this is not the version I talked about.
I said "the version from
http://beta.woodstone.nu"
Dirk Bulinckx.
From: Servers Alive Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert FernandoSent:
Wednesday, July 19, 2006 8:11 AMTo: Servers Alive Discussion
ListSubject: [SA-lis
upgrading to latest beta did not fix
problem.
uninstalled salive / registry entries
deleted
reinstalled 5.1 1964
still same problem
Run when alternate hml checks work but not
both on a single cycle
19 July 2006 7:03:36 Woodstone Servers Alive
version 5.1.1964.119 July 2006 7:03:36 Runni
Title: Old versions still installed?
Well, I guess that begs the question, Do I care if I remove
the uninstall entries? Would that leave some thing behind if I did uninstall the
most current version?
Would it matter?
If software uninstalls itself and no one is near enough to
hear you screa
Title: Old versions still installed?
If they are all installed to the same folder, you
could remove the registry entries for
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\Servers
Alive v5
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Uninstall\Servers
Title: Old versions still installed?
I see that on my w3k box as well... all 3 versions - If I
go to uninstall via Add Remove it tells me that it wants to uninstall the latest
version.
Very tardy... :-)
From: Servers Alive Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Be
Title: Old versions still installed?
I don't think we can do that. The installer doesn't
forsee that :-(
Dirk Bulinckx.
From: Servers Alive Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael ShookSent:
Tuesday, July 18, 2006 6:41 PMTo: Servers Alive Discussion
ListSubje
Title: Old versions still installed?
Dirk, I was just looking through one of our ServersAlive servers, and I see that v4, v5 and v5.1 are all installed. Since I just over-installed the new versions, can you clean up the list of the old version from the 'Add-Remove" during an upgrade?
Michael
Title: Uptimes Db
* if the previoushceck
date/time is UNknown (typical for a new entry that is added)
seconds is the time between the start of Servers Alive and the
current check.
(maybe this should be different, as it could well be that SA is
already running for days.
Title: Uptimes Db
OK.
File on http://beta.woodstone.nu was updated to
reflect this.
(build 2010 - page does NOT show that version number
yet).
Dirk Bulinckx.
From: Servers Alive Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael ShookSent:
Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:11 PMTo:
Title: Uptimes Db
sound like a good idea
Dirk Bulinckx.
From: Servers Alive Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael ShookSent:
Tuesday, July 18, 2006 5:11 PMTo: Servers Alive Discussion
ListSubject: RE: [SA-list] Uptimes Db
I would say for the case of a new e
Apologies for wasting your time.
The DNS address I was using was mistakenly resolving to two different IP addresses. Hence Servers Alive was failling becaue it was checking the wrong IP / wrong host.
Sorted now by slapping the DNS administrator (who happens to be me:) )
On 18/07/06, Dirk Bulin
Title: Uptimes Db
I would say for the case of a new entry, set the current
state seconds and totalseconds to 1 second. That way there's an entry, and
the loss of a few seconds won't make much difference over the course of a few
weeks or a month. (I think we can safely assume the state was hel
Title: Uptimes Db
Did some code check and this is how it works in build
2009:
there is NO record in the DB for that entry/date
combination
* if the previoucheck date/time is
known:
seconds that are added are the difference
between the previouscheck and the current chec
Does it give this each time?
What the logging shows is that (at the time of the check),
the remote server refused a connection to port 80 (which is needed for the
check)
Dirk Bulinckx.
From: Servers Alive Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard TempleSent:
Tuesd
I've setup a URL check for this address - http://bracknell-hip.epixtech.co.uk, checking for the string Help in the top right hand corner. I have a number of other similar checks to this, all working
fine.This one seems to be giving me the error below.
18 July 2006 00:06:46 ASP-HIP-08_Bracknell_U
15 matches
Mail list logo