Hi!
I have small doubts, whether libjpeg is delivered with Mac OS X:
locate libjpeg
gives me the following
Third Party App.:
/Applications/Gimp.app/Contents/Resources/lib/libjpeg.62.0.0.dylib
/Applications/Gimp.app/Contents/Resources/lib/libjpeg.62.dylib
/Applications/Gimp.app/Contents/Resourc
Hi Brandon,
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 2:59 PM, brandon.bar...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> I put together a package:
> http://barker.homeunix.net/bb/pydstool-0.87.081113.spkg
>
> There are a few big problems. This release has not been tested in
> python 2.6, and also some of the pydstool functions do the
Hi Nicolas,
Thanks for working on the LaTeX-graph code. I'll certainly give this
a closer look soon, with an eye towards not "wreak[ing] further
havoc." ;-) Have a couple of other things in the queue first,
though.
Fidel Barerra and I both have some work to do on this front, so I'll
try to co
I put together a package:
http://barker.homeunix.net/bb/pydstool-0.87.081113.spkg
There are a few big problems. This release has not been tested in
python 2.6, and also some of the pydstool functions do their own type
checking, and don't know about Integer (for example). I'll post an
update whe
On Sep 24, 3:39 pm, Michael Brickenstein wrote:
> Hi!
> On 23 Sep., 11:07, mmarco wrote:
> > I have to do some computations in an exterior algebra, and i have seen
> > that it is not yet implemented in sage, but there is some work in that
> > direction. My question is: will this feature be impl
Well said. It's clearly a big improvement, and simple. Works well on
all the machines I have available.
-Marshall
On Sep 24, 7:04 pm, Dan Drake wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 at 08:32AM -0700, John H Palmieri wrote:
> > So, back to the original question: for parallel testing, can we set
> > the
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> The machine bsd.math now runs OS X 10.6 with GCC 4.2.1. Feeling a
> little adventurous, I tried building Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 in 32-bit mode
> on that machine. After a while, the build failed while trying to
> compile NTL. Here's
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 at 08:32AM -0700, John H Palmieri wrote:
> So, back to the original question: for parallel testing, can we set
> the number of threads to be the output from multiprocessing.cpu_count
> ()? On t2, is it actually *bad* to use 128 threads, or is it just
> about the same as using 1
Dear Sage(-Combinat) devs, dear graph drawing fans,
Due to an urgent itch, I took some time today to work on the
graphviz+dot2tex integration. For a sample application, see:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/nthiery/bruhat-D4.pdf
Which was produced by the (too long) mantra:
Bill Page wrote:
> Jason,
>
> What are the Sage version prerequisites for this package (if any)?
> Besides new features is there a list of bug fixes? In particular, do
> you know if this version solves the problem with jmol on some Windows
> XP systems that has been mentioned occasionally here on
I'd like to put together an spkg for pydstool - would this be a useful
package for sage's core distribution?
http://www.cam.cornell.edu/~rclewley/cgi-bin/moin.cgi/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscri
John H Palmieri wrote:
> So, back to the original question: for parallel testing, can we set
> the number of threads to be the output from multiprocessing.cpu_count
> ()? On t2, is it actually *bad* to use 128 threads, or is it just
> about the same as using 16? (The point was to have a non-idio
Jason,
What are the Sage version prerequisites for this package (if any)?
Besides new features is there a list of bug fixes? In particular, do
you know if this version solves the problem with jmol on some Windows
XP systems that has been mentioned occasionally here on this list?
Regards,
Bill Pa
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:49 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Pavel Solin wrote:
>> Hi,
>> thanks for many useful hints.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:33 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Hi Pavel
2009/9/24 Robert Bradshaw :
>
> On Sep 24, 2009, at 12:34 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Harald pointed out Sage getting into Mandriva is featured in their
>> release notes. In fact, it's
>> a big part of them. Here they are:
>>
>> "Mandriva Linux 2010 includes (or will include) the fol
On Sep 24, 9:39 pm, William Stein wrote:
> We should setup something
> maybe more longterm, say on sagemath.org itself?
>
+1
~/www-files/irc/ sounds good for me, I can handle the rest ;)
H
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@g
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Pavel Solin wrote:
> Hi,
> thanks for many useful hints.
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:33 AM, William Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Pavel,
>> >
>> > thanks a lot for the feedback on the notebook. I think
On Sep 24, 2009, at 12:34 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Harald pointed out Sage getting into Mandriva is featured in their
> release notes. In fact, it's
> a big part of them. Here they are:
>
> "Mandriva Linux 2010 includes (or will include) the following versions
> of the major distribut
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
>
> I updated the jmol spkg to 11.8.6 at #7003 (ready for review!).
I just want to comment that I want jmol to just be part of the
standalone sage notebook.If you look in the
sagenb/data/java
directory of the current standalone noteb
I updated the jmol spkg to 11.8.6 at #7003 (ready for review!). Here
are some new things since the current version of jmol we have in Sage.
I post this here because some people might be interested in
exposing/using some of these in Sage:
These come from: http://chemapps.stolaf.edu/jmol/docs/e
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 12:37 PM, Harald Schilly
wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sep 24, 9:02 pm, William Stein wrote:
>> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/tmp/sage-devel.log
>>
>
> is "tmp" the final directory and does some logrotate without
> compression happen?
Well tmp is because I couldn't
On Sep 24, 9:02 pm, William Stein wrote:
> http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/tmp/sage-devel.log
>
is "tmp" the final directory and does some logrotate without
compression happen? I can add the directory to the sage specific
search on the website, then it's easy to search the logs!
Hi,
Harald pointed out Sage getting into Mandriva is featured in their
release notes. In fact, it's
a big part of them. Here they are:
"Mandriva Linux 2010 includes (or will include) the following versions
of the major distribution components: kernel 2.6.31 (estimation),
X.org 7.5 (with xorg-s
Hi,
Starting two days ago the irc chatter on #sage-devel is recorded in
the following place:
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/wstein/tmp/sage-devel.log
This took me 2 minutes to setup, so isn't as complicated as emailing a
google group or something.
Anyway, I hope people find it useful.
I'm pretty sure I've fixed this once on a mac, but unfortunately I
can't remember what I did. In fact, sadly, I'm not sure I knew what I
did at the time, I just kept trying different things I until it
worked.
>From your original link, I think we just have to correctly do option
5, i.e. edit the
> * More of a python import thing. In this scenario, each worksheet
> has
> an optional filename. If you use python to "import
> some_other_worksheet", the path is set up such that the normal python
> import mechanism works. This gives you all of the normal python
> namespace mechanisms. To
> I thought I'd amuse you a little, and hopefully my progress on Solaris
> will improve somewhat in the near future, when I get the hardware replaced.
That is amusing, and I must say, shocking. Primarily because the
sage.math computers are a *dream* to work on. Press a tab here, pull
a little,
More than likely the company that looked at your computers to see if
they were broken, has done you a great favour. I used to work as a
computer tech and sometimes it was very difficult to determine whether
a computer was broken or not.
By the time the company had dealt with your computers, I'm p
So, back to the original question: for parallel testing, can we set
the number of threads to be the output from multiprocessing.cpu_count
()? On t2, is it actually *bad* to use 128 threads, or is it just
about the same as using 16? (The point was to have a non-idiotic way
of setting the number o
William Stein wrote:
>>> (3) When image is saved and latex some text written to output, the
>>> image anyway appears after the text. So one does not
>>> have an opportunity to create a sequence of images
>>> with some text description below each of them. This should
>>> be
That editor seemed as fast as the native text area to me. I am also
using firefox 3.5.2 so it could be quite browser dependent.
On Sep 24, 7:11 am, William Stein wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
>
> > Regarding syntax highlighting, I just found a list on wikiped
That's pretty cool. Have you considered using Processing.js? Also, doesn't
@interact allow you to change parameters via sliders?
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 9:29 PM, Marmaduke wrote:
>
> Hi, hello,
>
> I recently began using SAGE and its notebook interface for high-
> dimensional dynamical systems w
Hi, hello,
I recently began using SAGE and its notebook interface for high-
dimensional dynamical systems work, and while matplotlib is only
static output; continually changing a parameter and replotting becomes
monotonous. Which lead me to Processing (http://processing.org/)
which, while designe
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Builds fine on x86_64 RHEL 5.3 (lena on SkyNet) with GCC 4.4.1. All
> doctests pass.
Can't compile on x86_64 RHEL 5.4 (rosemary.math) with GCC 4.1.2. The
build dies when trying to compile ECL. Here's a snippet of the
compilation error mess
I don't notice any difference of speed (I'm on Firefox 3.5.2, btw.) It seems
that the editor works as an iframe in the document (that's how FCKEditor
(now CKEditor) works, too). The DOM traversal to add elements can be slow, I
guess. I haven't read the source code (I'll take a peek at it later) tho
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:57 AM, Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
> Regarding syntax highlighting, I just found a list on wikipedia of editors
> we can use:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Javascript-based_source_code_editors
>
> CodeMirror (http://marijn.haverbeke.nl/codemirror/) seems to
Regarding syntax highlighting, I just found a list on wikipedia of editors
we can use:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Javascript-based_source_code_editors
CodeMirror (http://marijn.haverbeke.nl/codemirror/) seems to be the most
promising. Here's the demo:
http://marijn.haverbeke.nl/co
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> Hi Pavel,
>
> thanks a lot for the feedback on the notebook. I think every single
> point that you raised annoys me too and it should be fixed.
I fully agree. In the meantime, I did list a few workarounds for some
of the issues you have
I also agree. Mapping explicitly is a lot clearer and Pythonic. Even the
functional languages, with their focus on lists, do mapping explicitly.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:16 PM, William Stein wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 11:14 PM, Rado wrote:
> >
> > I am not sure if I get a vote, but I w
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
> Hi Pavel,
>
> thanks a lot for the feedback on the notebook. I think every single
> point that you raised annoys me too and it should be fixed.
>
> I have also CCed sage-devel.
>
> Ondrej
>
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Pavel Solin
That is *very* cool. We should put that in a wiki page so we can plan a way
to transition to a system like that.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Robert Bradshaw <
rober...@math.washington.edu> wrote:
>
> On Sep 22, 2009, at 8:51 AM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
> > Tim Joseph Dumol wrote:
> >> Sorry, I
Hi Pavel,
thanks a lot for the feedback on the notebook. I think every single
point that you raised annoys me too and it should be fixed.
I have also CCed sage-devel.
Ondrej
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Pavel Solin wrote:
> Hi,
> by now I spent many hours with programming inside the
>
Hi folks,
The Sage cluster consists of four similar computers:
* sage.math --- mainly for Sage development (128GB RAM, 24 cores)
* geom.math --- mainly for geometry research (128GB RAM, 24 cores)
* mod.math --- mainly for number theory research (128GB RAM, 24 cores)
* boxen.math --- mainly virtu
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
wrote:
>
> As you are aware, I am trying to improve Sage on Solaris. My progress
> has been stunted recently as three of my Sun computers were destroyed by
> lightning, including the fastest one I own. The damage is currently
> subject to an insur
As you are aware, I am trying to improve Sage on Solaris. My progress
has been stunted recently as three of my Sun computers were destroyed by
lightning, including the fastest one I own. The damage is currently
subject to an insurance claim, which I believe is almost resolved.
Soon I should ha
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 1:27 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> The machine bsd.math now runs OS X 10.6 with GCC 4.2.1. Feeling a
> little adventurous, I tried building Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 in 32-bit mode
> on that machine. After a while, the build failed while trying to
> compile NTL. Here's
Hi folks,
The machine bsd.math now runs OS X 10.6 with GCC 4.2.1. Feeling a
little adventurous, I tried building Sage 4.1.2.alpha2 in 32-bit mode
on that machine. After a while, the build failed while trying to
compile NTL. Here's a relevant install snippet:
{{{
This is NTL version 5.4.2
GOOD N
On 2009-Sep-23 12:17:26 -0700, William Stein wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 10:31 AM, John H Palmieri
> wrote:
>> I can't tell: is 128 a reasonable answer here? Is it okay to doctest
>> Sage in parallel using 128 threads?
>
>Ouch. I tried running > 16 processes in parallel using
>multiprocessin
48 matches
Mail list logo
