Hi there,
They are several tickets on sage trac which are desperately waiting for a
review... My scores are currently 8 review for 4.3 and 6 for 4.2.1, I and
don't want to bury the competitors :-). Please volunteer !
#6812 Enumerate integer list up to the action of a Permutation Group
Hi,
I've posted a new version of the compmath proposal here:
http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/project_summary.pdf
http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/project_description.pdf
http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/references_cited.pdf
This is basically the final version, though I
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I've posted a new version of the compmath proposal here:
http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/project_summary.pdf
http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/project_description.pdf
http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/references_cited.pdf
This is basically the
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 06:26:55AM -0500, Tim Daly wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I've posted a new version of the compmath proposal here:
http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/project_summary.pdf
http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/project_description.pdf
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 02:28:57AM -0800, William Stein wrote:
Hi,
I've posted a new version of the compmath proposal here:
http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/project_summary.pdf
http://wstein.org/grants/compmath09/project_description.pdf
Why Is It Essential To Keep An Updated Resume!!!
Just check it out guys.
http://highbrains.com/?page_id=1124
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more
The binomial is buggy again (sage 4.2):
In [143]: [binomial(1,1),binomial(1,2),binomial(1,3),binomial(1,4)]
Out[143]: [1, 0, 0, 0]
In [144]: [binomial(1.0,1),binomial(1.0,2),binomial(1.0,3),binomial
(1.0,4)]
Out[144]: [1.00, 0.000, NaN, NaN]
--
To post to this group,
sage: sorted(g.degree(), reverse=True)
[4, 4, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2]
This is probably what I was thinking of; I didn't see sample code.
Probably in the situations I used, I just used g.degree() all by its
lonesome self, unsorted, because the cases I needed could be done by
hand.
- kcrisman
--
To
I confirm this in 4.2.1. This is now #7562.
- kcrisman
On Nov 30, 12:19 pm, Henryk Trappmann bo198...@googlemail.com wrote:
The binomial is buggy again (sage 4.2):
In [143]: [binomial(1,1),binomial(1,2),binomial(1,3),binomial(1,4)]
Out[143]: [1, 0, 0, 0]
In [144]:
I've just banned this person. I can't find the message, so I guess
another moderator deleted it already.
Sorry for the spam.
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Shoaib Khan shoaib...@gmail.com wrote:
Why Is It Essential To Keep An Updated Resume!!!
Just check it out guys.
Hello,
Singular does not build properly on a Fedora system (4 processors
Intel Xeon). The end of the log is copied at the end of this message
and the complete log can be accessed from :
http://iml.univ-mrs.fr/~delecroi/install.log.tar.gz
I will try the binary solution unless you have a
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 02:38:35PM -0800, William Cauchois wrote:
Original author of the patch here. I took some time to look at this
today and found that the doctesting bug was due to reading the value
of sys.stdout only once in install(); during doctesting, sys.stdout is
reset some time
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 02:19:14AM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
1 - Add an option called ``version`` do deprecation where you can put the
information on since which version of sage this thing was deprecated:
sage: def bar():
...sage.misc.misc.deprecation(The function bar
You may recall some discussion recently about ./sage -bdist was not working on
Solaris, due to a GNUism (the non-POSIX option -a to 'cp').
I've attempted to fix this, by using more appropiate options for systems other
than Linux. There are basically two changes
I am however getting this
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:22:36AM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
I volunteer for combinatorics if Mike wants to get out of it.
Alternatively, would it make sense to make sage-combinat the owner,
meaning in practice we would share the work between Florent, Mike,
myself, for a better 24/24
Hi kcrisman,
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:42 AM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
SNIP
That is odd; I am pretty sure there used to be such a method, maybe
two years ago?
Ticket #7564 [1] improves the documentation of the method
GenericGraph.degree() by adding two examples showing how one
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
Here are the trac components with who owns each. It's possible that
many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point. If anybody would
like to suggest changes, volunteer to own a component, etc., just
respond in this thread.Don't ask me exactly what it
Hi!
At #6854 (ready for review, I think), I implemented introspection and
tab completion for elements of Infinite Polynomial Rings. This became
necessary since they have a __getattr__ method that allows to use
methods of the underlying *finite* polynomial (e.g., _latex_) in an
easy way, to the
I just built a Sage binary on one machine (Netra T1, Solaris 10
03/2005) and move it to a faster machine (Blade 2000) running the
latest version of Solaris. I installed it as root, in a different
location from where it was built on the first machine. I then tried to
run it as a normal user, and
cp: cannot access *.sage
In short: that does not seem to be a new problem.
I've seen this line before (I think I get it every time I build a
bdist on my Macs), and I admit, that I never cared. The files ending
in *.sage are supposed to be loadable/attachable scripts (in)to Sage
sessions, see
Hi David,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:29 AM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I just built a Sage binary on one machine (Netra T1, Solaris 10
03/2005) and move it to a faster machine (Blade 2000) running the
latest version of Solaris. I installed it as root, in a different
location
Hi Minh
On 30 Nov., 23:44, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
...
My two-cent, but you probably know already: Say as root, you build
Sage and then move the resulting binary to a different directory.
After moving the whole Sage (binary) directory, you need to start up
Sage as root at
Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi David,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:29 AM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I just built a Sage binary on one machine (Netra T1, Solaris 10
03/2005) and move it to a faster machine (Blade 2000) running the
latest version of Solaris. I installed it as root, in a
Simon King wrote:
Hi Minh
On 30 Nov., 23:44, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
My two-cent, but you probably know already: Say as root, you build
Sage and then move the resulting binary to a different directory.
After moving the whole Sage (binary) directory, you need to start
On Mon, 30 Nov 2009 at 10:43PM +0100, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
Does that mean that one of us has to move to Vladivostok, Pekin or
Sidney ?
We should get Dan to join. I mean: Dan Bump if Mike is still in
Malaysia, and Dan Drake otherwise. Actually probably both :-)
I was going to mention
I build Sage 4.2.0 on a machine with the first release of Solaris 10.
(A painfully slow process, as the machine is only 500 MHz). I
upgraded that to 4.2.1, which went without a hitch.
As you will gather from a previous email or two, I've created a
Solaris binary using
./sage -bdist
on the slow
Hi Simon,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:48 AM, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
SNIP
I guess David's point was that this information should be stated more
clearly in the Readme text.
See ticket #7565 [1] for a newer README.txt file. I hope the newer
README.txt is much clearer about the
2009/11/30 Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com:
Hi David,
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 9:29 AM, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I just built a Sage binary on one machine (Netra T1, Solaris 10
03/2005) and move it to a faster machine (Blade 2000) running the
latest version of Solaris. I
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
On Sun, Nov 29, 2009 at 12:22:36AM +0100, Florent hivert wrote:
I volunteer for combinatorics if Mike wants to get out of it.
Alternatively, would it make sense to make sage-combinat the owner,
meaning in
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
Here are the trac components with who owns each. It's possible that
many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point. If anybody would
like to suggest changes, volunteer to own a
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
You may recall some discussion recently about ./sage -bdist was not working
on
Solaris, due to a GNUism (the non-POSIX option -a to 'cp').
I've attempted to fix this, by using more appropiate options for
William Stein wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
You may recall some discussion recently about ./sage -bdist was not working
on
Solaris, due to a GNUism (the non-POSIX option -a to 'cp').
I've attempted to fix this, by using more
Oh, I thought 'tbd' was 'the benevolent dictator' :)
-Marshall
On Nov 30, 3:52 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Hi,
Here are the trac components with who owns each. It's possible that
many of these are dated/wrong/silly at this point. If anybody
I've resurrected this post because I have some indication of the
source of the subject start-up errors. The sage version is 4.2.1, my
architecture is amd64 running Gentoo and my gcc info is:
gcc version 4.3.4 (Gentoo 4.3.4 p1.0, pie-10.1.5)
Building sage with the usual make results in a sage
On Nov 29, 2009, at 5:22 AM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi Nathann,
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 1:57 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com
wrote:
SNIP
If I make no mistake, Robert Miller rewrote the Graph class in C,
which sounds like we are trying to remove networkX from Sage and use
our own
On Nov 29, 2009, at 2:26 PM, Paul C. Leopardi wrote:
GluCat ( http://glucat.sf.net ) currently uses uBLAS, which is part
of Boost.
I'm looking at Eigen (
http://www.macresearch.org/interview-eigen-matrix-library
http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/
On Nov 29, 2009, at 8:27 AM, Nathann Cohen wrote:
HMmmm...
I started creating new modules, and I wanted to split it piece by
piece, with time. Ticket #7365 creates a module named
graph_decomposition which I intend to fill ( but I will begin to write
these functions when this patch will be
Isn't there an option to set to run all the spkg internal tests?
- Robert
On Nov 29, 2009, at 2:16 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
I was just looking at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7095
os x 10.6 port -- numerous mysterious errors caused by weird 'abort
trap' issue
and see
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Nicolas M. Thiery
nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr wrote:
For the record: there is a patch of mine on trac with sage
-fixdoctests improvements, in particular for multiline output (sorry,
I am in the train, and unable to look up the ticket number). By
accident it did
39 matches
Mail list logo
