17:18 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2024/01/04 1:06:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2024/01/03 19:20:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all, I'd like to
thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of fixes all around. I really
appreciate
TASAKA wrote on 2024/01/04 1:06:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2024/01/03 19:20:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of
all, I'd like to thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of
fixes all around. I really appreciate that.
I think we are well prepared fo
wrote on 2024/01/03 19:20:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of
all, I'd like to thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of
fixes all around. I really appreciate that.
I think we are well prepared for the rebuild, therefore I have
requested sid
'f40-build-side-80411' (id 80411) created.
Use 'fedpkg build --target=f40-build-side-80411' to use it.
Use 'koji wait-repo f40-build-side-80411' to wait for the build
repo to be generated.
~~~
Ruby 3.3 is already merged [1] and build there:
https://koji.fedora
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 18:55 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 18:00 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 17:18 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2024/01/04 1:06:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2024/01/03 19:20:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 18:00 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 17:18 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2024/01/04 1:06:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2024/01/03 19:20:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all,
I'd like to thank to Mamor
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 17:18 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2024/01/04 1:06:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2024/01/03 19:20:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all,
I'd like to thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of fixes all
arou
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2024/01/04 1:06:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2024/01/03 19:20:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all, I'd like to
thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of fixes all around. I really
appreciate that.
I think we are
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2024/01/03 19:20:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all, I'd like to
thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of fixes all around. I really
appreciate that.
I think we are well prepared for the rebuild, therefore I
Dne 03. 01. 24 v 13:50 Jarek Prokop napsal(a):
On 1/3/24 11:48, jpro...@redhat.com wrote:
On 1/3/24 11:23, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 02. 01. 24 v 21:50 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
My build succeeded everywhere. Nevertheless, there were
some reports about issues with fibers (
On 1/3/24 11:48, jpro...@redhat.com wrote:
On 1/3/24 11:23, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 02. 01. 24 v 21:50 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
My build succeeded everywhere. Nevertheless, there were
some reports about issues with fibers (e.g.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/200
On 1/3/24 11:23, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 02. 01. 24 v 21:50 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
My build succeeded everywhere. Nevertheless, there were
some reports about issues with fibers (e.g.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20085). So we should
probably observe and
https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/925 (orphaned 6+ weeks)
Good idea!
With byebug resurrected in my COPR; my rails test works fine with Ruby
3.3:
Not sure I understand the "resurrected". Do we need byebug or not?
Vít
Log: https://gist.github.com/pvalena/4729
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 is out and it is time for Ruby mass rebuild. First of all, I'd
like to thank to Mamoru for the preparation and lot of fixes all around.
I really appreciate that.
I think we are well prepared for the rebuild, therefore I have requested
side-tag:
~~~
$ fedpkg re
ly half the CPU flags missing on Koji compared to
>> copr.
>>
>>
>> Hoping that somebody is going to try the patch on my behalf (unless I hit
>> the issue myself ;) )
>>
>
> My second build hit 101 issues, similarly to the previous one.
>
> Run
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:31 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 02. 01. 24 v 17:16 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
>
>
> On 1/2/24 16:41, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 02. 01. 24 v 16:15 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:38 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>> Hi everybody and happy new year
Dne 02. 01. 24 v 17:16 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
On 1/2/24 16:41, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 02. 01. 24 v 16:15 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:38 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi everybody and happy new year,
Being back from holidays, here is Ruby 3.3.0.
https:/
On 1/2/24 16:41, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 02. 01. 24 v 16:15 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:38 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi everybody and happy new year,
Being back from holidays, here is Ruby 3.3.0.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86668
Dne 02. 01. 24 v 16:15 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:38 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi everybody and happy new year,
Being back from holidays, here is Ruby 3.3.0.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86668
As some of you have noticed, there
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:38 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Hi everybody and happy new year,
>
> Being back from holidays, here is Ruby 3.3.0.
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86668
>
> As some of you have noticed, there are issues with expired certificates.
> I have asked back
Hi everybody and happy new year,
Being back from holidays, here is Ruby 3.3.0.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=86668
As some of you have noticed, there are issues with expired certificates.
I have asked backport here:
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/20106
Other tha
On 9/12/23 10:08, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
It is again the time to look at where Ruby 3.3 development stands. So
here is PR with the changes:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/159
Trying out Ruby 3.3.0 official release in local mock, I hit SSL issues
with tests in net
/9274
To workaround the Alexandria segfaults. I'll observe the upstream ticket
and hopefully there will be some proper solution soon. This is likely
the very last test release prior the official Ruby 3.3 release, because
I'll be off my work computer for the end of year holidays. So
Hi,
Looking at the versions of subpackages, it seems that the only
concerning package is rubygem-power_assert, where the version has not
changed between Ruby 3.2 and Ruby 3.3. Otherwise all the versions were
bumped.
Looking closer at the power_assert, it seem that
1) The content is still
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/21 21:08:
Hi everybody,
I am back with yet another update, this time rev 8e6f63df47. The changes are in
my PR, while the build is running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110562000
I have not noticed any noteworthy from upstream POV, but d
Hi everybody,
I am back with yet another update, this time rev 8e6f63df47. The changes
are in my PR, while the build is running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110562000
I have not noticed any noteworthy from upstream POV, but downstream, I
have extracted the bundle
Dne 12. 12. 23 v 15:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
9. rubygem-rubygems-mirror
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6743512/
```
+ ruby -Ilib -e 'Dir.glob "./test/test_*.rb", &method(:require)'
:127:in
`require': cannot load such file -- rubygems/indexer (
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
5. rubygem-childprocess
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6695574/
Same as before.
7.
rubygem-childprocess
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6576582/
Dne 20. 12. 23 v 14:22 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/20 18:56:
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 17:03 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 11:10 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
7. rubygem-railties
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/m
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/20 18:56:
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 17:03 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 11:10 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
7. rubygem-railties
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6695576/
Tes
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 17:03 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 11:10 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
7. rubygem-railties
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6695576/
Testsuite is failing, but due to some di
Hi again,
I'm back with yet another update, this time rev 8e6f63df47. The build is
running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110562000
From what I have noticed, there is included RubyGems 3.5.1 instead of
3.5.0.dev. And there seems to be fixed some issues with reporti
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 17:57 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
There is one remaining issue:
~~~
* Test file: test/version_test.rb
/usr/share/gems/gems/zeitwerk-2.6.6/lib/zeitwerk/kernel.rb:38:
warning: drb/unix is found in drb, which will no longer be part of the
default gems since Ruby 3.4.0. Add drb to
b.com/rails/rails/pull/48369/commits/cf45394d104b00679c900e9d2dd09154cadcbe11
The fix is in Rawhide:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-railties/c/3c1796f9c84c0b0c9eb0628364c24f850ba3c3af
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110386448
But unfortunately, to pass th
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 16:34 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 14:13 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/14 23:10:
Dear Rubyists,
As it turns out, yesterday version was not a big success, as we
learned the hard way (thx Mamor
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 17:03 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 11:10 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
7. rubygem-railties
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6695576/
Testsuite is failing, but due to some di
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 11:10 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
7. rubygem-railties
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6695576/
Testsuite is failing, but due to some different reason:
```
Failure:
FullStackConsoleTe
Hi everybody,
As you might have figured from my other email, I have yet another Ruby
update. This time rev 04f7be6126 and the scratch build is available here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110382113
There were some RubyGems/Bundler vendored gems updates and as can be
se
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 14:13 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/14 23:10:
Dear Rubyists,
As it turns out, yesterday version was not a big success, as we
learned the hard way (thx Mamoru). So here I am back with updated
version, thi
Dne 15. 12. 23 v 13:56 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/14 23:10:
Dear Rubyists,
As it turns out, yesterday version was not a big success, as we
learned the hard way (thx Mamoru). So here I am back with updated
version, this time rev e3631277c3. The changes are in my PR
d it here:
https://github.com/rails/rails/issues/50364
Vít
This seems to be flaky test suite, while it might be also due to Ruby
3.3. So far, I have 14 builds in my Copr and all failed, with one of
the failures above. Trying to reproduce locally, the first build
passed right away, while the se
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/14 23:10:
Dear Rubyists,
As it turns out, yesterday version was not a big success, as we learned the
hard way (thx Mamoru). So here I am back with updated version, this time rev
e3631277c3. The changes are in my PR and the build is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject
0546ba1b09bd2d8b97e4aef881de8db9f760b903af6.css"
to not be equal to
"application-c56ef81d122dffa8b257b0546ba1b09bd2d8b97e4aef881de8db9f760b903af6.css".
```
Not sure what this means.
This seems to be flaky test suite, while it might be also due to Ruby
3.3. So far, I have 14 builds in my Copr and
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
rubygem-shoulda-matchers is FIXED:
With some discussion, this is fixed on ruby side:
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/e34e8b93f8fac3ef40ab5ed8672fa003f3b4d9c0
ref: https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/7128
14.
rubygem-shoulda-matchers
Dear Rubyists,
As it turns out, yesterday version was not a big success, as we learned
the hard way (thx Mamoru). So here I am back with updated version, this
time rev e3631277c3. The changes are in my PR and the build is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110328934
As
Dne 14. 12. 23 v 11:24 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 14. 12. 23 v 9:51 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 14. 12. 23 v 9:21 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hello, again:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/14 0:30:
Hi again,
I'm back with yet another update, this time rev a7ad9f3836. The
build is running here:
Dne 14. 12. 23 v 9:51 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 14. 12. 23 v 9:21 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hello, again:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/14 0:30:
Hi again,
I'm back with yet another update, this time rev a7ad9f3836. The
build is running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?ta
Dne 14. 12. 23 v 9:21 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hello, again:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/14 0:30:
Hi again,
I'm back with yet another update, this time rev a7ad9f3836. The build
is running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110284699
This time, there are several ch
Hello, again:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/14 0:30:
Hi again,
I'm back with yet another update, this time rev a7ad9f3836. The build is
running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110284699
This time, there are several changes I'd like to mention.
* There is included pa
Dne 12. 12. 23 v 15:59 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 12. 12. 23 v 15:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
C. New failures
8. rubygem-rails-deprecated_sanitizer
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6743508/
```
1) Failure:
DeprecatedSanitizerTest#test_Action_
Hi again,
I'm back with yet another update, this time rev a7ad9f3836. The build is
running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110284699
This time, there are several changes I'd like to mention.
* There is included patch fixing several of the network related spec
failu
Dne 13. 12. 23 v 13:44 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/11 21:26:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 RC1 is here:
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2023/12/11/ruby-3-3-0-rc1-released/
And therefore I have updated the PR with recent changes and the build
is running here:
https
Dne 13. 12. 23 v 13:44 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/11 21:26:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 RC1 is here:
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2023/12/11/ruby-3-3-0-rc1-released/
And therefore I have updated the PR with recent changes and the build
is running here:
https
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/11 21:26:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 RC1 is here:
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2023/12/11/ruby-3-3-0-rc1-released/
And therefore I have updated the PR with recent changes and the build is
running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID
Dne 12. 12. 23 v 15:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
C. New failures
8. rubygem-rails-deprecated_sanitizer
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6743508/
```
1) Failure:
DeprecatedSanitizerTest#test_Action_View_sanitizer_vendor_returns_constant_from_HTML_mo
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/12/11 21:26:
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 RC1 is here:
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2023/12/11/ruby-3-3-0-rc1-released/
And therefore I have updated the PR with recent changes and the build is
running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID
Hi everybody,
Ruby 3.3 RC1 is here:
https://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2023/12/11/ruby-3-3-0-rc1-released/
And therefore I have updated the PR with recent changes and the build is
running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110183096
I have not seen anything what would
Hi everybody,
Here is yet another snapshot of Ruby 3.3, this time rev 071df40495:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=110009405
From upstream POV, I have not noticed nothing particularly interesting.
But I have reverted back the `%gem_install` macro to use again the
`--build
Dne 07. 12. 23 v 15:27 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/11/24 22:17:
Hi,
I am back with yet another update of Ruby 3.3, this time rev
24e0b185ab. The changes are in my PR and the scratch build is
available here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/11/24 22:17:
Hi,
I am back with yet another update of Ruby 3.3, this time rev 24e0b185ab. The
changes are in my PR and the scratch build is available here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=109487230
This starting to be boring, because there is
Dne 28. 11. 23 v 17:04 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
5. rubygem-childprocess
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6695574/
Same as before.
7.
rubygem-childprocess
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mt
Dne 26. 11. 23 v 15:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
5. rubygem-childprocess
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6695574/
Same as before.
7.
rubygem-childprocess
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6576582/
Dne 09. 11. 23 v 19:09 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
On 11/9/23 18:27, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 07. 11. 23 v 12:56 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
Hi,
On 11/1/23 17:13, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
Here is yet another Ruby 3.3 snapshot, this time a1e24ab484:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji
Hello again, all:
Now with again I tried to rebuild all rubygem-foo pacakages on Fedora with
ruby 3.3.0dev:
The packages failing to build with:
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/9cd086ba4b559153864ab924723a665a4ddfb5d8
are listed below. (Commented inline between my previous post.)
8 packages
Hi,
I am back with yet another update of Ruby 3.3, this time rev 24e0b185ab.
The changes are in my PR and the scratch build is available here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=109487230
This starting to be boring, because there is nothing what would caught
my attention
On 11/9/23 18:27, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 07. 11. 23 v 12:56 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
Hi,
On 11/1/23 17:13, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
Here is yet another Ruby 3.3 snapshot, this time a1e24ab484:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108418495
The respective changes are
Dne 07. 11. 23 v 12:56 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
Hi,
On 11/1/23 17:13, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
Here is yet another Ruby 3.3 snapshot, this time a1e24ab484:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108418495
The respective changes are available in my PR. There is nothing
Dne 08. 11. 23 v 16:13 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/30 19:37:
Nice, thx for the summary and a few remarks inline.
Dne 29. 10. 23 v 9:09 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
2.
rubygem-addressable
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/65765
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time commit ad3db6711c.
The changes are in my PR and the build is running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108809158
I have not noticed anything really interesting. The most interesting
thing is actually inclusion of
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/30 19:37:
Nice, thx for the summary and a few remarks inline.
Dne 29. 10. 23 v 9:09 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
2.
rubygem-addressable
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6576510/
Test suite segfaults constantly...
Isn't th
Hi,
On 11/1/23 17:13, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
Here is yet another Ruby 3.3 snapshot, this time a1e24ab484:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108418495
The respective changes are available in my PR. There is nothing
particular what would catch my attention. Happy testing and
Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2023/10/29 17:09:
Hello, all:
With wonderful work by Vít and friends, again I tried to rebuild all rubygem-foo
packages on Fedora against ruby 3.3.0dev.
For the below failure reports,
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/83ecdd1dce18246de631eb3b5d8308145bb269f5
is used.
A
Dne 02. 11. 23 v 11:15 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
On 11/1/23 11:17, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi Rubyists,
The release of Ruby 3.3 is coming close and to be ready for rebuild
after Christmas, I have submitted the Ruby 3.3 change proposal [1].
It is already in `ChangeReadyForWrangler` state
On 11/1/23 11:17, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi Rubyists,
The release of Ruby 3.3 is coming close and to be ready for rebuild
after Christmas, I have submitted the Ruby 3.3 change proposal [1]. It
is already in `ChangeReadyForWrangler` state, since I don't expect any
controversy (it is mostly
Dne 01. 11. 23 v 14:31 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 10:07 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 31. 10. 23 v 23:45 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Pavel Valena wrote on 2023/11/01 3:42:
>> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 12:36 PM Vít Ondruch
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Dne 26
Hi,
Here is yet another Ruby 3.3 snapshot, this time a1e24ab484:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108418495
The respective changes are available in my PR. There is nothing
particular what would catch my attention. Happy testing and thx for all
the feedback and support
On 11/1/23 15:01, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 01. 11. 23 v 11:27 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
Hi
On 10/12/23 17:20, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to e029375a7d.
The changes are in the PR:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/159
Dne 01. 11. 23 v 11:27 jpro...@redhat.com napsal(a):
Hi
On 10/12/23 17:20, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to e029375a7d. The
changes are in the PR:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/159
And the scratch build is running here:
Dne 01. 11. 23 v 12:28 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/11/01 19:17:
Hi Rubyists,
The release of Ruby 3.3 is coming close and to be ready for rebuild
after Christmas, I have submitted the Ruby 3.3 change proposal [1].
It is already in `ChangeReadyForWrangler` state, since
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 10:07 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 31. 10. 23 v 23:45 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> > Pavel Valena wrote on 2023/11/01 3:42:
> >> On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 12:36 PM Vít Ondruch
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Dne 26. 10. 23 v 18:26 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/30 20:43:
Dne 29. 10. 23 v 9:09 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
14.
rubygem-shoulda-matchers
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6576601/
Lots of:
```
An error occurred while loading
./spec/unit/shoulda/matchers/action_controller
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/11/01 19:17:
Hi Rubyists,
The release of Ruby 3.3 is coming close and to be ready for rebuild after
Christmas, I have submitted the Ruby 3.3 change proposal [1]. It is already in
`ChangeReadyForWrangler` state, since I don't expect any controversy (it is
mostly
Hi
On 10/12/23 17:20, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to e029375a7d. The
changes are in the PR:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/pull-request/159
And the scratch build is running here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=107
Hi Rubyists,
The release of Ruby 3.3 is coming close and to be ready for rebuild
after Christmas, I have submitted the Ruby 3.3 change proposal [1]. It
is already in `ChangeReadyForWrangler` state, since I don't expect any
controversy (it is mostly copy paste of Ruby 3.2 change [2])
Dne 31. 10. 23 v 23:45 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Pavel Valena wrote on 2023/11/01 3:42:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 12:36 PM Vít Ondruch
wrote:
Dne 26. 10. 23 v 18:26 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:31 PM Vít Ondruch
wrote:
Dne 25. 10. 23 v 16:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(
Pavel Valena wrote on 2023/11/01 3:42:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 12:36 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 26. 10. 23 v 18:26 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:31 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 25. 10. 23 v 16:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hi, Vít:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/24 23:07:
On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 12:36 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 26. 10. 23 v 18:26 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:31 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>>
>> Dne 25. 10. 23 v 16:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
>> > Hi, Vít:
>> >
>> > Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/24 23:07:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
Dne 29. 10. 23 v 9:09 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
14.
rubygem-shoulda-matchers
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6576601/
Lots of:
```
An error occurred while loading
./spec/unit/shoulda/matchers/action_controller/callback_matcher_spec.rb.
Failure/E
Nice, thx for the summary and a few remarks inline.
Dne 29. 10. 23 v 9:09 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
2.
rubygem-addressable
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mtasaka/rubygem-newruby-test-3-2/build/6576510/
Test suite segfaults constantly...
Isn't this some RegExp / GC thing seeint this
Hello, all:
With wonderful work by Vít and friends, again I tried to rebuild all rubygem-foo
packages on Fedora against ruby 3.3.0dev.
For the below failure reports,
https://github.com/ruby/ruby/commit/83ecdd1dce18246de631eb3b5d8308145bb269f5
is used.
Among ~455 packages, now 16 packages see bu
Dne 26. 10. 23 v 18:26 Pavel Valena napsal(a):
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:31 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 25. 10. 23 v 16:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> Hi, Vít:
>
> Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/24 23:07:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am back again with updated version of Ruby, this
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:31 PM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> Dne 25. 10. 23 v 16:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
> > Hi, Vít:
> >
> > Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/24 23:07:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I am back again with updated version of Ruby, this time c44d65427e.
> >> Please see the changes in the upstream PR
Dne 25. 10. 23 v 16:11 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Hi, Vít:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/24 23:07:
Hi,
I am back again with updated version of Ruby, this time c44d65427e.
Please see the changes in the upstream PR and test the build
(currently in progress) here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org
Hi, Vít:
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/24 23:07:
Hi,
I am back again with updated version of Ruby, this time c44d65427e. Please see
the changes in the upstream PR and test the build (currently in progress) here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108034430
Apart of fixes for
Hi,
I am back again with updated version of Ruby, this time c44d65427e.
Please see the changes in the upstream PR and test the build (currently
in progress) here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=108034430
Apart of fixes for the "user install gems" discussed in other parts
Dne 15. 10. 23 v 1:48 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/13 0:20:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to e029375a7d. The
changes are in the PR:
Vít, would you take a look at this change?
https://github.com/rubygems/rubygems/pull/5327
In ruby.git , th
Dne 20. 10. 23 v 14:58 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/20 21:21:
Dne 20. 10. 23 v 14:13 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 10. 23 v 1:48 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/13 0:20:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to e029375a7d.
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/20 21:21:
Dne 20. 10. 23 v 14:13 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 10. 23 v 1:48 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/13 0:20:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to e029375a7d. The changes
are in the PR:
Vít, would you take
BTW, the question also is, what is the influence of PR5327 on our settings:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ruby/blob/5bf57b1504871230600103083d77ff3502255e2e/f/operating_system.rb#_103
In theory, we should be able to drop this.
Vít
Dne 20. 10. 23 v 14:21 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 20
Dne 20. 10. 23 v 14:13 Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
Dne 15. 10. 23 v 1:48 Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a):
Vít Ondruch wrote on 2023/10/13 0:20:
Hi,
I am back again with yet another update, this time to e029375a7d.
The changes are in the PR:
Vít, would you take a look at this change?
https://github.c
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
