velopment
GEFEG USA
Global Leader in Ecommerce Tools
www.gefeg.com
425-260-5030
-Original Message-
From: Koller, Greg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 8:45 AM
To: David Frenkel; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
Bruce T LeGrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
I guess the difference, in our form of looking at transactions, is that
I have
a completely competent com
amp;CS Project Manager
John Muir / Mt. Diablo Health System
Walnut Creek, CA
(925) 941-2240
-Original Message-
From: Rachel Foerster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 10:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
Bruce,
I
t: Friday, May 31, 2002 11:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
I guess the difference, in our form of looking at transactions, is that
I have
a completely competent computer "opening the envelope", with
TED]
Cc: WEDi/SNIP ID & Routing
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
I agree, up to a point. But I still say that a form of pre-qualification
must exist, at the trading partner level. The last thing I want to do,
as a payer, is disclose eligibility data about
NIP ID & Routing
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
I agree, up to a point. But I still say that a form of pre-qualification
must exist, at the trading partner level. The last thing I want to do,
as a payer, is disclose eligibility data about one of my cust
; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
I'd have to turn the question back around. How can Wal-Mart, not mandated to
support federally required security and privacy, require a closed
environment
and the Health Care industry not?
---
847-872-8070
Fax: 847-872-6860
http://www.rfa-edi.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 8:23 AM
To: Mimi Hart
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health car
From: William.J.Kammerer[wkammerer]@novannet.com.comp
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
We're not really worried about how folks do eligibilities in the short
term (pre-HIPAA).
But when H-day arrives, an 800 number is no substitute under
-0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mimi.Hart[HartAM]@crstlukes.com.comp
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
I understand your argument Greg...but isn't healthcare different in the
following:
1. Wa
r
Manager of Operations and Business Development
United Wisconsin Proservices
(414)226-5520
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Be sure to visit our website at http://www.uwproservices.com/
-Original Message-
From: Rachel Foerster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 200
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
You have good points Mimi, maybe the banking industry is the better
example.
If I go to New York and put my ATM card in the machine, I will get my
money
because the Citibank machine is ultimately able to talk to my credi
, 2002 3:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care
providers
I understand your argument Greg...but isn't healthcare different in the
following:
1. Walmart uses EDI when it places an order with a sup
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care
providers
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for describing your procedures. Having procedures and processes
to
deal with this potential scenario has been m
services.com/
-Original Message-
From: Rachel Foerster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 2:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care
providers
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for describing your procedures. Having pr
ruce T LeGrand" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, 30 May, 2002 11:42 AM
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
Mimi, in the case of the blues, you would send your eligibility request
to the Iow
electronic mailroom
and then make a decision on what to do with it.
Rachel
-Original Message-
From: Bruce T LeGrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 7:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
Mimi, in the case of the blues, you would send your eligibility request
to the
Iowa version of the blue plan, whomever that may be. That's part of the
"national" agreement the blues have through their interplan tran
etter 1 follows )
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 09:26:49 -0500
To: BRUCE.LEGRAND, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mimi.Hart[HartAM]@crstlukes.com.comp
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
Requesting clarification on this point..
One of your clients visits Iowa (vacation hot
x.netcom.com.comp
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
Martin,
My apologies for mis-using the term non-par (non-participating) when I
truly
did mean unknown.I think some of the scenarios posted today
descri
cepting
their claims.
--( Forwarded letter 1 follows )
Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 16:43:36 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Rachel.Foerster[rachelf]@ix.netcom.com.comp
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-particip
]@ix.netcom.com.comp
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
Martin,
My apologies for mis-using the term non-par (non-participating) when I truly
did mean unknown.I think some of the scenarios posted today
o?
Rachel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 2:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
Rachel,
I'm thinking we have a simple misunderstandi
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
A side note...
Can anyone determine why messages in this thread are cross-posting to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
_
Martin A. Morrison
Project Management Consultant
HIPAA Implementation/Coordination
Blue S
A side note...
Can anyone determine why messages in this thread are cross-posting to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]?
_
Martin A. Morrison
Project Management Consultant
HIPAA Implementation/Coordination
Blue Shield of California
4203 Town Center Bl., Ste. D1
El Dorado Hills, Ca 95762
Ph: (916) 350-880
bmitter (which may be a provider) we don't know.
And 5... We process it (provided we can identify the provider).
_
Martin A. Morrison
-Original Message-
From: Rachel Foerster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2002 9:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: R
of the validity of the relationship or the security thereof. Solve
that problem, for free, then we've got some good groundwork.
--( Forwarded letter 1 follows )
Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 17:58:51 -0400
To: WEDi/SNIP.ID.&.Routing[routing]@wedi.org.comp
From: Willi
lobal Leader in Ecommerce Tools
www.gefeg.com
425-260-5030
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 3:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
Whoa!, Bill...
You make it sound
Just a few comments from the peanut gallery.
First - I was one of the first people to state that I expect to eventually
see and want a clean, secure, Internet way for Health Care to conduct
Ebusiness. But that is a long way off.
Second - that does not necessarily mean 'open' as I have seen it
it?
Rachel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 8:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
Rachel,
I was afraid I'd be misunderstood.
Let me ad
ED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 4:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
Martin,
I don't share your perception that a payer can choose **not** to receive an
electronic claim from a non-participating provider. I haven't seen a
: Rachel Foerster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 4:49 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
Martin,
I don't share your perception that a payer can choose **not** to receive
an
electronic claim from a non-particip
L 60099
Phone: 847-872-8070
Fax: 847-872-6860
http://www.rfa-edi.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 5:23 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
Whoa!, Bill...
You
e the word "Google" about 10 times a day.
_
Martin A. Morrison
Card carrying member of the "Anti-'ZZ'-League"
-Original Message-
From: William J. Kammerer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 4:02 PM
To: WEDi/SNIP ID & Routing
Subject:
e the plan's identifier,
you'll get the correct CPP, which points to the plan's open portal.
William J. Kammerer
Novannet, LLC.
Columbus, US-OH 43221-3859
+1 (614) 487-0320
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 28 May, 2
OH 43221-3859
+1 (614) 487-0320
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, 28 May, 2002 06:23 PM
Subject: RE: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
Whoa!, Bill...
You make it sound as if payers will be obligated t
t: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 2:59 PM
To: WEDi/SNIP ID & Routing
Subject: TA1 responding to non-participating health care providers
Just one more reminder - this time from the EDI-L mailing list - that we
have to keep in the back of our mind something almost no other industry
has wrestled w
Just one more reminder - this time from the EDI-L mailing list - that we
have to keep in the back of our mind something almost no other industry
has wrestled with in EDI before: Unsolicited Transactions, à la
Open-EDI, from non-participating providers.
Payers will have to be prepared for taking i
38 matches
Mail list logo
