Nick Alexander writes:
> On 11-Oct-10, at 6:53 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Martin Rubey
>> wrote:
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I'm currently looking at sage-mode for emacs, but fail to find
>>> documentation. C-h m doesn't really reveil much.
>
> I'm
If I is Ideal(x+y+z-3,x^2+y^2+z^2-5,x^3+y^3+z^3-7) and X=V(I), where
V(I) is the variety of I
and I have the following code
Code:
P. = PolynomialRing(CC,order='lex')
I = Ideal(x+y+z-3,x^2+y^2+z^2-5,x^3+y^3+z^3-7)
ans=I.groebner_basis()
print ans
and i get an output
[x + y + z - 3.00, y^
If I is Ideal(x+y+z-3,x^2+y^2+z^2-5,x^3+y^3+z^3-7) and X=V(I), where
V(I) is the variety of I
and I have the following code
Code:
P. = PolynomialRing(CC,order='lex')
I = Ideal(x+y+z-3,x^2+y^2+z^2-5,x^3+y^3+z^3-7)
ans=I.groebner_basis()
print ans
and i get an output
[x + y + z - 3.00, y^
Hi Andrew!
On 12 Okt., 11:34, andrew ewart wrote:
> If I is Ideal(x+y+z-3,x^2+y^2+z^2-5,x^3+y^3+z^3-7) and X=V(I), where
> V(I) is the variety of I
> and I have the following code
> Code:
> P. = PolynomialRing(CC,order='lex')
> I = Ideal(x+y+z-3,x^2+y^2+z^2-5,x^3+y^3+z^3-7)
> ans=I.groebner_basis
Dear all,
Luckily a bug has been fixed very recently related to the interfacing
with the notebook:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9327 by David Poetzsch-
Heffter
Thanks for that.
Now I am able to send a command string to sage via the notebook server
and receive the
result string.
I
On 11-Oct-10, at 6:53 PM, Minh Nguyen wrote:
Hi Martin,
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:21 AM, Martin Rubey
wrote:
Dear all,
I'm currently looking at sage-mode for emacs, but fail to find
documentation. C-h m doesn't really reveil much.
I'm sorry, there is essentially no documentation. I hav
On 10/12/10 4:59 AM, danielf wrote:
Dear all,
Luckily a bug has been fixed very recently related to the interfacing
with the notebook:
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/9327 by David Poetzsch-
Heffter
Thanks for that.
Now I am able to send a command string to sage via the notebook ser
i think its just reffering to vector space dimension
I have no idea what the Krull dimension of this space is
Also if i try lex in QQ the grobner basis i get out is
[x + y + z - 3, y^2 + y*z - 3*y + z^2 - 3*z + 2, z^3 - 3*z^2 + 2*z +
2/3]
--
To post to this group, send email to sage-support@googl
Martin Rubey writes:
> I just discovered
>
> http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8978
>
> does this imply that the binary on sagemath provided for suse 11.1 will
> not work on suse 11.2?
It seems it doesn't! Below what happens. Any cure? Is it known which version
is the last to work?
On 10/12/10 04:07 PM, Martin Rubey wrote:
Martin Rubey writes:
I just discovered
http://trac.sagemath.org/sage_trac/ticket/8978
does this imply that the binary on sagemath provided for suse 11.1 will
not work on suse 11.2?
It seems it doesn't! Below what happens. Any cure? Is it known w
"Dr. David Kirkby" writes:
>> sh: symbol lookup error:
>> /opt/local/sage-4.5.3-linux-64bit-opensuse_11.1_x86_64-x86_64-Linux/local/lib/libreadline.so.6:
>> undefined symbol: PC
>
> Readline often causes problems with Suse. If you search the archives
> you might find a solution. You could try re
The following code should produce a drawing of the
Frucht graph with edges labeled 0 upto 17.
However, labels 16 and 17 are missing, while
15 is misplaced. The edge labels are set correctly
(as the last line shows), they only don't show up.
The weird thing is that other graphs work OK (at least th
On 10/12/10 5:24 PM, Robert Samal wrote:
The following code should produce a drawing of the
Frucht graph with edges labeled 0 upto 17.
However, labels 16 and 17 are missing, while
15 is misplaced. The edge labels are set correctly
(as the last line shows), they only don't show up.
The weird thin
I observed that solve behaves inconsistently in the following regards:
sage: solve([x==1,x==-1],x)
[]
(this is as expected)
However:
solve([x==1,x==-1],x, solution_dict=True)
produces an error message. Easy to live with, but I was scared when I
first saw it :-).
It should be easy to correct, a
On Oct 12, 6:37 pm, Robert Samal wrote:
> I observed that solve behaves inconsistently in the following regards:
>
> sage: solve([x==1,x==-1],x)
> []
>
> (this is as expected)
> However:
>
> solve([x==1,x==-1],x, solution_dict=True)
>
> produces an error message. Easy to live with, but I was sca
On 13 okt, 03:39, kcrisman wrote:
> On Oct 12, 6:37 pm, Robert Samal wrote:
>
>
>
> > I observed that solve behaves inconsistently in the following regards:
>
> > sage: solve([x==1,x==-1],x)
> > []
>
> > (this is as expected)
> > However:
>
> > solve([x==1,x==-1],x, solution_dict=True)
>
> > pr
16 matches
Mail list logo
