Re: [sage-support] Fwd: sage q

2010-01-01 Thread David Joyner
I agree this is not a well-defined question but the questioner may want to look at http://www.gap-system.org/Manuals/doc/htm/tut/CHAP005.htm#SECT004 . I also suggest starting with smaller groups to begin with, if possible, to test out things. On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Alex Ghitza

[sage-support] Testing errors for Sage 4.3 in openSUSE 11.0

2010-01-01 Thread Samrat
Hi, On trying to compile Sage 4.3 on my openSUSE 11.0, the 'make test' process reported the following errors: -- The following tests failed: sage -t devel/sage/doc/en/tutorial/tour_algebra.rst sage -t

Re: [sage-support] Testing errors for Sage 4.3 in openSUSE 11.0

2010-01-01 Thread Minh Nguyen
Hi Samrat, On Sat, Jan 2, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Samrat samrat@gmail.com wrote: SNIP Should i attach the test.log for details? Yes, that would be helpful, but should first upload the log to somewhere on the web and provide a link to the log. What you can also do is first run the tests in

[sage-support] Re: region plot error

2010-01-01 Thread Marshall Hampton
That definitely looks like a bug. It seems to be in the fast_float command, called by setup_for_eval_on_grid. Hopefully someone more familiar with fast_float can comment on what is going wrong. -M.Hampton On Dec 31 2009, 5:30 pm, TianWei ltwis...@gmail.com wrote: When I try the following:

Re: [sage-support] SAGE and .NET interoperability.

2010-01-01 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
William Stein wrote: Unfortunately, there is no native port of Sage to Microsoft Windows (I wish there were). So you can't use it from .NET. -- William Is that situation changing? I was under the impression Microsoft were sponsoring a port, but I've not heard much about it. Is this

Re: [sage-support] Testing errors for Sage 4.3 in openSUSE 11.0

2010-01-01 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Samrat samrat@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On trying to compile Sage 4.3 on my openSUSE 11.0, the 'make test' process reported the following errors: Also, give us vastly more details about your openSUSE install. Everything you can think of. I ask, because I built

Re: [sage-support] SAGE and .NET interoperability.

2010-01-01 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: William Stein wrote: Unfortunately, there is no native port of Sage to Microsoft Windows (I wish there were).  So you can't use it from .NET.  -- William Is that situation changing? Not lately. I was under

[sage-support] Re: region plot error

2010-01-01 Thread Jason Grout
Marshall Hampton wrote: That definitely looks like a bug. It seems to be in the fast_float command, called by setup_for_eval_on_grid. Hopefully someone more familiar with fast_float can comment on what is going wrong. First, there is a bug, presumably in setup_for_eval_on_grid, where the

[sage-support] Re: Recovering permutations from poset elements

2010-01-01 Thread bump
bruhat_p_order = lambda p,q : p.bruhat_lequal(q) my_poset = Poset([perms, bruhat_p_order]) It seems that when I create the poset, the elements are no longer permutations but PosetElements, and I can't figure out how to recover the elements as permutations. I can't even coerce them back to

Re: [sage-support] SAGE and .NET interoperability.

2010-01-01 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
William Stein wrote: On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: William Stein wrote: Unfortunately, there is no native port of Sage to Microsoft Windows (I wish there were). So you can't use it from .NET. -- William Is that situation changing? Not

Re: [sage-support] SAGE and .NET interoperability.

2010-01-01 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: William Stein wrote: On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: William Stein wrote: Unfortunately, there is no native port of Sage to Microsoft Windows (I wish there were).  

Re: [sage-support] SAGE and .NET interoperability.

2010-01-01 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
William Stein wrote: The Cygwin-based port will provide all functionality, not a limited subset. As an estimate of difficulty: I'm confident Mike Hansen and I working fulltime for one month could complete it. It would have been finished already if good people were working on it. Just to

Re: [sage-support] SAGE and .NET interoperability.

2010-01-01 Thread William Stein
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: William Stein wrote: The Cygwin-based port will provide all functionality, not a limited subset.  As an estimate of difficulty: I'm confident Mike Hansen and I working fulltime for one month could complete it.  It

Re: [sage-support] SAGE and .NET interoperability.

2010-01-01 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
William Stein wrote: But that is very different from a native Windows port, which was I thought we were talking about. We are talking about porting Sage to windows. I will leave it to the lawyers to define native Windows port. Fair enough. I strongly disagree with your assertion that

Re: [sage-support] SAGE and .NET interoperability.

2010-01-01 Thread Mike Hansen
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: FWIW, a Google on Cywin brings up 4.8 million hits. On VirtualBox 4.2 million hits. Considering Cywin was released in 1995 and VirtualBox in 2007, it would suggest to me its a more popular tool today. VirtualBox

Re: [sage-support] SAGE and .NET interoperability.

2010-01-01 Thread Jaap Spies
Dr. David Kirkby wrote: William Stein wrote: But that is very different from a native Windows port, which was I thought we were talking about. We are talking about porting Sage to windows. I will leave it to the lawyers to define native Windows port. Fair enough. I strongly disagree

Re: [sage-support] SAGE and .NET interoperability.

2010-01-01 Thread Dr. David Kirkby
Mike Hansen wrote: On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: FWIW, a Google on Cywin brings up 4.8 million hits. On VirtualBox 4.2 million hits. Considering Cywin was released in 1995 and VirtualBox in 2007, it would suggest to me its a more popular tool

[sage-support] Re: SAGE and .NET interoperability.

2010-01-01 Thread Jason Grout
Mike Hansen wrote: On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: FWIW, a Google on Cywin brings up 4.8 million hits. On VirtualBox 4.2 million hits. Considering Cywin was released in 1995 and VirtualBox in 2007, it would suggest to me its a more popular tool

Re: [sage-support] SAGE and .NET interoperability.

2010-01-01 Thread Jaap Spies
Dr. David Kirkby wrote: Mike Hansen wrote: On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Dr. David Kirkby david.kir...@onetel.net wrote: FWIW, a Google on Cywin brings up 4.8 million hits. On VirtualBox 4.2 million hits. Considering Cywin was released in 1995 and VirtualBox in 2007, it would suggest

Re: [sage-support] arbitrary precision arithmetic by default

2010-01-01 Thread Dan Drake
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 at 10:13AM -0800, eliot brenner wrote: Is there a way to make all floating point calculations within a program or session occur to a fixed precision, say 500 digits? I know how to issue commands like R500 = RealField(500) #set up 500 bit precision arithmetic R500(pi)