On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:57 AM, Dan Drakedr...@kaist.edu wrote:
I was looking through the tasks on the trac server, and noticed #6056:
the HISTORY.txt is now very outdated. Also, nothing has been sent to
sage-announce since February.
While searching around, I found that the release tours on
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 6:59 AM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:16 PM, David Joynerwdjoy...@gmail.com
wrote:
Excellent!
Once/if you get Sage
On Jun 16, 2:15 am, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15-Jun-09, at 4:22 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
Someone didn't format their reST correctly, so building the reference
manual now produces warnings/errors.
Has the reference manual ever built correctly? (I always get tons
2009/6/16 davidloeffler dave.loeff...@gmail.com:
On Jun 16, 2:15 am, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15-Jun-09, at 4:22 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
Someone didn't format their reST correctly, so building the reference
manual now produces warnings/errors.
Has the
Hi David,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:57 PM, davidloefflerdave.loeff...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
I actually got an error (rather than a warning) from the docstring for
elliptic curve period lattices -- a typo, \signa, had confused
LaTeX.
This has been fixed at #6297. It has positive review,
Hi Dan,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Dan Drakedr...@kaist.edu wrote:
I was looking through the tasks on the trac server, and noticed #6056:
the HISTORY.txt is now very outdated. Also, nothing has been sent to
sage-announce since February.
I've tried sending release announcements to
I notice that you still have libm4ri-20090512.spkg in this version,
rather than malb's updated libm4ri-20090615.spkg. Is this deliberate?
The former failed to build for lots of people (including me).
David
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email
You can't run Sage on the Google Ap Engine.
Couldn't you have a Google App Engine application call the simple http
api to make some public notebook somewhere perform calculations? I'm
thinking of something like the remote sagetex that Dan announced the
other day. I'm not sure if
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dan,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Dan Drakedr...@kaist.edu wrote:
I was looking through the tasks on the trac server, and noticed #6056:
the HISTORY.txt is now very outdated. Also, nothing has been sent to
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:28 PM, davidloefflerdave.loeff...@gmail.com wrote:
I notice that you still have libm4ri-20090512.spkg in this version,
rather than malb's updated libm4ri-20090615.spkg. Is this deliberate?
No, it is not deliberate. There is now an rc2 with this fixed an some other
Wow, that's a fast release cycle :-)
On Jun 16, 12:34 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:28 PM, davidloefflerdave.loeff...@gmail.com
wrote:
I notice that you still have libm4ri-20090512.spkg in this version,
rather than malb's updated
2009/6/16 davidloeffler dave.loeff...@gmail.com:
Wow, that's a fast release cycle :-)
On Jun 16, 12:34 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:28 PM, davidloefflerdave.loeff...@gmail.com
wrote:
I notice that you still have libm4ri-20090512.spkg in this
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:11 PM, John Cremonajohn.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/16 davidloeffler dave.loeff...@gmail.com:
Wow, that's a fast release cycle :-)
On Jun 16, 12:34 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:28 PM, davidloefflerdave.loeff...@gmail.com
2009/6/16 davidloeffler dave.loeff...@gmail.com:
Wow, that's a fast release cycle :-)
That's what happens when you have a tag team.
As soon as somebody volunteers to be release manager for Sage-4.0.3,
or we could start that release cycle. (See the sage-release post I
made earlier today.)
2009/6/16 William Stein wst...@gmail.com:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:11 PM, John Cremonajohn.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/16 davidloeffler dave.loeff...@gmail.com:
Wow, that's a fast release cycle :-)
On Jun 16, 12:34 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at
One of the remaining failures in rc1 was fixed by the patch at #6303
which does not seem to have been merged yet (Craig Citro and I fixed
it earlier today). If that is right, there may still be failures with
rc2, but we were a bit confused about whether the second patch there
was necessary or
William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:28 PM, davidloefflerdave.loeff...@gmail.com
wrote:
I notice that you still have libm4ri-20090512.spkg in this version,
rather than malb's updated libm4ri-20090615.spkg. Is this deliberate?
No, it is not deliberate. There is now an rc2 with
+1 for including this function... I had made the same one, but mine is
actually 5 times slower than the one proposed in trac 6245 :P
Is it possible to not name it hadamard_product? Coming from MatLab,
I've used it hundreds of time, but I would have never recognized that
hadamard_product could be
4.0.2.rc1 installed fine (updating from 4.0.2.rc0) but had exactly one failure
in sage -testall on a 10.4 intel macbook:
zeus:~/sagefiles/sage-4.0.2.rc0 davidjoyner$ ./sage -t
devel/sage/sage/rings/number_field/number_field_element.pyx
sage -t
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Jaap Spiesj.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:28 PM, davidloefflerdave.loeff...@gmail.com
wrote:
I notice that you still have libm4ri-20090512.spkg in this version,
rather than malb's updated libm4ri-20090615.spkg. Is
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Alex Clemeshacleme...@gmail.com wrote:
You can't run Sage on the Google Ap Engine.
Couldn't you have a Google App Engine application call the simple http
api to make some public notebook somewhere perform calculations? I'm
thinking of something like
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I've created sage-4.0.2.rc1 which is here:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/release/4.0.2/rc1/sage-4.0.2.rc1/dist/sage-4.0.2.rc1.tar
You can upgrade by doing
sage -upgrade
Both David Joyner's and Jaap's test failures are the ones Craig and I
fixed earlier today at #6303, so that should go away when the second
patch there is merged. People might want to try applying it
themselves.
John
2009/6/16 Jaap Spies j.sp...@hccnet.nl:
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I've
On rc2 64-bit I get one failure:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/banner.py
Here's the detail:
**
File /home/jec/sage-4.0.2.rc2/devel/sage/sage/misc/banner.py, line 125:
sage: print Sage major version is %s %
Hi,
On sage.math, I installed sage-4.0.2.alpha3, then installed all
optional spkg's into it. All official optional spkg's do install fine
on sage.math. Also, on sage.math, all reasonable optional commercial
math software is also installed (I even have a legal magma in my home
directory). I
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
On sage.math, I installed sage-4.0.2.alpha3, then installed all
optional spkg's into it. All official optional spkg's do install fine
on sage.math. Also, on sage.math, all reasonable optional commercial
math software is also installed (I even have a legal magma
Hi,
Is there any way to get a copy of mupad on sage.math. There is a Sage
-- Mupad interface,
but mupad isn't on sage.math, so it is impossible to test. Any code
that I can't possibly test,
I will eventually remove from Sage so that I can make all tests pass,
even with the --optional
option.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
On sage.math, I installed sage-4.0.2.alpha3, then installed all
optional spkg's into it. All official optional spkg's do install fine
on sage.math. Also, on sage.math, all reasonable
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:03 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:59 PM, Jason Groutjason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
On sage.math, I installed sage-4.0.2.alpha3, then installed all
optional spkg's into it. All official optional
William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
The fix suggested by Clint to allow ATLAS to build (namely making
GuessSmallNB return 28) does indeed allow ATLAS to build.
I could crate a patch file for that, which is only applied on
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
The fix suggested by Clint to allow ATLAS to build (namely making
GuessSmallNB return 28) does indeed allow
I'm working on a very fast implementation of the
Nelder-Mead algorithm for optimizing functions.
This is a particularly good algorithm if the
function is noisy, or is not smooth.
Is it in SAGE already? If not, I'd be happy to
release my code to SAGE under the whatever license
once it is
hello all,
i'm just giving a try to the binaries found on the website and it
doesn't work:
nemo-henry% /local/apps/sage-3.4.2-i86pc-SunOS+toolchain/sage
--
| Sage Version 3.4.2, Release Date: 2009-05-04 |
|
There is a simplex method implemented in scipy.optimize, I think its
the default for the function fmin (see
http://docs.scipy.org/doc/scipy/reference/tutorial/optimize.html
for instance).
On the other hand, the scipy functions are very float-oriented, so if
your implementation could handle more
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:11 PM, John Cremonajohn.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm testing this now. It seems that putting ... into the expected
output does not work when it is at the beginiing of the output, which
is annoying.
Can you tell me how to uninstall a spkg? Now that I have installed
Hi Dan,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 12:57 PM, Dan Drakedr...@kaist.edu wrote:
SNIP
While searching around, I found that the release tours on the wiki
sometimes link to a nonexistent release note: in
http://wiki.sagemath.org/sage-3.4.2 the link to
Hi Sage-Devel,
Should we be using twitter for something?
William
--
William Stein
Associate Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:30 PM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Golam Mortuza
Hossaingmhoss...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Jun 14, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Burcin Erocalbur...@erocal.org wrote:
There were long discussion about the typesetting of partial
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:31 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sage-Devel,
Should we be using twitter for something?
I'm not sure if that will catch on. I've created the Sage Math
LinkedIn group a few weeks ago
http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=2010654
So far there's only 11
sage: version()
'Sage Version 4.0.1, Release Date: 2009-06-06'
sage: var('a d')
(a, d)
sage: A = matrix([[a,0],[1,d]])
sage: A.eigenvalues()
[d, a]
sage: A.jordan_form()
---
RuntimeError Traceback
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:31 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sage-Devel,
Should we be using twitter for something?
I'm not sure if that will catch on. I've created the Sage Math
LinkedIn group a few
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Henryk
Trappmannbo198...@googlemail.com wrote:
sage: version()
'Sage Version 4.0.1, Release Date: 2009-06-06'
sage: var('a d')
(a, d)
sage: A = matrix([[a,0],[1,d]])
sage: A.eigenvalues()
[d, a]
sage: A.jordan_form()
The file HISTORY.txt has been updated with releases up to and
including Sage 4.0.1. It has been uploaded to the Sage website, and is
available at
http://www.sagemath.org/src/announce/HISTORY.txt
About time that happened, though it was a bear to do, I'm sure - great
work, Minh!
By the
So the conclusion is that we will go with the Mathematica style notation.
Does that also apply to Golam's earlier comment
(a) If we all agree that there is no ambiguity when the particular
argument is a symbolic variable or symbolic function then
we should typeset them as
Tristram Scott wrote:
Hi Dave,
I might be interested in working on this, but only if there is a chance
that it will be possible to get it to compile using the SunStudio
compilers. I see that at the moment the only work being done is under gcc.
Anyway, I have sun hardware, ranging from
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 05:14:43PM +0200, William Stein wrote:
Is there any way to get a copy of mupad on sage.math. There is a Sage
-- Mupad interface,
but mupad isn't on sage.math, so it is impossible to test. Any code
that I can't possibly test,
I will eventually remove from Sage so
On 16-Jun-09, at 7:27 AM, John Cremona wrote:
On rc2 64-bit I get one failure:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/banner.py
Just a guess: sage -sdist was tagged with sage-4.0.2.rc2 instead of
just 4.0.2.rc2.
Nick
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group,
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 12:19:49PM -0700, Rob Beezer wrote:
On Jun 15, 3:03 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Just out of curiosity what computes the layout of the graph? Does
Sage give the vertex positions, then tikz takes care of the *text
labels* and edge positions? Or can
Hi kcrisman,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 3:12 AM, kcrismankcris...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
By the way, the release notes for 3.0.3 never happened, but they do
exist (somewhere) on sage-devel if you go through them enough (as I
had to once), so if you are looking for something to occupy a half-
The release note for Sage 3.0.3 is already up at
http://www.sagemath.org/src/announce/sage-3.0.3.txt
Michael Abshoff also copied it to sage-announce at:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-announce/browse_thread/thread/853...
Like I said, I saw it before... but it's not included in
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:22 PM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Tristram Scott wrote:
Hi Dave,
I might be interested in working on this, but only if there is a chance
that it will be possible to get it to compile using the SunStudio
compilers. I see that at the moment the
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:20 PM, kcrismankcris...@gmail.com wrote:
So the conclusion is that we will go with the Mathematica style notation.
Does that also apply to Golam's earlier comment
(a) If we all agree that there is no ambiguity when the particular
argument is a symbolic
I noticed someone installed 'hg' yesterday on t2.
Is this to be expected?
kir...@t2:[~] $ hg
abort: couldn't find mercurial libraries in [/usr/local/bin
/usr/lib/python24.zip /usr/lib/python2.4 /usr/lib/python2.4/plat-sunos5
/usr/lib/python2.4/lib-tk /usr/lib/python2.4/lib-dynload
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I noticed someone installed 'hg' yesterday on t2.
Cool. I have no idea who did that yesterday. I kind of thought I did
that a few months ago.
Is this to be expected?
No.
kir...@t2:[~] $ hg
abort: couldn't
John Cremona wrote:
On rc2 64-bit I get one failure:
sage -t devel/sage/sage/misc/banner.py
Same here on Fedora 10, 32 bit
Jaap
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send
Hi kcrisman,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:07 AM, kcrismankcris...@gmail.com wrote:
The release note for Sage 3.0.3 is already up at
http://www.sagemath.org/src/announce/sage-3.0.3.txt
Michael Abshoff also copied it to sage-announce at:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 6:49 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 2:31 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Sage-Devel,
Should we be using twitter for something?
I'm not sure if that will catch on. I've created the Sage Math
LinkedIn group a few
No, it is not deliberate. There is now an rc2 with this fixed an some other
things fixed:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/farm/src/sage-4.0.2.rc2.tar
Craig just made the above, by the way.
Actually, this isn't going to be the final rc2 -- I had added a
handful of fixes, and
Recently, I've been doing multi-day computations with the notebook,
and I've been annoyed about the very poor support for such a thing.
One of my biggest gripes is that we don't have an easy-to-use progress
meter. Perhaps one could make a twitter account for their notebook,
and subscribe to the
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Tom Boothbytomas.boot...@gmail.com wrote:
Recently, I've been doing multi-day computations with the notebook,
and I've been annoyed about the very poor support for such a thing.
One of my biggest gripes is that we don't have an easy-to-use progress
meter.
On 16-Jun-09, at 11:57 AM, Tom Boothby wrote:
Recently, I've been doing multi-day computations with the notebook,
and I've been annoyed about the very poor support for such a thing.
One of my biggest gripes is that we don't have an easy-to-use progress
meter. Perhaps one could make a
I attempted to last night, and it (as you can tell) went badly. I
intended to fix it this morning.
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:21 AM, William Steinwst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 8:18 PM, Dr. David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I noticed someone installed 'hg'
As Nick noted, I accidentally did sage -sdist sage-... instead of just
using the version number at the end; for anyone working on a release
in the future, just a tip -- that doesn't work too well. ;)
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6338
Nick
I'm on Ubuntu-8.04 on an i386 Macbook using KDE. Kernel is 2.6.24-21-
server.
The install log is 45 megs, so here's just the last stage where it
failed:
STAGE 2-4-5: GEMV TUNE
make -f Makefile INSTALL_LOG/cMVRES pre=c 21 | ./xatlas_tee
INSTALL_LOG/cMVTUNE.LOG
make[3]: *** [build] Error 255
Hi sage-devel,
usually I use
export MAKE='make -j2'
and then MAKE to build Sage versions on my MacIntel Core2Duo. For Sage
4.0.2.rc0 I noticed the following problem, which does not seem to be
related to the specific Sage version. First I had a strange doctest
failure not reported by anybody
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:23 AM, bparkisbpar...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm on Ubuntu-8.04 on an i386 Macbook using KDE. Kernel is 2.6.24-21-
server.
The install log is 45 megs, so here's just the last stage where it
failed:
STAGE 2-4-5: GEMV TUNE
make -f Makefile INSTALL_LOG/cMVRES
It seems that when I rest-ify a module using Sage, it alphabetizes the
functions under a class, and the classes and functions within the
module, even if I've ordered the functions more logically than
alphabetical. Is there a way to turn this off?
2009/6/16 Robert Miller rlmills...@gmail.com:
It seems that when I rest-ify a module using Sage, it alphabetizes the
functions under a class, and the classes and functions within the
module, even if I've ordered the functions more logically than
alphabetical. Is there a way to turn this off?
On Jun 16, 4:15 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:23 AM, bparkisbpar...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm on Ubuntu-8.04 on an i386 Macbook using KDE. Kernel is 2.6.24-21-
server.
The install log is 45 megs, so here's just the last stage where it
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:39 PM, John Cremonajohn.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/16 Robert Miller rlmills...@gmail.com:
It seems that when I rest-ify a module using Sage, it alphabetizes the
functions under a class, and the classes and functions within the
module, even if I've ordered the
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 6:36 AM, bparkisbpar...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
This looks to me like your system was overloaded or something (just a
guess). But can you give some information about your hardware, like
CPU speed, etc.
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
Intel core duo, dual core 1.83
Something I have asked on this list more than once, without ever
getting an answer!
Mike Hansen, ahem? ;-)
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
Minh Nguyen wrote:
This looks to me like your system was overloaded or something (just a
guess). But can you give some information about your hardware, like
CPU speed, etc.
Would it not be sensible for Sage to at least give an option of
continuing if ATLAS can't be optimized? The fact is,
On Jun 16, 4:56 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Do you also get the same/similar errors if you build Sage 4.0.1 from
source? It looks like you were trying to build version 3.4.
--
Regards
Minh Van Nguyen
I downloaded 3.4 because it was the most recent source version from
the
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Alex Clemeshacleme...@gmail.com wrote:
You can't run Sage on the Google Ap Engine.
Couldn't you have a Google App Engine application call the simple
http
api to make some
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 3:27 PM, Dorian Raymerdeldo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 5:54 AM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
[...]
Thanks for thorough explanations.
I have a question --- why don't you run the frontend on the app engine
as well? That way, you don't need
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Robert Millerrlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
Something I have asked on this list more than once, without ever
getting an answer!
Mike Hansen, ahem? ;-)
Sphinx does this by introspection so it needs to come up with some
order on the methods. If you want
Also, there are probably lots of modules and classes where an
alphabetical listing is way better than the one they are in in the
code since the alphabetical is at least consistent and predictable.
I think that alphabetical is probably the simplest option. This
suggests that module level
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Nick Alexanderncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
Also, there are probably lots of modules and classes where an
alphabetical listing is way better than the one they are in in the
code since the alphabetical is at least consistent and predictable.
I think that
Hi,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:20 PM, kcrismankcris...@gmail.com wrote:
So the conclusion is that we will go with the Mathematica style notation.
Does that also apply to Golam's earlier comment
(a) If we all agree that there is no ambiguity when the particular
argument is a
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 at 12:06PM -0700, Tom Boothby wrote:
I attempted to last night, and it (as you can tell) went badly. I
intended to fix it this morning.
I noticed this problem and described a solution at [1], but of course
trac tickets are a bad place for system administration discussion.
Hi,
I ran across this example of doing 3D using processing.js:
http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/3d
although it also uses web2py. I thought it was interesting
given the various problems with jmol at times.
Cheers,
Tim.
---
Tim Lahey
PhD Candidate, Systems Design Engineering
University of Waterloo
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Tim Laheytim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I ran across this example of doing 3D using processing.js:
http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/3d
although it also uses web2py. I thought it was interesting
given the various problems with jmol at times.
Wow, this is
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:32 PM, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Tim Laheytim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I ran across this example of doing 3D using processing.js:
http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/3d
although it also uses web2py. I thought it was
On Jun 17, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Tim Laheytim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I ran across this example of doing 3D using processing.js:
http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/3d
although it also uses web2py. I thought it was interesting
given the
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 10:49 PM, Tim Laheytim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2009, at 12:32 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Tim Laheytim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I ran across this example of doing 3D using processing.js:
http://mdp.cti.depaul.edu/3d
On Jun 17, 2009, at 1:14 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
Surprisingly enough, Firefox 3.5 does worse thatn Firefox 3.0 on my
Ubuntu Jaunty (it is about the same choppy and it reacts in weird way
on the mouse). I am having some development version of Firefox 3.5, so
it may improve in the future.
Cool, its a 3d engine written from scratch in js (as the author says
it has nothing to do with web2py). It runs fine on my firefox 3.5b4 in
ubuntu jaunty. However, o3d uses hardware acceleration while
processing.js (which only a bit more than a parser from java-js)
doesn't so I expect it can't
88 matches
Mail list logo
