Hi,
Due to accumulating history, the names of the various bases of
Symmetric functions and variants are not very consistent:
sage: Sym = SymmetricFunctions(FractionField(QQ['q,t'])); Sym
Symmetric Functions over Fraction Field of Multivariate Polynomial Ring in
q, t over
Hi Martin!
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 01:39:55PM +0200, Martin Rubey wrote:
Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr writes:
What do you think? Suggestions for further improvements?
I think this is a very good idea :-)
:-)
Also, a short name without renaming will be appreciated from
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:41:47AM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
sage: Sym.h() # should this be complete?
Sym on the homogeneous basis
Hugh agrees with me (and Alain!) that homogeneous should be changed
to complete. Other opinions?
He also suggests that it
Hi Hugh, Christian, Gregg,
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 09:39:15PM -0700, Hugh Thomas wrote:
Christian Stump and Gregg Musiker have written code implementing many
methods related to cluster algebras. This spans several tickets. The
first substantial one is #10527.
I have
Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr writes:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:41:47AM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
sage: Sym.h() # should this be complete?
Sym on the homogeneous basis
Hugh agrees with me (and Alain!) that homogeneous should be changed
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:05:39PM +0200, Martin Rubey wrote:
I think that in the complete basis is somewhat strange to read.
How about
sage: Sym.p()
Sym; basis: powersum
sage: Sym.m()
Sym; basis: monomial
sage: Sym.e()
Sym; basis: elementary
sage: Sym.h()
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
Ok, everybody, please vote!
sage: Sym.e()
Sym; basis: elementary
There is an issue with the above in that it makes no mention of the
base ring. Knowing the base ring is important since it causes
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:39:14AM -0400, Franco Saliola wrote:
sage: Sym.e()
Sym; basis: elementary
There is an issue with the above in that it makes no mention of the
base ring. Knowing the base ring is important since it causes issues
with changing bases over different base
On 8/27/12 6:23 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:41:47AM +0200, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
sage: Sym.h() # should this be complete?
Sym on the homogeneous basis
Hugh agrees with me (and Alain!) that homogeneous should be changed
to
On 8/27/12 2:21 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 12:07:15PM -0700, Frédéric Chapoton wrote:
sage: Sym.e()
Symmetric Functions over Rational Field in the elementary basis
This is my vote, for coherence with the rest of Sage, using long
descriptions in
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:29:34PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
Sym ... in the LLT spin basis at level 3.
I thought we agreed on in.
Of course ...
Nicolas
--
Nicolas M. Thiéry Isil nthi...@users.sf.net
http://Nicolas.Thiery.name/
--
You received this message
On Tuesday, 28 August 2012 07:35:27 UTC+10, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 02:29:34PM -0700, Anne Schilling wrote:
Sym ... in the LLT spin basis at level 3.
I think it should be ... in the LLT spin basis OF level 3.
Andrew
--
You received this message because you
I want to weigh in on the choice of homogeneous/complete/homogeneous
complete.
I posted some comments on the trac server.
Hugh agrees with me (and Alain!) that homogeneous should be changed
to complete. Other opinions?
I am truly afraid of what Alain has to say about this subject.
He is very
13 matches
Mail list logo
