Hi!
On Monday, 18 March 2024 at 23:36, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> On Wednesday, 13 March 2024 at 21:46, Nicolas Chauvet via
> rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> > Le mer. 13 mars 2024, 21:44, Nicolas Chauvet a
> > écrit :
> >
On Wednesday, 07 August 2024 at 14:53, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Mass rebuild for F39 is finished .
You meant F41, I assume. ;)
Anyway, thanks for taking care of this.
> you may see updated list here:
> https://www.serjux.com/rpms/failed_to_build.html
>
> Failed
Hello, Peter.
I can see that you've resumed your open source contributions. Great!
On Monday, 08 July 2024 at 04:44, runlevel5 wrote:
> commit a29398a4ed39d21d0677097fedefdb63d76afe64
> Author: Peter Lemenkov
> Date: Thu Jul 4 21:07:06 2024 +0200
>
> Can be built with ffmpeg-free-devel as
Hi, Martin.
I've noticed that you updated flowblade and checked if it can be moved
to Fedora. It appears it has no dependencies outside Fedora (after the
obvious:
sed -e |Requires: ffmpeg|Requires: /usr/bin/ffmpeg|
It builds in rawhide and works. I opened
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cg
On Monday, 03 June 2024 at 15:29, solomoncyj--- via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> hi, i am new here. I would like to ask, if we are not the developer of
> the pacakege, can we still add it?
Most of package maintainers are not developers of their respective
upstream projects. It's not a requirement
Hello, Attila.
On Tuesday, 21 May 2024 at 20:15, attipaci--- via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I am the maintainer of SuperNOVAS, a C/C++ astrometry library. It is a
> fork of the Naval Observatory Vector Astrometry Software (NOVAS)
> package. It provides bug fixes, many improvements,
Hi!
mpc-qt is being moved to Fedora now. I've just approved the review
request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2280171
I'll post again when it's built in Fedora and ready to be retired here.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://fedoraproject.org
There should be a science of disconte
Hello, Nicolas.
On Tuesday, 23 April 2024 at 12:05, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Le mar. 23 avr. 2024 à 00:19, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> a écrit :
> >
> > Hello, Leigh.
> >
> > On Friday, 19 April 2024 at 16:30, Leigh Scott wrote:
> > >
Hello, Leigh.
On Friday, 19 April 2024 at 16:30, Leigh Scott wrote:
> commit 994ebf9da6930ed28c3a1daa6cdcb9fdc070bf80
> Author: Leigh Scott
> Date: Fri Apr 19 15:30:14 2024 +0100
>
> Update to 7.0
Thanks for working on 7.0 update. This is an ABI bump and there was no
announcement on RPM F
Hi!
It looks like ffms2 can be moved to Fedora now. I opened a review ticket
with the 5.0-RC3 build. Cc'ing Igor, the original maintainer, though I
suspect he might be too busy to keep maintaining it.
Bugzilla ticket for reference:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2274319
I'll post aga
Thanks for finding and applying the upstream fix!
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://fedoraproject.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
On Tuesday, 26 March 2024 at 08:49, Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> Why didn't the cunt inform us instead of wasting my fucking time!
1. Yes, someone has forgotten to retire the package in RPM Fusion. This
happens in Fedora, too, and is no excuse for your reaction.
2. You're n
On Tuesday, 26 March 2024 at 01:44, Leigh Scott wrote:
> commit 18bfd88a84df92c3efb1d7729eab367a85247230
> Author: Leigh Scott
> Date: Tue Mar 26 00:44:36 2024 +
>
> Update bino to 2.1
Uhm. It should be retired instead:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/bino
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedo
On Wednesday, 13 March 2024 at 21:46, Nicolas Chauvet via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> Le mer. 13 mars 2024, 21:44, Nicolas Chauvet a
> écrit :
>
> > Only gpac-static is used for x264 to minimise an oversized
> > dependency on the full shared gpac library.
I have no intention of dropping gpac-s
Hi!
It looks like gpac can be moved to Fedora now. The only optional
dependency enabled by default in the current package is faad2, but AAC
decoding works fine via FFmpeg (ffdec:libfdk_aac or ffdec:aac with
libavcodec-freeworld). In fact, FFmpeg decoder is used by default even
if gpac is built with
On Sunday, 10 March 2024 at 07:47, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> On Sunday, 10 March 2024 at 00:23, Sérgio Basto via
> rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> [...]
> > Last run: 2024-03-09 18:48:15.435796 UTC
> >
> > Failed builds:
Hello, Sérgio.
On Sunday, 10 March 2024 at 00:23, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
[...]
> Last run: 2024-03-09 18:48:15.435796 UTC
>
> Failed builds: 18
[...]
> Package: HandBrake
[...]
> Package: x264
I'll fix the above.
Regards,
--
Fedora https://fedoraproject.org
There
On Thursday, 18 January 2024 at 14:17, Julian Sikorski via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
[...]
> Thanks! It's not about the bug itself. The intense discussion made me
> realise that I have not contributed to mplayer and/or ffmpeg for a
> really long time. The way I consume media has also changed in
On Thursday, 18 January 2024 at 12:51, Julian Sikorski via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> where can I request to be removed as a co-maintainer/default bugzilla CC for
> ffmpeg and mplayer? Bug 6843 is the straw that broke the camel's back,
> sorry.
I believe here: https://admin.rpmfu
On Sunday, 07 January 2024 at 21:28, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Le ven. 5 janv. 2024 à 15:55, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> a écrit :
[...]
> I'm not sure this is an issue with gstreamer1 as until now when any
> gst plugins was (un-)installed, the cache could be resca
On Thursday, 04 January 2024 at 09:41, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Le jeu. 4 janv. 2024 à 09:26, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> a écrit :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wednesday, 03 January 2024 at 15:23, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > > Hi there,
> >
Hi,
On Wednesday, 03 January 2024 at 15:23, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> And happy new year 2024.
>
> Seems like there is an issue with the way gst1-libav detects it's
> features wrt fuller ffmpeg:
> H264/H265 codec support are missing even after enabling the
> ffmpeg-libs or libavcode
On Monday, 18 December 2023 at 20:23, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Le dim. 17 déc. 2023 à 16:43, Dominik Mierzejewski
> a écrit :
> >
> > commit 862cfbf78db610c5221c2274496e6de205718b21
> > Author: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> > Date: Sun Dec 17 16:42:
Hi, Martin.
shotcut can be built in Fedora directly. The BuildRequires: x264-devel
isn't used during build, so it can be dropped. It uses libx264 only via
FFmpeg. Please consider moving this to Fedora and taking advantage of
Fedora infrastructure and CI.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://fedor
On Friday, 01 September 2023 at 12:07, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/wxsvg/
>
> as you can see I'm the main maintainer of this package, why in Fedora I
> just have commit permissions ?
My apologies, fixed.
> I don't mind
Hello all,
wxsvg has moved to Fedora. Existing maintainers (sergiomb, martinkg)
were added to the Fedora package ACL. Let me know if anyone else wants
to be added to maintainer ACL in Fedora.
Existing users will upgrade safely. I ran rfpkg retire on master branch
and opened https://bugzilla.rpmf
Hello all,
libmms has moved to Fedora. Existing maintainers (jwrdegoede, kwizart,
sergiomb) were added to the Fedora package ACL. Let me know if anyone
else wants to be added to maintainer ACL in Fedora.
Existing users will upgrade safely. I ran rfpkg retire on master branch
and opened https://bu
On Thursday, 24 August 2023 at 21:13, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 1:09 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
> rpmfusion-developers wrote:
>
> > I've just approved pianobar for inclusion in Fedora. Existing maintainer
&
Hello all,
I've just approved pianobar for inclusion in Fedora. Existing maintainer
hobbes1069 was added to the Fedora package ACL. Let me know if anyone
else wants to be added to maintainer ACL in Fedora.
Existing users will upgrade safely. I ran rfpkg retire on master branch
and opened https://
On Wednesday, 16 August 2023 at 17:41, Andrew Bauer via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
> For what it is worth, I took a stab at upgrading the telegram-desktop
> package to the latest 4.9.1, but mock fails because the openh264 repos
> for rawhide are returning http 404. I'll give it some time to settl
On Monday, 17 July 2023 at 14:01, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
[...]
> Can you point me where is the package review ?
The bug number is mentioned in the commit log.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2168538
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://fedoraproject.org
There
On Saturday, 08 July 2023 at 14:59, Petr Menšík wrote:
> Hi,
>
> tried to rebuild it on f38. It failed to start in default configuration:
>
> čec 08 14:45:00 pemensik-t460 systemd[1]: Started minidlna.service -
> MiniDLNA is a DLNA/UPnP-AV server software.
> čec 08 14:45:00 pemensik-t460 minidlna
Hello all,
I've migrated minidlna to Fedora for F37+ and added existing maintainers
(musuruan, pemensik, Cc'd) to the Fedora package. Let me know if anyone
else wants to be added to maintainer ACL in Fedora.
Existing users will upgrade safely. Please retire in RPM Fusion,
accordingly.
Regards,
D
DEBUG util.py:443: Error: Error downloading packages:
DEBUG util.py:443:librsvg2-2.56.2-1.fc39.x86_64: Download failed: Status
code: 404 for
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/l/librsvg2-2.56.2-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
(IP: 192.168.182.1)
Hello all,
I've migrated normalize to Fedora for F37+ and added existing maintainer
(dtimms, Cc'd) as admin to the Fedora package.
Existing users will upgrade safely. Please retire in RPM Fusion
accordingly.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://fedoraproject.org
There should be a science of dis
Hi!
I decided to orphan mplayer as I haven't used it for years. Feel free to
pick it up.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://fedoraproject.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Di
On Wednesday, 19 April 2023 at 08:43, Stephen via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> this needs to be rebuilt as there is a dependency issue with qt5 5.15.9
FYI, obs-studio is now in Fedora rawhide/39:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-bed98726a2
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https:/
On Tuesday, 21 March 2023 at 12:20, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Le mar. 21 mars 2023 à 11:13, Dominik Mierzejewski
> a écrit :
> ...
> >
> > @@ -45,11 +48,12 @@ file format decoder and encoder.
> >
> > %package -n heif-pixbuf-loader
> > Summary:HEIF image loader for GTK+ applications
>
Is the original reason for this package being in RPM Fusion instead of
Fedora even valid? https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34#c0
said:
This package cannot be allowed in Fedora since it retrieve information
from websites and thus could possibly violate EULA.
I'm not entirely sure wha
On Wednesday, 08 February 2023 at 12:56, Nicolas Chauvet via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> As fedora has branched already ('or close'), here is the plan for rpmfusion.
>
> I'm proposing that we skip the mass-rebuild this time.
> The Main reason is, we are late and I don't have the time to deal wi
On Wednesday, 08 February 2023 at 12:42, Ralf Corsépius via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
>
>
> Am 08.02.23 um 12:27 schrieb Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
> rpmfusion-developers:
>
> > > Plus the DVD- and BD-specific libraries. (Though most of the
On Wednesday, 08 February 2023 at 11:25, Frank Dana via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
> There are an AWFUL lot of DVD-authoring and -conversion tools still in the
> REPOs, considering how infrequently most people even encounter physical
> media these days.
>
> Do we really need a half-dozen differe
On Thursday, 19 January 2023 at 02:45, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
[...]
> Nah, for that I would just build locally and copy to Dropbox. I wanted to
> take advantage of the multiple arches.
>
> I don't have time to play with it right now, but I wonder if I could fake
> the other
On Sunday, 08 January 2023 at 10:45, Vitaly Zaitsev via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
> On 07/01/2023 22:53, Dominik Mierzejewski wrote:
> > You could've simply refrained from doing the update before investigating
> > why the new dependency is x86_64-only.
>
> Nothing bad happened. Only Rawhide pac
On Friday, 06 January 2023 at 22:33, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Thursday, 05 January 2023 at 14:09, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote:
[...]
> > Also it now requires SVT-AV1, so the package can only be built on
> > x86_64.
>
> From what I found, SVT-AV1 should b
On Thursday, 05 January 2023 at 14:09, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote:
> On 05/01/2023 13:31, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > > Link only against vpl.
> > Why?
>
> It can't be built against Intel Media SDK exclusively:
> htt
On Thursday, 05 January 2023 at 10:56, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote:
> commit 0b46db2d20d07b6f27f50faae9202a6589030729
> Author: Vitaly Zaitsev
> Date: Thu Jan 5 10:56:14 2023 +0100
>
> Link only against vpl.
Why?
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusio
On Thursday, 05 January 2023 at 11:48, Vitaly Zaitsev wrote:
> commit fb54c4727ad92f495a5e76105fc455ae80758306
> Author: Vitaly Zaitsev
> Date: Thu Jan 5 11:46:39 2023 +0100
>
> Restored ability to build without ffmpeg. Set ExclusiveArch.
Why do you want to build without ffmpeg?
Why can't
On Sunday, 23 October 2022 at 10:42, Simone Caronni wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
>
> sorry I was on holiday.
>
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 2:13 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
> domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
>
> > Simone, would it make sense keep the oneV
On Friday, 07 October 2022 at 18:22, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-10-07 at 14:03 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > On Thursday, 06 October 2022 at 18:25, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 17:16 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
&
On Sunday, 16 October 2022 at 17:08, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
[...]
> Date: Sun Oct 16 16:59:18 2022 +0200
>
> Update to 22.5.4
Thanks. I updated intel-mediasdk to 22.5.4 in rawhide as well:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=93137169
Simone, would it make sense keep the one
On Thursday, 06 October 2022 at 18:25, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-09-28 at 17:16 +0200, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > Forwarded as a dedicated topic:
> >
> > -- Forwarded message -
> > [ ... ]
> >
> > On my side I want to rework the ffmpeg package to get back to normal
> > (s
On Thursday, 26 May 2022 at 11:09, Leigh Scott wrote:
> Trying to build for aarch64 with a under powered builder isn't viable any
> more.
>
> I have already tried limiting cpu cores.
>
> https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/chromium-freeworld.git/tree/chromium-freeworld.spec#n6
>
> I'm not willi
On Wednesday, 25 May 2022 at 17:11, Leigh Scott wrote:
> commit 18bbf609ff961e6a9dee32384ffd083c2f9c7b64
> Author: Leigh Scott
> Date: Wed May 25 16:11:03 2022 +0100
>
> Exclude aarch64
>
> chromium-freeworld.spec | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> ---
> diff --git
On Wednesday, 25 May 2022 at 07:10, Leigh Scott wrote:
> commit 04d8ac5a29fb3d988b63769dcde207068ebe8e38
> Author: Leigh Scott
> Date: Wed May 25 06:09:52 2022 +0100
>
> Update to 102.0.5005.61
>
> chromium-freeworld.spec | 21 ++---
> clang_fix.patch | 10
Dear developers,
I've just noticed that I'm no longer the "main contact" for ffmpeg:
https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/ffmpeg/timeline
The change was done without any prior notification. Nicolas, please
revert the change and let's talk about this. Otherwise this sets a bad
precedent
On Sunday, 03 April 2022 at 14:00, Leigh Scott wrote:
> This change means your package doesn't qualify to be in rpmfusion, please
> revert.
Or, even better, move the package to Fedora if that was the only
non-Fedora dependency.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion h
On Sunday, 10 April 2022 at 17:45, Leigh Scott wrote:
> I removed other people from the group due to inactivity or need. Fedora does
> similar.
>
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/AS2YFCRE6ITN4VS6MVJ566CCSLKDYQCU/#VEXK5T5XAONVTB46VVBJVTWLCBUYAVWI
On Friday, 11 February 2022 at 13:37, Leigh Scott wrote:
> Hi Dominik,
>
> Sorry, I considered it a lesser evil than bundling ffmpeg for chromium and
> qt5-qtwebengine-freeworld.
>
> Feel free to revert it.
I don't want to rush either way. Is there a bug report against chromium
open? Let's try r
Hello, Leigh.
I don't think it's a good idea to carry this patch. It was rejected by
FFmpeg upstream:
https://ffmpeg.org/pipermail/ffmpeg-devel/2021-September/285401.html
There was no further discussion about it, so you're effectively
following Chromium fork of FFmpeg here.
Regards,
Dominik
--
On Wednesday, 15 December 2021 at 11:30, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Le mer. 15 déc. 2021 à 10:46, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> a écrit :
> >
> > On Wednesday, 15 December 2021 at 09:58, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > T
On Wednesday, 15 December 2021 at 09:58, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This site sum-up many components that we distribute that might or not
> be oudated.
> https://repology.org/projects/?inrepo=rpmfusion_fedora_rawhide&outdated=1
>
> Please review as needed, and be careful not to break ABI
On Monday, 08 November 2021 at 11:51, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> On Monday, November 8, 2021 10:55:32 AM CET Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > On Monday, 08 November 2021 at 10:12, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > &g
On Monday, 08 November 2021 at 10:12, Andreas Schneider wrote:
> Hi,
>
> there are several packages in the distribution which require FFMPEG
> (libavformat, libavcodec, etc.), one of them being chromium. The package
> could
> be created in a way that you can easily replace it with a version fro
On Tuesday, 21 September 2021 at 16:11, Vitaly Zaitsev via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
> On 21/09/2021 15:47, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Me too. Please add me as co-maintainer (rathann).
>
> Done.
Thanks!
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora
On Monday, 20 September 2021 at 16:05, Vitaly Zaitsev via rpmfusion-developers
wrote:
> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 16:05:16 +0200
> From: Vitaly Zaitsev
> Subject: Re: Orphaned: mpv
> To: rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> Authentication-Results: hv01.online.rpmfusion.net; dkim=pass (1024-bit
Hi!
libavresample library from FFmpeg was deprecated in FFmpeg 4.0 in
January 2017. It was removed in FFmpeg (4.5?) in April 2021. It looks
like my nagging to stop using it paid off and we're down to two
consumers from the original six:
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5347 .
So, he
Hi!
The only reason I wanted to keep these alive is gone since VMware
switched their Horizon Client to gstreamer 1.x. Consequently, I've
orphaned the following in rawhide/F35+:
free/gstreamer
free/gstreamer-ffmpeg
free/gstreamer-plugins-bad
free/gstreamer-plugins-base
free/gst
Hi Michael.
On Thursday, 22 April 2021 at 17:44, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> commit b9e74c9ce609e6123961a4fe1e6d36160bf6b4c3
> Author: Michael Cronenworth
> Date: Thu Apr 22 10:45:17 2021 -0500
>
> Update dependency on xdpyinfo (rfbz#5979)
>
> kodi.spec | 9 -
> 1 file changed,
On Thursday, 18 February 2021 at 11:15, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hello
>
> RPMFusion f34 branch is ready, if you notice something is missing
> please let us know .
>
> Thanks to everyone who helped in maintain RPMFusion.
+1. Thanks a lot, guys.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org
A libdvdread update to the latest 6.1.1 release is overdue and is coming
to rawhide. It comes with an ABI bump (.so.4 -> .so.7) and an API change
(a previously public struct ifo_handle_t is now private). I rebuilt all
dependent packages in COPR (Fedora ones) and in mock locally (RPM
Fusion) and onl
On Monday, 27 July 2020 at 19:00, Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> VLC rebuilds should not be on stable branches if their Fedora
> dependencies are not available yet.
> That's the point.
The point is it's impossible to sync such updates between Fedora and RPM
Fusion perfectly. In this particular case,
Hello,
I'm updating the matroska stack to the latest upstream versions,
including stable branches as the libraries are security sensitive.
libebml and libmatroska come with soname bumps but no incompatible
API changes. I tested the rebuilds in copr in advance.
I'm rebuilding all dependent package
On Monday, 06 July 2020 at 12:48, FeRD wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 6:19 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
> domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
>
> >
> > Have you tried unbundling waf instead of patching it?
> >
> >
> I haven't,
Hello, Frank.
On Sunday, 05 July 2020 at 03:44, Frank R Dana wrote:
> commit 6af1c99534c18798ea1080a10df2a104015dead4
> Author: FeRD (Frank Dana)
> Date: Sat Jul 4 21:44:02 2020 -0400
>
> Add patch to make all Python code use python3
>
> cinelerra-gg.spec |4 +
> waf-python3.patch |
On Saturday, 04 July 2020 at 09:36, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
[...]
> The last ffmpeg update has "indirectly" enabled a python3 dependency
> when vapoursynth was enabled.
> So kodi, as linked with system ffmpeg, will load both python2-libs and
> python3-libs in the same process. This has no chance to
On Thursday, 05 December 2019 at 17:49, Vascom wrote:
> чт, 5 дек. 2019 г., 18:51 FeRD :
> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019, 9:39 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
> >
> >> compat-ffmpeg needs a maintainer as I orphaned it today.
> >>
> >> https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/package/free/compat-ffmpeg28/
> >
> >
> > I jus
Hi!
Does anyone have a vector version of the RPM Fusion logo? If not,
then at least a high resolution version of what's on the wiki.
I'm making a presentation for a conference and I've just found out
I don't have a nice-looking RPM Fusion logo.
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora http
On Thursday, 21 November 2019 at 12:08, FeRD wrote:
> Ah, it seems this is a well-known issue[1].
>
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 5:40 AM FeRD wrote:
>
> > I have no idea how this *ever* worked. Maybe hb.h is new-ish, on one side
> > or the other?
>
> Or, old-ish. The plot thins. From a comment[2] a
On Friday, 15 November 2019 at 16:24, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> libdvdread 6.0.2 brings a SONAME bump from .so.4 to .so.7 due to a small
> change in the pgc_t struct (still_time and pg_playback_mode fields were
> swapped). Only dvdauthor and lib
Hello, Vasiliy.
On Thursday, 14 November 2019 at 07:51, Vasiliy Glazov wrote:
> commit 22819ea7f6df52fcb7f58940fa4b8585bd399101
> Author: Vasiliy Glazov
> Date: Thu Nov 14 09:51:32 2019 +0300
>
> Correct build gstreamer plugin.
>
> svt-hevc.spec | 7 +--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertion
Hello,
libdvdread 6.0.2 brings a SONAME bump from .so.4 to .so.7 due to a small
change in the pgc_t struct (still_time and pg_playback_mode fields were
swapped). Only dvdauthor and libdvdnav packages in Fedora and dvd95
package in RPM Fusion actually reference any of those fields, but it's
still a
Hi, Richard.
On Monday, 07 October 2019 at 17:49, Richard Shaw wrote:
[...]
> 1. Can MongoDB live in the non-free repository?
>
> I think the problem is that once we package MongoDB we really can't stop
> people from providing MongoDB as a service, but I'm not a lawyer.
I'd say this is fine. RPM
Hi, Kevin.
On Monday, 07 October 2019 at 00:40, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > It's not fine. Older branches will get a completely confusing changelog
> > entry saying they were rebuilt for a change in a dependency that never
>
Hi!
On Friday, 04 October 2019 at 12:37, FeRD wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:47 AM Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>
> > NO, please re-evaluate, I'm not going to read further nor to discuss
> > it yet again.
>
> I will!
Thanks.
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 4:34 A
On Friday, 04 October 2019 at 10:23, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Please consider to use cherry-pick next time.
> I don't see the point to compute a merge resolution for the changelog
> because of a single fix.
> This is craziness.
Cherry-picking only makes sense when the branches are too diverged. I
On Friday, 09 August 2019 at 17:40, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Next week I will update dav1d to version 0.4.0 which includes a SONAME bump,
> and will do a GIT snapshot of aom, whose library is unstable.
>
> I will push these updates both on F31 and F30, so consumers of these
> li
On Saturday, 29 June 2019 at 17:43, Gergely Gombos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I live in Budapest. :)
>
> I'll have leave to vacation on Friday and might not be able to get a
> day off for Thursday so actually participating on the conference is
> still a question. But I'd definitely like to meet with you gu
On Saturday, 29 June 2019 at 13:39, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:54 AM Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Anyone going at Flock 2019 (Budapest) ?
> > I will be there, so anyone to meet ?
> >
>
> Looks like fun but non-work sponsored international travel isn't an
>
On Sunday, 23 June 2019 at 16:00, Frank R Dana wrote:
[...]
> %changelog
> +* Sun Jun 23 2019 FeRD (Frank Dana) - 0.2.3-3
> +- Add explicit Requires: zeromq, to work around other EL7
> + packages which provide the required libzmq.so.5
There shouldn't be any. What packages are those? Have you fi
On Sunday, 28 April 2019 at 16:23, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 4/28/19 4:23 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> > +1. FFmpeg without patented codecs support will be unusable trash.
>
> It's also unfortunate that the discussion regarding all of this is being
> done on Twitter.
On Saturday, 27 April 2019 at 16:58, David Timms wrote:
> On 21/4/19 11:47 pm, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:38 AM Sérgio Basto >
> > On sáb, 2019-04-13 at 16:03 +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> > > On 13/04/2019 12:56, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > >
> > > dvbc
Hello, RPM Fusion devs,
in case you missed it, MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 are now permitted in Fedora:
- Forwarded message from Tom Callaway -
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2019 10:53:13 -0400
From: Tom Callaway
Subject: [Fedora-legal-list] MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 Video
To: Fedora Legal List
X-CRM114-Status: Goo
On Tuesday, 19 March 2019 at 23:05, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Le mar. 19 mars 2019 à 10:12, Nicolas Chauvet a écrit :
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > As I've received some security request related to one of our package,
> > I've setup a mail alias with as secur...@rpmfusion.org for security
> > (sensitive) req
On Saturday, 09 February 2019 at 22:54, FeRD wrote:
> I just filed[1] bug #5166 in bugzilla about this:
>
> Looks like the newly-built mp4tools didn't pick up the correct version of
> the also-newly-built wxsvg, as it contains an incompatible symbol
> definition.
>
> With both installed:
> mp4too
On Friday, 25 January 2019 at 21:16, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Next week is FOSDEM 2019 at Bruxelles Belgium if you were not aware of.
> https://fosdem.org/2019/
>
> I will be there to assist some conference and meet good Fedora people
> and other community.
> Anyone plans to be ther
On Thursday, 17 January 2019 at 22:12, nore...@rpmfusion.org wrote:
> RPM Fusion update report
>
[...]
> Fedora 29
> -
> Pushed to testing:
[...]
> xvidcore-1.3.5-4.fc29
This can be pushed to stable now, both I and the original reporter
tested this build and i
Hi, Sérgio.
Is there any reason why mp3gain cannot me moved to Fedora?
I don't see any dependencies apart from gcc and mpg123-devel,
both of which are in Fedora.
Happy New Year, everyone!
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org
There should be a sc
On Thursday, 13 December 2018 at 10:03, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> commit 08cdcfe810fa4f4d323b9ad8503bd638d273a2f3
> Author: Nicolas Chauvet
> Date: Thu Dec 13 09:44:42 2018 +0100
>
> Bump epoch
Care to explain why this was necessary?
> vlc.spec | 18 +++---
> 1 file changed, 7
On Friday, 07 December 2018 at 14:22, Antonio wrote:
> commit ca91ca34ef08a0fddee97eb0d5f19ed3a0d8e21b
> Author: sagitter
> Date: Fri Dec 7 14:22:31 2018 +0100
>
> Undo latest commit (sorry)
Use git-revert(1) next time, please.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPMFu
1 - 100 of 436 matches
Mail list logo
