On 12/30/10 5:13 PM, Rob Beezer wrote:
On Dec 30, 10:46 am, Jason Grout wrote:
I was thinking of another matrix constructor that is a very thin wrapper
around matrix(). Something like:
def column_matrix(*args, **kwds):
return matrix(*args, **kwds).transpose()
I like it. See http://tr
On Dec 30, 1:01 am, Dan Drake wrote:
> There are a number of "basic moves" in linear algebra that you do all
> the time when describing algorithms, doing proofs, and so on. The better
> Sage supports those basic moves, the easier it will be to experiment
> with basic linear algebra stuff.
That's
On Dec 30, 10:46 am, Jason Grout wrote:
> I was thinking of another matrix constructor that is a very thin wrapper
> around matrix(). Something like:
>
> def column_matrix(*args, **kwds):
> return matrix(*args, **kwds).transpose()
I like it. See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/10
Op 30-12-2010 22:16, Robert Bradshaw schreef:
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:04 PM, daveloeffler wrote:
On Dec 30, 1:41 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
And otherwise it does a "best guess" kind of approach, which is decent
(especially if there is only one patch :). In any case, I don't think
people wou
Apparently those packages were installed, but not on the most current
version: upgrading solved the problem.
Thanks
On 29 dic, 14:00, Volker Braun wrote:
> Install your distribution's lzo and lzo-devel packages.
--
To post to this group, send an email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscr
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:04 PM, daveloeffler wrote:
> On Dec 30, 1:41 pm, Robert Bradshaw
> wrote:
>>
>> And otherwise it does a "best guess" kind of approach, which is decent
>> (especially if there is only one patch :). In any case, I don't think
>> people would mind getting a "nag" that the p
On Dec 30, 1:41 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
>
> And otherwise it does a "best guess" kind of approach, which is decent
> (especially if there is only one patch :). In any case, I don't think
> people would mind getting a "nag" that the patchbot got confused,
> indicating that it might be worth your
On 12/30/10 1:22 AM, Rob Beezer wrote:
On Dec 29, 10:31 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
Notice that there is an underlying ideology that vectors are rows:
Yes, I have noticed that. Ties go to rows:
sage: matrix( [vector(QQ, [1,2,3]), vector(QQ,[4,5,6])] )
[1 2 3]
[4 5 6]
But the above is the first
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 2:01 AM, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On 30 Dez., 10:21, daveloeffler wrote:
>> I can see a slight problem with this. At present there's no mechanism
>> to explain to the patchbot exactly which patches to apply. So if you
>> have (say) a ticket with a patch that requir
On Dec 30, 1:50 pm, Rob Beezer wrote:
> I'd like to improve the current state of the linear algebra code over
> CDF (and by extension, over RDF). The purpose would be to make Sage
> more usable for teaching various topics involving matrices with
> complex entries and orthogonal vectors (thus in
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 13:24, Alex Leone wrote:
> Comments? It would be good to discuss this before the upcoming bug days if
> we are going to do anything with the notebook.
Hi, I read most of it and I also read your posting on mongodb-users ;)
Basically, most of it is also what I would have i
On Dec 30, 10:01 am, Simon King wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On 30 Dez., 10:21, daveloeffler wrote:
>
> > I can see a slight problem with this. At present there's no mechanism
> > to explain to the patchbot exactly which patches to apply. So if you
> > have (say) a ticket with a patch that requires a
Hi Dave,
On 30 Dez., 10:21, daveloeffler wrote:
> I can see a slight problem with this. At present there's no mechanism
> to explain to the patchbot exactly which patches to apply. So if you
> have (say) a ticket with a patch that requires a patch from an earlier
> ticket to be applied, or if you
On Dec 29, 6:52 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Simon King wrote:
> > Hi!
>
> > I just noticed that my patch from #10296 (ready for review, improving
> > the communication with singular via pexpect) had bit rotted.
>
> > Of course, the patchbot knew that the old p
On Thu, 30 Dec 2010 at 12:22AM -0800, Rob Beezer wrote:
> Excepting the above - I want to build matrices out of sets of vectors
> where the vectors become columns (as optional behavior).
Big thumbs up to being able to easily make matrices whose columns are
specified vectors.
This past semester,
On Dec 29, 10:31 pm, Jason Grout wrote:
> Notice that there is an underlying ideology that vectors are rows:
Yes, I have noticed that. Ties go to rows:
sage: matrix( [vector(QQ, [1,2,3]), vector(QQ,[4,5,6])] )
[1 2 3]
[4 5 6]
But the above is the first example where I have been tempted to
sugg
16 matches
Mail list logo
