On Thu, Sep 09, 2010 at 01:51:18PM -0700, Quimey Vivas wrote:
I am interested in the computation of Hochschild (co)homology of path
algebras. This is the first step. I am just learning about sage
development, so my code might be very buggy and/or incomplete in some
areas (such as coercion
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
Does current_randstate().set_seed_gap() actually sets GAP's random
seed, so that
subsequent GAP commands make use of the correctly set seed?
Yep.
--Mike
--
To post to this group, send an email to
On Sep 11, 2:36 pm, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 10:17 PM, Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com wrote:
Does current_randstate().set_seed_gap() actually sets GAP's random
seed, so that
subsequent GAP commands make use of the correctly set seed?
Yep.
I see.
Hi Rob,
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:17 AM, Rob Beezer goo...@beezer.cotse.net wrote:
The
sick green has always been a bit jarring to my eye. Maybe a light
beige or cream? But not puce.
Done. Please see the latest patch to ticket #9850 [1]. A preview [2]
of what's to come is also attached with
Right now, the deprecation function (for giving deprecation warnings)
has an option to say when the deprecation took effect. Because of the
way release numbers are decided, and because patches can be delayed
getting in, saying when a deprecation took place is very hard, if not
practically
Sorry, I thought I had sent this earlier.
On Sep 11, 2010, at 7:20 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 at 10:13AM -0700, kcrisman wrote:
It is. I've also been testing this - you should try out the very
latest version:
http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/iandrus/
There are still a few
I got stuck at scipy:
In the log below, the line beginning with
sage_fortran -Wall -shared -Wall -shared -undefined dynamic_lookup -
bundle...
definitely looks weird, as -shared option should not be there...
(I must also say that the error message looks weird, too, as there is
no option
On 9/11/10 1:27 PM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
Sorry, I thought I had sent this earlier.
On Sep 11, 2010, at 7:20 AM, Dan Drake wrote:
On Tue, 31 Aug 2010 at 10:13AM -0700, kcrisman wrote:
It is. I've also been testing this - you should try out the
very latest version:
For really fast generics I think you may need some kind of jit.
Are generics handled by cython code or python code in sage? Does it
cache anything?
I recently encountered similar problems anyhow. A generic rref took 20
minutes to reduce a tiny (by my standards) matrix as part of a
factoring
Hi Dave,
On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
There's odd bits code scattered around in Sage that do tests for g95, which
is an old Fortran 95 compiler that in any modern Linux or Unix systems.
According to Wikipedia
Just to be clear, I'm specifically talking about arithmetic by the
way. Anything for which the python overhead is completely irrelevant,
should of course be implemented in python.
Arithmetic really screws up almost every aspect of computing. There's
a group of related full employment problems
On 11 September 2010 21:48, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
When building femhub and packages for femhub, I have to deal with
these fortran issues as well. And I never understood
a) why sage used g95 in the first place (yes I know it's smaller, but
it's not standard at all imho)
On 11 September 2010 21:48, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
When building femhub and packages for femhub, I have to deal with
these fortran issues as well. And I never understood
a) why sage used g95 in the first place (yes I know it's smaller, but
it's not standard at all imho)
a) why sage used g95 in the first place (yes I know it's smaller, but
it's not standard at all imho)
Agreed. I can't see the point of it.
Apparently because there was no gfortran for certain platforms. Now we
assume Linuces (?) have this, but as Dima demonstrates, with OS X
10.4, somehow
On 09/12/10 12:10 AM, François Bissey wrote:
On 11 September 2010 21:48, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
When building femhub and packages for femhub, I have to deal with
these fortran issues as well. And I never understood
a) why sage used g95 in the first place (yes I know it's
On 09/12/10 01:07 AM, kcrisman wrote:
a) why sage used g95 in the first place (yes I know it's smaller, but
it's not standard at all imho)
Agreed. I can't see the point of it.
Apparently because there was no gfortran for certain platforms. Now we
assume Linuces (?) have this, but as Dima
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 09/12/10 12:10 AM, François Bissey wrote:
On 11 September 2010 21:48, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
When building femhub and packages for femhub, I have to deal with
these fortran issues as well. And
On 09/12/10 12:10 AM, François Bissey wrote:
+1 to move to FC.
I raised this back in November 2009 - William is against using FC.
http://www.mail-archive.com/sage-devel@googlegroups.com/msg31854.html
Dave
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 09/12/10 12:10 AM, François Bissey wrote:
On 11 September 2010 21:48, Ondrej Certikond...@certik.cz wrote:
When building femhub and
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
On 09/12/10 12:10 AM, François Bissey wrote:
+1 to move to FC.
I raised this back in November 2009 - William is against using FC.
http://www.mail-archive.com/sage-devel@googlegroups.com/msg31854.html
I read
On 09/12/10 12:10 AM, François Bissey wrote:
+1 to move to FC.
I raised this back in November 2009 - William is against using FC.
http://www.mail-archive.com/sage-devel@googlegroups.com/msg31854.html
I read the thread in question. I think more recent autotools don't check
fortran
Is there any reason whatsoever to have g95 code in ATLAS, given we don't build
ATLAS on OS X?
No opinion - this sounds fine, but is beyond my knowledge.
One more question about Mac --- how do you install gcc in there? Using
xcode? So I would just ship gfortran binary that is compatible
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 6:29 PM, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there any reason whatsoever to have g95 code in ATLAS, given we don't
build
ATLAS on OS X?
No opinion - this sounds fine, but is beyond my knowledge.
One more question about Mac --- how do you install gcc in there?
23 matches
Mail list logo
