On Feb 15, 7:02 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
The latest release of R in Sage will not build without iconv on Solaris.
The
option to disable the use of iconv,
Dave,
Did you check that Cygwin does not have its own iconv patches?
It used to have patches...
Dmitrii
On Feb 15, 5:02 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 8:13 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
The latest
kcrisman wrote:
One could then update the R spkg for adding iconv support. There is
currently a ticket with a .p0 spkg for R adding Mac graphics support
(removing the no-aqua options) and some other graphics-related stuff
which is on hold for some other stuff, but it would instead make sense
Dima Pasechnik wrote:
Dave,
Did you check that Cygwin does not have its own iconv patches?
It used to have patches...
Dmitrii
I've not specifically checked Cygwin myself, but this ticket, created by Mike
Hansen 4 months ago:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/7319
(gdmodule requires
On Feb 15, 9:26 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
kcrisman wrote:
One could then update the R spkg for adding iconv support. There is
currently a ticket with a .p0 spkg for R adding Mac graphics support
(removing the no-aqua options) and some other graphics-related
kcrisman wrote:
On Feb 15, 9:26 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
kcrisman wrote:
One could then update the R spkg for adding iconv support. There is
currently a ticket with a .p0 spkg for R adding Mac graphics support
(removing the no-aqua options) and some other
kcrisman wrote:
R's spkg-install needs an overhaul, as noted in my previous email (which It
seems to have invalid options, invalid comments, and various other issues. It
would appear we could potentially get better performance too, at the cost of
installing other libraries.
If you could point
On Feb 15, 12:23 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
kcrisman wrote:
R's spkg-install needs an overhaul, as noted in my previous email (which
It
seems to have invalid options, invalid comments, and various other issues.
It
would appear we could potentially get
kcrisman wrote:
On Feb 15, 12:23 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
kcrisman wrote:
R's spkg-install needs an overhaul, as noted in my previous email (which It
seems to have invalid options, invalid comments, and various other issues. It
would appear we could potentially get
