Re: [RDD] Having Troubles running Rivendell 2.1.0 (deb packages) on Ubuntu Studio 11.10 (libhpi.so.9)

2011-12-12 Thread Larry Owen
First, if you are in a bind, don't let me lead you astray, download the appliance. I'm just guessing here. That being said and since I don't know your linux background, let me elaborate on my suggestion. The symbolic link should be made as follows: cd # make sure it's there, if it's a link

Re: [RDD] BIG Hard Drives

2011-12-12 Thread Bill Putney
On Ubuntu Linux 10.04 LTS. Bill On 12/12/11 4:09 PM, Larry Owen wrote: Are you running zfs on linux or a nas? -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. Bill Putney wrote: Robert, We're using a ZFS file system here. We've chosen not to use the very la

Re: [RDD] BIG Hard Drives

2011-12-12 Thread James Harrison
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 ZFS is lovely, but a bit of a pain to configure, and effectively unsupported on Linux - so you need FreeBSD for your fileserver. Which may be a degree of complexity too far. LVM is not as fantastic, but also very simple. For a simpler solution I'd g

Re: [RDD] Having Troubles running Rivendell 2.1.0 (deb packages) on Ubuntu Studio 11.10 (libhpi.so.9)

2011-12-12 Thread Patrick Schmalstig
I have attempted all suggestions given to me as of December 12 2011 1913 EST. Nothing has worked. I still have the exact same problem. Solutions I've tried: *Checking to make sure I had correct repositories for Ubuntu 11.10 (I do) *Checked I installed libhpi (it is installed and was installed same

Re: [RDD] BIG Hard Drives

2011-12-12 Thread Larry Owen
Are you running zfs on linux or a nas? -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. Bill Putney wrote: Robert, We're using a ZFS file system here. We've chosen not to use the very large consumer drives and stuck with slightly smaller (750 GB) server quality drives.

Re: [RDD] Having Troubles running Rivendell 2.1.0 (deb packages) on Ubuntu Studio 11.10 (libhpi.so.9)

2011-12-12 Thread Jorge Soto
When I first started using Rivendell I ran it from a live Slax cd, that was version .9x if I can remember correctly. I now run version 2.1.1 that I configured from source on Ubuntu 11.04. I knew nothing about Linux before I started doing this. Thanx to the Rivendell forum, I am now able to (some

[RDD] 2.1.1 - sending Now/Next multiple times per song

2011-12-12 Thread Keith Thelen
Hello all! Lately I've noticed one machine's Now/Next data becoming more and more repetitive. It's running 2.1.1, which was compiled from source on OpenSuSE 11.1. The program doing the listening logs each time it receives data from Rivendell. In the beginning I'd only see a cart's data get sent

Re: [RDD] Having Troubles running Rivendell 2.1.0 (deb packages) on Ubuntu Studio 11.10 (libhpi.so.9)

2011-12-12 Thread Fred Gleason
On Dec 12, 2011, at 18:09 55, Patrick Schmalstig wrote: > That doesn't make any sense. Rivendell according to you, 2.1.0, is not beta. > Another developer told me it was. It all depends on what layer in the ecosystem you're looking at. Most Linux applications (including Rivendell) are develope

Re: [RDD] BIG Hard Drives

2011-12-12 Thread Bill Putney
Robert, We're using a ZFS file system here. We've chosen not to use the very large consumer drives and stuck with slightly smaller (750 GB) server quality drives. ZFS allows for very large file systems and flexible expansion even with drives of dissimilar geometries later. ZFS doesn't use hard

Re: [RDD] BIG Hard Drives

2011-12-12 Thread Bill Putney
Alban, Compare and contrast if you would please, LVM vs. ZFS... Bill Putney - KPTZ Port Townsend, WA On 12/12/11 3:01 PM, Alban Peignier wrote: > On Mon 12 Dec 2011 11:53:28 PM CET, Robert Jeffares wrote: > >> This client is likely to want to add a whole lot more to the library, so >> adding a s

Re: [RDD] Having Troubles running Rivendell 2.1.0 (deb packages) on Ubuntu Studio 11.10 (libhpi.so.9)

2011-12-12 Thread Patrick Schmalstig
Sorry that did not work. I'm getting the same error message. :( On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Larry Owen wrote: > On 12/12/2011 09:36 AM, Alban Peignier wrote: > > computer and could not find libhpi.so.9. However, I did find > >> libhpi.so.0 as well as libhpi.so (without any trailing number

Re: [RDD] Having Troubles running Rivendell 2.1.0 (deb packages) on Ubuntu Studio 11.10 (libhpi.so.9)

2011-12-12 Thread Patrick Schmalstig
That doesn't make any sense. Rivendell according to you, 2.1.0, is not beta. Another developer told me it was. Now, someone else also told me that the 2.1.0 packages are not designed for Ubuntu 11.10. Then why are they in the repositories for that version of Ubuntu in the first place, in addition

Re: [RDD] BIG Hard Drives

2011-12-12 Thread Alban Peignier
On Mon 12 Dec 2011 11:53:28 PM CET, Robert Jeffares wrote: > This client is likely to want to add a whole lot more to the library, so > adding a second 2Tb makes sense. > > What, in your opinion, is the best method of combining the drives to > produce a big /var/snd Hi Robert, No storage solut

Re: [RDD] Having Troubles running Rivendell 2.1.0 (deb packages) on Ubuntu Studio 11.10 (libhpi.so.9)

2011-12-12 Thread Patrick Schmalstig
Yes I did add that to the repositories and yes libhpi is installed. I am going to try a suggestion about symlinking using ln -s libhpi.so.0 libhpi.so.9 and seeing if that works. Thanks for your advice. On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Larry Owen wrote: > did you add this to your sources list: >

[RDD] BIG Hard Drives

2011-12-12 Thread Robert Jeffares
I have a project to construct a playout system for someone who has in excess of 40,000 tracks of audio. There is a good reason for a library of this size given the application [which is not your regular radio station] My problem is storage on /var/snd I can source 2TB drives and from my experi

Re: [RDD] RN Macro

2011-12-12 Thread sfijn
Hi Jimmy, Did you get your problem solved? I am having the same issue. (see my post: [RDD] problem running RN command) What operating system do you use? Thanks, Stephan > >It is executable and I can run either with or without the 1 from a >command prompt and using LB or LC successfully, just not

Re: [RDD] Having Troubles running Rivendell 2.1.0 (deb packages) on Ubuntu Studio 11.10 (libhpi.so.9)

2011-12-12 Thread Larry Owen
On 12/12/2011 09:36 AM, Alban Peignier wrote: > computer and could not find libhpi.so.9. However, I did find >> libhpi.so.0 as well as libhpi.so (without any trailing numbers). Didn't notice this the first time, but you should try sym linking that: ln -s libhpi.so.0 libhpi.so.9 _

Re: [RDD] Having Troubles running Rivendell 2.1.0 (deb packages) on Ubuntu Studio 11.10 (libhpi.so.9)

2011-12-12 Thread Alban Peignier
On 12/12/2011 06:46 AM, Patrick Schmalstig wrote: > I am unable to run Rivendell 2.1.0 on Ubuntu Studio 11.10. I > installed Rivendell via. deb packages from the tryphon > repositories. > > Whenever I try to execute and run ANY of the rivendell programs I > get an error saying that libhpi.so.9 is

Re: [RDD] Having Troubles running Rivendell 2.1.0 (deb packages) on Ubuntu Studio 11.10 (libhpi.so.9)

2011-12-12 Thread Fred Gleason
On Dec 12, 2011, at 09:41 15, Patrick Schmalstig wrote: > ...and why didn't Rivendell put "beta" in their version number in the deb > packages? That's a huge inconvenience. Because that version (2.1.0) of "Rivendell" (as released by the project of that name) isn't a 'beta' version. It works qu

Re: [RDD] Having Troubles running Rivendell 2.1.0 (deb packages) on Ubuntu Studio 11.10 (libhpi.so.9)

2011-12-12 Thread Larry Owen
did you add this to your sources list: deb http://debian.tryphon.eu oneiric main contrib deb-src http://debian.tryphon.eu oneiric main contrib if so there are a couple of libhpi packages, try installing that with apt-get. Maybe the dependencies are not correctly setup. ~larry On 12/12/2011 0

Re: [RDD] Having Troubles running Rivendell 2.1.0 (deb packages) on Ubuntu Studio 11.10 (libhpi.so.9)

2011-12-12 Thread Patrick Schmalstig
It did not say that Rivendell 2.1.0 was in beta in my package manager after adding tryphon repositories... so how would I know? *If you did not read my previous post clearly, *I have already searched my entire computer using locate for libhpi.so.9 and all I found was libhpi.so.0 and libhpi.so but