[Bug 4779] Review request: gjots2 - gjots2 is a fairly simple jotter (outline processor) application for your desktop.

2018-01-30 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4779 --- Comment #2 from Bob Hepple --- Hi Leigh, Thank you _so_much_ for bumping it in Fedora. I've been trying to get that to happen for _years_ https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396749 Perhaps I didn't understand the process but I had

[Bug 4779] Review request: gjots2 - gjots2 is a fairly simple jotter (outline processor) application for your desktop.

2018-01-30 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4779 leigh scott changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug 30] Tracker : Sponsorship Request

2018-01-30 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30 Bug 30 depends on bug 4779, which changed state. Bug 4779 Summary: Review request: gjots2 - gjots2 is a fairly simple jotter (outline processor) application for your desktop. https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4779 What

[Bug 4639] dfhack - Memory hacking library for Dwarf Fortress and a set of tools that use it

2018-01-30 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4639 --- Comment #10 from Ben Rosser --- Thanks for taking a look! > IIRC using the %setup macro is the preferred way to unpack additional sources. > http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/RPM-HOWTO/build.html > Do you think it is possible? So I'd like to do t

[Bug 4059] Review request: dwarftherapist - Management tool designed to run side-by-side with Dwarf Fortress

2018-01-30 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4059 Ben Rosser changed: What|Removed |Added namespace||nonfree --- Comment #4 from Ben Rosser --

Re: RPM Fusion update report 2018-01-28

2018-01-30 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 09:19 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Thx for the notice. > > I've avoided the "final sync to main mirror" on purpose the previous > time. Because mythweb and mythtv wasn't at the same version. > But I've forgotten to sync this time. Done now. BTW I just notice we miss debug

Re: RPM Fusion update report 2018-01-28

2018-01-30 Thread Richard Shaw
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > it is a bug > el7 have python-requests but package not provides python2-requests > which is easy to fix > %if fedora > requires python2-requests > %else > requires python-requests > > python-requests-cache seems it is not available in el /

Re: About transcode and dvdrip

2018-01-30 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2018-01-30 14:07 GMT+01:00 Sérgio Basto : > On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 15:44 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Forwarding from IRC to mailing list since I don't have IRC access >> today. >> >> I think transcode could be retired nowadays (along dvdrip) >> 1/ It's not maintained upstream. >> 2/ I

Re: About transcode and dvdrip

2018-01-30 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Thu, 2018-01-25 at 15:44 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > Hi, > > Forwarding from IRC to mailing list since I don't have IRC access > today. > > I think transcode could be retired nowadays (along dvdrip) > 1/ It's not maintained upstream. > 2/ It lost any interest already since pvm3 support was

Re: RPM Fusion update report 2018-01-28

2018-01-30 Thread Paul Howarth
On Tue, 30 Jan 2018 02:17:18 + Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 18:33 -0700, Wade Berrier wrote: > > On Mon Jan 29 01:19:37 MST 2018, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > > > 2018-01-29 9:12 GMT+01:00 Marcel Telka : > > > > On Sun, Jan 28, 2018 at 02:50:39PM +0100, nore...@rpmfusion.org >

Re: About to propose RetroArch for reviewing

2018-01-30 Thread David Demelier
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 10:17 +0100, Nicolas Chauvet wrote: > I'm not sure about why this topic is forwarded to the RPM Fusion > mailing list. But it seems that only one dependency depends on > ffmpeg. > Is it possible to have something working in fedora without ffmpeg > support ? (and eventually hav

[Bug 4782] Review request: rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages - A package to obsolete retired packages from rpmfusion-free

2018-01-30 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4782 Nicolas Chauvet changed: What|Removed |Added Group|Package Reviews | CC list accessible|1

[Bug 4782] New: Review request: rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages - A package to obsolete retired packages from rpmfusion-free

2018-01-30 Thread RPM Fusion Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4782 Bug ID: 4782 Summary: Review request: rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages - A package to obsolete retired packages from rpmfusion-free Product: Package Reviews Vers

Re: About to propose RetroArch for reviewing

2018-01-30 Thread Nicolas Chauvet
2018-01-30 10:11 GMT+01:00 David Demelier : > On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 09:01 +0100, David Demelier wrote: >> A few questions before I ask for reviewing: >> >> 1. RetroArch uses libretro cores that are dynamically loaded, I've >> actually used the /usr/libexec/libretro directory but I wonder if I >> sh

Re: About to propose RetroArch for reviewing

2018-01-30 Thread David Demelier
On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 09:01 +0100, David Demelier wrote: > A few questions before I ask for reviewing: > > 1. RetroArch uses libretro cores that are dynamically loaded, I've > actually used the /usr/libexec/libretro directory but I wonder if I > should use /usr/lib64/libretro (from %{_libdir} RPM

RPM Fusion update report 2018-01-30

2018-01-30 Thread noreply
RPM Fusion update report Section free: - Fedora 25 - Pushed to testing: Pushed to stable: Fedora 26 - Pushed to testing: smplayer-18.2.0-1.fc26 Pushed to stable: devedeng-4.8.12-1.fc26 xmltv-0.5.70-1.fc26 yle-dl-2.26-2.fc26 Fedor

About to propose RetroArch for reviewing

2018-01-30 Thread David Demelier
Hello all, As some of you remember, I've told a few months ago my attempt to port RetroArch to Fedora in RPM Fusion repositories. The port is complete and almost ready to be included [1]. RetroArch is a fully featured frontend for libretro cores, an effort to create a convenient all-in-one emula