Can you compile sage from scratch?
Yes. I have a Linux machine and John Cremona installed sage 4.5.2
2010-08-05 for me from scratch.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
sage-combinat-devel group.
To post to this group, send email to
On Sep 1, 1:37 am, Bruce brucewestb...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you compile sage from scratch?
Yes. I have a Linux machine and John Cremona installed sage 4.5.2
2010-08-05 for me from scratch.
Great.
To install the patch, download it by going to
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9838
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 05:50:26AM -0700, bump wrote:
Now you will need mercurial installed. For example if you have
Ubuntu you can run
sudo apt-get install mercurial
if you do not have it already.
Or just use `sage -hg` instead of `hg`.
Best,
Nicolas
--
On Aug 20, 11:27 am, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
The best fix would be to have, as has been planned some time ago,
WeylCharacterRing use categories (and by the way
CombinatorialFreeModule), and this would be automatically handled by
the coercion system.
Dan: do you
Hi Niles,
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Niles nil...@gmail.com wrote:
I've noticed a separate list of developers on the DevMap at
sagemath.org . . . is there a plan to integrate these two lists?
There is a plan. Some people who are listed on the Dev Map are not
listed on the trac home page
On Aug 28, 1:21 pm, Sebastian Pancratz s...@pancratz.org wrote:
On Aug 27, 1:00 pm, luisfe lftab...@yahoo.es wrote:
I have added a new ticket for adding a default gcd and lcm for field
elements.
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9819
For the case of field elements gcd and lcm
On Aug 31, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 7:37 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
When I click stop server, and then start server, I see this error
message in the log:
Setting environment variables
Warning: Attempted to overwrite SAGE_ROOT environment variable
Checking
Does Sage have any sort of policy on using pre-release software in
.spkg files? By this I mean a package which is marked by the upstream
developers as a alpha/beta/release candiadate, or something someone
has grabbed by use of cvs/jit/svn etc.
I know this is sometimes happens - the Pari update in
As you will see from a previous email today, I'm not over-keen on the
use of unstable snapshots, but I'm aware they are sometimes necessary
http://www.sagemath.org/doc/developer/patching_spkgs.html#bumping-up-an-spkg-s-version
says If the upstream package is taken from some revision other than a
Hi!
When I tried to create an spkg out of a folder with many uncommitted
changes in the mercurial repository, after a while the process hanged.
It was invisible to top and didn't finish (I waited something like
10 minutes). But after committing the changes, it worked fine and
quickly.
I doubt
Hi!
The following happens with Sage-4.5.2
sage.math:
sage: L = [(360, {}), (2520, {0: 'X'}), ('prime', 3)]
sage: sorted(L)
[(360, {}), (2520, {0: 'X'}), ('prime', 3)]
bsd.math:
sage: L = [(360, {}), (2520, {0: 'X'}), ('prime', 3)]
sage: sorted(L)
[('prime', 3), (360, {}), (2520, {0:
Another issue,
Assuming that we allow a fallback implementation of gcd/lcm for field
elements.
Do we want such gcd/lcm if the field is non-exact?
FractionField(RR[x]) and so on.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an
On Sep 1, 6:58 am, Ivan Andrus darthand...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 7:37 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
When I click stop server, and then start server, I see this error
message in the log:
Setting environment variables
Any field with an is_zero() function on its elements is presumably OK?
John
On 1 September 2010 15:39, luisfe lftab...@yahoo.es wrote:
Another issue,
Assuming that we allow a fallback implementation of gcd/lcm for field
elements.
Do we want such gcd/lcm if the field is non-exact?
On Sep 1, 2010, at 4:40 PM, kcrisman wrote:
On Sep 1, 6:58 am, Ivan Andrus darthand...@gmail.com wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 8:15 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
On Aug 31, 2010, at 7:37 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
When I click stop server, and then start server, I see this error
message in the log:
Dear Luis,
I think the points you raise are valid ones. Perhaps the following
would be a sensible solution?
Implement gcd and lcm for general field elements just as you suggest.
(So gcd(x,y) is 1 unless (x,y) is (0,0), in which case it is 0.) It
should be just fine for inexact fields, too, so
Tim,
all screwing around aside for a moment. I broadly agree with your
sentiments. However, there are also some issues with what you are
suggesting. And I mean to make these observations in all seriousness.
One of the reasons we have been rewriting things like ZZ and ZZ[x] is
that there has been
Hi,
Expect downtime, instability, reboots, etc. Today on the sagemath
infrastructure.
William
--
William Stein
Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an
Has anyone given thought for making Sage read Mathematica syntax? I've
seen a recent video from William stating it is NOT an aim of Sage to
be clone of any of the 4 M's - in contrast, Octave is a clone of
MATLAB.
Whilst parsing Mathematica code is not an aim of Sage, I doubt many
would are argue
Hi there,
When I try to connect to trac I get the following:
Warning:
* Can't synchronize with the repository (/usr/local/sage/devel/sage does
not appear to contain a Mercurial repository.). Look in the Trac log for more
information.
* Can't synchronize with the repository
Hello everybody !!!
I've been writing a tutorial for LP, and I hope the Graph tutorial
will follow, but I have a problem with doctests... Something like that
:
sage: g = Graph()
Now we add a vertex ::
sage: g.add_vertex(1)
does not work as Sphinx forgets the definition of g between
On 1 September 2010 17:16, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everybody !!!
I've been writing a tutorial for LP
Nathann
It would be good if you could update that bit of the documentation
that tells one how to load the optional GPLK package, when GLPK is now
a standard
On Sep 1, 5:27 pm, Sebastian Pancratz s...@pancratz.org wrote:
I don't think this change in code should be used as a band-aid to make
things work in one of the trac tickets you mentioned earlier.
For the problem that raised all the stuff up I have an alternative
solution (with pros and cons
On Sep 1, 11:55 am, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Has anyone given thought for making Sage read Mathematica syntax? I've
seen a recent video from William stating it is NOT an aim of Sage to
be clone of any of the 4 M's - in contrast, Octave is a clone of
MATLAB.
Whilst
On 1 September 2010 17:45, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 1, 11:55 am, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Has anyone given thought for making Sage read Mathematica syntax? I've
seen a recent video from William stating it is NOT an aim of Sage to
be clone of any of the 4
On Sep 1, 9:21 am, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
Hi there,
When I try to connect to trac I get the following:
Warning:
* Can't synchronize with the repository (/usr/local/sage/devel/sage does
not appear to contain a Mercurial repository.). Look in the
On 1 September 2010 14:21, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr wrote:
Hi there,
When I try to connect to trac I get the following:
Warning:
* Can't synchronize with the repository (/usr/local/sage/devel/sage does
not appear to contain a Mercurial repository.). Look in the
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Nathann Cohen nathann.co...@gmail.com wrote:
Any idea how to fix it ?
You need to use .. link to connect a doctest block with the one
above it. For example,
{{{
.. link
::
sage: d.items()
[(1, 5), ('sage', 17), (Integer Ring, Finite Field of size 7)]
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:23 AM, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
Any idea why sorted has become machine dependent?
It's always been somewhat machine dependent -- see
http://yz.mit.edu/wp/default-behavior-of-pythons-cmp/ .
--Mike
--
To post to this group, send an email to
On Sep 1, 1:30 pm, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 1 September 2010 17:45, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sep 1, 11:55 am, David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Has anyone given thought for making Sage read Mathematica syntax? I've
seen a recent video from
Hi Mike!
On 1 Sep., 19:45, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
It's always been somewhat machine dependent --
seehttp://yz.mit.edu/wp/default-behavior-of-pythons-cmp/.
Ah! So, the problem is that I have both strings and integers, there is
no __cmp__ implemented that compares both, and thus
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
But then, what can one do? I.e., how can one safely doctest the
contents of a dictionary D?
You could build the dictionary and check that it is equal to the
dictionary in question:
sage: L
{360: {}, 2520: {0: 'X'},
Hi Mike!
On 1 Sep., 20:05, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
You could build the dictionary and check that it is equal to the
dictionary in question:
sage: L
{360: {}, 2520: {0: 'X'}, 'prime': 3}
sage: dict([(360, {}), (2520, {0: 'X'}), ('prime', 3)]) == L
True
Good idea!
Thank you,
On Sep 1, 11:00 am, Simon King simon.k...@nuigalway.ie wrote:
But then, what can one do? I.e., how can one safely doctest the
contents of a dictionary D?
If the default choice of sorted is not portable, make sure to tell
the system to sort on something that is portable, like you suggest:
At
Hello everyone,
This is a reminder that a patch for multivariate power series is
waiting for review at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/1956
The idea is to implement multivariate power series as univariate power
series over a multivariate polynomial ring; the power series variable
is
Hi,
Most sage.math related infrastructure will be down for the next few
hours for maintenance.
William
--
William Stein
Professor of Mathematics
University of Washington
http://wstein.org
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group,
Hello everyone,
Over at asksage, I complained that the sage documentation bears no
resemblance to sagemath.org, and I for one actually did find this a
little confusing at first (until I realized that all python
documentation looks like this, by default). That complaint got a
couple of up-votes,
+1
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Niles nil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
Over at asksage, I complained that the sage documentation bears no
resemblance to sagemath.org, and I for one actually did find this a
little confusing at first (until I realized that all python
documentation
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Niles nil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
Over at asksage, I complained that the sage documentation bears no
resemblance to sagemath.org, and I for one actually did find this a
little confusing at first (until I realized that all python
documentation looks
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:03 PM, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:33 PM, Niles nil...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
Over at asksage, I complained that the sage documentation bears no
resemblance to sagemath.org, and I for one actually did find this a
little
On 09/01/2010 04:33 PM, Niles wrote:
Over at asksage, I complained that the sage documentation bears no
resemblance to sagemath.org, and I for one actually did find this a
little confusing at first (until I realized that all python
documentation looks like this, by default). That complaint
Looks good to me too. Nice idea.
Did you experiment with the background color on the verbatim stuff
(doctests)? Looks like strings print in blue, so that probably
wouldn't be a good choice and maybe there is enough blue already. The
sick green has always been a bit jarring to my eye. Maybe a
On 09/ 1/10 02:19 AM, Alex Ghitza wrote:
On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 00:07:43 +0100, Dr. David Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
It's nice to know that running the tests 100 times and reporting the failures
managed to unearth a bug.
I'm not sure I would call this a bug, but it is definitely
Hi,
1. sagenb.org, sagemath.org, sage.math, boxen.math, etc., should all
be back up.
2. I rebooted boxen, mod, and geom after upgrading their ILOM
Firmware, so if you had jobs running on any of those machines, they
were killed.
3. The computer disk.math serves everybody's home directories; it's
For A and B Parents, should A == B ever differ from A is B? This came up in
tracking down a p-adics bug, but there's at least one place that assumes the
equivalence of these conditions. The place I'm thinking of is in
sage.categories.hom_set.Hom, where it checks a cache to see if the Homset
has
On 9/1/10 10:32 AM, Bill Hart wrote:
Tim,
all screwing around aside for a moment. I broadly agree with your
sentiments. However, there are also some issues with what you are
suggesting. And I mean to make these observations in all seriousness.
I'm reading this thread with great interest.
On 9/1/10 7:00 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
Should any desire to update to a non-stable release be discussed on
sage-devel first?
That sounds reasonable to me.
Jason
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to
On 9/1/10 5:17 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
Looks good to me too. Nice idea.
Did you experiment with the background color on the verbatim stuff
(doctests)? Looks like strings print in blue, so that probably
wouldn't be a good choice and maybe there is enough blue already. The
sick green has always
On 9/1/10 7:25 PM, David Roe wrote:
P.S. To find an example of two parents which currently compare as equal but
are not the same object, do
sage: R = Zp(5, print_sep=|)
sage: S = Zp(5, print_sep=:)
sage: R == S
True
sage: R is S
False
Carl Witty commented on a similar issue in printing in
whuss at some point added something like this for both Mma and Maple,
though very basic, as part of another ticket (symbolic sums?). I
can't remember where it is and am unfortunately having some internet
issues :( but anyway I believe this code was merged into Sage at some
point.
Hi there,
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 08:27:22PM -0500, Jason Grout wrote:
On 9/1/10 7:25 PM, David Roe wrote:
P.S. To find an example of two parents which currently compare as equal but
are not the same object, do
sage: R = Zp(5, print_sep=|)
sage: S = Zp(5, print_sep=:)
sage: R == S
On 2 September 2010 04:01, Felix Lawrence fe...@physics.usyd.edu.au wrote:
I think there's some confusion here. kcrisman seems to be talking
about allowing the Mathematica interface to parse mathematica output,
importing it to Sage. Dave seems to be proposing writing something
that lets
On 2 September 2010 02:12, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 9/1/10 7:00 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
Should any desire to update to a non-stable release be discussed on
sage-devel first?
That sounds reasonable to me.
Jason
Thank you Jason.
Who would agree with making this a
On 2 September 2010 02:12, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
On 9/1/10 7:00 AM, David Kirkby wrote:
Should any desire to update to a non-stable release be discussed on
sage-devel first?
That sounds reasonable to me.
Jason
Thank you Jason.
Who would agree with
the mathematica syntax parser that I wrote appears to run inside
Maxima, so
you can, if you wish, feed such text to the mma-in-maxima system.
The intent in that project is mainly to take mma syntax for
expressions and map it into
maxima, and not take the big step of having a more-or-less full
On 2 Sep, 05:55, François Bissey f.r.bis...@massey.ac.nz wrote:
Who would agree with making this a policy and so adding to the Sage
Developers Guide a few sentences saying that any updates of packages
that are not to a stable release (i.e snapshots, alpha, beta, release
candidates etc)
56 matches
Mail list logo
