I'm all failure all the time with pbuild on hardy 32 and 64 and gutsy 64
using pbuild.
a log from a 32 bit hardy failure is at:
http://tarbox.org/sage/hardy32.log.bz2
rebuilding now without pbuild... will let you know
-glenn
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 21:39 -0700, mabshoff wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
Consider the following Sage run, from Sage 3.0.3:
sage: x1 = PolynomialRing(ZZ, 'x').gen()
sage: x2 = PolynomialRing(ZZ, 'x', sparse=True).gen()
sage: (x1+x2).parent()
Univariate Polynomial Ring in x over Integer Ring
sage: (x2+x1).parent()
Univariate Polynomial Ring in x over Integer Ring
where
On Jun 26, 10:33 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > #3470: Tom Boothby: add pyprocessing (=multiproccessing) to sage
> > [Reviewed by Yi Qiang]
>
> Mike Hansen did most of the work on this, IIRC.
Thanks a lot, fixed in my notes. Anybody who is not properly credited
and knows about not properly as
> #3470: Tom Boothby: add pyprocessing (=multiproccessing) to sage
> [Reviewed by Yi Qiang]
Mike Hansen did most of the work on this, IIRC.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
Hello folks,
this is alpha1 and it contains a whole lot of notebook improvements by
Timothy, Cyclotomic field fixes by Craig, the new pyprocessing code,
various spkg updates and a whole lot more. It also has some small
fixes for modular symbol pickling, but there should be much more code
coming i
in response to my message:
Original Message
Subject: Re: Programming skills required by mathematicians?
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: rAgAv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Newsgroups: alt.math.undergrad,sci.math.num-analysis,sci.log
> This is definitely a bug since the docs explicitly say:
> "PolynomialRing(base_ring, name, sparse=False) returns a univariate
> polynomial ring; all other input formats return a multivariate
> polynomial ring." and name is by definition a string.
>
> To get a multivariate polynomial ring in 1 va
On Jun 26, 7:50 pm, mhampton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think having a "support" button that is linked to sage-support is an
> excellent idea.
yeahr well, some redesign won't hurt ;)
a possibility is also to include a link to the search page. it's very
easy to link to searches (append ?s=key
I have noticed some weird behavior on FF that might be the same
problem. I have a very large cell that I don't want to split up
because its all cython (I suppose that's a bad idea for other
reasons), and I am beginning to see some problems with that worksheet
- cells not formatted right, text not
I think having a "support" button that is linked to sage-support is an
excellent idea. Watching my students use Sage, all they ever see is
the notebook. If its not there, it doesn't exist for them. Most of
them don't even click on "help", they bug my TA or me about things.
Actually, the "help"
On Jun 26, 6:46 pm, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2) and 3) are good but miss my point - to make it one click from the
> notebook to (for instance) the sage-support/post page
Maybe, a link to an explanatory page like the "guidelines" with a link
to the post page is better...
> On the oth
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 9:44 AM, Joel B. Mohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I cannot figure out how to force sage to construct a ring as a multivariate
> ring with only a single generator. In the past, I used MPolynomialRing to
> force multi-variate implementation, but that is now depr
1) and 4) - agreed, absolutely.
2) and 3) are good but miss my point - to make it one click from the
notebook to (for instance) the sage-support/post page, where of course
you would have to acquire a login. But maybe it is already pretty
clear what to do from the notebook help functionality? I've
Hi,
I cannot figure out how to force sage to construct a ring as a multivariate
ring with only a single generator. In the past, I used MPolynomialRing to
force multi-variate implementation, but that is now deprecated.
Specifically, the output below really bugs me. I had code relying on featu
On Jun 26, 4:37 pm, kcrisman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> one could be sent to a form
> which automatically sends something to sage-support, or be sent to
> sage-support, or whatever.
+1, but some comments:
1) It is a must have to be able to contact the author of the report.
Often, the problem
Hi,
Here is an unsolicited idea which I am not capable of implementing but
which I think might be useful - or not. See what you think.
The FF-based browser Flock is undergoing a beta, and at
http://flock.com/node/62538
points out a "bug icon", which apparently you click on to get in their
bugz
Dear developers,
I would like to point you to an unresolved issue with displaying long
notebooks in firefox. It has been described on the support mailing
list at
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-support/browse_thread/thread/5bf18982afbbc1ba/1bf708d80ac67165?lnk=gst&q=firefox#1bf708d80ac67165
a
17 matches
Mail list logo
