (I mean: best practices
that are well documented), and to socialize those choices.
--
Michael Richardson , Sandelman Software Works
-
Jean Mahoney wrote:
> On 4/24/25 1:52 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> Paul Hoffman wrote:
>> > This thread has become very author-hostile. "You are forced to deal
>> > with changes that are being made to match some people's preferred
Paul Hoffman wrote:
> This thread has become very author-hostile. "You are forced to deal
> with changes that are being made to match some people's preferred
> viewing of your source material."
That's exactly what the RPC does today.
If the author hasn't used NSNL, then ANY diff the
Ted Lemon wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2025, at 6:13 AM, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> The question remains, when the RPC edits text, whether XML or kramdown,
>> ought they do a do-nothing pass where they change to NSNL.
>> Assume that there is a tool to do this.
to.
(Because comments on ML are usually about section 4.3.2)
All of the above then goes against people who then open the document XMLmind,
and then save it, and then wonder why every single line is a diff.
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman S
hat the people we want to reach don't come to
the plenary.
Were it me, I'd do a commit where I *just* wrapped things.
> Obviously, these lines are going to be a bit blurry, but I think if
> we can agree on the general concept, we'll be in a much better
> place.
Ag
t, but 80% of readers' MUA will wrap it and the point will be lost)
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works|IoT architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/
ext week.
I doubt it will compile for WSL, it just barely compiles on Linux.
(The author runs a fork of NetBSD that he maintains)
Carsten suggests that magit.el might also do this, and I installed it, but I
haven't used it yet.
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
) might be useful in order to turn on copy-editing pass into multiple
commits for review.
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
ing it out
there and reliable has been difficult}
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-intere
er mind.
Not possible like that.
github can render markdown, and can show diffs to markdown in red/green text,
and during the I-D process, that's really useful.
It's a reason why many would like the editorial pass from the RPC to occur in
markdown rather than XML.
--
Michael R
ust like email or uri, but the idea is
that
> it contains your ORCID, like this:
It all works for me.
I'm just not clear we are at a point in the xml process where we can actually
do amendments. It seems that we have been spinning wheels on this for along
time.
--
Michael Richa
said the RPC was doing this.
I think it is worth reposting this more widely.
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
rfc-intere
t; problems that I-Ds have.
It would great if we could have an IETF gitlab, so that we could argue less
about github vs git. Document repos on *github* become attractive
nuissances, making people not familiar with the IETF process think they can
write PRs long after the document has become
er
http://geocities.com/rsalz/my-pet-protocol.txt
--
Michael Richardson. o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
rfc-interest mailing list -- rfc-intere
e",
and for which the principles of open-stand.org applied.
--
] Never tell me the odds! | ipv6 mesh networks [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works|IoT architect [
] m...@sandelman.ca http://www.sandelman.ca/| ruby on
S Moonesamy wrote:
> I removed the IETF mailing list (SAAG) from the Cc.
Good, so did my reply-to.
> At 09:12 AM 01-12-2024, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> Over in saag@, there is a multi-week long debate about whether/how to
publish
>> algorithm allocations
Stephen Farrell wrote:
> On 01/12/2024 17:12, Michael Richardson wrote:
>> I think that the very-big-tent collective "we" have benefitted
>> greatly from the multi-decade ambiguity about the RFC series.
> If the above is the case, why do you think w
Over in saag@, there is a multi-week long debate about whether/how to publish
algorithm allocations which are not the result of IETF consensus. Some feel
that Specification Required is not strong enough, others feel it is too
strong, with the quasi-temporary nature of I-Ds intruding into the deba
31 matches
Mail list logo
