On Jul 21, 8:53 pm, Carl Witty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
CUDA includes 2 programming languages (a C dialect and a low-level
assembly language), and a library to load programs into the graphics
card, send data back and forth, call the programs, etc. (There's also
a mode where you write your
On Jul 21, 2:08 pm, Jason Grout [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently most elements of QQbar are printed in interval notation:
[-2.0741620076681855 .. -2.0741620076681850] + [1.7722625415877633 ..
1.7722625415877638]*I
When dealing with lots of these, or when dealing with matrices and
vectors
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Martin Albrecht
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi William,
just a few nitpicks:
- Gruppenzugehörigkeit is probably a typical-typo leftover (?)
- In the three points explaining what Sage is more precisely you write that
we have new code ... that unifies
Hi William,
just a few nitpicks:
- Gruppenzugehörigkeit is probably a typical-typo leftover (?)
- In the three points explaining what Sage is more precisely you write that
we have new code ... that unifies leaving the impression that all/most of
our code is just interface stuff, i.e. the
Hi William,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 1:32 PM, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sage: class Foo(object):
: def trait_names(self):
: return ['a','b','c','d']
:
sage: a = Foo()
sage: a.
a.aa.ba.ca.da.trait_names
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Michael,
mabshoff wrote:
| Various people have started looking into this, but so far no one has
| produced code. One big issue (at least for me) with pycuda is the
| requirement for boost, but I am not sure how that could be overcome.
| [...]
|
Francesco Biscani a écrit :
With the non-header-only Boost libraries (such as Boost.Python), a
possible approach could be that of modifying the build system of a
package that uses them to compile and link the needed Boost libraries
together with the package's own library. I.e., add the
On Jul 22, 1:29 am, Thierry Dumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Francesco Biscani a écrit :
With the non-header-only Boost libraries (such as Boost.Python), a
possible approach could be that of modifying the build system of a
package that uses them to compile and link the needed Boost
On Jul 22, 10:38 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've posted a new version of my ISSAC talk to ...
hi, here are some ideas that come to my mind...
1. you talk about cython and python. that's ok, but you are only
talking about the solution to a problem without explaining the
Installed fine and passed sage -testall on amd64 hardy heron, phenom chip.
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:16 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello folks,
this is 3.0.6.rc0 which should be the last release before the ISSAC
2008 special 3.0.6 release for Wednesday. We fixed a bunch of issues
Hello,
upon compiling of sage 3.0.5 I got this error:
##
periods.cc: In member function `void ldash1::init(const level*, const
std::vectorlong int, std::allocatorlong int , long int, const
rational)':
periods.cc:593: error: call of overloaded `log(int)'
Here is part of install.log (I have set over more or less
sensitive, or boring information):
make[1]: Entering directory `XX/sage-3.0.5/spkg'
base/dir-0.1-install
../data/
../local/
../local/etc
../local/lib
../local/bin
../local/include
../tmp/
XX/spkg/build
installed/
Harald Schilly wrote:
On Jul 22, 10:38 am, William Stein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I've posted a new version of my ISSAC talk to ...
hi, here are some ideas that come to my mind...
1. you talk about cython and python. that's ok, but you are only
talking about the solution to a
You might like to see the question on this forum, my reply and now the
reply from the original poster.
http://www.karakas-online.de/forum/viewtopic.php?p=33950#33950
At this moment, and I know these things change, typing free
mathematiica into Google gives this as the #1 page.
Dave
You might like to see the question on this forum from 'mud'
http://www.karakas-online.de/forum/viewtopic.php?p=3395
my reply (on second page) and now a comment from 'Chris Karakas
(chris)
At this moment, (and I know these things change), typing free
mathematica into Google gives this as the #1
On Jul 22, 11:17 am, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I just wanted to share why Sage is (or will be soon) useful for me.
1) I have a program that I do for my master thesis, it's some finite
elements method + electronic structure calculations and my boss gave
me access to some
On Jul 21, 6:18 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Quick and very dirty : 'find . -cmin -5' (files modified less than 5
minutes ago).
Not even close :). There are packages that install in less than 10
seconds.
That one was a joke, of course. I have used it
On Jul 22, 6:07 am, karakas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Here is part of install.log (I have set over more or less
sensitive, or boring information):
GCC Version
gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i586-suse-linux/3.3.5/specs
Configured with: ../configure
On Jul 21, 7:44 pm, Timothy G Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Tim,
I figured I'd give everyone an update on how things are going with the
Sage packages. I believe (but am not certain) that all of the Sage
dependencies that I want to get into Lenny will make it, though I'm still
waiting
Hi,
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 08:44:22 +0200
Martin Albrecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- In the three points explaining what Sage is more precisely you write that
we have new code ... that unifies leaving the impression that all/most of
our code is just interface stuff, i.e. the new
On Jul 22, 7:33 am, Dr. David Kirkby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Jul 22, 11:17 am, Ondrej Certik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Hi Ondrej,
I just wanted to share why Sage is (or will be soon) useful for me.
1) I have a program that I do for my master thesis, it's some finite
elements
On Jul 22, 8:12 am, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 22, 6:07 am, karakas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Here is part of install.log (I have set over more or less
sensitive, or boring information):
GCC Version
gcc -v
Reading specs from
On Jun 9, 2008, at 10:36 PM, mabshoff wrote:
Okay, I can confirm that with sage 3.0.1, sage -gp has the same speed
as my standalone GP build. So mostly likely the change to GMP 4.2.2
introduced a speed regression (probably the core 2 patches not being
applied properly).
Ok, I will
Speaking of Matlab, I was able to get version r2008a (most recent
version) working in a linux-2.6 zone using the CentOS 5 distribution.
I then installed RPyC 3.00 RC1 ( http://rpyc.wikispaces.com/ ) in both
the lx zone's copy of sage and in the native solaris sage
installation. I started up the
Thank you very much for the clear and fast answer. Since upgrading gcc
will probably mean an upgrading of glibc too, which will mean a
recompilation/upgrade of the whole system, I guess it is better to
postpone compilation until I finish my migration from SuSE to Gentoo
(which is going to take a
On Jul 22, 4:44 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, there is a vast people using Windows out there either by choice
or because they don't know about alternatives.
True, but I suspect the first year students under discussion should be
aware of other systems such as Linux. They would
On Jul 22, 2008, at 12:35 PM, David Harvey wrote:
Okay, I can confirm that with sage 3.0.1, sage -gp has the same
speed
as my standalone GP build. So mostly likely the change to GMP 4.2.2
introduced a speed regression (probably the core 2 patches not being
applied properly).
Ok, I will
Well, there is a vast people using Windows out there either by choice
or because they don't know about alternatives.
True, but I suspect the first year students under discussion should be
aware of other systems such as Linux. They would have the choice to
use Linux if they wanted. I can't
On Tue, 22 Jul 2008, mabshoff wrote:
On Jul 21, 7:44 pm, Timothy G Abbott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Sage 3.0.4 or 3.0.5 built with polybori 0.5rc fails to find
m4ri_build_all_codes and m4ri_destroy_all_codes. This is discussed in
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/3264.
Because
On Jul 22, 11:48 am, David Harvey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 22, 2008, at 12:35 PM, David Harvey wrote:
SNIP
This seems to have been fixed already in 3.0.5. Sorry for the noise.
david
Hi David,
we reverted to the old gmp 4.2.1 spkg in 3.0.5 since the only reason
to upgrade was to
On Jul 22, 2:55 pm, Simon Beaumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
I decided to have a play with the pycuda-0.90.2 kit for which I needed
boost_1_35_0
Mhh, is 1.35.0 mandatory? We might have to upgrade boost in PolyBoRi
then.
- the main caveat is to make sure boost is using the sage
On Jul 22, 10:17 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brandon
Speaking of Matlab, I was able to get version r2008a (most recent
version) working in a linux-2.6 zone using the CentOS 5 distribution.
I then installed RPyC 3.00 RC1 (http://rpyc.wikispaces.com/)
Interesting, I had
I decided to have a play with the pycuda-0.90.2 kit for which I needed
boost_1_35_0 - the main caveat is to make sure boost is using the sage
python include, lib and executable rather than any system installed
python. Similarly configure pycuda. My sage server runs as user sage -
so I had to run
On Jul 22, 11:18 pm, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 22, 2:55 pm, Simon Beaumont [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Simon,
I decided to have a play with the pycuda-0.90.2 kit for which I needed
boost_1_35_0
Mhh, is 1.35.0 mandatory? We might have to upgrade boost in PolyBoRi
then.
34 matches
Mail list logo
