I'll have to see if I can dig up my notes, but I saw this as well and
was able to fix it. Can you post your smb.conf?
Aaron Kincer
On Nov 5, 2007 10:30 AM, Bruno Pirajá Moyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello everybody, i have use samba (3.0) as a PDC in my company. The file
tree was growing so
I was getting that message when the name of my computer didn't match that of
what I set in my SMB.conf for server string parameter. Not knowing any
details of your smb.conf and your system, that is my shot in the dark
gotcha.
On 10/29/07, C. Peterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all, I'm
Is your server string your real machine name (i.e. it's what you get when
you type hostname at a command prompt)? If not, try making your server
string the same as your hostname.
On 10/29/07, C. Peterman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ah sorry, here is my smb.conf
Begin smb.conf
[global]
#
I'm not entirely sure I follow. Do you mean to say you are you saying you
want to be able to get a list of users and groups that are listed in the ACL
entries on a file server? I'm guess this is conceptually a way to get a
snapshot of all users and groups that are being used in some form or
Other people (me included) have seen that. Now that I've moved us to
3.0.24 (Ubuntu 7.04 Feisty Server), I'm not seeing that kind of
behavior. I can't be completely sure if it was the upgrade or some
changes to my smb.conf required by the upgrade that did it. Do you have
a test environment to
GROUPFILE $username;
close(GROUPFILE);
}
}
$j += 1;
}
}
}
#End Script
Let me know if you have any questions.
Aaron Kincer
--
To unsubscribe from this list go
I saw similar behavior with Access. The issue is now gone and it just so
happened to coincide with when I fixed some ACL and DOS attribute
issues. I did this by turning off the map archive, map hidden, map read
only, and map system settings and used nt acl support, ea support and
store dos
in there.
Aaron Kincer
Any None wrote:
I'm a job trainee, very new to Linux and Samba and was asked to set up a server
based on OpenSUSE and Samba. The idea is not to make a production server but to
investigate how and how well this works (the company is Windows exclusive at
the moment)
I got as far
this issue.
http://us4.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/NetworkBrowsing.html#id350945
Jonathan Johnson
Sutinen Consulting, Inc.
www.sutinen.com
Aaron Kincer wrote:
Also, as others have mentioned, Windows and its applications can have
long memories about servers contacted
My first question would be does this happen with other applications or
strictly Office? Do you get the same behavior if you attempt to open a
.doc file with Open Office?
Second, have you watched your samba logs in real time (example: tail -f
/var/log/samba/your_pc_log) as you try to open a
. For example, the list
of recently opened files.
I doubt this would have an effect, but just for giggles you could flush
the dns cache (ipconfig /flushdns)
Berend Tober wrote:
Berend Tober wrote:
Aaron Kincer wrote:
...
Do you get the same behavior if you attempt to open a .doc file
with Open
I run Samba on Ubuntu in an Active Directory environment and don't (any
longer) see strange slowness. Can you sanitize and post your smb.conf
for starters?
David Olsson wrote:
Running samba with Ubuntu, default configuration, one share, samba running as
daemons rather from inetd.
Copying
-09cdfc4509f08e6891f5f5a750b28a32218c592e
Hope that helps.
Aaron Kincer
Michael Cleghorn wrote:
Hello list,
i'm going to try very hard not to rant here, but i've been trying to get Samba
working for 3 days, and it's just not happening. Let me start from the
beginning. i'm just a lowly Windows admin
I've been running the latest Ubuntu (3.0.24) packages on Feisty for a
few weeks and only have seen issues with acls and extended attributes.
After I figured out the recipe to get over that hump, it runs fine
integrated into native AD on Server 2003. What seems to be your problem?
Miguel
map archive = no
map hidden = no
map read only = no
map system = no
dos filemode = yes
I hope this helps someone out there.
Aaron Kincer
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman
!
Will
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Kincer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 12:21 PM
To: Will Holmes
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] Help Please! - Copying files from Windows to Samba
share loses connection
I see you don't have the server string set
= false
minimum_uid = 0
debug = false
}
Thanks!
Will
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Kincer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 8:47 AM
To: Will Holmes
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: FW: [Samba] Help
server.
Thanks!
Will
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Kincer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 10:59 AM
To: Will Holmes
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: FW: [Samba] Help Please! - Copying files from Windows to Samba
share loses connection
That's a pretty old
into other issues later on.
Could I upgrade just Samba? How hard of a task is it to update samba? I
don't know if I will need a special version since it is an IBM power
version.
Thanks!
Will
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Kincer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 11:17 AM
I see you don't have the server string set.
Have you tried to join this server to the domain with a net ads join
command?
Will Holmes wrote:
Hello all,
I haven't been able to solve an issue I am having when copying over data
from a Windows box to a Samba share. I have found others
I've seen this problem when the Samba server clock is out of sync with
the AD servers. Come to think of it, lots of problems happen because of
that.
Gianluca Culot wrote:
Hello List
I'm running Samba 3.0.24,1 on a freebsd 6 server
I've joined the unix server to an active directory domain
?
Carlos Eduardo Pedroza Santiviago wrote:
Hi,
On 5/1/07, Aaron Kincer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been working at this for a few days now and I can't figure out what
is broken. Google turns up similar issues from years back, but I hope
this is a bug resurfacing. ACL entries are being deleted when
There may be another way, but POSIX ACLs will allow you to do what you
want I believe. I use them that way now with one difference--I don't
have shares defined underneath other shares. I'm not sure if that makes
a difference.
Kevin Gutch wrote:
I would like to be able to setup shares i n the
No offense, but it sounds like you are venting about something that
wasn't enabled for the packages in your particular distro of choice. If
so, it seems to me that this is the wrong venue to vent. I would suggest
contacting the vendor, distro maintainer and/or package maintainer with
your
the entry's in both and didn't know it. Thanks for the info. I'm going to give it a try in the morning and let you know if it worked.
Levi
From: Don Meyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 4/30/2007 6:54 PM
To: Aaron Kincer; Kemp, Levi
Cc: samba
path = /share/test
read only = No
create mask = 0777
directory mask = 0777
guest ok = Yes
map readonly = permissions
nt acl support = yes
inherit acls = yes
Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Aaron Kincer
I saw this with Samba 3.0.24 on Ubuntu Feisty 7.04. Actually I've seen
quite a bit different behavior from 3.0.22 on Edgy 6.10 with EAs and
ACLs which I'm trying to figure out some workarounds. But that's off
topic for this discussion.
You must make sure that the hostname set in /etc/hostname
Is this why the Explanation of each Parameter section of the on-line
smb.conf documentation is jacked and shows only xi:include/xi:include?
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
==
I missed that. Can't read all messages and get any work done :)
Gerald (Jerry) Carter wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Aaron Kincer wrote:
Is this why the Explanation of each Parameter section
of the on-line smb.conf documentation is jacked
and shows only xi:include
Dealing with data duplication is not always particularly easy. What I
would suggest is the following:
1) Identify the duplicates with the oldest modification date
2) Notify your users that you are making changes and to be on the
lookout for any problems
3) Change the file permissions so that
If they are working great as PDC's, I wouldn't worry too much. As a file
server in an Active Directory environment, the Red Hat version of Samba
on RHEL4 is, in my opinion, unacceptably broken. It's little things like
file locking not working right and strange other quirks that I can't
In pure mathematical terms, the maximum throughput on 100MB ethernet is:
100Mb / 8 = 12.5 MegaBytes per second.
That assumes, of course, a perfect world with a 100% efficient protocol.
Of course, this doesn't exist. So in network design, if you have one
100MB link from the switch your server
And it looks like I'll have to go update where I put that in a line in
an Ubuntu wiki entry I made and take it out.
Jeremy Allison wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 11:47:59AM -0600, James A. Dinkel wrote:
I don't know why, but I just tried this, removind the SNDBUF AND RCVBUF,
and the file
As an IT Manager, I personally have said we won't even begin _testing_
Vista until it hits SP1. Upper management was very enthusiastic about
that approach. Perhaps your environment is different. It seems to me
that until you can determine how clients are going to mix with your
environment you
Relatively speaking, not expensive at all. You can get a Dell PowerVault
loaded with SAS 320GB 15K at ridiculously low prices if you catch them
around the end of a business quarter. They practically give stuff away
to boost sales numbers for quarterly reports.
Charles Marcus wrote:
Aaron
Do you mean a review to detail the best performance? This is complicated
question since budget clearly plays a role. But I'll give you what I
think are the highest performance options without considering costs (and
not including a RAM storage array).
RAID: 0+1 (mirrored stripe sets)
Drive
That's what I meant the first time. Thanks for correcting me.
Charles Marcus wrote:
RAID: 0+1 (mirrored stripe sets)
RAID 1+0 is much better - much less likely to fail, and rebuilds much
faster:
http://aput.net/~jheiss/raid10/
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and
RAID 10 is very good, but does have the downside of requiring quite a
few disks to achieve large amounts of storage.
Scott Lockwood wrote:
Charles Marcus wrote:
RAID: 0+1 (mirrored stripe sets)
RAID 1+0 is much better - much less likely to fail, and rebuilds much
faster:
No offense, but making any software update or change to a production
system without first testing it in a test environment is an
administrative issue, not a software issue.
It isn't terribly difficult to configure a test environment that would
allow you to see if everything works as expected.
Not that I don't understand your frustration. I do. I guess it boils
down to whether I would prefer the developers concentrate on fixing bugs
and improving functionality or for them to expend energy on helping
prevent me from doing something bad that goes against best practices. I
What environment are you doing this in? In other words, is this over a
wireless connection to a remote site? Perhaps something else?
As a general rule of thumb, SMB is a MUCH less efficient protocol than
others such as FTP. In a near perfect world (i.e. a controlled real
world setting), I've
Why part2: To share resources with Windows clients.
Gary Dale wrote:
Rick Bilonick wrote:
Can someone explain what's required to join a linux computer to the
windows domain and what the benefits would be?
Rick B.
How: use pam_winbind (see the howtos on the samba.org site)
Why: single
Of Aaron Kincer
Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 10:33 AM
To: werner maes
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Samba] sharing word files
This is standard behavior of Microsoft Word.
werner maes wrote:
hello
I'm having the following problem:
On a share I have a user with read-only access
This is standard behavior of Microsoft Word.
werner maes wrote:
hello
I'm having the following problem:
On a share I have a user with read-only access to word files. Another
user has read-write access to these files.
When the user with read-only access opens a word file and then the
I've discovered something interesting. If the AD domain controller that
holds the global catalog is offline, certain things will exhibit the
behavior you are talking about. Most notably, if a PC is set to sync an
offline folder. Microsoft Access also will peg the processor.
Not sure if this
.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Kincer
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 10:00 AM
To: James A. Dinkel
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Subject: Re: [Samba] smbd keeps maxing out the cpu, must reboot server
constantly
I just watched the top for a bit and did some testing and I see brief
spikes on my
of RAM assigned to this vm. It's the only vm running on this ESX server.
Also top doesn't show a user smbd process maxing out the processor, it's the
root smbd process.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Kincer
Sent: Friday, January 05, 2007 10:00 AM
To: James A. Dinkel
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
James,
I'm running Samba 3.0.22 on Ubuntu 6.10 with VMWare 3.0.1 build-32039
(vmware -v from command line) and I'm not having that problem. What
versions are you running? Make sure you aren't running your virtual
machine from the same data store where the VMWare server lives. That's a
design
I just watched the top for a bit and did some testing and I see brief
spikes on my system where each domain user has their own smbd process
that grabs resources. This seems to happen when first opening a
directory. It would seem that whatever resources Samba needs to complete
this operation,
mount -t smbfs //server/share/ /mnt/folder -o
username=username,password=password
Try that.
Jason Zondor wrote:
Hello,
I've got a FreeBSD 5.5 box running Samba 3.0.21 and every-time I try
to do a mount -t smbfs -o username=username,password=password
//server/share /mnt/folder I get the
:* Aaron Kincer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
*Sent:* Thursday, December 07, 2006 5:43 PM
*To:* James A. Dinkel
*Cc:* samba@lists.samba.org
*Subject:* Re: [Samba] Does Samba/Winbind not follow nested groups in
AD?!?
I had some problems with authentication on a Red Hat server due to
corrupted .tdb files
Congratulations! I stand corrected. I said I thought upgrading wasn't
the route, but I guess you were right all along. Curious that I don't
see that behavior. Who knows what gremlins were biting you and not me
despite us having the same OS, Samba version and AD environment.
Hopefully Feisty
I use 3.0.22 with Windows 2003 with no issues. Read this Ubuntu forum
post and see if you can draw some useful information that might help
crack the case. The information in here should be fairly universal I
believe, but don't bet your job on it:
things that I though might do something.
For the life of me, I can not get nested groups to work on this server.
James Dinkel
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Kincer
James,
You are correct--I don't have windbind nested groups = yes set in my
smb.conf. Yes, default 3.0.22. I followed
James,
You are correct--I don't have windbind nested groups = yes set in my
smb.conf. Yes, default 3.0.22. I followed the Ubuntu configuration
instructions to the letter found in the Ubuntu forums that I've posted
before with only the changes you've seen in my smb.conf. Here is the
link to
Right. That guide gets you in the door. The additional acl and extended
dos attributes stuff is separate.
James A. Dinkel wrote:
http://ubuntuforums.org/archive/index.php/t-91510.html
That guide also does not say anything about adding acl and user_xattr to
the mount options of the
Since you and I are using the same version of Ubuntu and both have our
servers integrated into Active Directory, you would expect similar
behavior configurations notwithstanding. As we've discussed earlier, I
have no problems with nested groups. I think you're barking up the wrong
tree
I just simulated your scenario and I have no problems.
1) User testing member of: group1
2) group1 member of group 2
3) group2 has rights to folderA
4) User testing can successfully open folderA.
5) Removing group2 rights from folderA results in access denied.
James A. Dinkel wrote:
I get the same behavior on Ubuntu 6.06 with Samba 3.0.22 so it isn't
just you. I notice that when an XP client first connects, the share
behaves as it should with file and folder deletions showing up
immediately. If left sitting with a share open for a few minutes, the
behavior starts. You can
In theory, the server should notify the client that a change has
occurred on the folder being viewed and then the client refreshes as
opposed to a constant refresh going on. If you look in the smb.conf
documentation, the change notify setting defaults to every 60 seconds.
You could move it out
suspicions are correct, I think it is
better to call it a bug in Windows that Samba would have to work around.
John Drescher wrote:
On 11/30/06, *Aaron Kincer* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In theory, the server should notify the client that a change has
occurred
Like I said, Microsoft fixed an identical sounding problem in support
article 823291. This fix was added to XP SP2. Hint: This code change
wasn't added to Windows 2000.
So based on the evidence at hand, the problem seems to have been caused
by Microsoft.
Chris Smith wrote:
On Wednesday 29
I am not sure if you are using Samba for DC duties as you don't
explicitly say, but I can give you some general things to be aware of:
-Windows NT SP3 and Windows 95 clients have issues in native 2003
domains due to SMB packet signing (if that's what you are moving to).
You can address that
.
Does that answer your question?
Aaron Kincer
Douglas Phillipson wrote:
Douglas Phillipson wrote:
With Samba v3.x and WinXP, if there is a local profile on the users
PC when the user logs on while hooked to a Samba DC, should the PC
check for the DC profiles password prior to checking
Funny, just 15 minutes ago I was thinking I need to setup logging to
dump into a database.
I'll check it out soon and give it a test run. Thanks for answering my
thoughts.
Quim Rovira wrote:
I've written down a simple yet a bit obfuscated perl script to put
samba logs on a MySQL database,
Without posting any logs, it's rather difficult to guess.
Denis wrote:
Tomasz Chmielewski wrote:
I'm running Samba 3.0.23c on Debian-arm (unstable), kernel 2.6.18.
I can copy files from the Samba server just fine, when I do it from a
Linux machine.
When I want to copy files from the Samba
Can you be more specific than burned through?
What brand of hardware are you running?
I am unconvinced that your OS and/or Samba are the cause of your
hardware issues. I've seen data intensive servers running RAID 5 run for
many years with no problems. I would be more inclined to believe
James McLaughlin wrote:
Out of curiosity--what is the same slot in your array that suffered
the
failed drive?
Magic Number is 4
JM
So what you are saying is that it is the SAME slot in which both drives
died? I'd call you hardware vendor if you still have a warranty and let
them know
.shtm
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/ref-guide/ch-samba.html
If you are going to stick with RHEL, read these documents especially if
you are still using the Red Hat packages. You'll want to follow their docs.
Good luck.
Aaron Kincer
Michael Casale wrote:
Hi all
arrangements contrary to the license by
which it is provided.
I hope you regain some sense about you.
Sincerely,
Aaron Kincer
IT Manager
On 11/12/06, Gerald (Jerry) Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The Samba Team disapproves strongly of the actions taken
lose their support for those packages. Nice
delimma, huh?
Good luck.
Aaron Kincer
On 11/12/06, Michael Casale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks is advance for any help you can offer -
I just inherited a Samba file server in my new position, and am familiar
with Samba, but no genius
-Guide/unixclients.html#ch9-adsdc
and if he wanted to upgrade to the latest version of samba, he could
install from kde-redhat repository since Rex has the packages for
updating samba for RHEL
http://kde-redhat.sourceforge.net/
Craig
On Sun, 2006-11-12 at 23:53 -0500, Aaron Kincer wrote:
If you
.
Aaron Kincer
Boaz Bezborodko wrote:
Gary Dale wrote:
Boaz Bezborodko wrote:
I'm looking to move my companies server from an old Netware 5.0 file
server to a Linux/Samba server on new hardware.
Since my companies' systems are not mission critical (I can afford to be
down for a few hours
I would be a bit more helpful if you include your configuration files
and be a bit more clear about what you are trying to accomplish with
your Samba server.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all
I'm trying to setup a samba 3.0.23c on a network with a Windows 2003 AD.
I've followed the guide at
rights to the /home folder. You MUST go back and configure permissions
properly on this folder after creating a new account. You need to be
diligent and consistent when choosing a global home share. Make sure you
don't later try to map a drive to that letter. It won't work.
HTH,
Aaron Kincer
.
Then the mappings are not made persistent.
PS: If I remeber right, one time made persistent you must delete them
all before try to map them with no persistence.
Edmundo Valle Neto
Aaron Kincer escreveu:
Rory,
I can't speak for anyone else, but in my logon scripts, I delete shares
before mapping them
There are how-tos out there that clearly highlight what you have to do
in order to get authentication against Active Directory. You need to use
Google (or some other search engine) effectively to find them. I can
tell you that in order to have proper AD authentication, you must
absolutely use:
/10951_3502441_1
Dale
Original Message
Subject: Re: [Samba] Authenticating Linux Against AD with Winbind
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2006 11:43:11 -0400
From: Aaron Kincer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jason Rotunno [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: samba@lists.samba.org
References:
[EMAIL
I know why you are doing what you are doing, but try deleting by
individual share:
net use e: /delete
net use e: \\server5\peachtree
net use w: /delete
net use w: \\server5\contract_maintenance
net use t: /delete
net use t: \\server5\fleet
net use x: /delete
net use x: \\server5\allusers
Rory,
I can't speak for anyone else, but in my logon scripts, I delete shares
before mapping them because Windows exhibits very strange behavior sometimes
with shares. Anyone who has ever gotten the amusing error connection cannot
be restored or whatever it says knows what I mean. Deleting and
:\Documents and
Settings\username\.).
Doing that creates even more headaches if you are concerned about
security for user separation and would require quite a bit of work. Oh,
and let's not forget the non-homogenous client issues.
Doug VanLeuven wrote:
Aaron Kincer wrote:
I am having
How about Windows client to Windows client speeds?
I'm getting the feeling the problem might be the speed of the hard
drives on your clients.
Sebastian Held wrote:
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2006 14:56 schrieb Peter Daum:
maybe some people would be adventurous enough to just try it
Have you shut down all other processes including anti-virus to make sure
there isn't something else causing a wide variance?
Sebastian Held wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 5. Oktober 2006 16:41 schrieben Sie:
How about Windows client to Windows client speeds?
I'm getting the feeling the problem
The EULA for XP Home explicitly states a maximum of five (5) users to
connect for file/print sharing services. XP Professional is ten (10).
This is software independent. Installing a Windows version of Samba (if
one exists now or in the future) would not provide you a legal way
around this
altogether, I can't fathom the potential impact as
there are pet projects in data centers all over the place with Samba as
it is now (based on anecdotal and non-scientific experience).
Rashkae wrote:
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:12:46PM -0400, Aaron Kincer wrote:
The EULA for XP Home explicitly states
I am having trouble envisioning a network where people are constantly
signing onto different computers (outside of schools and libraries). If
users move around that much, perhaps a VNC/Citrix/Terminal Services approach
would be better.
Roaming profiles are a solution to a problem that existed
I am not sure from Bernd's email what he is trying to accomplish, but
there are things to consider if you are trying to do roaming profiles.
With the volume of data often stored in today's profile, it is
non-trivial to enable this option and I do not recommend doing so for
the average user.
Thought you might find this worth reading since it is on topic to this
thread:
http://techreport.com/reviews/2006q3/maxtor-diamondmax-11/index.x?pg=6
Mark Smith wrote:
Mark Smith wrote:
Actually, setting SNDBUF and RCVBUF to 65536 from the default of 8192
is what got me _TO_ 22MBps...
on either end as well.
Hope that helps.
Aaron Kincer
Nick Black wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to use Samba to let me mount windows network drives on an
Ubuntu Dapper Server installation that I am using as a desktop.
Using:
testparm
my smb.conf seems to be ok.
Using
smbclient -L GM.local -U username
(had to resend this with the right email address for the list)
Forgot to tell you to use sudo of you aren't using the root account. So
append sudo in front of that as you have in your other command. One more
thing--the lfs option enables files greater than 2GB. smbclient chokes
on them if you
Barry, Christopher wrote:
For each host on 192.168.3.0/24, manually add in the WINS address of
hgsserver in the wireless NIC configuration. Because WINS does not jump
routers, you'll need to tell the client where to find this information.
This is not entirely correct. Many routers can be
Have you performed a net ads join command yet?
Guillermo Gutierrez wrote:
Help me please, I am getting desparate.
I have tried to the follow the following how-to for joining a Gentoo
Linux samba server to a windows 2003 domain and cant seem to get the the
getent passwd command to any domain
and a few minutes later I saw users and
groups.
Even though I can see domain info usingthe getent passwd command I
still cannot log in as a domain user.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Kincer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 6:21 AM
To: Guillermo Gutierrez
Cc
couldn't get any domain users or groups to show.
After that I started up winbind and a few minutes later I saw users and
groups.
Even though I can see domain info usingthe getent passwd command I
still cannot log in as a domain user.
-Original Message-
From: Aaron Kincer [mailto:[EMAIL
Is this strictly a Samba network or is it Windows Domain/Active
Directory environment?
Júlio Dutra Couto wrote:
I have a problem restricting the access of a particular workstation to a
single user. Is there a way of doing this? I couldn't find it anywhere,
although it is trivial to do it the
David,
I think you'll find this document helpful. I do not know for certain if the
permissions are the same on Linux, but it _should_ be.
http://docs.hp.com/en/B8725-90101/ch03s04.html
On 9/27/06, Graham, David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
I seem to have Samba+AD+ACL's working on a
With Samba 3.0.22, I created the computer account manually in Active
Directory and then use the following command:
net ads join -S domain.controller.computer.name -U
active.directory.user.with.domain.admin.privileges
To do this, make sure that in your smb.conf file, you have the option
It is pretty standard behavior for encrypted authentication schemes to
reject authentication requests when the time deviation between the
client and server are too far apart. This is by design. It is basically
a timeout from Active Directory's perspective. You can use Active
Directory GPOs to
clients with incorrect clock can connect to Windows servers
and can't connect to Samba. I thought Samba tried to emulate Windows file
server as close as possible. In this particular case I thought Samba would
fall back to NTLM auth. Maybe I misunderstand something.
Thanks,
Leonid
Aaron Kincer
luck,
Aaron Kincer
Alex de Vaal wrote:
Hello Aaron,
It is always good that people are thinking along and actually you ask right
questions to me, which I asked myself too.
To answer your questions:
1) No.
2) Yes
3) No, not yet.
4) They do that anyway ;)
5) YES!
I have almost 100 Linux servers
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
