Dear Andrew,
During your last rebase you introduced the following lines in your patch:
tableaux-combinatorics-am.patch:+del from tableau_tuple import
TableauTuple, StandardTableauTuple, TableauTuples, StandardTableauTuples
trac_Kleshchev-partitions-am.patch:+del from partition_tuple
Hell everybody !!!
I'm sorry to answer this late but I don't always read the sage-combinat
posts ^^;
Well, here's the thing if you did not work it out already :
With Sage's MILP support, you will be able to answer easily those two
questions :
Is there a subcollection
Oops, sorry, fixed now.
Florent: thanks for cleaning up after me.
Andrew
On Tuesday, 23 April 2013 23:38:00 UTC+10, fhivert wrote:
Dear Andrew,
During your last rebase you introduced the following lines in your patch:
tableaux-combinatorics-am.patch:+del from tableau_tuple
On 04/23/2013 03:32 AM, John Cremona wrote:
On 22 April 2013 20:20, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
5) Sage color scheme has been updated/fleshed out to match the updated
trac theme
Speaking of color schemes: I've heard comments that the red and green colors
used when
On 22 April 2013 22:32, R. Andrew Ohana andrew.oh...@gmail.com wrote:
When 5.9, 5.10, ... are out is up to Jeroen.
My goal is to have everything reviewed by mid/late June, so assuming I meet
my goal then I expect a 6.0 release in the Augest-September time frame
(assuming about a month
On 23 April 2013 08:41, P Purkayastha ppu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/23/2013 03:32 AM, John Cremona wrote:
On 22 April 2013 20:20, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
5) Sage color scheme has been updated/fleshed out to match the updated
trac theme
Speaking of color schemes:
Hi There
i have updated my proposal, taking into account the discussion. I've
mostly extended the Details section. Thanks for reading.
=== Title, Project Synopsis
Get Sage ready for Linux distributions
Sage is currently shipped as a software distribution that, next to
genuine code, includes all
On Monday, April 22, 2013 10:45:33 PM UTC+2, Justin C. Walker wrote:
A question (well, two) occurs to me: are new accounts needed?
I just made one, and an additional request is pending. So, please inform
those who create trac accounts all the time if we should halt this for a
day or so.
On 04/23/2013 09:41 AM, P Purkayastha wrote:
Does this webpage accurately depict what you see?
http://www.vischeck.com/vischeck/vischeckURL.php
That's a strange question indeed. How can we tell how non-colourblind
people see that page?
I think a good test page with different colours is
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
I think a good test page with different colours is
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11337
Yes, Johnco. should tell us how they see #13540 … it's a dark red
tone, so it will be hidden between the darker blue
On 04/23/2013 11:31 AM, Harald Schilly wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
I think a good test page with different colours is
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11337
Yes, Johnco. should tell us how they see #13540 … it's a dark red
On 23 April 2013 10:31, Harald Schilly harald.schi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be
wrote:
I think a good test page with different colours is
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/11337
Yes, Johnco. should tell us how they see
On 04/23/2013 11:36 AM, John Cremona wrote:
I also see a couple of orange numbers 14276, 14375. The contrast
between that and the green is not so easy -- as Jeroen also finds.
Can we try a darker green?
OK, I'll make the change.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
On 04/23/2013 05:27 PM, Jeroen Demeyer wrote:
On 04/23/2013 09:41 AM, P Purkayastha wrote:
Does this webpage accurately depict what you see?
http://www.vischeck.com/vischeck/vischeckURL.php
That's a strange question indeed. How can we tell how non-colourblind
people see that page?
Sorry, I
If its important to be able to distinguish the ticket numbers (and I'm not
quite sure that it adds that much information, you can always use
mouse-over to see the status and title) then we should make one of them
inverted (with text background color).
For diffs I agree that red-green is
On 04/23/2013 07:55 PM, Volker Braun wrote:
If its important to be able to distinguish the ticket numbers (and I'm
not quite sure that it adds that much information, you can always use
mouse-over to see the status and title) then we should make one of them
inverted (with text background color).
Robert Bradshaw wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 8:42 AM, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 5:33 AM, leif not.rea...@online.de
mailto:not.rea...@online.de wrote:
People promised a couple of times (last time early this year IIRC)
that t2
On 04/23/2013 03:45 PM, leif wrote:
IMHO it's better to tell people they should build from source than
offering potentially broken bdists.
At least, it's considered a bug if the bdist is broken. But it's true
that we never really test bdists.
--
You received this message because you are
On Apr 23, 7:55 am, Volker Braun vbraun.n...@gmail.com wrote:
If its important to be able to distinguish the ticket numbers (and I'm not
quite sure that it adds that much information, you can always use
mouse-over to see the status and title) then we should make one of them
inverted (with
On 04/23/2013 11:36 AM, John Cremona wrote:
I also see a couple of orange numbers 14276, 14375. The contrast
between that and the green is not so easy -- as Jeroen also finds.
Can we try a darker green?
I made some minor adjustments to the colour scheme. Please try again
John Cremona wrote:
Any chance of user configurable colour schemes?
Yes, please.
There's already Trac-Preferences-Syntax Highlighting where one can
choose different color schemes; haven't tried that though, and can't
tell whether it's sufficient.
-leif
On 22 April 2013 22:10, Jeroen
On 23 April 2013 14:45, leif not.rea...@online.de wrote:
IMHO it's better to tell people they should build from source than offering
potentially broken bdists. [We already get enough error reports for the
Linux bdists, although a couple simply due to distro mismatches, i.e.,
people trying to
On 4/23/13 2:41 AM, P Purkayastha wrote:
On 04/23/2013 03:32 AM, John Cremona wrote:
On 22 April 2013 20:20, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
5) Sage color scheme has been updated/fleshed out to match the updated
trac theme
Speaking of color schemes: I've heard comments that
On 23 April 2013 17:04, Jason Grout jason-s...@creativetrax.com wrote:
Robert Kern on the scipy mailing list a long time [1] ago mentioned another
tool for simulating color blindness for non-colorblind people:
http://colororacle.org/
There are probably lots of other such tools.
Is there
2013/4/23 Felix Salfelder fe...@salfelder.org:
Hi There
Hi,
Sorry for only commenting in this thread this late; I have been very
busy with my work and should still be for a few months, but always
find some time to contribute and work on some personal projects :-)
I had a sagemath review
A big thanks to Paulo for packaging Sage for Fedora and getting it all
reviewed and into the official distribution!
On Tuesday, April 23, 2013 10:08:54 PM UTC+1, Paulo César Pereira de
Andrade wrote:
I had a sagemath review request for Fedora for several months,
and only made the
William Stein wst...@gmail.com writes:
On Apr 22, 2013 11:28 AM, Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be wrote:
As only link or even the default link, I am against this because
the repo doesn't correspond to Sage. If I would be new to Sage, I
would find it very confusing that the source code
Jeroen Demeyer jdeme...@cage.ugent.be writes:
On 04/22/2013 09:32 PM, John Cremona wrote:
I volunteer to be the official red-green colour-blind
guinea-pig if you point me to a suitable sample page.
Me too by the way.
Wait, weren't you the one who decided this color scheme during Sage Days
I just made one, and an additional request is pending. So, please inform
those who create trac accounts all the time if we should halt this for a
day or so.
Yes, there will be notice since it will probably mean a few hours of
downtime (it takes a while to dump and reload the trac database).
29 matches
Mail list logo
