p.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to
> sage-combinat-devel+**unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> .
> To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@**
> googlegroups.com .
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com
t;primitive" elements of the domain, i.e.
>>> as in our example, using ((1),(2),(3),(4),(1,2),(2,3)) instead of
>>> (1,2,3,4,(1,2),(2,3)); then certainly ((1),(2)) and (1,2) are
>>> different things, problem solved.
>>>
>>> (and certainly
t to this group, send email to sage-combinat-devel@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> sage-combinat-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-combinat-devel?hl=en.
>
>
--
that's where I learned the theory
because that's what I could find. (The Seress text has a partition
backtrack section, but it is very thin.)
--
Jason B. Hill
http://math.jasonbhill.com | jason.b.h...@colorado.edu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
r consumption. As far as I
know, nobody has really done this. Has anyone done this? I don't think
it would be hard. (E.g., for my purposes I use a language much more
like I.G. Macdonald's text... although this blurs the difference
between partitions and set compositions.)
Jason
--
It works fine now. Thanks!
--
Jason B. Hill
http://math.jasonbhill.com | jason.b.h...@colorado.edu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sage-combinat-devel" group.
To post to this group, send email to sage-combinat-de...@googlegrou
7;all'
Error importing ipy_profile_sage - perhaps you should run %upgrade?
WARNING: Loading of ipy_profile_sage failed.
sage:
--
Jason B. Hill
http://math.jasonbhill.com | jason.b.h...@colorado.edu
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Gro
Can you clarify this a bit?
Obviously, there's a difference between the product of matrices of
permutations and the matrix of the product of permutations. That is, they
are 'reversed.' But, multiplication in the matrices is not the same
operation as the one imposed on the elements from a group. Fo
#x27;ll be back from vacation on Wednesday. Unfortunately, this will be my last
computer access until then. :-(
Jason B. Hill
On Sun, May 30, 2010 at 3:46 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Jason B Hill
> wrote:
> > Can we get a list together of all o
; domain to non-fixed points?
>
I do think this would be sufficient, yes. Keep in mind though that this
should be easily restricted to subgroups and subrepresentations.
Jason B Hill
>
> - Robert
>
>
> On May 17, 2010, at 3:06 PM, Mike Hansen wrote:
>
> -- Forwarde
hould be
acceptable as input as a generator.
For now, I would appreciate input on this and also the patch I submitted to
introduce some of these capabilities in Sage's current implementation of
permutation groups.
Brevity is a virtue I do not have. Sorry about that.
Jason B. Hill
--
You
11 matches
Mail list logo
