On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 11:42 PM, Iain Davis wrote:
>> As far as Tk goes. I am not particularly married to any one windowing
>> toolkit. Would wx, gtk or qt be a better fit, and still be X-platform?
>> I think we should target Windows, Linux and Mac. Tk caught my eye
>> because IDLE is written in
> As far as Tk goes. I am not particularly married to any one windowing
> toolkit. Would wx, gtk or qt be a better fit, and still be X-platform?
> I think we should target Windows, Linux and Mac. Tk caught my eye
> because IDLE is written in it (Tkinter) and makes it a breeze to
> create other desk
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Iain Davis > It does, but it doesn't
appeal to the audience that Ed may be thinking
> of. That audience is going to be drawn in much more quickly if they
> can download a single package that a) includes both ruby and an IDE (a
> low-footprint one similar to IDLE wi
> Ed Howland wrote:
>> Yiannis has a valid point too. There should be a nice X-Platform IDE
>> that ships with Ruby core
Marnen Laibow-Koser wrote:
> I'd be curious to see what the Ruby community could come up with. I do
> like the idea of something like IDLE that's actually *designed for* and
>
Ed Howland wrote:
> Peter makes very good points. Thanks for the wrap-up. (And I was just
> being tongue-in-cheek about the my reasons for getting a Mac.)
>
> Yiannis has a valid point too. There should be a nice X-Platform IDE
> that ships with Ruby core
I'd be curious to see what the Ruby comm
Michael Pavling wrote:
> On 25 August 2010 22:20, Michael Pavling wrote:
>> and has done since the first time I tried it in Jan 2009.
>
> Correction, it was April when I got debugging working :-)
Good to know. Maybe the problem had to do with using JRuby on this
project (which is a Swing/Monke
> Your attitude is similar enough to mine, if I understand it correctly,
> that I suspect if you try a good graphical editor like KomodoEdit or
> jEdit, you won't go back to Emacs in GUI situations.
*grin*. Certainly possible. I think I tried KomodoEdit, but that was
long while ago, who knows how
Iain Davis wrote:
> This is discussion has been very helpful to me: I'm learning Rails
> (and Ruby), so far I've primarily been using Emacs and command line.
> But I also I had given NetBeans (and a couple of other IDEs) a brief
> try on the off-chance that I was missing out on something that I wou
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 6:06 PM, Robert Walker wrote:
> Leonardo Mateo wrote:
>> I use Vim. Mostly because it just feels good for me, with the right
>> plugins I have everything I use on every IDE I've used before (that
>> is, code competion, syntax highlighting, code reference, tabs, and a
>> few
Leonardo Mateo wrote:
> I use Vim. Mostly because it just feels good for me, with the right
> plugins I have everything I use on every IDE I've used before (that
> is, code competion, syntax highlighting, code reference, tabs, and a
> few more).
As long as Vim uses that damn modal editing (i.e. 'i
Todd Weeks wrote:
> Thanks all for your help. I must admit part of the purpose of my post
> was to
> vent my own ignorance. Your responses are very encouraging.
> I'm getting better at searching the group itself. Happy learned how to
> put.
> LOL But its nice to know there are persons out there t
11 matches
Mail list logo
