2008/5/26 Colin Piggot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On a SAM RGB Scart cable the composite video output from the SAM (pin 19) is
> not connected. At the TV end, Pin 19 connects to Pin 16 via a 470ohm
> resistor - the diagram in the SAM manual of a RGB Scart lead just has a wire
> link between 16 and 19 b
Dave wrote:
> Here's Simon's vision finally realised 18 years on :-)
> http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/dlaundon/mode3+3a.jpg
Oooh, nice!
> On a previous
> TV (years ago) it seemed like the composite signal and RGB signals
> were interfering with each other (and one seemed to be offset from the
> othe
2008/5/23 Frode Tenneboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> ftp://ftp.worldofspectrum.org/pub/sinclair/magazines/SinclairUser/Issue099/Tape/SUIssue99-Megatape27.tzx.zip
>
> ..or more easily accessible:
>
> ftp://ftp.nvg.ntnu.no/pub/sam-coupe/disks/demos/SimonGoodwin-512x384Interlace.zip
Thanks Frode. Brings
Thomas wrote:
> There's a timing difference between even frames and odd fields in the
> syncs generated at the field end. Non-interlaced video essentially
> sends only even fields.
Was about to say the same thing. The standard 625 line frame (consisting of
one odd and one even field) has several s
] On
Behalf Of Dave Laundon
Sent: 22 May 2008 20:56
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: Re: Interlaced video
2008/5/22 Colin Piggot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Now the question is, depending how the TV is interlacing the
frames, and
how
many frames there's been since the SAM was powered
reset it?
Howard
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Laundon
Sent: 22 May 2008 20:56
To: sam-users@nvg.ntnu.no
Subject: Re: Interlaced video
2008/5/22 Colin Piggot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Now the question is, depending how the TV i
On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 23:43 +0100, Dave Laundon wrote:
> 2008/5/22 Colin Piggot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Yes, it was Simon Goodwin's routine on a Crash cover tape in 1990 or so. On
> > the frame interrupt it toggled between two screens with different palettes,
> > which looked absolutely horrid th
James wrote:
> Wasn't it Sinclair User?
Oops! Yes, you're quite right. It was Sinclair User - issue 99.
Colin
=
Quazar : Hardware, Software, Spares and Repairs for the SAM Coupe
1995-2008 - Celebrating 14 Years of developing for the SAM Coupe
Website: http://www.samcoupe.com/
> > Yes, it was Simon Goodwin's routine on a Crash cover tape in 1990 or so. On
> > the frame interrupt it toggled between two screens with different palettes,
> > which looked absolutely horrid though on the TV's I'd tried it on. Other
> > routines in the issue did MODE 3 interlacing - flicki
2008/5/22 Colin Piggot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Yes, it was Simon Goodwin's routine on a Crash cover tape in 1990 or so. On
> the frame interrupt it toggled between two screens with different palettes,
> which looked absolutely horrid though on the TV's I'd tried it on. Other
> routines in the issue
Dave wrote:
> I seem to remember there was a cover tape on one of the magazines that
> had a "new display mode" that swapped between two screens at 50Hz or
> something. Can't remember if it was "interlacing" or some method of
> increasing colours. My memory is vague...
Yes, it was Simon Goodwin'
2008/5/22 Colin Piggot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Now the question is, depending how the TV is interlacing the frames, and how
> many frames there's been since the SAM was powered up - when the 'Interlaced
> Pictures' from FRED are loaded the frames might show with the intended
> 'interlacing', or be r
Dave wrote:
> Anyway, it seems my TV doesn't realise the signal is not interlaced!
Hmmm... sounds an interesting telly! The "comb effect" definitely shows it's
interlacing. I've not come across a telly that will automatically interlace
non-interlaced video before - although I have seen one that re
13 matches
Mail list logo
