Alright, it was a struggle debugging javascript (i feel sorry for the
people that have to code in it for a living), but finally I am done
with the hook between the graph editor and sage notebook. Here is the
first prototype:
1) get http://www.math.uiuc.edu/~rkirov2/sage/graph_editor.zip
2)
On 2-Jul-09, at 13:29 , Robert Miller wrote:
Source tarball:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/
sage-4.1.alpha3.tar
Sage-4.1.alpha3 built OK on 32 bit ubuntu 9.04 on an Atom N270.
Other than two tests which timed out, the following tests failed:
sage -t -long
This is now #6462.
(I have played with it a bit myself, and I can get pickling and
unpickling to work, by defining a __reduce__ function for orders, and
adjusting the __reduce__ function for number field elements; but now
the standard x == loads(dumps(x)) test doesn't seem to work.)
David
On
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 1:25 PM, davidloefflerdave.loeff...@gmail.com wrote:
This is now #6462.
(I have played with it a bit myself, and I can get pickling and
unpickling to work, by defining a __reduce__ function for orders, and
adjusting the __reduce__ function for number field elements;
On 4-Jul-09, at 07:27 , Kevin Horton wrote:
On 2-Jul-09, at 13:29 , Robert Miller wrote:
Source tarball:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/
sage-4.1.alpha3.tar
Sage-4.1.alpha3 built OK on 32 bit ubuntu 9.04 on an Atom N270.
Other than two tests which timed out, the
Same here... today I upgraded and had to set to image fonts explicitly
in jsmath options
On 2 Lip, 10:03, Peter Jeremy peterjer...@optushome.com.au wrote:
On 2009-Jul-01 01:21:56 -0700, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com
wrote:
Is anyone else seeing the fonts in jsmath in firefox 3.5
It is indeed a bit strange that OrderElement derives from
FieldElement. But my diagnosis was different: Parent classes that have
attributes which are Elements cause problems for the default Python
unpickler.
For instance, if X is an AbsoluteOrder, then loads(dumps(X)) works and
equals X, *as
Hmmm Could this kind of behaviour come fro the sole fact that I do
not use a good version of some software ?
sage: setup()
---
SystemExitTraceback (most recent call
last)
Hello.
I use Sagemath to show the Linear Algebra problems solution.
And I am Korean.
Therefore I write the comments in Korean using p or div html tag in
worksheet like this.
http://nosyu.pe.kr/attach/1/5682987737.png
If I want to modify the sentence, I just double click the sentence.
Then
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
Currently the way to do numerics in Sage is to import scipy and numpy
(because they really have created a good stack), and turn off
preparsing (because those type issues get really annoying). At this
point, it may become unclear why
Patch is now up at: http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6462
David
On Jul 4, 2:14 pm, davidloeffler dave.loeff...@gmail.com wrote:
It is indeed a bit strange that OrderElement derives from
FieldElement. But my diagnosis was different: Parent classes that have
attributes which are
Dag Sverre Seljebotn wrote:
1) I must be able to use NumPy together with the preparser (it's just
too much hassle to turn it on and off, and it kind of defeats the
purpose.). That is, with the preparser on, I should be able to run most
NumPy-using code without changes. (I don't think is
Rado,
Excellent!!! This is really, really nice and a *huge* step forward.
This looks usable in its current state, even though I know there's
lots more to think about with regards to plugging it in properly. And
I'll be interested to see what Pat LeSmithe could add. Thanks for
your hard work
The following off-list exchange between Rob and Rado preceded Rado's
first post to this thread. I apologize for mis-paraphrasing Rado's
remarks, Rob's response to which Rado has, in some respects, already
replied.
Rob Beezer wrote:
Radoslav Kirov wrote:
[about an editor window that
It's possible to dismiss the result of the survey because of the low
participation level, or to dismiss the results because of a hypothesis
that the respondents already KNOW Sage and want to know something
else.
But I suspect that there is also an underlying current of simple lack
of interest in
Hello
There is a better solution.
Thanks to introduce the ticket.^^
On Jul 5, 3:30 am, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 11:55 PM, NoSyudon...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello.
I use Sagemath to show the Linear Algebra problems solution.
And I am Korean.
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 4, 2009 at 11:55 PM, NoSyudon...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
So I find the python code and modify it.
sageroot/devel/sage/sage/server/notebook/cell.py:211
211 : /script%(self.__id,self.__id,self.__text)
=
211 : /script%(self.__id,self.__id,((self.__text).decode
Hello.
I use Sagemath to show the Linear Algebra problems solution.
And I am Korean.
Therefore I write the title in Korean.
http://nosyu.pe.kr/attach/1/5682987737.png
But in worksheet, the title is broken because of truncated_name
function in worksheet.py.
def truncated_name(self,
Source tarball, sage.math binary, and upgrade URL are, respectively:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0.tar
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/rlmill/release/sage-4.1.rc0-sage.math-only-x86_64-Linux.tar.gz
Hello all,
This is my first time in sage-devel. I have a project with a
professor til the end of August to construct cocompact/uniform
lattices on SL2(Z[i]) basically by quaternion algebras. I figure that
since I'm writing code using python and sage, I might as well do it
right and incorporate
On Sun, Jul 5, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Robert Millerrlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
merged the following:
#6429 [with patch; positive review] sagedoc: make search_src and
friends less OS dependent
#6258 [with patch, positive review] Improve accuracy of graph
eigenvalues
#6196 [with
This bug
http://sagetrac.org/sage_trac/ticket/6423
was reported by someone outside the sage project, but who potentially
could contribute - he writes software for testing computer algebra
systems, and seems to succeed in finding quite a few bugs. I believe he
submitted 100 once to WRI, of
22 matches
Mail list logo