On Jan 9, 3:58 am, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 09, 2010 at 10:53:30AM +0100, Vincent Delecroix wrote:
I get the following with sage-4.3, is it normal to have [2, 1] and [1,
2] as partitions ?
{{{
sage: for p in Partitions(3, max_slope=1):
:
On Apr 26, 7:58 am, Florent Hivert florent.hiv...@univ-rouen.fr
wrote:
How is it decided to make a ticket a blocker ? Is it the responsibility of the
release manager ? If on Wednesday I had realized that 4.4rc0 was so close to
be
out, could I have made #8746 a blocker ? (Apologies if my use
On May 19, 3:55 pm, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
Hi John!
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 03:40:44PM -0700, John H Palmieri wrote:
On May 19, 3:02 pm, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 02:25:22PM -0700, John Palmieri wrote
Some questions about defining an AlgebraWithBasis or a
GradedAlgebraWithBasis:
- Do these need to be defined using CombinatorialFreeModule, as in the
example?
- If so, in all of the examples I've seen, CombinatorialFreeModule
needs a basis with an explicit indexing set. I don't know an explicit
the implementation
for a parent. I'll try to work on it this week, and keep you updated
when I'll have some draft.
Great!
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 09:46:54PM -0700, John H Palmieri wrote:
Some questions about defining an AlgebraWithBasis or a
GradedAlgebraWithBasis:
- Do these need to be defined using
I would like to construct the set of ordered partitions of a positive
integer n subject to a condition like this:
- if the partition is (l_1, l_2, ...), then I want to specify a
variant of slope: I want to specify integers a and b, or lists of
integers (a_1, a_2, ...) and (b_1, b_2, ...) and
(also posted to sage-devel)
One of the examples in the docstring for DisjointUnionEnumeratedSet
goes something like this:
sage: U = DisjointUnionEnumeratedSets(Family(NonNegativeIntegers(),
Permutations))
sage: it = iter(U)
sage: it.next()
[]
If I try the same thing, replacing Permutations
On Jun 4, 3:21 pm, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 4, 2:51 pm, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
Hi John,
Hi Nicolas,
On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:48:00AM -0700, John H Palmieri wrote:
How about this for a starting point for an implementation
okay. I hope some other people chime in with ideas as well.
John
Andrew
On Jun 20, 5:45 am, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a simple example of a graded algebra with basis. Please take a
look at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9280
and provide
On Jun 22, 2:53 pm, Franco Saliola sali...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello John,
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 11:45 PM, John H Palmieri
jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a simple example of a graded algebra with basis. Please take a
look at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9280
I have
On Jun 24, 12:23 am, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 11:06:40PM -0700, John H Palmieri wrote:
If the grading is over NN/ZZ, or some naturally ordered monoid, I
would definitely argue for keeping degree for all elements.
That's not how I think
I personally don't like the use of an asterisk * for scalar
multiplication in printed output -- I like a space, or sometimes
nothing at all -- so I've put a patch at
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9370
which allows for customization of printing of
CombinatorialFreeModuleElements.
I find the following a little strange. I know why it happens, but
anyway:
sage: F = CombinatorialFreeModule(QQ, [1,2,3,4], prefix='F')
sage: F._prefix = 'x'
sage: G = CombinatorialFreeModule(QQ, [1,2,3,4], prefix='F')
sage: G.prefix()
'x'
Would it be possible, and would it make sense,
On Sep 2, 3:33 am, Bruce brucewestb...@gmail.com wrote:
I am trying to construct the free module on the set of instances of a
class G.
Did you also ask this on ask.sagemath.org? I've posted some possibly
related ideas in the thread http://ask.sagemath.org/question/94/using-
On Sep 27, 5:41 am, Christian Stump christian.st...@gmail.com wrote:
Salut,
as you are just talking about the CombinatorialFreeModule: my problem
is that the CFM imports everything from rings, as you can create a CFM
over any ring. Now, I use the CFM to implement the universal
cyclotomic
On Sep 27, 12:02 pm, Nicolas M. Thiery nicolas.thi...@u-psud.fr
wrote:
Hi John, Christian,
On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 08:20:26AM -0700, John H Palmieri wrote:
I think that many of the import statements in free_module.py should be
inside the methods that use them, rather than
On Friday, February 25, 2011 1:28:06 PM UTC-8, Christian Stump wrote:
Is it okay if I open a ticket on that and provide a fix?
Yes, please fix CombinatorialFreeModule!
Is there a way to provide a latex prefix in addition to the prefix
for CombinatorialFreeModule in order to get
On Tuesday, March 22, 2011 1:34:44 AM UTC-7, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote:
Is it already possible or would it be easy to implement a quotient
of the free algebra by specifying relations between the generators?
Unless Singular can provide something (but I guess that would be more
for
On Tuesday, December 20, 2011 12:48:00 AM UTC-8, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:55:11AM +, Sagan, Bruce wrote:
Formidable! This installed dot2tex. Thanks so much!! One last
question. When I went back to the notebook and ran a view command (I just
copied the
On Friday, December 23, 2011 4:54:53 PM UTC-8, Travis Scrimshaw wrote:
I copied the latest version of TikZ / PGF (using a shared folder)
to the VM and installed it. I was able to compile the .tex file using
the VM's latex compiler and view the output .pdf from my host OS
(Windows
On Friday, January 13, 2012 2:07:00 PM UTC-8, Raymond N. Greenwell wrote:
Hello! I posted this on sage-support, but I should have posted it
here.
I tried using the HasseDiagram and rank features of Sage as described
on
On Sunday, April 8, 2012 8:44:47 PM UTC-7, Mark Shimozono wrote:
Suppose I make a new file that looks like
a sage module, replete with doctesting strings.
If I run
sage -t
on it, the functions defined in the new file are not loaded
and errors occur.
What version of Sage is this?
Dear Sage developers:
Because of Volker's work on the patch at Trac #13109, the syntax for
deprecations has changed. He fixed all of the discrepancies in the Sage
library, and we just did similar fixes on (I think) all tickets with
positive reviews. So if you have a ticket at some other stage
In the combinat queue, some files contain non-ascii characters. Several
participants at Sage-Combinat Days 40 have run into problems with this:
when there are non-ascii characters, if you clone the combinat queue, you
get errors when building Sage and its documentation.
-
For people working with the combinat queue:
- Trac ticket #13255 [1] touches many files, all in the directory
devel/sage/sage/misc.
- Trac ticket #6495 [2] touches many files, all in devel/sage/doc/,
including practically all of the files in devel/sage/doc/en/reference.
These patches are
On Thursday, July 19, 2012 2:45:09 PM UTC-7, Martin wrote:
Anne Schilling writes:
Here are several *ideas*:
* We should run daily tests on the needs review section and pop
patches
off that section if the tests do not pass (or people are not actively
working
on making
On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 1:35:02 PM UTC-7, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
All in all, in the future, I *will* put a negative review to similar
non essential global changes that impact much of our code (stuff in
combinat, ...). Unless the author volunteers to handle all the
rebasing work
On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 6:05:44 PM UTC-7, Volker Braun wrote:
On Wednesday, August 1, 2012 8:47:37 PM UTC-4, John H Palmieri wrote:
See http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/13255. There may be
other similar tickets by the same author.
At least that ticket only touches stuff
On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 11:51:16 AM UTC-7, Franco Saliola wrote:
Hello Simon,
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Simon King
simon...@uni-jena.dejavascript:
wrote:
Hi Franco,
On 2012-08-14, Franco Saliola sal...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
What should the method that
On Tuesday, August 14, 2012 1:27:49 PM UTC-7, Simon King wrote:
[Followup-To: header set to gmane.comp.mathematics.sage.algebra.]
On 2012-08-14, John H Palmieri jhpalm...@gmail.com javascript: wrote:
--=_Part_11_31037299.1344973817229
What about just dual? By default, it would
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 11:40:05 AM UTC-7, Anne Schilling wrote:
Hi All!
Savdeep Sethi made a summary of a comparison between Sage and LiE.
Any volunteers to port or implement the functionality of LiE to Sage?
There is already an optional LiE spkg for Sage [1]. I don't know
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 11:47:08 AM UTC-7, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Wednesday, August 22, 2012 11:40:05 AM UTC-7, Anne Schilling wrote:
Hi All!
Savdeep Sethi made a summary of a comparison between Sage and LiE.
Any volunteers to port or implement the functionality of LiE
On Friday, August 24, 2012 12:29:06 AM UTC-7, Nicolas M. Thiery wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 04:48:31PM -0700, Andrew Mathas wrote:
Here, I think, is the complete list together with their recommended
replacements:
Thanks! If no one has complained in, say, two days, please go
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 4:53:33 PM UTC-7, Anne Schilling wrote:
In principle, reading the documentation of Partitions the command
sage: RestrictedPartitions(5,[3,2,1], 3).list()
[[3, 1, 1], [2, 2, 1]]
should be achieved by
sage: Partitions(5, parts_in = [3,2,1], max_length=3)
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 5:21:31 PM UTC-7, Anne Schilling wrote:
On 8/29/12 5:11 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Wednesday, August 29, 2012 4:53:33 PM UTC-7, Anne Schilling wrote:
In principle, reading the documentation of Partitions the command
sage
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:03:51 AM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote:
Works for me on Firefox 17.0.1 on Linux x86_64. Can somebody try and see
if its fixed in more recent recent release?
In more detail: go to http://www.mathjax.org/download/ and follow the
link for Current Version:
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:09:15 AM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:03:51 AM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote:
Works for me on Firefox 17.0.1 on Linux x86_64. Can somebody try and see
if its fixed in more recent recent release?
In more detail: go to http
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 9:17:24 AM UTC-8, Volker Braun wrote:
On Thursday, December 13, 2012 5:13:38 PM UTC, John H Palmieri wrote:
Or perhaps Volker meant a more recent release of Firefox. What is the
most recent release available for OS X 10.6.8?
Thats what I meant - most
On Tuesday, February 19, 2013 6:23:08 PM UTC-8, Andrew Mathas wrote:
Hi Travis,
The queue isn't applying for in using version 5.6 even with this spkg
installed. Specifically, trac_6495-part1-moving-files-link.patch does not
apply. It's not a big deal as I can just move to 5.7.rc0 but it
On Wednesday, May 22, 2013 9:58:56 AM UTC-7, Nicolas M. Thiéry wrote:
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:13:09AM -0700, kcrisman wrote:
A standard package which is only useful in the presence of an
optional
package doesn't make sense to me.
It simplifies our users's life, and that
On Friday, February 14, 2014 6:18:42 PM UTC-8, Mark Shimozono wrote:
Nicolas,
In your case, to implement the smash product, you probably want to
implement a subclass of CombinatorialFreeModuleTensor, set its
category to the join of ModulesWithBasis(QQ).TensorProducts() and
On Friday, February 14, 2014 9:06:35 PM UTC-8, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Friday, February 14, 2014 6:18:42 PM UTC-8, Mark Shimozono wrote:
Nicolas,
In your case, to implement the smash product, you probably want to
implement a subclass of CombinatorialFreeModuleTensor, set its
Quick question: why not use the class
sage.modules.free_module.FreeModule_generic?
Longer question/comment (not directed at you, but at the general situation
in Sage): is it a problem to have multiple parallel developments of free
modules, one in sage.modules.free_module, one in
On Tuesday, March 11, 2014 12:40:41 PM UTC-7, Nathann Cohen wrote:
On that note, I think reviewers shouldn't hold up tickets because they
don't like the current implementation without providing a working
alternative and can demonstrate why it's better.
Do you think that a patch
You ask at the end what you're doing wrong. There are at least two things:
first, you should probably also post this message to sage-combinat-devel,
which gets a lot more traffic. I'm cc'ing that group. Second, the very last
error message is partly a clue:
TypeError: unhashable type:
know).
Anyway, I'll keep fiddling with the code. Thanks for your help.
Best,
Simon
On Monday, April 14, 2014 1:37:11 PM UTC+10, John H Palmieri wrote:
You might look at the code in the file
http://trac.sagemath.org/attachment/ticket/9280/trac_9280_nomodule.patch
On Saturday, April 26, 2014 11:31:43 AM UTC-7, slabbe wrote:
One issue that is bugging me
isA https://github.com/kjellmf/dot2tex/issues/13
(https://code.google.com/p/dot2tex/issues/detail?id=32)
I'm not able to reproduce the issue with \verb in the current
development
On May 30, 2:46 pm, John Cremona john.crem...@gmail.com wrote:
I notice that during sage -docbuild all pdf there were a lot of
latex errors flashing by, too fast to read -- is there a log kept of
a docbuild run?
John
I don't think there is a log in general, but for pdf files, they are
On May 31, 6:28 am, jyr jyr2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
There is something strange going on with the simple sqrt() function:
sage: sqrt(2)
sqrt(2)
sage: sqrt(2.0)
1.41421356237310
sage: sqrt(2,prec=100)
1.4142135623730950488016887242
but:
sage: sqrt(2.0,prec=100)
On May 31, 2:15 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 6:28 AM, jyr jyr2...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
There is something strange going on with the simple sqrt() function:
sage: sqrt(2)
sqrt(2)
sage: sqrt(2.0)
1.41421356237310
sage: sqrt(2,prec=100)
On May 31, 6:01 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I can get the HTML and PDF versions of the documentation. But the PDF
version of the tutorial, the installation guide, the reference manual,
the construction guide, and the programming guide all still have The
Sage Group. This
On Jun 1, 9:32 am, Mike Hansen mhan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Sage 4.0.1.alpha has been released. This should hopefully take care of
the rest of the fallout from the switch to Pynac. The tarball can be
found at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/mhansen/sage-4.0.1.alpha0.tar
and a
On Jun 8, 8:56 am, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8-Jun-09, at 8:42 AM, Pat LeSmithe wrote:
davidloeffler wrote:
Can I make a special request for this release? It would be really
nice
if we could get rid of the insufferable WARNING: html_favicon is not
an .ico
On Jun 8, 8:42 am, Pat LeSmithe qed...@gmail.com wrote:
davidloeffler wrote:
Can I make a special request for this release? It would be really nice
if we could get rid of the insufferable WARNING: html_favicon is not
an .ico file on building the documentation. Inspection reveals that
the
On Jun 8, 7:37 pm, Dan Drake dr...@kaist.edu wrote:
The latex() command does different things in the notebook and the
command line.
Command line:
sage: var('a, b, c')
(a, b, c)
sage: eqn = [a+b*c==1, b-a*c==0, a+b==5]
sage: s = solve(eqn, a,b ,c)
sage: latex(s[0])
On Jun 14, 12:38 pm, Burcin Erocal bur...@erocal.org wrote:
Hi again,
There were long discussion about the typesetting of partial derivatives
in the new system, but I don't think we got to a conclusion yet. The
previous thread is here:
On Jun 15, 12:13 am, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Here's Sage 4.0.2.rc0. Come and get it while it's hot:
The following response to this release announcement was autogenerated
by the Sage docbot:
Someone didn't format their reST correctly, so building the reference
On Jun 15, 5:15 pm, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
On 15-Jun-09, at 4:22 PM, John H Palmieri wrote:
On Jun 15, 12:13 am, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
Here's Sage 4.0.2.rc0. Come and get it while it's hot:
The following response to this release
On Jun 15, 7:59 pm, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
Nick is right that rebuilding the docs is a pain. But as has been
pointed out before, you can rebuild the HTML version once in a new
branch, then only changed files get rebuilt the next time.
make ptestlong does not appear
On Jun 17, 10:20 am, Martin Albrecht m...@informatik.uni-bremen.de
wrote:
Hi there,
Sage Days 16 is coming up next week in Barcelona. On Tuesday, I will give a
talk on how to get started developing Sage. At SD16 many people are attending
who never attended a Sage Days before and thus we
Right now, the coercion section of Developer's guide starts off by
saying
**September 2008:** Much of this material is out of date. We are
working on a revised version.
(The relevant ticket is http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/
4196.)
Now that we have a very nice coercion section
On Jun 17, 1:31 pm, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote:
Right now, the coercion section of Developer's guide starts off by
saying
**September 2008:** Much of this material is out of date. We are
working on a revised version.
(The relevant ticket is
On Jun 17, 1:53 pm, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes: #4196 talks about the developer's guide, while #5454 deals with
the reference manual.
True, but the new section in the reference manual has a fair bit of
exposition at the top. What else would you want in the developer's
On Jun 25, 11:18 am, Robert Miller rlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
This release is primarily the Python upgrade. The source tarball and
sage.math binary are here:
On Jun 26, 6:45 am, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
Upon using hg_sage.import_patch with options='--no-commit', everything
works fine but I get the following extremely non-informative message
from the python-2.6 hg.py module:
DeprecationWarning: os.popen3 is deprecated. Use the
On Jun 26, 9:19 am, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 26, 12:06 pm, Nick Alexander ncalexan...@gmail.com wrote:
Where is the code for these sage -foo commands?
I found them once but have forgotten where they are.
SAGE_ROOT/local/bin/sage-foo
Thanks.
but I don't know
On Jun 26, 1:15 pm, gsw georgswe...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 26 Jun., 21:34, Arnaud Bergeron aberge...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/26 kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com:
On Jun 26, 2:24 pm, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 26, 10:33 am, kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com wrote
On Jun 26, 1:57 pm, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 26, 1:15 pm, gsw georgswe...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 26 Jun., 21:34, Arnaud Bergeron aberge...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/6/26 kcrisman kcris...@gmail.com:
On Jun 26, 2:24 pm, John H Palmieri jhpalmier
On Jun 26, 2:40 pm, Craig Citro craigci...@gmail.com wrote:
Should the strings extra1, etc., be searched for only in the source
code, or should they be searched for both in the source code and the
file name?
I've definitely used the search path too behavior on purpose at
various times.
In the notebook, if I use hg_sage.serve(), I see this:
**
**
* Open your web browser to http://localhost:8200 *
**
On Jun 27, 12:04 pm, davidloeffler dave.loeff...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 27, 8:43 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
#6418: John Palmieri: ref manual fixes for 4.1.alpha1 [Reviewed by
Minh Van Nguyen]
\begin{pedantry}
We're going to need another reference-manual-fixing ticket,
On Jun 27, 6:50 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
#!/usr/bin/bash
if [ `uname` = SunOS -a `ld --version 21 | grep GNU` = ]; then
echo Solaris system. The linker is NOT the GNU linker
echo The correct compiler flags are '-Wl,-h,'
elif [ `uname` = darwin ];
On Jun 28, 12:44 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 7:38 PM, John H Palmierijhpalmier...@gmail.com
wrote:
In the notebook, if I use hg_sage.serve(), I see this:
**
*
On Jun 27, 11:43 am, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Tom Boothbytomas.boot...@gmail.com wrote:
Sage 4.1.alpha2 has been released, find it at
http://sage.math.washington.edu/home/boothby/releases
SNIP
The following tickets were
At the moment, we have two tickets for changing the cloning process:
#5350: sage-clone should use hard links for the build directory
#6187: After making a clone, the reference manual (and other docs)
should not have to be completely rebuilt.
Both have positive reviews, in fact the first was
On Jun 29, 11:17 am, Robert Miller rlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Also, popen has been deprecated. We're getting warnings in a few
places, and this should be resolved before sage-4.1 is released.
Robert Miller is taking over, and the plan is to have him close
...
--tom
I
On Jun 30, 12:22 am, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Dan Drakedr...@kaist.edu wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 at 05:21PM -0700, John H Palmieri wrote:
How about #6429: sagedoc: make search_src and friends less OS
dependent? This should fix the doctest
On Jul 1, 5:21 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
Once a .spkg package is built, tested and installed in Sage, all the
config files using during its creation, all the object files etc are all
deleted. This is obviously normally a good idea, as it conserves disk
space.
But
On Jul 2, 10:29 am, Robert Miller rlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
This is my current list for rc0, aside from getting someone to fix
#6448:
For those of us who don't like warning when building the reference
manual, would you consider #6435? It's a pretty trivial patch and has
a positive review.
On Jul 4, 8:21 pm, Robert Miller rlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
Source tarball, sage.math binary, and upgrade URL are, respectively:
On Jul 5, 11:41 am, Simon King simon.k...@uni-jena.de wrote:
Dear Sage devel,
writing a test suite for my cohomology package, I got rather
frustrated. After working around the randomness of some Gap functions,
I am now concerned with the computation time.
It happened that the tests passed,
On Jul 6, 4:03 am, Andrzej Giniewicz ggi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:25 AM, gswgeorgswe...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mac OS X 10.4, too, singular fails to build (see the message from
John H Palmieri above).
It seems that (see trac #6362) the update from Singular
On Jul 6, 11:03 am, Andrzej Giniewicz ggi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:20 PM, John H Palmierijhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
It builds for me; the other two spkgs there (3.1.0-4-...) fail to
build on my mac.
can you maybe provide full log there of both 3.1.0-2 and
On Jul 6, 7:58 pm, rjf fate...@gmail.com wrote:
the way most programming language grammars work, those based on so-
called context-free grammars, it is important to avoid ambiguity, and
to have constructions that can be parsed regardless of context.
thus
x+y means the same as
(x)+y in most
There is some ugly LaTeX'ing going on in Sage:
In the notebook, try
{{{
%latex
$\sage{type(35))$
}}}
In this case, it uses the string type 'sage.rings.integer.Integer'
as text, but the and signs get converted into an upside-down
exclamation point and question mark.
Or click the Typeset button
On Jul 7, 11:30 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
The following tickets were merged in Sage 4.1.rc1:
#5799: John Palmieri: jsMath, favicon, and logo for live, static, and
offline docs [Reviewed by Robert Miller, only merged
trac_5799_manifest.patch]
For the record,
On Jul 8, 12:07 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 11:35 AM, John H Palmierijhpalmier...@gmail.com
wrote:
There is some ugly LaTeX'ing going on in Sage:
In the notebook, try
{{{
%latex
$\sage{type(35))$
}}}
In this case, it uses the string type
On Jul 7, 11:09 pm, Robert Miller rlmills...@gmail.com wrote:
All known issues have been fixed, and all long doctests pass on
sage.math (* -- see below), so there is a chance this could be
sage-4.1.
On Intel Mac OS X 10.5, built fine -- upgraded from 4.1.alpha3 and
also built from scratch.
On Jul 9, 6:06 pm, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
I just noticed an old thread, where a user had problems on squite,
making his own version of some packages with an alpha, heta or rc
release of Sage.
It would be good if alpha/beta/rc releases always showed a message that
On Jul 20, 9:10 am, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm about to release Sage 4.1.1.alpha0. But before doing so, I have a
question about the Sage banner. As you know the banner currently
reads:
--
|
On Jul 20, 12:34 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 4:18 AM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm getting the following error when working through this part of the
Sage tutorial
On Jul 20, 9:02 pm, Ondrej Certik ond...@certik.cz wrote:
[snip]
Also, question to all, do you like the In [3] and Out[3] lines? I
don't have an opinion on it yet myself, so I implemented them, to see
how it looks like.
How easy would it be to add a way to toggle them on and off?
Also,
On Jul 20, 8:04 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
This is the first release of the Sage 4.1.1 release cycle. William and
I are co-chairing this release cycle. The source tarball and the
sage.math only binary are available at
On Jul 22, 2:17 pm, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Jaap,
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Jaap Spiesj.sp...@hccnet.nl wrote:
slabbe wrote:
Bonjour Jaap,
This is nowhttp://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/6593.
I will post a patch soon.
Thanks! I could not apply
Want to boost doctest coverage in Sage by 0.5%? Review the ticket
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/877
John
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
To post to this group, send email to sage-devel@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
On Jul 27, 1:18 pm, John H Palmieri jhpalmier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 27, 3:59 am, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks,
The following tests failed on sage.math:
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/misc/lazy_attribute.py
sage -t -long devel/sage/sage/misc
On Jul 28, 5:42 pm, William Stein wst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 4:47 PM, Robert
Bradshawrober...@math.washington.edu wrote:
On Jul 28, 2009, at 4:16 PM, William Stein wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 3:56 PM, David
Kirkbydavid.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
2009/7/28
Is OS X 64-bit support just about ready to be part of Sage? The
instructions at http://wiki.sagemath.org/osx64 worked well for me with
4.1.1.alpha1, as far as I can tell: I just get the same 2 doctest
failures that everyone else gets (lazy_attribute and
abstract_method). Can we just make a new
On Aug 2, 11:19 am, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net
wrote:
If there were only pre-release versions of Sage available, and no stable
release, then a less prominent message may be ok. But when there are
stable releases, and someone is using one that has not had much testing,
I believe
On Aug 5, 6:45 am, Minh Nguyen nguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 10:50 PM, Minh Nguyennguyenmi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Alex,
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Alex Ghitzaaghi...@gmail.com wrote:
Built from scratch on
Linux cartan 2.6.28-15-generic #48-Ubuntu SMP Wed Jul
1 - 100 of 1458 matches
Mail list logo
