On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 03:19:17PM -0500, Jason Bandlow wrote:
I wanted to give you a quick update on the status of my review. First,
I haven't been able to look at it as closely as I wanted--Jessica went
to the hospital of Friday with a blood clot, and that pretty much
dominated my
Hi,
With sage-4.1 , sagenb-0.4 on a debian amd 64 Lenny, I cannot make
certtool generate certificates.
Sage launches certtool with arguments:
--generate-privkey --outfile /scratch/sage/.sage/dsage/cacert.pem
(/scratch/sage is the home directory)
and this command never finishes.
I try bin
We will not be changing the name to MathTor.
-- William
Has someone already bothered to ask the people at one of the following
sites whether they intend to sue Sage (at sagemath.org) or rather its
leader in the future?
http://sage.com/
http://www.sagefinancial.co.uk/
I apologize for this post... it took a *very* long time... but at the
end, after some *minutes* I got a certificate...
t.d.
Thierry Dumont a écrit :
Hi,
With sage-4.1 , sagenb-0.4 on a debian amd 64 Lenny, I cannot make
certtool generate certificates.
Sage launches certtool with
Thanks Rob for the suggestion, I opened a thread:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-edu/browse_thread/thread/d017d3973e9a7a2a
The reason why I choose to post here is because I need help on what
MUST be imported in the global namespace. At the current stage, the
plot function pops up instead
The sage Makefile or more precisely deps, for polybori it reads:
$(INST)/$(POLYBORI): $(BASE) $(INST)/$(PYTHON) $(INST)/$(SCONS)
$(INST)/$(BOOST_CROPPED)
$(SAGE_SPKG) $(POLYBORI) 21
$(LIBM4RI) is pulled as a dependency of $(SAGE) after $(POLYBORI).
So in sage polybori will use its
Hi,
To me, a year is FAR too short. Mathematica makes a major release about once
every two years, and a semi-major one every 6-12 months. There are plenty of
people using older versions of that. If Sage wants to make a viable
alternative
to Mathematica, it needs to keep deprecated
slabbe wrote:
Hi,
To me, a year is FAR too short. Mathematica makes a major release about once
every two years, and a semi-major one every 6-12 months. There are plenty of
people using older versions of that. If Sage wants to make a viable
alternative
to Mathematica, it needs to keep
It's clear that Sage, unlike most other projects, makes extensive use of
software not written by Sage developers. As such, when bugs are found in that
software, they should ideally be reported upstream.
I would suggest a pull-down on the track where one could select from
1) N/A - Not an
I would like to announce that thanks to Juanjo, FriCAS now builds out
of the box with ecl under cygwin, so I suspect that maxima should do
so, too.
Martin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe
On Nov 2, 4:15 am, Ralf Hemmecke r...@hemmecke.de wrote:
We will not be changing the name to MathTor.
-- William
Has someone already bothered to ask the people at one of the following
sites whether they intend to sue Sage (at sagemath.org) or rather its
leader in the future?
William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Stan Schymanski schym...@gmail.com wrote:
I would love to have a script that converts old names in a whole
worksheet to new names. Every time someone deprecates an old name, he
could add the relevant line to the script.
Would that be
On Nov 2, 2:42 am, Vincent Delecroix 20100.delecr...@gmail.com
wrote:
As it
concerns the code and not the usage of Sage I wrote here and not in
sage-support... perhaps a mistake ?
No, I think this is exactly the right place to ask your question about
the import statements. I just don't have
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 11:09 PM, Stan Schymanski schym...@gmail.com wrote:
I would love to have a script that converts old names in a whole
worksheet to new names. Every time someone
It seems that a:
{{{
from sage.server.all import *
}}}
resolves the plotting problem.
I updated the patch (still the same adress
http://iml.univ-mrs.fr/~delecroi/lycee-vd.patch)
Now, an other problem arises. Maxima starts to polluate the RAM
(arround 20% of my 1G) and goes in a loop during
On Nov 1, 2009, at 12:49 PM, John Cremona wrote:
2009/11/1 Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie:
Hi!
On 1 Nov., 19:30, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Is this really becoming a thread about changing the name from Sage
to
something quite different? I hope not.
Why
Ondrej Certik wrote:
On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Ondrej Certik wrote:
I solve this problem by using gmail, filtering all messages into the
sage label (folder) and then when I want to check threads, which I
am involved in, I click on the
I think 10 years would be best. Any less than 5 is asking for trouble. Sure
Sage
makes a new release every couple of weeks, but as we see from recent
discussions, not everyone wants to update every couple of weeks.
I think both are unrealistic for a volunteer project. Instead of
looking at
On Nov 2, 8:48 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
* After one year we are allowed to remove deprecated code, but we
only actually do so at major releases (e.g., 5.0, 6.0, 7.0 etc.)
Thus Sage-5.0 *will* remove deprecated code that was deprecated at
least a year ago.
I think this is a
Hello,
I see that in the past there was some interest in polymake. I'm
suddenly interested as well in the package and was wondering if anyone
out there had done any work on it since the most recent discussion in
the mailing list back in June:
Chris Swierczewski wrote:
Hello,
I see that in the past there was some interest in polymake. I'm
suddenly interested as well in the package and was wondering if anyone
out there had done any work on it since the most recent discussion in
the mailing list back in June:
I am not aware of anything that Porta could do that cddlib cannot do.
The polyhedra.py package in geometry should be able to do all that.
Please let me know if there is something you want to do that isn't
covered by that.
Recently Volker Braun did a massive rewrite of polyhedra.py, which
should
Peter Jeremy wrote:
I think 10 years would be best. Any less than 5 is asking for trouble.
Sure Sage
makes a new release every couple of weeks, but as we see from recent
discussions, not everyone wants to update every couple of weeks.
I think both are unrealistic for a volunteer project.
Hello Marshall,
I am not aware of anything that Porta could do that cddlib cannot do.
The polyhedra.py package in geometry should be able to do all that.
Please let me know if there is something you want to do that isn't
covered by that.
I mainly wanted to use Porta's system of ineqalities
Hi,
What is the current status of MacOS 10.6 compatibility?
I just downloaded sage-4.2.tar to my desktop machine
and compilation fails in the singular package (see below).
I don't seem to have succeeded in compiling sage-4.1.2
on any MacOS 10.6 desktop although it seems to have
compiled on my
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 2:18 PM, David Kohel drko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
What is the current status of MacOS 10.6 compatibility?
Sage-4.2 builds from source no problem with 10.6.1 and GCC 4.2.1 on
all my test machines, and we've had no reported build failures until
yours now.Some tests
This problem was reported via the report a problem link:
nodes are chopped off when plotting graphs
4.2, mac osx
When trying to plot the following graph the nodes are being chopped
off (only parts of the nodes appear on the plot). Increasing the
option scaling_term - as suggested in the
Yes, I can confirm this in mac os 10.6. It appears you can eliminate this
problem using the talk=True option.
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
This problem was reported via the report a problem link:
nodes are chopped off when plotting graphs
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
I think 10 years would be best. Any less than 5 is asking for trouble.
Sure Sage
makes a new release every couple of weeks, but as we see from recent
discussions, not everyone wants to
Well, the current polyhedra.py should work fine for that. For
example, if you have inequalities defining a unit cube x = 0, y=0,
z=0, x=1, y=1, z=1, you could put them into sage as follows and
get the vertices:
Interesting. I though that you needed a working install of the
polymake spkg in
The functions in sage/geometry/polytope.py require polymake. The
stuff in sage/geometry/polyhedra.py just needs cddlib, which is a
standard component of sage (and why I originally got involved in Sage
- I had been using Porta and wanted to switch to cddlib, and
installing Sage was the easiest
IIRC, when you make a vertex radius too big parts of it pass to
outside whatever boundary is used on the plot. I don't think this is
new, since my recollection is that this was the behavior early this
past summer. Anyway, I think this ticket is relevant - maybe there
are others.
Rob Beezer wrote:
IIRC, when you make a vertex radius too big parts of it pass to
outside whatever boundary is used on the plot. I don't think this is
new, since my recollection is that this was the behavior early this
past summer. Anyway, I think this ticket is relevant - maybe there
are
Jonathan wrote:
Jason,
I think this is a great idea. As I use Sage a bit in my teaching,
it would be nice to have a primitive with separate items for axes,
axes' labels, axes scale (the numbers on the axes). Then buttons
could be added to turn these on and off at the user request. If
Hi,
I updated tar on sage.math to version 1.22 by building from source.
I also updated rsync to the latest version (this was another request, offlist).
William
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 3:19 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
35 matches
Mail list logo
