On Feb 12, 2013, at 3:15 PM, Michael Welsh wrote:
> On 13/02/2013, at 11:09 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
>> On Feb 12, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Michael Welsh wrote:
>>
>>> On 13/02/2013, at 9:53 AM, kcrisman wrote:
Hi! Thanks to very hard work by Ivan Andrus, we have Sage double-clicking
sws fi
On 13/02/2013, at 11:09 AM, Ivan Andrus wrote:
> On Feb 12, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Michael Welsh wrote:
>
>> On 13/02/2013, at 9:53 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>>> Hi! Thanks to very hard work by Ivan Andrus, we have Sage double-clicking
>>> sws files on Mac. We just need one more test to make it complet
On Feb 12, 2013, at 2:25 PM, Benjamin Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:53 PM, kcrisman wrote:
>> Hi! Thanks to very hard work by Ivan Andrus, we have Sage double-clicking
>> sws files on Mac. We just need one more test to make it complete.
>>
>> If you DO have OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion
On Feb 12, 2013, at 1:59 PM, Michael Welsh wrote:
> On 13/02/2013, at 9:53 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>>
>> We particularly would like people who don't even have
>> Sage.app to try this, since with multiple versions of Sage.app there can be
>> natural confusion as to which one is supposed to open the
On Feb 12, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Michael Welsh wrote:
> On 13/02/2013, at 9:53 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>> Hi! Thanks to very hard work by Ivan Andrus, we have Sage double-clicking
>> sws files on Mac. We just need one more test to make it complete.
>>
>> If you DO have OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion but ha
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 12:53 PM, kcrisman wrote:
> Hi! Thanks to very hard work by Ivan Andrus, we have Sage double-clicking
> sws files on Mac. We just need one more test to make it complete.
>
> If you DO have OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion but have NOT ever made something that
> makes sws files ope
On 13/02/2013, at 9:53 AM, kcrisman wrote:
> Hi! Thanks to very hard work by Ivan Andrus, we have Sage double-clicking
> sws files on Mac. We just need one more test to make it complete.
>
> If you DO have OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion but have NOT ever made something
> that makes sws files open wi
On 13/02/2013, at 9:53 AM, kcrisman wrote:
>
> We particularly would like people who don't even have
> Sage.app to try this, since with multiple versions of Sage.app there can be
> natural confusion as to which one is supposed to open the file, though in
> principle this should work there as w
Hi! Thanks to very hard work by Ivan Andrus, we have Sage double-clicking
sws files on Mac. We just need one more test to make it complete.
If you DO have OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion but have NOT ever made something
that makes sws files open with Sage.app on a double-click, please
download
http:
On Feb 11, 11:30 pm, Robert Bradshaw
wrote:
> I don't think we should have a separate ZZ whose category is
> EuclideanDomains another one whose category is Rings, another one
> whose category is AbelianGroups, and another one whose category is
> Sets. Perhaps this is a special case, as this is a n
Le 12/02/2013 11:55, Volker Braun a écrit :
+1 for having a FEM implementation.
I've seen some of the codes in numerical GR (Cactus) and they are
definitely not "generic FEM" implementations that one could apply to a
wide range of problems ;-)
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 7:12:42 AM UTC, tdumo
+1 for having a FEM implementation.
I've seen some of the codes in numerical GR (Cactus) and they are
definitely not "generic FEM" implementations that one could apply to a wide
range of problems ;-)
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 7:12:42 AM UTC, tdumont wrote:
>
> I like FreeFem++
> http://ww
On Monday, February 11, 2013 7:38:08 PM UTC+1, Christian Kuper wrote:
>
> I would be greatly interested in your opinion why you think "no".
>
Well, I wasn't that serious and it's just for me personally. Can you give
me some examples what this package could do? I'm happy to learn more every
day
On Tuesday, February 12, 2013 8:12:42 AM UTC+1, tdumont wrote:
>
> -parallelism: matlab as some interesting things...Sage has only mpi and
> "forks"...
... wait until ipython 0.13 is properly inside sage:
http://ipython.org/ipython-doc/dev/parallel/
H
--
You received this message becaus
On 02/12/2013 03:12 PM, Thierry Dumont wrote:
-in my country, many people use matlab only for graphics; Sage as good
graphics, but not yet exactly at the same level as matlab.
I would say the graphics _output_ in Sage is better than in matlab - try
introducing antialiasing of figures in matla
15 matches
Mail list logo
