On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
Martin Albrecht wrote:
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Ronan Paixão wrote:
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There are no talks from
2008/11/5 Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Martin,
Martin Albrecht wrote:
http://nguyenminh2.googlepages.com/sage_numtheory-crypto.pdf
This is a short tutorial on using Sage to study elementary number
theory and the RSA public key cryptosystem. By short, I mean at most
10 pages. If
Hi,
sorry for taking this off-list earlier.
1) Modern cryptography uses many fundamental concepts from number
theory
I think the precise statement would be that public key cryptography uses
many fundamental concepts from number theory. Most of symmetric
cryptography is not based on
I have now placed MAF on my website. You can find it at
www.alunw.freeuk.com/MAF/download.html
As yet there is no licence of any kind with any of the downloads,
though the download page does state my intention to publish the
program under the terms of the GPL.
I shall try to update the download
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 18:03 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Ronan Paixão [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Em Qua, 2008-11-05 às 12:07 +1100, Minh Nguyen escreveu:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:17 AM, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Harald,
On Tue,
Martin Albrecht wrote:
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
Martin Albrecht wrote:
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Ronan Paixão wrote:
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Ronan Paixão
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
There are no
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
Martin Albrecht wrote:
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Jason Grout wrote:
Martin Albrecht wrote:
On Wednesday 05 November 2008, Ronan Paixão wrote:
Em Ter, 2008-11-04 às 17:44 -0800, William Stein escreveu:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:46
Martin Albrecht wrote:
I suppose my preferred copyright statement is something like this: I don't
care what you do with these slides and I happily provide TeX sources. You
might violate someone's copyright though, but that is your problem. Don't
get me wrong: You are of course right and
Hi folks,
Here it is, the latest version of a Sage tutorial in number theory and
crypto:
http://nguyenminh2.googlepages.com/sage_numtheory-crypto-v3.pdf
This version incorporates suggestions from John, Martin and William, and
they are duly acknowledged in the document itself. Please remind me
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi folks,
Here it is, the latest version of a Sage tutorial in number theory and
crypto:
http://nguyenminh2.googlepages.com/sage_numtheory-crypto-v3.pdf
This version incorporates suggestions from John, Martin and William, and
they are duly acknowledged in the
Jason,
Does anyone know if it is assumed that if the _pos dictionary in a graph
is not None, then it contains each vertex as a key? It seems like it is
assumed several places in the code (e.g., in the subgraph() function).
However, _pos isn't updated properly (e.g., in the delete_vertex
On Nov 5, 3:45 pm, Minh Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here it is, the latest version of a Sage tutorial in number theory and
crypto:
http://nguyenminh2.googlepages.com/sage_numtheory-crypto-v3.pdf
wow, looks really good and is nearly exactly what i originally
expected.
It's now linked from
Robert Miller wrote:
Jason,
Does anyone know if it is assumed that if the _pos dictionary in a graph
is not None, then it contains each vertex as a key? It seems like it is
assumed several places in the code (e.g., in the subgraph() function).
However, _pos isn't updated properly (e.g.,
Should we consider creating our own Sage documentation license?
As was pointed out, public domain not only doesn't exist in some
countries, it also isn't a license technically speaking.
I am personally happy with the GFDL 1.3, but some might find it
a bit of overkill.
Comments? Unless people
On Nov 5, 9:23 am, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we consider creating our own Sage documentation license?\
-1 - the will only cause more license proliferation.
As was pointed out, public domain not only doesn't exist in some
countries, it also isn't a license technically
On Nov 5, 2008, at 9:23 AM, David Joyner wrote:
Should we consider creating our own Sage documentation license?
As was pointed out, public domain not only doesn't exist in some
countries, it also isn't a license technically speaking.
Much of the headache in choosing a license is that there
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:42 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 5, 9:23 am, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we consider creating our own Sage documentation license?\
-1 - the will only cause more license proliferation.
As was pointed out, public domain not only
Robert Miller wrote:
Jason,
Does anyone know if it is assumed that if the _pos dictionary in a graph
is not None, then it contains each vertex as a key? It seems like it is
assumed several places in the code (e.g., in the subgraph() function).
However, _pos isn't updated properly (e.g.,
Em Qua, 2008-11-05 às 13:23 -0400, David Joyner escreveu:
Should we consider creating our own Sage documentation license?
As was pointed out, public domain not only doesn't exist in some
countries, it also isn't a license technically speaking.
Just now I noticed on the CC page that in Brazil
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 10:43 AM, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I went through 5 passes, and sage -testall kept locking up at various
places, so I rebuilt
Sage. I also tested to see if the tarball was coorupted but it seems
the download went okay.
After the rebuild, the same lockup
On Nov 5, 10:23 am, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am personally happy with the GFDL 1.3, but some might find it
a bit of overkill.
FWIW for Maxima I have pressed for new documents to be
licensed under GPL. Having the same license for documents
and code means stuff can be freely
Hello folks,
here goes 3.2.alpha3 - somewhat later than planned. Hopefully we
fixed all numerical doctest noise from #788 (I even reverted a small
number of changes) and otherwise merged a couple other nice patches.
If this release builds and doctests fine it will likely become
3.2.final in
While we are discussing licenses, I thought I would point out that the
Sage wiki very prominently says By making an explicit contribution to
the Sage wiki (or the Sage documentation), one certifies that one's
contribution is licensed under the Creative Commons 3.0 license.
(I don't know about
To quote U.S. copyright law, section 107:
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use
of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or
phonorecords, or by any other means specified by that section, for
purposes such as criticism, comment,
On Nov 5, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Ronan Paixão wrote:
Em Qua, 2008-11-05 às 13:23 -0400, David Joyner escreveu:
Should we consider creating our own Sage documentation license?
As was pointed out, public domain not only doesn't exist in some
countries, it also isn't a license technically speaking.
On Nov 5, 2008, at 10:28 AM, David Joyner wrote:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 12:42 PM, mabshoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Nov 5, 9:23 am, David Joyner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should we consider creating our own Sage documentation license?\
-1 - the will only cause more license
William Stein wrote:
Would you consider this weird if you read it in a paper, or
would you know how to interpret it?
Let $f = x^3 + x + 1$ and consider $f(10)$.
I'm not so sure I know what to do with that.
I'm pretty sure I want (x^3 + x + 1)(10) to be (x^3)(10) +
x(10) + 1(10). (If the
On 5-Nov-08, at 8:55 PM, Robert Dodier wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Would you consider this weird if you read it in a paper, or
would you know how to interpret it?
Let $f = x^3 + x + 1$ and consider $f(10)$.
I'm not so sure I know what to do with that.
I find this bizarre. I am
In the spirit of release early I've added my (incomplete) notes on
graph theory commands to the Documentation Project wiki. These are
designed for a first-time student of the subject and are being
developed as I teach such a course this semester. So they should see
frequent updates for the next
29 matches
Mail list logo
