On 2012-05-23 03:14, John H Palmieri wrote:
> Try installing the command line tools and see if that helps. Sage
> bundles GCC, but it doesn't necessarily include everything which is
> installed with the command line tools, so the machine might be missing
> some important component.
What are these "
On 5/21/12 1:10 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
On 5/18/12 5:46 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
It does seem to me like the problems are in threads acquiring locks and
possibly sending/receiving data. Maybe switching to the multithreaded
flask server might help. For the record, all the other *.sagenb.org
servers
On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 2:26:52 PM UTC-7, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
> > Sorry I haven't got back to you on this. Is XCode installed on the 10.7
> > laptop? Also, I notice that the error messages seem to indicate that
> you're
> > using th
On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 21:00:57 UTC+2, Nils Bruin wrote:
>
> I've discovered that the sage mirror www.cecm.sfu.ca/sage isn't
> updating anymore. It's doing a cron job trying to rsync with
>
> cecmir...@boxen.math.washington.edu:/home/was/www/sage/
>
> which fails. Has there been a change to t
Op 22-05-2012 15:26, Volker Braun schreef:
> On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 4:16:08 AM UTC-4, Marco Streng wrote:
>
> Definitely! That would make it possible to have a smooth projective
> model, with the correct points at infinity.
>
>
> I don't understand that sentence - a smooth elliptic sur
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Jason Grout
wrote:
> Sorry I haven't got back to you on this. Is XCode installed on the 10.7
> laptop? Also, I notice that the error messages seem to indicate that you're
> using the 10.6 binary; I wonder if that might be part of the problem? Did
> you compile 5
Le mardi 22 mai, Julien Puydt a écrit:
> http://boxen.math.washington.edu/home/jpuydt/sage-5.0-armv7l-Linux.tar.bz2
I forgot :
$ md5sum sage-5.0-armv7l-Linux.tar.bz2
ad53951e62c802071844f9bc6d5763d8 sage-5.0-armv7l-Linux.tar.bz2
if you don't get the same, perhaps the upload isn't finished yet (
Le lundi 21 mai, mmarco a écrit:
> I am a bit busy now, but if you pass me a tarball with the compiled
> sage directory in it i can try to create a chroot environment to be
> run in (rooted) android devices.
Sorry it took so long -- apparently I've been slow to ask for an
account :-P :
http://box
On May 22, 2012, at 13:08 , Justin C. Walker wrote:
>
> On May 22, 2012, at 12:59 , Jason Grout wrote:
>
>> On 5/22/12 2:53 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>>> Can anyone else evaluate this in Sage 5.0 on OSX 10.7?
>>
>> Just as a data point, this works fine for me in Sage 5.0 on OSX 10.6.8:
>>
>> sag
On May 22, 2012, at 12:59 , Jason Grout wrote:
> On 5/22/12 2:53 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
>> Can anyone else evaluate this in Sage 5.0 on OSX 10.7?
>
> Just as a data point, this works fine for me in Sage 5.0 on OSX 10.6.8:
>
> sage: URL='http://github.com/jasongrout/minimum_rank/raw/minimum_rank
On 5/22/12 2:53 PM, Jason Grout wrote:
Can anyone else evaluate this in Sage 5.0 on OSX 10.7?
Just as a data point, this works fine for me in Sage 5.0 on OSX 10.6.8:
sage:
URL='http://github.com/jasongrout/minimum_rank/raw/minimum_rank_1_1_0/'
sage:
files=['Zq_c.pyx','Zq.py','zero_forcing_64
On 5/22/12 2:13 PM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
A professor in the department (not me) recently got a new macbook with
MacOS 10.7 Lion on it. Due to some of the issues with installing XCode,
we simply waited until Sage 5 to install Sage. However, upon installing,
it fails to build Jason Grout's minimum
I've discovered that the sage mirror www.cecm.sfu.ca/sage isn't
updating anymore. It's doing a cron job trying to rsync with
cecmir...@boxen.math.washington.edu:/home/was/www/sage/
which fails. Has there been a change to the path required to sync to?
(It hasn't able to find this directory since F
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Jonathan wrote:
> Yes, I made a typo..Thanks for realizing what I meant.
>
> However, I still think that a solution that has complex answers is OK. If
> you are finding the symbolic solution isn't it better to find the general
> solution and then deal with specif
On May 22, 9:27 am, Jonathan wrote:
> Yes, I made a typo..Thanks for realizing what I meant.
>
> However, I still think that a solution that has complex answers is OK. If
> you are finding the symbolic solution isn't it better to find the general
> solution and then deal with specific cases?
On May 21, 5:08 pm, Maciek Sykulski wrote:
> The old patch somewhat
> works.http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/attachment/ticket/11436/trac_11436...
>
> It didn't apply automatically because the source in sage-5.0
> looks a bit different now:
> -
> def _read_in_file_command(self, fi
Maybe you should state at least a few details of your problem if you want
meaningful advice.
I like zeromq/pyzmq which is currently an optional package
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/12843
Its very easy to implement various messaging patterns without getting
bogged down in details
On Tuesday, May 22, 2012 4:16:08 AM UTC-4, Marco Streng wrote:
>
> Definitely! That would make it possible to have a smooth projective
> model, with the correct points at infinity.
>
I don't understand that sentence - a smooth elliptic surface can already be
embedded in P^2, right?
Note that t
Hi!
AFAIK, Singular uses the geo bucket data structure for internally
representing polynomials during Gröbner basis computations. I did not
succeed in finding it with search_src, but to be on the safe side, I
ask here: Are geo buckets wrapped in Sage?
Best regards,
Simon
--
To post to this grou
On May 21, 4:02 pm, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
> On 2012-05-21 23:21, Adam Webb wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >> William (or anyone else having this problem), can you test the SPKG
> >> Jeroen has put up on #12970 ? Just unpack a sage source tarball, and
> >> replace mpir-2.4.0.p3.spkg
> >> withhttp://
Yes, I made a typo..Thanks for realizing what I meant.
However, I still think that a solution that has complex answers is OK. If
you are finding the symbolic solution isn't it better to find the general
solution and then deal with specific cases? I don't see what is wrong
with: p = (-A)^(1/B
Op 22-05-2012 4:09, David Eklund schreef:
> Hi Volker,
>
> thanks for the advice! I think basing the implementation on the Cox ring
> is what I wanted anyway.
>
> If any number theory people are reading this I think it is worth
> thinking about making hyperelliptic curves subvarieties of weighte
Dima Pasechnik writes:
> AFAIK, pexpect provides IPC (Inter-Process Communication?) in Sage, and is
> used
> by a number of Sage packages.
While it is true that we use pexpect a lot, it is a particularly crude
kind of IPC, and we only use it because it's a quick and dirty solution
when you have
AFAIK, pexpect provides IPC (Inter-Process Communication?) in Sage, and is
used by a number of Sage packages.
On Tuesday, 22 May 2012 08:50:59 UTC+2, Keshav Kini wrote:
>
> Jorge Catumba Ruiz writes:
> > Hi, I was wondering if is possible to use IPC mechanisms with SAGE. That
> its
> > import
24 matches
Mail list logo
