Hello, Rob.
You wrote 11 августа 2010 г., 1:10:25:
I have an undergraduate student who is funded this summer to develop
some routines for Sage which create random matrices with nice
properties for beginning students of linear algebra to practice with
(or for faculty to put on exams, or to put
On 08/05/2010 11:12 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Mitesh Patel qed...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/04/2010 03:10 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 2:51 AM, Mitesh Patel qed...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/30/2010 01:54 AM, Craig Citro wrote:
So we're
On 10 August 2010 10:35, Kutoma Ltd goen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello to everyone,
Just downloaded the latest source tar file for SAGE ( 4.5.2) inclusive
the README.
Hope someone can advise a bit more about the follow statements
written.
x86_64 OpenSolaris (64-bit) -- not officialy
On 08/11/10 11:37 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
On 10 August 2010 10:35, Kutoma Ltdgoen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello to everyone,
Just downloaded the latest source tar file for SAGE ( 4.5.2) inclusive
the README.
Hope someone can advise a bit more about the follow statements
written.
x86_64
Since I'm teaching a linear algebra class this semester, I'll bite.
Applies fine to 4.5.2.rc0.
Two extremely minor comments off the top of my head, but I'll make
them on the ticket.
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 5:10 PM, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
Sage Devlopers,
I have an
Hej Johan,
It indeed seems to be at the core of a wider problem. The core of the
problem seems that sometimes you can represent various objects in
different ways.
- So in the coding theory example you can represent a general linear
code by a generator matrix. While you can represent a cyclic
On Aug 11, 1:28 pm, koffie m.derickx.stud...@gmail.com wrote:
Hej Johan,
It indeed seems to be at the core of a wider problem. The core of the
problem seems that sometimes you can represent various objects in
different ways.
- So in the coding theory example you can represent a general
Hi Ryan
It seems that we are in agreement with most thing so far then :-)
I just realised, however, a new problem with the whole encoder-decoder
solution. Many such algorithms will want to take various options (like
decoding bound, list size and multiplicity in the Guruswami-Sudan
case), which
Hi Ryan
It seems that we are in agreement with most thing so far then :-)
I just realised, however, a new problem with the whole encoder-decoder
solution. Many such algorithms will want to take various options (like
decoding bound, list size and multiplicity in the Guruswami-Sudan
case), which
Damn you, Refresh-button! Is there a way to delete such a duplicate
post?
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
sage-devel+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
For the first time today I build a 32-bit version of Sage on OpenSolaris.
This was 4.5.3.alpha0 on my Sun Ultra 27. (I've tried 64-bit OpenSolaris before,
with minimal success, though I can build it). A 64-bit build is just too
unstable, but a 32-bit one is more usable.
I added the following
On Aug 11, 8:24 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
For the first time today I build a 32-bit version of Sage on OpenSolaris.
This was 4.5.3.alpha0 on my Sun Ultra 27. (I've tried 64-bit OpenSolaris
before,
with minimal success, though I can build it). A 64-bit build is
Axiom solves this problem by separating the category
information from the specific domain information.
Thus you can have a categorical implementation that works for
every domain in the category but you can supply a specific
implementation for a given domain.
So a dense matrix and a sparse
On 08/11/10 04:43 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Aug 11, 8:24 am, Dr. David Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
For the first time today I build a 32-bit version of Sage on OpenSolaris.
This was 4.5.3.alpha0 on my Sun Ultra 27. (I've tried 64-bit OpenSolaris before,
with minimal success,
That's funny -- I just spent 5 days on holiday with my old friend Neil
Immerman, who won the Godel Prize in 1995 for proving NL = co-NL,. I
don't think that he mentioned the P=NP thing once. And then I get
back online and find that sage-devel is buzzing with it!
John
On Aug 11, 3:10 am, Bill
Thanks for answering the call, David. Much appreciated. I suspect
you'll find the routines useful this fall, and especially if we get
around to building interacts as front-ends in the waning weeks.
Rob
On Aug 11, 4:07 am, David Joyner wdjoy...@gmail.com wrote:
Since I'm teaching a linear
Hi Sergey,
Thanks for the pointer to ALGLIB - I'd seen it discussed but hadn't
investigated.
We've pretty much been targeting QQ (maybe really ZZ) since the idea
is to make examples/problems for an introductory course without a
numerical component. Where we can drop-in an a general exact ring
On 08/10/2010 04:35 AM, Kutoma Ltd wrote:
Thanks for any clarification.Also maybe a other question.Is someone
working on any Interop between Sage and Haskell.
I'm not aware of any ongoing projects to bridge Sage (or Python) and
Haskell. I'd be happy to be corrected!
I found this sage-devel
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Mitesh Patel qed...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/10/2010 04:35 AM, Kutoma Ltd wrote:
Thanks for any clarification.Also maybe a other question.Is someone
working on any Interop between Sage and Haskell.
I'm not aware of any ongoing projects to bridge Sage (or Python)
I've just got a message from the Sage nagbot, which made me bring this up.
Does anyone have any comments on #4446?
It's outside my maths knowledge, but I've taken some time to review bits of
this. The ticket has been open 21 months, and a lot of people have put a lot of
work into it.
Dave
On 08/11/2010 03:25 AM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
On 08/05/2010 11:12 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Mitesh Patel qed...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/04/2010 03:10 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
So it looks like you're getting segfaults all over the place as
well... Hmm... Could
On 08/11/2010 05:00 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 2:50 PM, Mitesh Patel qed...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/10/2010 04:35 AM, Kutoma Ltd wrote:
Thanks for any clarification.Also maybe a other question.Is someone
working on any Interop between Sage and Haskell.
I'm not aware of
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:15 PM, Mitesh Patel qed...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/11/2010 03:25 AM, Mitesh Patel wrote:
On 08/05/2010 11:12 PM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:26 AM, Mitesh Patel qed...@gmail.com wrote:
On 08/04/2010 03:10 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
So it looks like
23 matches
Mail list logo
