Just a heads up guys but I upgraded to a UDM Pro SE recently so I'm no
longer running the network application on a PC.
I can maintain it for now assuming any issues I run into on ARM are the
same as x86_64 but if there's someone who would like to maintain the unifi
package I am willing to turn ove
I'm trying to do a pull on nonfree/unifi in master and it took about 3
minutes to complete.
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists
I'm working on updating unifi but the f39 package seems to be stuck
building:
https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=614375
I decided to try and cancel it so I could restart the build before
submitting a ticket but that's not working for me either:
$ koji-rpmfusion cancel 614375
2023-10
I didn't see an open ticket[1] but wanted to ask here first as my unifi
build[2] has been stuck for a while.
Thanks,
Richard
[1]
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/buglist.cgi?component=Build%20System&list_id=22725&product=Infrastructure&resolution=---
[2] https://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?tas
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 4:11 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
>
> > I also just checked and it is setup on release monitoring but for some
> > reason it's saying the latest version is really the oldest...
> >
> > https://release-monitoring.org/project/320447/
> >
On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 1:09 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski via
rpmfusion-developers wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've just approved pianobar for inclusion in Fedora. Existing maintainer
> hobbes1069 was added to the Fedora package ACL. Let me know if anyone
> else wants to be added to maintainer A
I know Leigh is not interested in Fedora packaging for whatever reason.
Feel free to add me to the Openshot packages once approved.
If I have a chance I'll see if I can work in the reviews. Can you reply
with the BZs?
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-devel
On Wed, Jan 18, 2023 at 10:18 AM Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-developers <
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 17:34 -0600, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion-
> developers wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 5:29 PM Sérgio Basto
> > wrote:
>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 5:29 PM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 23:25 +, Sérgio Basto via rpmfusion-
> developers wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 17:10 -0600, Richard Shaw via rpmfusion-
> > developers wrote:
> > > I tried a scratch build on RPM Fus
I tried a scratch build on RPM Fusion which I haven't done in some time and
was greeted with the following:
$ rfpkg scratch-build --srpm
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=1673913600
Wrote: /home/build/rpmfusion-scm/nonfree/unifi/unifi-7.3.81-1.el8.src.rpm
[] 100% 00:00
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 1:05 PM Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>
> I have discovered that the kernel on CentOS-stream 8 is way behind the
> RHEL8 current one. So kernel ABI is backward with our prebuilt kmod
> that targets current RHEL8.7
>
This is very unfortunate. In my case I only use my CentOS 8 Str
I'm trying to build unifi for EL9 and running into this issue on aarch64
and ppc64le:
Error: Error downloading packages:
ansible-srpm-macros-1-7.el9.noarch: Download failed: Status code: 404
for
http://mirror.in2p3.fr/pub/epel/9/Everything/ppc64le/Packages/a/ansible-srpm-macros-1-7.el9.noarch.
I was trying to upload new Unifi sources and found my cert had expired, so
I ran rpmfusion-packager-setup and refreshed my certs, now when I try to
upload I get:
2.2%Could not execute new_sources: (56, 'OpenSSL SSL_read:
error:0A0003FC:SSL routines::sslv3 alert bad record mac, errno 0')
Thanks,
R
I have built the latest unifi version which addresses the recent CVE around
log4j.
Looking at the release notes it seems to be the only change. Should this be
pushed directly to updates?
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6176
Thanks,
Richard
_
I can't get to koji or bugzilla. Is it just me?
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
I'm trying to build a new mythtv but most of the builds are failing and
from the web interface all I can see is:
Error
An error has occurred while processing your request.
AttributeError: 'datetime.datetime' object has no attribute 'timestamp'
Full tracebacks disabled
Thanks,
Richard
_
Maybe I'm over-simplifying things, but instead of trying to force a round
peg is a square hole (it may fit, but that's not the point!)
How about submit a ticket for an exception?
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-develop
There isn't a soname change and abipkgdiff doesn't show anything particular
interesting, but for posterity potential impacted packages are:
# dnf repoquery --quiet --whatrequires "libyaml-cpp.so.0.6()(64bit)" --qf
"%{name}" | uniq | sort
calamares-libs
daggy
dcm2niix
facter
fawkes-core
fawkes-lua
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 3:14 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
> Maybe it isn't that bad.
>
> $ abidiff libdav1d.so.2.0.0 libdav1d.so.3.0.0
> ELF SONAME changed
> Functions changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added function
> Variables changes summary: 0 Removed, 0 Changed, 0 Added variable
>
> SONAME c
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 10:21 AM Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Richard Shaw said:
> > The problem appears that it's looking for /usr/bin/java directly I did
> have
> > that in the service file since absolute paths are preferred but I tried
> > removing it a
Ok, trying to get JAVA_HOME to work...
I tried the Environment=JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/jre-1.8.0
Note it's jre-1.8.0 not java-1.8.0 but unifi doesn't appear to honor it.
(On a side note the fact SystemD can't show you the environment a
unit/process is executed under is stupid...)
# tr '\0' '\n'
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:28 AM Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> So for me you only need to remove the Requires on mongod and write an
> online documentation for unifi.
> Right now you assume unify end-users would find the unitfi package in
> rpmfusion nonfree repo which is a first step wrong because the
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:28 AM Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>
> As a side note, you could avoid to enforce the system java to switch
> back to 1.8.0 globally by asking unify to use
> JAVA_HOME=/usr/lib/jvm/java-1.8.0
>
I tried adding JAVA_HOME to the systemd service environment file but it did
not wor
On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 4:28 AM Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Le lun. 7 oct. 2019 à 17:50, Richard Shaw a écrit :
> >
> > If #1 is "NO" then I don't think I have any choice but to retire
> unifi{,-lts} which really sucks because it was a crap load of work
> massag
On Mon, Oct 7, 2019 at 11:19 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> > 1. Can MongoDB live in the non-free repository?
> >
> > I think the problem is that once we package MongoDB we really can't stop
> > people from providing MongoDB as a service, but I'm not a lawyer.
With MongoDB being removed from Fedora it's put these packages between a
rock and a hard place.
Now unifi technically relies on an external repo (MongoDB supplied package)
which is not permitted. Obviously if this was always the case I would have
never submitted it as a package but MongoDB's licen
Just checking to see if there was a plan to fix this[1]
I see there were newer builds attempted but they failed for
various reasons, some of them arch specific (armhf and ppc64le).
Leigh, since you've been maintaining it for some time now it might be best
if you were the primary BZ contact as wel
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 1:41 PM Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>
> So please report if any issue. (either using bz , mailing list or IRC
> #rpmfusion freenodes).
>
IRC is blocked while at $DAYJOB but looks like Leigh kicked off a new build
already and it completed.
Thanks,
Richard
_
On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 5:03 PM FeRD wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 29, 2019 at 5:17 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>>
>> Error: Error downloading packages:
>>Status code: 404 for
>> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/os/Pac
I thought maybe it was a transient error but 5 build attempts and still no
luck:
Error: Error downloading packages:
Status code: 404 for
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/k/krb5-libs-1.17-44.fc32.x86_64.rpm
Looks like -45 release ha
Thanks for your efforts Antonio.
I think we need to separate the utilities that need Python 3 from the
Python 3 bindings where we can.
Perhaps the 2to3 converter will work for simple utility scripts.
Do we know what all the consumers are of the python bindings? We may need
to drop them in the sh
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 7:09 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> 11989 mythtv-30.0-9.20190601git6bd8cd4993.fc31
>
MythTV is a Python 3 problem. No response from upstream as of yet. I see
some others are trying to help fix the package while I'm in China for work.
VPN access works but loses connection freq
You guys have fun! Wish I could be there but I get on a plane to Beijing in
the morning for work...
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 10:54 AM Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Anyone going at Flock 2019 (Budapest) ?
> I will be there, so anyone to meet ?
>
Looks like fun but non-work sponsored international travel isn't an option
:)
Thanks,
Richard
___
This is pretty neat. I don't own a Pi but I may buy one soon just to play
around with it.
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.r
On Fri, Apr 19, 2019 at 11:38 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On sáb, 2019-04-13 at 16:03 +0200, Xavier Bachelot wrote:
> > On 13/04/2019 12:56, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> >
> > dvbcut: Clip and convert DVB transport streams to MPEG2 program
> > streams
> > libfame: Fast Assembly MPEG Encoding library
> > li
Initial dependency report:
akmods
help2man
Perl module issue
doxygen
Perl module issue
libva-vdpau-driver
libvdpau
dblatex
Perl module issue
nasm
adobe-source-code-pro-fonts
adobe-source-sans-pro-fonts
perl(Font::TTF::Font)
perl(Sort::Versions)
schroedinger
gtk-doc
dblatex
docbook-utils
docbook-st
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 3:47 PM Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Please apply to the ACL asap.
>
Done, for builder, I assume I don't need Admin.
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe s
On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 11:52 AM Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> Wanted to make a status of RPM Fusion for RHEL8.
>
> As you know, we depends on EPEL8 to start work, but this might not
> happen before GA, so if anyone interested in, I've started a quick
> copr repo with few basics packages
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 2:34 PM FeRD wrote:
> I just tried to build[1] libopenshot for rawhide, and it failed due to
> libopenshot-audio not being available but I already built that[2] for
> rawhide. Do I need to tag the libopenshot-audio build for buildroot
> override? I thought that wasn't
On Mon, Apr 8, 2019 at 12:44 PM Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Hi
>
> I don't understand why this package fails late at that point in the
> release:
> It seems like there are few hidden error in the spec such like when
> you claim to use python3, but the configure script claim to search for
> python2
>
Thanks to both of you for working on the infra side. I know it seems like a
thankless job sometimes.
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le
It's the armv7hl target that is picking up /bin/bash, all other targets are
getting /usr/bin/bash.
Thanks,
RIchard
>
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-l
For some reason the requires on the noarch package are different...
BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on different
architectures: unifi-data-5.10.19-2.fc30.noarch.rpm
rpmdiff output was:
removed REQUIRES /bin/bash
added REQUIRES /usr/bin/bash
Can I fix this in t
On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 12:47 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> unifi
>
I'll take a look when I have time, this doesn't make any sense because it's
a binary source package...
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.r
The only change was to add hdhomerun-devel to fix 5176. Can it get pushed
to stable early?
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.
Looks like the subject didn't update?
Thanks,
Richard
-- Forwarded message -
From: Leigh Scott
Date: Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 10:38 AM
Subject: [mplayer] - Rebuilt for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild
To: ,
commit cc46a4209a259d48c2f42fe348dc2b14f0d924d0
Author
Thanks all,
f30 build complete now catching up mythweb.
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
Can you or Leigh kill his build? I can't start a new one until it's done.
Thanks,
Richard
>
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 9:05 AM Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Le mer. 27 févr. 2019 à 15:34, Richard Shaw a
> écrit :
> >
> > Ok, well that didn't work. Mythgame built fine on F29... It looks like
> in F30 that minizip was split out into it's own project from the zlib
Ok, well that didn't work. Mythgame built fine on F29... It looks like in
F30 that minizip was split out into it's own project from the zlib package.
Looking into it.
Thanks
RIchard
>
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.
I added the BR's for minizip which seem to be a new dependency but
configure is still not picking it up. I can't mock build from rawhide (as
of yesterday) so instead of abusing the builders I'll try f29 to
troubleshoot this issue.
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpm
I was hoping it was a transient issue but now not so sure...
DEBUG util.py:490: BUILDSTDERR: Unable to detect release version (use
'--releasever' to specify release version)
DEBUG util.py:490: BUILDSTDERR: Failed to synchronize cache for repo
'build', disabling.
DEBUG util.py:490: BUILDSTDERR:
Can MongoDB live in the non-free repository or is the license still an
issue even there?
Thanks,
Richard
-- Forwarded message -
From: Ben Cotton
Date: Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 3:26 AM
Subject: Re: Server Side Public License (SSPL) v1
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
J
Thanks!
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
I've been running v30 for about a week now and haven't noticed any issues.
Since f29 still has a lot of life left I'm planning to upgrade it but keep
f28 on v29.1...
Sergio, do you want to update your script? Or should we just upgrade all
current branches?
Thanks,
Richard
>
_
I may have missed an email but was wondering if we're not processing pkgdb
requests right now?
https://admin.rpmfusion.org/pkgdb/packager/hobbes1069/requests
I submitted the unifi-lts requests a while back.
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mai
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 7:41 AM Sérgio Basto wrote:
> tag
> https://github.com/MythTV/mythtv/releases/tag/v30.0
Just installed a local test build. I'll try it out for a few days but it
doesn't really look like a major update based on the release notes...
https://www.mythtv.org/wiki/Release_Not
I just noticed the tag for MythTV version 30.
I'm working on test builds now. I still don't think we have resolution on a
python2 package in rawhide... requests-cache? IIRC I asked the maintainer
to provide both Py3 and Py2 packages but have not gotten a response.
Thanks,
Richard
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 1:44 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
> I have zero interest in Silver Blue or Flatpak.
>
I haven't decided on SilverBlue yet but figure it's a good idea to be aware
of what they're doing as it relates to akmods.
The only interest I have in Flatpak is perhaps packaging difficult to
Saw this on discourse...
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/supporting-the-nvidia-drivers-on-silverblue/849
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-d
On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 6:11 AM FeRD wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 2:47 AM Martin Gansser
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> fedora-review always ends with error message:
>> $ fedora-review --other-bz https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org -b 5104 -m
>> fedora-rawhide-x86_64-rpmfusion_free
>> ...
>> ERROR:
On Sat, Dec 8, 2018 at 1:10 PM Antonio Trande wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> 'mythtv' is the last rpm that i'm rebuilding for el7.
>
> On rawhide only we can't build it yet for missing python3 packages from
> Fedora (python3-oauth, python3-urlgrabber); we have two choices:
>
> - Disable python on mythtv on
I'm for keeping 3.3 in EL7 if it makes things a lot easier... EL 8 is
around the corner and thus the opportunity to for major updates.
Once CentOS 8 is released my plan is to put most of my energy there and
only keep el7 updated if it's easy.
Thanks,
Richard
__
I requested branches for all the packages I maintain that I care to support
el8 on.
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusi
Darn... Wrong mailing list... Started typing "devel" and thought it said
Fedora...
Thanks for the reply anyway!
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers
I've been working on getting a good build of FreeCAD 0.17 in Fedora (long
story) and I was finally able to get a good scratch build on Rawhide so I
decided to do a local mock build for Fedora 28 so I could actually test the
package...
As expected it built fine but I can't install it due to a depen
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 8:30 AM Vascom wrote:
> Appdata is not mandatory if it is not provided by upstream.
>
No, not mandatory, but nice to have.
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To uns
I'm not sure when I'll have time, but I need to go through all the packages
I maintain and see which ones still need appdata info added...
I know imagination does...
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpm
Review request submitted...
https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5041
Leigh, can you do a quick review?
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusio
Ok, scratch build complete for f28...
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=265813
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@list
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 6:41 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
> It used to be
>
> ExclusiveArch: i686 x86_64 armv7hl
>
Yup, went back and looked at the driver package (figured it should match!).
I've got a test package built and now testing in mock for rawhide. I'll try
to get a review request submitted if
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 6:31 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
> On 07/10/2018 12:28, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>
> Why is nvidia-settings x86_64 only? Don't i686 users need this as well?
>
>
> The latest nvidia driver doesn't support 32bit O/S
>
Ahh, but this one should,
On Sun, Oct 7, 2018 at 2:42 AM Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Le sam. 6 oct. 2018 à 22:54, Richard Shaw a
> écrit :
> >
> > commit 0f29a2833180a0efa697aa3a2a4129b72ea12f99
> > Author: Richard Shaw
> > Date: Sat Oct 6 15:51:57 2018 -0500
> >
> > Add nv
Ran into a problem, the arm package doesn't have a gtk3 library for
nvidia-xsettings...
Should I just conditionalize it to package the gtk2 library instead?
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.or
Ok, based on the feedback used the package name "nvidia-settings-390xx".
I kept all the binary related stuff called "nvidia-settings" because I went
with the conflict with the nvidia-settings package and renaming everything
is a PITA.
I will be doing some local testing on my home computer before
Ok, I know Nicolas mentioned bundling it but I'm assuming the idea was
still to split it out as a subpackage?
Something like:
nvidia-390xx-settings
nvidia-390xx-xconfig
Also I assume they should conflict with the main packages as they will
install the same name binaries...
Should we add a Recom
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:13 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
> Nvidia is nonfree so use
>
>
> koji-rpmfusion tag-build f29-nonfree-override
> xorg-x11-drv-nvidia-390xx-390.87-1.fc29
>
Duh... Too much cut-n-paste.
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 10:12 AM Robert-André Mauchin
wrote:
> On mercredi 3 octobre 2018 14:55:22 CEST Richard Shaw wrote:
> > I'd like to get the nvidia 390.87 drivers available but Robert has not
> > responded to my request to finish the review...
>
> Oops, I didn&#x
I'd like to get the nvidia 390.87 drivers available but Robert has not
responded to my request to finish the review...
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfu
On Thu, Sep 27, 2018 at 4:27 AM wrote:
> RPM Fusion update report
>
>
> Section free:
> -
> Fedora 27
> -
> Pushed to testing:
> openshot-2.4.3-1.fc27
> wireguard-0.0.20180925-1.fc27
> wireguard-kmod-0.0.20180925-1.fc27
>
> Pushed to stable:
> libo
Going to try this one more time...
I know that Nicolas wasn't in favor but I don't want to choose what version
of Unifi[1] someone has to run based on their choice of Fedora or EPEL.
There are cases where someone on CentOS 7 may want to have the latest and
greatest or someone running Fedora may wa
On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 9:05 AM FeRD wrote:
> As Karel said, I'm not sure what the question is here, but OpenShot on el7
> would certainly be compatible with, and benefit from ffmpeg 3.3/3.4. That's
> the only one I maintain, so I can't really speak for the rest, though I
> can't imagine audacity,
Once complete, please respond here and I'll take care of the openshot
packages.
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.o
On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Leigh Scott via rpmfusion-developers <
rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org> wrote:
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Leigh Scott
> To: rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 15:31:58 -
> Subject
from comment #25
> <https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4647#c25>)> SPEC:
> https://www.dropbox.com/s/a3fy23xaw163ap5/unifi.spec?dl=0
> > SRPM: https://www.dropbox.com/s/q6vi2pfpv5wgkbi/unifi-5.7.20-1.fc27.src.rpm
> >
> > * Thu Mar 08 2018 Richard Shaw - 5.7.20-1
On Thu, Mar 15, 2018 at 8:00 AM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Why it a lts version really needed after all ? you can just build the
> lts in EL7 and use the latest version in fedora ?
> Is there version compatibility issue that would requires to have the
> two in parallel if needed ?
>
Some users ma
Just yesterday Ubiquity announced a LTS version of their Unifi controller
software currently under review for the RF Non-free repository.
When the review is approved I would like to request both a "unifi" and
"unifi-lts" module in pkgdb. The packages will be identical other than the
version of the
Ok, looking back at the console output from rfpkg it does say canceled but
no failures so it wasn't immediately obvious.
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpm
Is there something going on I need to be aware of? It looks like my build
of openshot for F28 was canceled but on the command line there was no
indication of any failure so I kicked off builds for F26 and 27 as well.
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=204179
Thanks,
Richard
__
Trying repoquery from my F27 box I get:
clutter-gst-1.6.0-19.fc27.src.rpm
drawtk-2.0-5.fc27.src.rpm
But I'm assuming several project dlopen them?
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsub
I may take a look when I have time but which packages still require the old
0.10/0.11 versions of gstreamer?
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-devel
I had a conditional for BuildRequires but two subpackages also had Requires
on python-requests and python-requests-cache. I conditionalized them and
kicked off a build.
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.r
On Mon, Jan 29, 2018 at 8:17 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> it is a bug
> el7 have python-requests but package not provides python2-requests
> which is easy to fix
> %if fedora
> requires python2-requests
> %else
> requires python-requests
>
> python-requests-cache seems it is not available in el /
mythtv can not currently be built due to a chance in QT in 5.10.x. A fix
has been applied to master but not backported to fixes/29.0 yet. It should
be done sometime this week.
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@
Something going on I'm not aware of?
http://koji.rpmfusion.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=189484
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists
I'm not a git expert but I think it should be good now...
Thanks,
Richard
___
rpmfusion-developers mailing list -- rpmfusion-developers@lists.rpmfusion.org
To unsubscribe send an email to rpmfusion-developers-le...@lists.rpmfusion.org
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> Thx for the quick answer.
> The point to revert is to keep the openshot version as binary rpm in
> el7 repo to match the version that is available source form in git.
> This is extremely important because if a rebuilt is needed for any
> re
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:20 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> > EL 7
> > -
> > Pushed to testing:
> >
> > Pushed to stable:
> > libopenshot-0.1.8-3.el7
> > libopenshot-audio-0.1.4-1.el7
>
> I've untagged these libopenshot built given the missing openshot
> package (lacks of python3-qt5 or
I was working on updating xmltv and I believe I updated the patches
correctly but when I try to build a package locally first I get the
following during %check:
+ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 "/usr/bin/perl" "-MExtUtils::Command::MM"
"-MTest::Harness" "-e" "undef *Test::Harness::Switches; test_harn
1 - 100 of 571 matches
Mail list logo
