Hi,
During the last few weeks I've spent time optimizing code, among other
things. A surprising number of random things I look at in Sage are
too slow by a factor of 10-100,
usually due to programming style.One way to help to remedy that
would be to write a book or article about how to
OK. This is now #9581.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sage-devel
URL: http://www.sagemath.org
Hi!
Thanks for the great work.
This is again a great opportunity for
Sage to excel against the big M systems.
Cheers,
Michael
On Jul 22, 3:25 pm, Alexander Dreyer
jan.alexander.dre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi alltogether,
On Sage Days 24 in Linz we finished the integration of the Plural,
I just tried to build Sage, and got a failure with building IML. See log here.
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/iml-1.0.1.p12.log
As soon as I restarted make again, so the build completed ok.
On thing I did do, was reverse the order of the list of items listed under 'all'
in
I just tried to build Sage, and got a failure with building IML. See log
here.
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/iml-1.0.1.p12.log
As soon as I restarted make again, so the build completed ok.
On thing I did do, was reverse the order of the list of items listed under
'all'
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:06:24PM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 07/23/10 11:59 AM, Fran?ois Bissey wrote:
I just tried to build Sage, and got a failure with building IML. See log
here.
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/iml-1.0.1.p12.log
As soon as I restarted make again, so
While I'm not discounting a parallel make issue entirely, it doesn't look
like a typical one. The failing .lo's include the first one to be built in
a non-parallel build, so it seems unlikely that one would be suffering
from missing dependencies. (And there are no errors reporting missing
On 07/23/10 12:23 PM, Willem Jan Palenstijn wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:06:24PM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 07/23/10 11:59 AM, Fran?ois Bissey wrote:
I just tried to build Sage, and got a failure with building IML. See log
here.
On 07/23/10 12:39 PM, François Bissey wrote:
While I'm not discounting a parallel make issue entirely, it doesn't look
like a typical one. The failing .lo's include the first one to be built in
a non-parallel build, so it seems unlikely that one would be suffering
from missing dependencies. (And
On 07/23/10 12:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 07/23/10 12:39 PM, François Bissey wrote:
While I'm not discounting a parallel make issue entirely, it doesn't
look
like a typical one. The failing .lo's include the first one to be
built in
a non-parallel build, so it seems unlikely that one
Hi all,
does somebody know if there is already a Cython code for Goldwasser-
Kilian/ Atkin-Morain (primality proving using elliptic curves) in
SAGE? I heard that SAGE currently imports PARI code for that. In case
there's no Cython code, I'd like to contribute those algorithms.
Thanks, Georg
--
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I just tried to build Sage, and got a failure with building IML. See log
here.
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/iml-1.0.1.p12.log
As soon as I restarted make again, so the build completed ok.
Well,
I know someone has coded up a few R functions to do this as well as
some python, but as far as I can tell the R code is not in cran, and
the python code only works for continuous data. Also it seems sage
doesn't have a good function for returning probability density
functions and cumulative
On 07/23/10 03:52 PM, Carl Witty wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I just tried to build Sage, and got a failure with building IML. See log
here.
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/kirkby/iml-1.0.1.p12.log
As soon as I restarted make
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 05:48:09PM +0100, Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
On 07/23/10 03:52 PM, Carl Witty wrote:
the/dev/null 21 means we don't get to see the actual compile error.
It would be interesting, and perhaps informative, to see what the error was.
That's one of the features of libtool.
May there be any official way to explain reciprocally and fix this?
I don't see any reason for not doing some effort in the direction of
cooperation, I don't think there's any problem among the user
communities
Maurizio
On Jul 23, 7:05 am, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On
Hi,
When I compile Sage 4.5.1 in Opensue 11.3, I get the following
error.
My cpu is an AMD Athlon 1700XP.
Machine:
Linux hilbert 2.6.34-12-default #1 SMP 2010-06-29 02:39:08 +0200 i686
athlon i386 GNU/Linux
Deleting directories from past builds of previous/current versions of
sqlite-3.6.22
Hi,
During the last few weeks I've spent time optimizing code, among other
things. A surprising number of random things I look at in Sage are
too slow by a factor of 10-100,
usually due to programming style.One way to help to remedy that
would be to write a book or article about how to
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Shing mat...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
When I compile Sage 4.5.1 in Opensue 11.3, I get the following
error.
My cpu is an AMD Athlon 1700XP.
I think this is due to an incompatibility between your systemwide
readline and the one included in sage.You might
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 5:45 AM, G Hahn gh...@cantab.net wrote:
Hi all,
does somebody know if there is already a Cython code for Goldwasser-
Kilian/ Atkin-Morain (primality proving using elliptic curves) in
SAGE? I heard that SAGE currently imports PARI code for that.
Yes, Sage only includes
As I am working on patching this, I wonder if we shouldn't have an API
change in sage. Currently several functions, namely cliques_number_of
take a 'with_labels' argument as a Bool to determine whether a
dictionary of values is returned or a list. In the new networkx
version, the function always
Am 23.07.2010 22:06, schrieb William Stein:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Shing mat...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
When I compile Sage 4.5.1 in Opensue 11.3, I get the following
error.
My cpu is an AMD Athlon 1700XP.
I think this is due to an incompatibility between your systemwide
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Thomas Bächler
tho...@momo.math.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Am 23.07.2010 22:06, schrieb William Stein:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Shing mat...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
When I compile Sage 4.5.1 in Opensue 11.3, I get the following
error.
My cpu is an AMD
On Jul 23, 11:14 am, Ben Edwards bjedwa...@gmail.com wrote:
I know someone has coded up a few R functions to do this as well as
some python, but as far as I can tell the R code is not in cran, and
the python code only works for continuous data. Also it seems sage
doesn't have a good function
On 23 July 2010 21:40, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 1:30 PM, Thomas Bächler
tho...@momo.math.rwth-aachen.de wrote:
Am 23.07.2010 22:06, schrieb William Stein:
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Shing mat...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
When I compile Sage 4.5.1 in
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 7/22/10 9:53 PM, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
I just read on their website
dedicated to Sage for Windows: [...] Provide an alternative to
Enthought's EPD, Python(x,y), and ActiveState Python: 100% free and
open
On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 6:40 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 10:05 PM, Jason Grout
jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 7/22/10 9:53 PM, Afif Elghraoui wrote:
I just read on their website
dedicated to Sage for Windows: [...] Provide an alternative to
On 23 July 2010 21:05, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
During the last few weeks I've spent time optimizing code, among other
things. A surprising number of random things I look at in Sage are
too slow by a factor of 10-100,
IMHO, we need a benchmark to benchmark a large part of
On 15 July 2010 22:15, Carl Witty carl.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Carl Witty carl.wi...@gmail.com wrote:
One very simple change might be easier to implement/use. How about if
there were both a share button and a publish button, and these
went in to separate
IMHO, we need a benchmark to benchmark a large part of Sage, then
compare that from release to release and see if there are any
significant changes.
+1 but... Is there any existing automatic way to do that ? For example
through plugging a few lines of script in Sphinx, which is already
In the discussion I linked to, they actually discuss how the source
wasn't easily available initially due to hosting issues-- the project
head would send it to whoever asked for it. It's still not very easy
to find (they mentioned working on that), but if you go to the mirror
link on their
Open the java console. I think you are still getting some java errors
of some kind.
On Jul 19, 9:23 am, Jan Groenewald j...@aims.ac.za wrote:
Hi
Re: jmol via SAGE on lucid using openjdk
Progress! The error has reduced. I still get:
2010-07-19 14:26:15+0200 [HTTPChannel,14,127.0.0.1]
32 matches
Mail list logo
