On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 18:42:31 +0200, TAKAHASHI Motonobu
wrote:
From: vagy
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:08:57 +0200
Btw how did you examine it? Did you setup a test lab
that implements the setup as i described it?
- Setup 2 subnets connected via a router
- Setup 2 Samba box in each subnet, ea
From: vagy
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2013 09:08:57 +0200
>>> Btw how did you examine it? Did you setup a test lab
>>> that implements the setup as i described it?
>>
>> - Setup 2 subnets connected via a router
>> - Setup 2 Samba box in each subnet, each smb.conf is like
>>
>> -
>> [global]
>> workg
On Tue, 26 Feb 2013 02:15:33 +0200, TAKAHASHI Motonobu
wrote:
From: vagy
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:20:31 +0200
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:40:32 +0200, TAKAHASHI Motonobu
wrote:
looking the SAMBA docs[1] i realized that remote browse sync
means that an LMB will sync its browse list with anoth
From: vagy
Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2013 23:20:31 +0200
> On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:40:32 +0200, TAKAHASHI Motonobu
> wrote:
>
> looking the SAMBA docs[1] i realized that remote browse sync
> means that an LMB will sync its browse list with another
> LMB. Thus this "trick" will allow two LMBs to find out
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013 17:40:32 +0200, TAKAHASHI Motonobu
wrote:
From: vagy
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 18:28:03 +0200
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:36:56 +0200, TAKAHASHI Motonobu
wrote:
From: vagy
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:34:37 +0200
i am about to implement cross subnet browsing/sharing
and I wa
---
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: samba-boun...@lists.samba.org
[mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im
Auftrag von TAKAHASHI Motonobu
Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. Februar 2013 16:37
An: v...@freemail.gr
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] Cross-subnet browsing with LMBs
From: vagy
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 18:28:03 +0200
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:36:56 +0200, TAKAHASHI Motonobu
> wrote:
>
>> From: vagy
>> Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:34:37 +0200
>>
>>> i am about to implement cross subnet browsing/sharing
>>> and I was wondering if the following configuration
>>> wo
...@lists.samba.org [mailto:samba-boun...@lists.samba.org] Im
Auftrag von TAKAHASHI Motonobu
Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. Februar 2013 16:37
An: v...@freemail.gr
Cc: samba@lists.samba.org
Betreff: Re: [Samba] Cross-subnet browsing with LMBs + remote browse sync +
samba4WINS
From: vagy
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013
On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 17:36:56 +0200, TAKAHASHI Motonobu
wrote:
From: vagy
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:34:37 +0200
i am about to implement cross subnet browsing/sharing
and I was wondering if the following configuration
would do it, so i would like your opinion:
1. There are two subnets separ
From: vagy
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2013 13:34:37 +0200
> i am about to implement cross subnet browsing/sharing
> and I was wondering if the following configuration
> would do it, so i would like your opinion:
>
> 1. There are two subnets separated by a simple router (no firewalls)
>
> 2. Each subnet
Hi,
i am about to implement cross subnet browsing/sharing
and I was wondering if the following configuration
would do it, so i would like your opinion:
1. There are two subnets separated by a simple router (no firewalls)
2. Each subnet will have a mixture of Win7/WinXP and Linux hosts.
3. Each
If you have fixed IPs (or static DNS leases), one way round this is to
populate %SystemRoot%\system32\drivers\etc\lmhosts on the Windows client.
I look forward to seeing any other solutions here :-)
On 6 July 2010 13:07, wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm having a problem with cross subnet browsing and
Hi All,
I'm having a problem with cross subnet browsing and name resolution across
an openvpn tunnel. i've found quite a few people who've had the same on
mail lists but none of their fixes have worked. The spec of the setups at
both ends of the tunnel are as follows:
OS - CentOS 5.5
Samba Versio
Am 09.07.2010 14:42, schrieb t...@tms3.com:
>
>
>
>> --- Original message ---
>> *Subject:* Re: [Samba] Cross subnet browsing + OpenVPN
>> *From:* Robert Schetterer
>> *To:*
>> *Date:* Friday, 09/07/2010 3:05 AM
>>
>> Am 09.07.2010 11:37,
--- Original message ---
Subject: Re: [Samba] Cross subnet browsing + OpenVPN
From: Robert Schetterer
To:
Date: Friday, 09/07/2010 3:05 AM
Am 09.07.2010 11:37, schrieb Julian Pilfold-Bagwell:
Sorry about the delay, family emergency to deal with.
browse sync shares the info across them
Am 09.07.2010 11:37, schrieb Julian Pilfold-Bagwell:
> Sorry about the delay, family emergency to deal with.
> browse sync shares the info across them. I tried putting the specific
> IP addresses of the local master browsers into the browse sync but it
> still doesn't seem to spread everything acr
Sorry about the delay, family emergency to deal with.
browse sync shares the info across them. I tried putting the specific
IP addresses of the local master browsers into the browse sync but it
still doesn't seem to spread everything across all the subnets.
From what I understand, the remote
Julian Pilfold-Bagwell wrote:
>I'm having a problem with cross subnet browsing and name resolution
across
>an openvpn tunnel. i've found quite a few people who've had the same on
>mail lists but none of their fixes have worked. The spec of the setups
at
>both ends of the tunnel are as follows:
>
>O
SNIP
Hi All,
I'm having a problem with cross subnet browsing and name resolution
across
an openvpn tunnel. i've found quite a few people who've had the same
on
mail lists but none of their fixes have worked. The spec of the setups
at
both ends of the tunnel are as follows:
Hi All,
I'm having a problem with cross subnet browsing and name resolution across
an openvpn tunnel. i've found quite a few people who've had the same on
mail lists but none of their fixes have worked. The spec of the setups at
both ends of the tunnel are as follows:
OS - CentOS 5.5
Samba Versi
Hi all I followed the steps given in chapter 10 for getting cross-subnet to
work.
However, the samba server can see the fileshares in the workgroup
but the computers in the other subnet can't see the samba share.
Here's the setup: I'm using a router to share an internet connection between a
win
Edmundo,
Edmundo Valle Neto wrote:
I already used samba in network with more than one segment and never
needed any "remote ..." option too, it worked even through a VPN. The
samba books says to use that options when more than one WINS server are
used, for example. Using the same WINS serve
Todd.
I already used samba in network with more than one segment and never
needed any "remote ..." option too, it worked even through a VPN. The
samba books says to use that options when more than one WINS server are
used, for example. Using the same WINS server in both networks, the name
Anthony Messina wrote:
Todd Pytel wrote:
Yeah, the WINS server (which is just the single Samba server) is named
in the DHCP options, so the Windows desktops are set up for it
automatically. Again, all the name resolution works fine - the desktop
can successfully view \\aristotle\username and do
Todd Pytel wrote:
> Yeah, the WINS server (which is just the single Samba server) is named
> in the DHCP options, so the Windows desktops are set up for it
> automatically. Again, all the name resolution works fine - the desktop
> can successfully view \\aristotle\username and do nblookups.
>
> An
Craig White wrote:
> you probably don't need that option if the clients know where to find
> the WINS servers (probably can set multiple WINS servers in DHCP
> configuration)
Yeah, the WINS server (which is just the single Samba server) is named
in the DHCP options, so the Windows desktops are
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 20:17 -0500, Todd Pytel wrote:
> Craig White wrote:
>
> > I believe what you want is 'remote announce' - you can get a good
> > definition of it's usage in the man page for smb.conf
>
> I've tried that as well (using remote announce = 192.168.0.255), but it
> didn't seem to
Craig White wrote:
I believe what you want is 'remote announce' - you can get a good
definition of it's usage in the man page for smb.conf
I've tried that as well (using remote announce = 192.168.0.255), but it
didn't seem to make any difference. That might be a routing issue - I
didn't thor
Hi
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 19:42 -0500, Todd Pytel wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've had cross-subnet browsing working in Samba in the past, though I
> tend to struggle with it each time I set it up. For whatever reason, I
> can't seem to get things working this time.
>
> Summary: Only my desktop, not t
Hi all,
I've had cross-subnet browsing working in Samba in the past, though I
tend to struggle with it each time I set it up. For whatever reason, I
can't seem to get things working this time.
Summary: Only my desktop, not the file server, shows up in the desktop's
Network Neighborhood. (I h
I have two domains which are on different subnets, connected by a routed
OpenVPN tunnel. The domains trust each other.
Domain A has the WINS server. Domain B is confused to use Domain A's WINS
server. The VPN pushes the WINS server as part of its DHCP options as
well.
>From either domain, I am
Hi,
I know a lot of cross-subnet browsing in a ipsec environment stem(?)
from the MTU settings for your connection. I know I have the turn it
down to around 1200 to be sure all data arrives on the other end.
All the symptoms (slow logins etc) point at it.
Regards,
Bolke
--
To unsubscribe fr
Jonathan Salomon wrote:
Hi all!
This is a repost to this list, hoping to draw some extra attention
because I got NO reply whatsoever to the original posting :( I would
really appreciate if someone could comment om which of both strategies
as described below is best.
I am having some trouble
Hi all!
This is a repost to this list, hoping to draw some extra attention
because I got NO reply whatsoever to the original posting :( I would
really appreciate if someone could comment om which of both strategies
as described below is best.
I am having some trouble with a samba domain dist
Hi!
I am having some trouble with a samba domain distributed over 2 subnets
(192.168.0.0/23 (supernetted) & 192.168.4.0/24). These subnets are
linked over the internet through a IPSec gateway to gateway (network to
network) connection (i.e. all machines can reach/ping each other on both
subn
lists.samba.org
>Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Cross-subnet browsing...AGAIN!!!
>
>Robin Bowes wrote:
>
>> If I browse to My Network Places\Microsoft Windows
>Network\Home on each
>> of the XP machines, here's what I see under Home on each machine:
>>
>
Robin Bowes wrote:
If I browse to My Network Places\Microsoft Windows Network\Home on each
of the XP machines, here's what I see under Home on each machine:
Tosh2: Tosh2
All shares on Dude under My Network Places
Batmobile: Batmobile, Dude
Tosh: Batmobile, Dude
Some shares on Dud
Hi,
I've been struggling with getting subnet browsing to work on my home
network for some time and have decided to give it another go.
This is my network configuration:
Internet - Cisco SOHO97
(192.168.1.1)
| | |
++ | +
I as sending this again in the hopes that someone will respond. Surely I am
not the only one with this setup.
Thanks,
Misty
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: [Samba] Cross-subnet browsing and VPN
Date: Monday 06 June 2005 09:54 am
From: Misty Stanley-Jones <[EMAIL PROTEC
We have two subnets which both belong to the domain CORP, and anothen domain
in its own subnet called DV. The two networks are connected via a VPN
connection between the gateways. The routing all works. However I am having
trouble with a member server trying to become the master browser despi
Hi,
We have a server being hosted in a data center. We would like to use it
as our PDC. I got the remote browse sync and announce figured out.
But, if possible, we would prefer not have the domain/workgroup
advertised on the subnet where the PDC reside and conversely not receive
the browse l
Hi,
Thank you for your response.
I use the tun device as it seemed it was a bit easier to setup. I did
read that tap was a bit better with windows, but other than the oplocks
issue with Samba I have not had any real problem with the openVPN setup
and Samba. I think I will setup a test openVPN ser
Hi Michael,
do you use the tap device?
like this ( man openvpn advice tap instead of tun devices for win networks)
#example conf
#my partners dns name
remote your.partner.dns
#kind of device
dev tap0
float
#tunnel ips my tunnel nic partners tunnel nic
ifconfig 192.168.10.2 255.255.255.0
#what
Hello all,
I will give you a few details first.
In my office I am running Samba 3.02a as a simple file serve and a WINS
server. It currently serves about 11 employees. That setup, other than a
couple of minor things works fine.
I administrate a remote office as well that is part of the same
comp
I finally got cross subnet browsing working. I had to set the wins
server on every client to 192.168.0.1 The 192.168.2.0 side can open "My
network Places" and see all the computers. The only problem is that the
192.168.0.0 side can't see the other computers in 192.168.2.0, they only
see the
I finally got cross subnet browsing working. I had to set the wins
server on every client to 192.168.0.1 The 192.168.2.0 side can open "My
network Places" and see all the computers. The only problem is that the
192.168.0.0 side can't see the other computers in 192.168.2.0, they only
see the
Ok so I got it working on one side of the vpn. The 192.168.2.0 can see
all the machines on both sides, but the 192.168.0.0 side can't see the
machines in my network places. They are XP Pro machines incase that
makes a difference. The wierd thing is I can ping the machines by name
but can't s
Jason,
I have seen sync delays of a couple of hours. I don't know any way to force
it. I would suggest to increase the logging level of nmbd to 2 or 3 and tail
-f the nmbd.log file and see what you get.
Charles
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:28:16 -0400, Jason C. Waters wrote
> I have it setup that way,
I have it setup that way, with the clients behind each gateway to use
the gateway as their wins server. But I can't see them through my
network places. Any ideas? How long does it take to sync? Can I force
it to sync? Thanks for your help.
Jason
Charles Hamel wrote:
Jason,
Option A is the
Jason,
Option A is the good way.
You could use remote browse sync according the the manpage since you only have
Samba servers. We have a mixed network here so it is not a solution. So your
configuration could be, anybody correct me if this is wrong :
For the 192.168.0.1 server :
remote browse sy
Charles,
The clients behind each gateway, do they point to the local wins
server then? So for the clients on the 192.168.0.0 network, they would
point to 192.168.0.1, where samba is running a wins server and announces
to 192.168.2.255? You have wins server = 192.168.1.50, would I just
have
I'm having a hard time figuring this one out. I've done this before
when I had a PDC on one end of the VPN, and a BDC on the other. This is
what my setup looks like now.
Clients(XP)
|
PDC(192.168.0.4), windows 2000
|
|
WINS Server Samba(192.168.0.1), a
Dear all,
I'm having great difficulty getting cross-subnet domain logon & browsing to
work and have nearly reached the end of my sanity trying to figure out
what's wrong. Here's my setup and what's happening (apologies if it is
convoluted):
Subnet A
One Samba PDC with encrypted passwords.
One
Greetings,
I recently upgraded my Samba server and am now running Debian sid's
samba-2.999+3.0.alpha20-4. I have the following domain / workgroup /
browsing options set in /etc/samba/smb.conf:
interfaces = eth0 192.168.54.0/24 192.168.52.0/24
os level = 65
local master = yes
domai
W dniu Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:44:27AM +0100, Marian Mlcoch, Ing wystukał(a):
>Try laborate with registry and parameter MaintainServerList=No as described
>on
>http://www.buildorbuy.org/browsemaster.html
Thanks, I'll try.
--
Daniel Fenert --==> [EMAIL PROTECTED] <==--
==-P o w e
://www.buildorbuy.org/browsemaster.html
- Original Message -
From: "Daniellek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Marian Mlcoch, Ing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: [Samba] cross subnet browsing (win Xp problem)
> W dniu Wed, Nov 0
W dniu Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 07:38:42AM +0100, Marian Mlcoch, Ing wystukał(a):
>Hi Daniel
>Browsing on mixed subnets network cross routers is problem.
>I dont undestand how is configured your leased line and routers but if your
>Win98 clients on second network ok see first segment PCs then problem i
some. And wins on XP must be set to samba IP.
- Original Message -
From: "Daniellek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 8:31 PM
Subject: [Samba] cross subnet browsing (win Xp problem)
> I've got to networks connecte
I've got to networks connected through leased line, routing set between
networks, WINS server running on Samba.
There's one primary samba server, and Win98/WinXP clients connected to it.
First network with samba server works great with win98 and winxp.
Second network also works ok with win98 cli
Thanks Simon,
I had wondered if the ip helper address I put in for
DHCP (running on the samba server) was causing this.
I wasn't getting very far in proving/disproving it though.
(Lot's of reading tcpdump's manpage!)
I'll put these changes in place right away.
Thanks for your help.
Con Harte.
Con Harte wrote:
>The LMB for one of our routed networks doesn't seem to
>be collecting the browse list from our DMB (also PDC).
>
>Also we seem to be getting entries in nmbd's log to say
>that the LMBs of these remote nets are claiming that they
>are LMB of the local net. They _are_ LMBs but of
Possibly someone somewhere can help with this...
I am in the process of moving our companies major
network from a switched and shared network, to a
routed and switched network.
At the moment we are in a very hybrid state which
is likely to continue for some time. I will try to
explain what we h
I am trying to get cross subnet browsing working, could someone confirm if
it is possible to do this using different workgroup names on each subnet?
(Each subnet is actually set up as a separate domain, all the machines
across both subnets point to one WINS server, but the browse lists are not
be
Hi there,
I have a problem regarding browsing across subnets,
on a VPN I am setting up.
We have two subnets, connected via an ipsec
connection. 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0. All the machines on subnet 192.168.2.0
can see all the machines on subnet 192.168.1.0, but those on 192.168.1.0 can
64 matches
Mail list logo
