On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Tim Laheytim.la...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
Oh, the OS X Readme should really be updated (and the 64-bit build
instructions added).
On OS X 10.5.8 with GCC 4.0.1, I ran the following commands
$ SAGE64=yes
$ export SAGE64
$ make
prior to building these versions
On Aug 29, 12:21 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:25 AM,
Juanjojuanjose.garciarip...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Aug 28, 3:01 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
Using the first release of Solaris 10
On a Dell desktop with 2 GB RAM and plenty of free HDD space, Sage
compilation fails. Here is the end of the installation log:
***
==
Shall we try to build pari
Maurizio, you should try emacs with sage-mode. It's exactly what you
(and I) want.
Pierre
On Aug 29, 8:57 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:14 AM, Maurizio maurizio.gran...@gmail.comwrote:
On 29 Ago, 19:21, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On
http://www.bitfolge.de/pubs/thesis/
Can this help Sage in any way?
AAP
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 6:32 AM, Pierrepierre.guil...@gmail.com wrote:
Maurizio, you should try emacs with sage-mode. It's exactly what you
(and I) want.
Pierre
On Aug 29, 8:57 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
oh thanks. The mpmath is even capable of the complex branches.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options,
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 6:01 AM, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
Hi William,
PS: Although database_gap...spkg was possible to install, the
installation of our cohomology package failed -- because Sage (for
whatever reason) believes that cliquer needs to be available. See below.
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 3:04 AM, arachnoid q...@arachnoid.com wrote:
On a Dell desktop with 2 GB RAM and plenty of free HDD space, Sage
compilation fails. Here is the end of the installation log:
What exact compiler are you using (output of gcc -v)? Is there any
possibility to use a
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 11:16 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.netwrote:
I've seen various spkg-install files where there is something like:
if [ `uname` = Darwin -a $SAGE64 = yes ]; then
echo Building 64 bit OSX version of Sage
CFLAGS=-O2 -g -m64 export CFLAGS
I agree!
In fact, learning sage-mode has been the reason for me to start
learning emacs.
The problem is that I've never used emacs and I don't really have so
much time to spend on setting it up, and moreover, I couldn't find so
many information about sage-mode. Apart from this wiki page:
Maurizio,
I have been using emacs for about 20 years and I could not get
sage-mode to work either -- it turned out that I had a not very new
version of emacs. (I'll try again soon). If you are editing .py
files then emacs's python mode works well enough, and you can also
tell emacs to treat
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 11:04 AM, arachnoid q...@arachnoid.com wrote:
On Aug 30, 8:49 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 3:04 AM, arachnoid q...@arachnoid.com wrote:
On a Dell desktop with 2 GB RAM and plenty of free HDD space, Sage
compilation fails.
On Aug 30, 8:49 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 3:04 AM, arachnoid q...@arachnoid.com wrote:
On a Dell desktop with 2 GB RAM and plenty of free HDD space, Sage
compilation fails. Here is the end of the installation log:
What exact compiler are you using
On Aug 30, 5:51 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
* It's hard to see why the options -O2 and -g are needed on Darwin, but
not on other platforms. Perhaps someone thought it was a good idea to
add debug support on OS X, but not on any other platform. Perhaps they
thought OS X is so
Juanjo wrote:
On Aug 30, 5:51 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
* It's hard to see why the options -O2 and -g are needed on Darwin, but
not on other platforms. Perhaps someone thought it was a good idea to
add debug support on OS X, but not on any other platform. Perhaps they
thought
Still no taker for the review ? Maybe I'll end being the one who does it. By
the way, do the review include Linear Programming or has it already been
done ?
Alex
2009/8/27 Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com
Hello everybody !!!
I sent some time ago a few patches in the Graph Theory section
Hi,
If I am writing a Spninx docstring in Sage, and I want to write, e.g.,
`{\rm Gal}(K/L)`
how do I do this? There are tons of operators like Gal, Hom, Frob, etc.,
but no matter what I do, when in ReST-mode they always get typeset in
italics -- I can't get them to get typeset in Roman.
On Aug 30, 4:58 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
If I am writing a Spninx docstring in Sage, and I want to write, e.g.,
`{\rm Gal}(K/L)`
how do I do this?
For me, `\mathrm{Gal}(K/L)` works: in Latex, {rm Gal} is deprecated in
favor of \mathrm{Gal} (or \textrm{Gal} if you're in
Hi,
There was a new release of OS X today, called OS X 10.6.The install
DVD, which cost $30, also includes a new version of XCode (build 5646),
which uses gcc 4.2.1 by default.
1. Sage binaries built on 10.5 appear to work fine on OS X 10.6. Yeah.
2. Sage itself fails to build from source
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 7:41 PM, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.comwrote:
On Aug 30, 4:58 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
If I am writing a Spninx docstring in Sage, and I want to write, e.g.,
`{\rm Gal}(K/L)`
how do I do this?
For me, `\mathrm{Gal}(K/L)` works: in
Hi...I was trying to build from source on Xubuntu 9.04 32bit running
on an IBM Thinkpad T43 w/ Centrino 1.86Ghz proc., 1.5GB Ram. I had to
compile because the version in the repos is just too old (3.0.5), and
the available
binary for 4.1.1 gave an error on startup due (as I discovered from
the
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
There was a new release of OS X today, called OS X 10.6.The
install DVD, which cost $30, also includes a new version of XCode (build
5646), which uses gcc 4.2.1 by default.
1. Sage binaries built on 10.5 appear to work fine on OS X 10.6. Yeah.
2. Sage
The patch to implement LP into Sage is a different ticket, but those
two tickets use it, though.. ;-)
Nathann
On Aug 31, 12:52 am, Alexandre Blondin Massé
alexandre.blondin.ma...@gmail.com wrote:
Still no taker for the review ? Maybe I'll end being the one who does it. By
the way, do the
23 matches
Mail list logo
