Hi folks,
I thought I should share with you that the 90% doctest coverage goal
is moving very well. Within days of my report of the current doctest
coverage status in Sage 4.4.4.alpha0, we see a number of modules being
raised to 100% coverage:
* #9214 combinat/lyndon_word.py
* #9213 combinat/pose
Hi folks,
Ticket #3565 [1] aims to bring the doctest coverage of the module
server/notebook/worksheet.py up to 100%. As I understand it, this
module is no longer maintained nor being worked on because Sage
notebook development is now done in the SageNB repository. For any
Sage notebook experts out
Hi,
is your Debian installation up to date?
It could be that an older gcc you have by default is due to this,
and if so, there is no telling as to what goes wrong.
Just in case you wonder what I mean, you ought to run
aptitude update
and then
aptitude safe-upgrade
and see if there are no "held ba
Is your Debian installation up to date?
Your old compiler etc might be due to this.
If not, please do the usual thing (aptitude update; aptitude safe-
upgrade)
and see if this helps..
Just in case,
Dima
On 13 June, 00:46, orca wrote:
> Ok Marik
>
> I checked that the default g++ under lenny is s
Hi Minh,
On 13 Jun., 12:00, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> ...
> All of the above tickets have positive review! If anyone has some
> time, here are some doctest tickets needing some attention:
>
> * #9222 databases/conway.py
> * #9066 shapes2.py
And there is also #8800, which raises the coverage of
sage.c
Hi Minh,
Could be that a preliminary version of this post was already sent by
accident -- sorry, if this was the case.
On 13 Jun., 12:00, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> I thought I should share with you that the 90% doctest coverage goal
> is moving very well.
Great!
>...
> All of the above tickets have
Dear Kirby and Pasechnik,
Sorry for the waste of time: I have now upgraded my Debian lenny
system and, as Marik above has stated, it now does have matched 4.3.2
versions of all three compilers (gcc, g++ and gfortran). I am now
building Sage from scratch and everything seems to be going fine. I
wil
I've just been looking at the atlas package, and see that people have really
tried to cripple the performance.
1) Make is unset on all platforms. Would it not be wiser to find out where
problems exist, and do things like this for only one platform, or one distribution?
It's clear the ATLAS de
On Jun 12, 8:09 am, David Kirkby wrote:
> kir...@sage:~$ /usr/local/bin/sage
> --
> | Sage Version 4.4.3, Release Date: 2010-06-04 |
> | Type notebook() for the GUI, and license() for information. |
>
On 06/13/10 03:25 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Also, the number of threads was set to zero with the option -t 0 when
ATLAS was configured. That must hit runtime performance badly.
Dave
I guess zero threads would have a pretty fatal effect on performance! Threading
had been disabled in ATLA
On Jun 12, 9:07 am, kcrisman wrote:
> > 1) Get a list of recommended packages from that version of R -
> > preferably in a way that does not require them to be hard-coded in a
> > test script, but generated by R.
>
> Unfortunately, I couldn't find one when I was looking for it. It might
> be worth
Can at least someone confirm that it SHOULD run well in 10.4 LTS and Firefox?
It's a pretty big problem not to have any 3d plots at all!
On 06/12/2010 03:27 PM, Cedric Sodhi wrote:
Hello everyone,
this problem has been brought up several times, yet all the threads end
without any solution what
Hi
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 05:09:54PM +0200, Cedric Sodhi wrote:
> Can at least someone confirm that it SHOULD run well in 10.4 LTS and Firefox?
> It's a pretty big problem not to have any 3d plots at all!
It should. Please check a recent thread about it:
http://groups.google.com/group/sage-deve
I too haven't got JMol to work in the NB, although it works fine as
the standalone application when run from the commandline. I don't see
how the site you mentioned would help. Installing JAVA was no problem
and it works just fine, including JMol applets on the jmol.sourceforge
site. This is most l
2010/6/13 ManDay :
> I too haven't got JMol to work in the NB, although it works fine as
> the standalone application when run from the commandline. I don't see
> how the site you mentioned would help. Installing JAVA was no problem
> and it works just fine, including JMol applets on the jmol.sourc
On Jun 13, 5:09 pm, Cedric Sodhi wrote:
> Can at least someone confirm that it SHOULD run well in 10.4 LTS and Firefox?
> It's a pretty big problem not to have any 3d plots at all!
>
Hi,
I didn't want to just say "works for me" but I guess since you asked:
I am running Ubuntu 10.04 x86_64, Fi
Hi there,
The build process completed SUCCESSFULLY! Everything seems to be
working fine!
Thank you all again!!
On Jun 13, 10:59 am, orca wrote:
> Dear Kirby and Pasechnik,
>
> Sorry for the waste of time: I have now upgraded my Debian lenny
> system and, as Marik above has stated, it now does h
Hello Paulo, firstly, I've tried both, Sun from the Partner
repositories and OpenJDK with IcedTea and none of them works.
Currently I'm using Sun's JAVA, that is where I get these exact errors
in the console. I've tried both with Firefox - I've even never heard
of Chromium (only Google Chrome)
Ada
Yes.
John
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Yes.
Cheers,
Georg
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
On Saturday, June 12, 2010, Jason Grout wrote:
> On 6/12/10 6:22 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>
>
> 3. It breaks consistency with the 4 M's, which all return mutable
> matrices from the top-level identity matrix constructor.
>
>
> Correction: Maple identity matrices are immutable. However, Magma,
> Ma
On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Alexander R. Povolotsky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.math.symbolic/browse_thread/thread/eed8d297c7c37ca7/b49f8fccb5ca2aaf?hl=en#b49f8fccb5ca2aaf
> Mathematica/WolframAlpha and Derive 6.10
> could handle well the below identity which I came ac
On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 4:37 PM, William Stein wrote:
> Here's what you can do in Sage (or Maxima):
> Unfortunately, just doing
>
> sage: var('n')
> n
> sage: sum((4/(8*n+1)-2/(8*n+4)-1/(8*n+5)-1/(16*n+12)-1/(16*n+14)), n, 0,oo)
>
> in sage leads to:
>
> TypeError: unable to make sense of Maxima e
Hi folks,
In a recent thread [1] on sage-notebook, it was suggested that files
under the component
sage/server
need not contribute to the total doctest coverage. Taking a cue from
that, today's coverage update [2] contains good news.
I have blacklisted everything under sage/server in generating
Hi folks,
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
> full coverage in order to meet the 90% coverage goal. Now, the number
> of strategic modules is down to 140.
My little search program has just completed its search. The updated
strategic list now consists of 130 modules.
--
Reg
25 matches
Mail list logo
