: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 15:13:01 -0800
Subject: Re: [sage-support] SAGE and .NET interoperability.
From: wst...@gmail.com
To: sage-support@googlegroups.com
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Dr
Jaap Spies wrote:
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
William Stein wrote:
But that is very different from a native Windows port, which was I thought
we
were talking about.
We are talking about porting Sage to windows. I will leave it to the
lawyers to define native Windows port.
Fair enough.
I
Dave,
it makes no sense to compare cygwin and virtualbox by Googlehits.
Cygwin is just a tool to port Unix software to Windows quickly
and relatively painlessly (at least the command-line software
can usually be ported pretty quickly). Cygwin is also a toolchain to
develop software on Windows
Gentoo has the ability to compile software in Microsoft's SUA. Maybe it
could be useful to port sage. You can check out some docs
herehttp://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/gentoo-alt/prefix/
.
2010/1/3 Dima Pasechnik dimp...@gmail.com
Dave,
it makes no sense to compare cygwin and virtualbox by
William Stein wrote:
Unfortunately, there is no native port of Sage to Microsoft Windows (I
wish there were). So you can't use it from .NET.
-- William
Is that situation changing? I was under the impression Microsoft were sponsoring
a port, but I've not heard much about it. Is this
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Unfortunately, there is no native port of Sage to Microsoft Windows (I
wish there were). So you can't use it from .NET.
-- William
Is that situation changing?
Not lately.
I was under
William Stein wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Unfortunately, there is no native port of Sage to Microsoft Windows (I
wish there were). So you can't use it from .NET.
-- William
Is that situation changing?
Not
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
William Stein wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
William Stein wrote:
Unfortunately, there is no native port of Sage to Microsoft Windows (I
wish there were).
William Stein wrote:
The Cygwin-based port will provide all functionality, not a limited
subset. As an estimate of difficulty: I'm confident Mike Hansen and I
working fulltime for one month could complete it. It would have been
finished already if good people were working on it. Just to
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
William Stein wrote:
The Cygwin-based port will provide all functionality, not a limited
subset. As an estimate of difficulty: I'm confident Mike Hansen and I
working fulltime for one month could complete it. It
William Stein wrote:
But that is very different from a native Windows port, which was I thought we
were talking about.
We are talking about porting Sage to windows. I will leave it to the
lawyers to define native Windows port.
Fair enough.
I strongly disagree with your assertion that
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
FWIW, a Google on Cywin brings up 4.8 million hits. On VirtualBox 4.2 million
hits. Considering Cywin was released in 1995 and VirtualBox in 2007, it would
suggest to me its a more popular tool today.
VirtualBox
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
William Stein wrote:
But that is very different from a native Windows port, which was I thought
we
were talking about.
We are talking about porting Sage to windows. I will leave it to the
lawyers to define native Windows port.
Fair enough.
I strongly disagree
Mike Hansen wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
FWIW, a Google on Cywin brings up 4.8 million hits. On VirtualBox 4.2 million
hits. Considering Cywin was released in 1995 and VirtualBox in 2007, it would
suggest to me its a more popular tool
Dr. David Kirkby wrote:
Mike Hansen wrote:
On Fri, Jan 1, 2010 at 7:08 PM, Dr. David Kirkby
david.kir...@onetel.net wrote:
FWIW, a Google on Cywin brings up 4.8 million hits. On VirtualBox 4.2
million
hits. Considering Cywin was released in 1995 and VirtualBox in 2007, it
would
suggest
Hi there,
I have a C# (4.0) program which, at some point, needs to calculate
partial derivatives of arbitrary order of some functions. To do this
the old fashioned way (loops and the like) has turned into horror code
and a nightmare to test. To do it numerically doesn't make the code
much easier
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:01 PM, dfg d.figueiras.gar...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I have a C# (4.0) program which, at some point, needs to calculate
partial derivatives of arbitrary order of some functions. To do this
the old fashioned way (loops and the like) has turned into horror code
17 matches
Mail list logo