So I upgraded a linux machine to ubuntu 8.04. I knew that there would
an issue with self signed certs. I found that I wasn't even able to
add an exception.
I went preferences->advanced/encryption->view certificates
Then switched to the servers tab and clicked on add exception.
I tried to get cert
I cannot work out from these references whether you regard
multimodular or p-adic as the way to go. Or are you intending to try
both and compare them?
John
2008/4/28 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hi,
>
> Regarding fast cyclotomic linear algebra, there is now a wiki page up:
>
>ht
Hah, this made me smile in the morning ;)
Cheers,
Michael
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Maxima] [sage-devel] compiling Maxima by ECL
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 09:46:54 +0200
From: Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Michael.Abshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: [EMAIL PROT
That's a bug with the beta5 of firefox3 that prevents you from adding
those certificates. Just start the insecure notebook using "./sage -
inotebook" and you will be fine - or wait for an update ;)
h
On Apr 28, 9:07 am, Joshua Kantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I found that I wasn't even able
On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 at 12:07AM -0700, Joshua Kantor wrote:
> So I upgraded a linux machine to ubuntu 8.04. I knew that there would
> an issue with self signed certs. I found that I wasn't even able to
> add an exception.
>
> I went preferences->advanced/encryption->view certificates Then
> switche
In my long task of getting sage on Gentoo I
inspect spkg. So today I was creating an ebuild
for quaddouble and looked at the config options
available and the one used by sage and I see this:
--enable-ieee-add use addition that satisfies IEEE-style error
bound
inst
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:54 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I cannot work out from these references whether you regard
> multimodular or p-adic as the way to go.
For practical linear algebra -- i.e., where you care about how fast
algorithms actually run rather than only caring
> -Original Message-
> From: Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 12:47 AM
> To: Michael.Abshoff
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> sage-devel; Robert Dodier; maxima mailing list
> Subject: Re: [Maxima] [sage-devel] compiling Maxima
On Apr 28, 4:22 pm, rjf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 12:47 AM
> > To: Michael.Abshoff
> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> > sage-devel; Robert Dodier; maxima
more response to Juan..
>
> * The simplistic garbage collector is an option and it is provided for
> platforms in which Boehm-Weiser does not run. Currently, this means
> _none_ of the supported platforms.
>
> * Boehm-Weiser is a strong garbage collector and a very powerful one
> in terms of tun
I am posting a reply of Juan here at his request:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Richard Fateman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thank you for this information. Unfortunately Michael said the sourceforge
> > page was mostly out of date and pointed me to
> > this: http://ecls.wiki.sourceforge
2008/4/28 William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:54 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I cannot work out from these references whether you regard
> > multimodular or p-adic as the way to go.
>
> For practical linear algebra -- i.e., where you care
SEP
Implement Lattices over ZZ, with pairings into QQ or ZZ
0. (Maybe) Implement a FreeModule_ZZ_quotient class. This would also
allow for constructing abelian groups in the sort of canonical way
(something people have been asking for...)
1. Implement a LatticeModule class, which will inherit f
Please can we also have real-valued bilinear forms? Mordell-Weil
lattices (from elliptic curves over number fields) will require
non-rational values.
John
2008/4/28 Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> SEP
>
> Implement Lattices over ZZ, with pairings into QQ or ZZ
>
> 0. (Maybe) Implemen
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:02 PM, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> SEP
>
> Implement Lattices over ZZ, with pairings into QQ or ZZ
>
> 0. (Maybe) Implement a FreeModule_ZZ_quotient class. This would also
> allow for constructing abelian groups in the sort of canonical way
> (someth
David, I don't think you understood my suggestion. We are talking
about groups A which are finitely-generated and torsion-free, so
abstractly isomorphic to Z^n, together with a suitable blinear
function on AxA taking values in Z or Q, and I wish to include R
-valued forms.
John
2008/4/28 David
I believe all that David was saying was that our LatticeQuotients
should probably inherit from a new FreeModule_ZZ_quotient class
instead of from AbelianGroups, since the latter are not fully
developed sage objects yet...
On Apr 28, 11:29 am, "John Cremona" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David, I d
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:29 AM, John Cremona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> David, I don't think you understood my suggestion. We are talking
> about groups A which are finitely-generated and torsion-free, so
> abstractly isomorphic to Z^n, together with a suitable blinear
> function on Ax
This is the problem with gmail - it hides the text. When *I* read my own
comment, I didn't like it! Here's what meant: Robert had a number of
options for the LatticeQuotient class, one of which was
" -- Inherit from AbelianGroup?"
To *that*, I vote -1 because infinite AbelianGroup instances a
I am in fact planning on reimplementing finitely generated abelian
groups soon, so my vote would be to have the quotient of lattices L/L'
(with L' a full sublattice or not) be an abelian group A with a
canonical map L -> A.
David
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:33 PM, William Stein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I support John's view that real-valued lattice need also to be taken
into account. Minkowski lattices of number fields and Mordell-Weil
groups are prime examples.
Some people also like to embed lattices in R^n equipped with the
standard Euclidean inner product. As such the coordinates are
non-r
Interesting discussion.
Sorry to have misread David Roe's -1: as several people noticed,
thanks to gmail's habit of hiding quoted text I mistakenly thought he
was disagreeing with me and took umbrage.
David K's suggestions look very sensible to me, and I know that he is
speaking from experience
On 4/28/08, Robert Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3. Implement a LatticeQuotient class (for now, just full sublattices,
> i.e., finite quotients).
> -- Inherit from FreeModule_ZZ_quotient?
> -- Inherit from AbelianGroup?
> -- Inherit from nothing?
> ( The question here is what the un
On Apr 28, 2:32 pm, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In my long task of getting sage on Gentoo I
> inspect spkg. So today I was creating an ebuild
> for quaddouble and looked at the config options
> available and the one used by sage and I see this:
> --enable-ieee-add use addition
On Apr 29, 11:33 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> On Apr 28, 2:32 pm, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > In my long task of getting sage on Gentoo I
> > inspect spkg. So today I was creating an ebuild
> > for quaddouble and looked at the config options
> > available
I agree with David -- I'd like to see separate classes for various
lattice-type structures, including:
- Symmetric bilinear lattices
- Skew-symmetric bilinear lattices
- Quadratic lattices
- Hermitian lattices
For me the main point of a lattice class would deal with the issue of
On Apr 29, 1:54 am, Francois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Apr 29, 11:33 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Francois,
> Hi Michael,
>
> The latest upstream release has the same default.
Ok.
>I try to get what upstream
> offers and I didn't see any archives of old release like the one used
Thanks. Do you guys think it might be wise to temporarily change the
banner to mention this. I had never heard of inotebook.
On Apr 28, 4:01 am, Dan Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 at 12:07AM -0700, Joshua Kantor wrote:
> > So I upgraded a linux machine to ubuntu 8.04. I
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:53 AM, mabshoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 22, 9:41 am, Robert Bradshaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > On Apr 21, 2008, at 11:34 AM, mabshoff wrote:
>
>
> > > The number of bundles in trac is rather small and most of those
> > > bundles either have rev
I'm not sure exactly what the speed differences are, but I think that
they are quite significant. When writing the partition counting code,
which uses quaddouble, I recall that things ran much slower if "sloppy"
multiplication and division were not enabled. (However, I have no hard
benchmarks to b
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Jonathan Bober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure exactly what the speed differences are, but I think that
> they are quite significant. When writing the partition counting code,
> which uses quaddouble, I recall that things ran much slower if "sloppy"
On Apr 29, 8:00 am, "William Stein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 10:47 PM, Jonathan Bober <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure exactly what the speed differences are, but I think that
> > they are quite significant. When writing the partition counting code,
> >
On Apr 28, 4:33 am, mabshoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
dortmund.de> wrote:
> For the record: I have reverted the patches after Nick suggested
> backing them out. We plan to release 3.0.1 soon, but we can revisit
> this in 3.0.2 ;)
Nick and Craig did discuss this in IRC last night and after some
semant
33 matches
Mail list logo
