Hi folks,
This is now ticket #10433
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10433
I opted to move the method min_spanning_tree() from Graph to
GenericGraph. The code for Kruskal's algorithm has been moved to the
new module spanning_tree.pyx and GenericGraph.min_spanning_tree() now
calls spanni
Hi Sage-devel,
If you would be interested in organizing, being involved in,
attending, getting your friends to attend, etc., a "Sage for Newbies"
Sage Days, please send me an email (off list is totally fine).
This workshop would involve a combination of:
* creating materials to make Sage more
On 12/9/10 7:32 PM, kcrisman wrote:
Jason - wasn't there some spirited discussion a while ago about using
Python properties? I couldn't find it in a search.
Oh, please don't bring that back. It's already enough work getting
students to remember the parentheses; having to remember when to use
On 12/9/10 6:03 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
Thanks, everybody, for the illuminating discussion.
Is there any objection to deprecating the current .adjoint() function
(which returns a matrix of cofactors) and renaming it as the
"adjugate"? With all the usual procedures and warnings for the
deprecation
-Original Message-
From: sage-devel@googlegroups.com on behalf of Bill Hart
Sent: Fri 12/10/2010 2:21 PM
To: sage-devel
Subject: [sage-devel] Re: Goto Blas.
So I don't know what is considered a fast time to build BLAS, but on
my machine it was straightforward. I just typed make and it det
On Dec 9, 7:03 pm, Rob Beezer wrote:
> Thanks, everybody, for the illuminating discussion.
>
> Is there any objection to deprecating the current .adjoint() function
> (which returns a matrix of cofactors) and renaming it as the
> "adjugate"? With all the usual procedures and warnings for the
>
So I don't know what is considered a fast time to build BLAS, but on
my machine it was straightforward. I just typed make and it detected
the number of cores, the architecture and built a multithreaded BLAS
and LAPACK (which it automatically downloaded for me). It took about
90s to build and automa
On Dec 10, 12:39 am, Bill Hart wrote:
> This is *fantastic* news that GotoBlas has been BSD licensed. I've
> wanted to use it in FLINT for years, and we've just been discussing
> highly optimised matrix routines (Fredrik Johansson has been writing
> lots of code too).
>
> But I am slightly confu
This is *fantastic* news that GotoBlas has been BSD licensed. I've
wanted to use it in FLINT for years, and we've just been discussing
highly optimised matrix routines (Fredrik Johansson has been writing
lots of code too).
But I am slightly confused over the CBLAS interface thing.
It seems that t
Hi,
I wrote a function using the sage notebook (not on sagenb.org but a
local sage build). As the function is quite slow when using it from
within the notebook, I was wondering if it is possible to access the
worksheet containing the function from the sage interactive shell
(e.g. by something like
Thanks, everybody, for the illuminating discussion.
Is there any objection to deprecating the current .adjoint() function
(which returns a matrix of cofactors) and renaming it as the
"adjugate"? With all the usual procedures and warnings for the
deprecation. That would begin the process to free
On 2010-12-08 16:28, Mitesh Patel wrote:
> I've reproduced this when upgrading "manually" from a copy ('cp -a') of
> vanilla 4.6 to 4.6.1.alpha3 on OS X 10.6 (bsd.math)
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sage-release/browse_thread/thread/8dbb88f4bb9a6c27/fca9c2ed57255675?#fca9c2ed57255675
>
> and
12 matches
Mail list logo
