Re: some naive question from new user

2015-12-17 Thread Connie Sieh
On Sun, 13 Dec 2015, Albert wrote: Dear: I am a new Scientific user and I've got some naive questions. I would be appreciated if somebody can give me some advice. (1) I found there are different iso file from: http://ftp1.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/7x/x86_64/iso/ If I would like

AD Integration - what do you do about user/group pairs like puppet/puppet ?

2013-03-27 Thread James M. Pulver
So we're working along our SL6 and AD Server 2008R2 integration, using SSSD for authentication and such. We've realized that AD won't allow groups and users to have the same name. For common software like puppet and quemu that has this setup, what do you do? Change the program configuration to

Re: AD Integration - what do you do about user/group pairs like puppet/puppet ?

2013-03-27 Thread Paul Robert Marino
WellThe same user should be able to login from multiple clients at the same time so as long as the gids and uids on your file system are consistent across the board that's a non issue.But a word of advice DO NOT PUT THE USERS FOR YOUR SERVICES IN AD OR ANY OTHER LDAP SERVERIts a horrible idea

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI

2012-12-28 Thread Tom H
/network-scripts/ hackery and I agree. But it's good hackery. As a multi-distro user, I wish that all distributions used the same hackery...

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI

2012-12-28 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
for real work. If I'm understanding you correctly, you're calling the scripts in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ hackery and I agree. But it's good hackery. As a multi-distro user, I wish that all distributions used the same hackery... Amen. But I wish our favorite upstream vendor would use

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI

2012-12-27 Thread Tom H
this business of system and user network connections. https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Deployment_Guide/part-Networking.html You've apparently read the document. I'll withdraw the complaint that there is no way to turn it off. But having to install

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI

2012-12-27 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 10:05 AM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote: NM in F-17/F-18 understands ifcfg files defining bonds, bridges, vlans. I've installed an X-less F-18 and uninstalled NM without a hitch so it's still uninstallable (but I didn't try to do so with GNOME or another DE

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI

2012-12-14 Thread Tom H
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Konstantin Olchanski olcha...@triumf.ca wrote: On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:15:58PM -0500, Tom H wrote: I don't use the GUI ... Yes, right. New way of thinking, if you are not using a GUI you are some kind of luddite. Not using a GUI at all on SL or TUV

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI

2012-12-14 Thread Lamar Owen
? Enterprise Linux != Server-only Linux. Workstation users may very well be on a network where the physical connection is per-user authenticated with something like 802.1x NAC. This isn't just for wireless. I can think of numerous use cases where an ethernet-connected workstation should not have

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI

2012-12-13 Thread Konstantin Olchanski
, ... Complaint rejected. RTFM the Deployment Guide, section Networking. It tells you to use nm-connection-editor. It even explains all this business of system and user network connections. https://access.redhat.com/knowledge/docs/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/6/html/Deployment_Guide/part

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI

2012-12-13 Thread Konstantin Olchanski
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 05:15:58PM -0500, Tom H wrote: I don't use the GUI ... Yes, right. New way of thinking, if you are not using a GUI you are some kind of luddite. No matter that I am in Canada and I need to manage a machine in Japan hidden behind 25 firewalls. Ping time is 200 ms, ssh

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI

2012-12-12 Thread Winnie Lacesso
Konstantin Olchanski wrote: This disables the super-clever extra-useful network manager feature where it enables networking when a user logs in into the console and helpfully disables the networking when a user logs out from the console. Do I grok this aright - you set up an SL workstation

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI

2012-12-12 Thread Konstantin Olchanski
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 01:54:21PM +, Winnie Lacesso wrote: Konstantin Olchanski wrote: This disables the super-clever extra-useful network manager feature where it enables networking when a user logs in into the console and helpfully disables the networking when a user logs out from

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI.

2012-12-11 Thread Tom H
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote: Well, I had expected this behavior for the longest, actually, simply from my long-ago reading of the 'ifup' man page. It's not explicitly stated, but given the two files listed and the wording, it is, to my mind at least,

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI.

2012-12-10 Thread Tom H
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 7:28 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 6:38 PM, Tom H tomh0...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia nka...@gmail.com wrote: You can put NM_MANAGER=no in /etc/sysconfig/network, along with NO_ZEROCONF=yes

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI.

2012-12-10 Thread Lamar Owen
On 12/09/2012 07:28 PM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: If you look at the /ets/sysconfig/network-scripts maze of twisty little scripts, all different, you'll see that most of the ifup, ifdown, and similar executable scripts actually source /etc/sysconfig/network somewhere in their actual operation.

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI.

2012-12-10 Thread Konstantin Olchanski
On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 09:53:34AM -0600, Jos? Pablo M?ndez Soto wrote: I noticed that my virtual machine with GUI, that I built from the SL-63-x86_64-2012-08-02-Install-DVD.iso, won't reply to pings or open SSH sessions until a user logs in. Open network manager - edit connections or run

RE: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI.

2012-12-10 Thread Carl Friedberg
present until user logs in on GUI. On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 09:53:34AM -0600, Jos? Pablo M?ndez Soto wrote: I noticed that my virtual machine with GUI, that I built from the SL-63-x86_64-2012-08-02-Install-DVD.iso, won't reply to pings or open SSH sessions until a user logs in. Open network

SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI.

2012-12-09 Thread José Pablo Méndez Soto
or open SSH sessions until a user logs in. I tried the same on a CentOS 6.2 built similarly, and no matter if there are users or no users logged in, it always have networking and you can SSH into it. Any idea about this difference? Can it be changed in SL so to initiate connections before a GUI log

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI.

2012-12-09 Thread Eero Volotinen
-x86_64-2012-08-02-Install-DVD.iso, won't reply to pings or open SSH sessions until a user logs in. I tried the same on a CentOS 6.2 built similarly, and no matter if there are users or no users logged in, it always have networking and you can SSH into it. Any idea about this difference? Can

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI.

2012-12-09 Thread MT Julianto
On 9 December 2012 17:05, Eero Volotinen eero.voloti...@iki.fi wrote: 2012/12/9 José Pablo Méndez Soto aux...@gmail.com: I noticed that my virtual machine with GUI, that I built from the SL-63-x86_64-2012-08-02-Install-DVD.iso, won't reply to pings or open SSH sessions until a user logs

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI.

2012-12-09 Thread José Pablo Méndez Soto
...@iki.fi wrote: 2012/12/9 José Pablo Méndez Soto aux...@gmail.com: I noticed that my virtual machine with GUI, that I built from the SL-63-x86_64-2012-08-02-Install-DVD.iso, won't reply to pings or open SSH sessions until a user logs in. I tried the same on a CentOS 6.2 built

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI.

2012-12-09 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
. I noticed that my virtual machine with GUI, that I built from the SL-63-x86_64-2012-08-02-Install-DVD.iso, won't reply to pings or open SSH sessions until a user logs in. I tried the same on a CentOS 6.2 built similarly, and no matter if there are users or no users logged in, it always

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI.

2012-12-09 Thread Bluejay Adametz
NetworkManager is *not the friend* of anyone running a server. It's unfortunately difficult to rip out by the roots, I've had pretty good luck with a 'yum remove NetworkManager'. The only thing I've found depending on it has been NetworkManager-gnome, and that's no big loss. Maybe I'm missing

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI.

2012-12-09 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Bluejay Adametz blue...@fujifilm.com wrote: NetworkManager is *not the friend* of anyone running a server. It's unfortunately difficult to rip out by the roots, I've had pretty good luck with a 'yum remove NetworkManager'. The only thing I've found depending on

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI.

2012-12-09 Thread Tom H
or just to have a criteria on how they both differ, being RedHat re-distros. I noticed that my virtual machine with GUI, that I built from the SL-63-x86_64-2012-08-02-Install-DVD.iso, won't reply to pings or open SSH sessions until a user logs in. I tried the same on a CentOS 6.2 built

Re: SL 6.3 doesn't no network present until user logs in on GUI.

2012-12-09 Thread Nico Kadel-Garcia
until a user logs in. I tried the same on a CentOS 6.2 built similarly, and no matter if there are users or no users logged in, it always have networking and you can SSH into it. Any idea about this difference? Can it be changed in SL so to initiate connections before a GUI log in? On RHEL 6

Re: User proc uses all RAM+swap = kernel panic - shouldn't OS not allow?

2012-09-14 Thread Chris Schanzle
On 09/14/2012 03:58 AM, Winnie Lacesso wrote: Server has 16GB RAM 20GB swap; problem is, it's a compute server used by many. So one user (later mortified remorseful, but) causes grief for many. And a forced reset is always a concern re: possible filesystem corruption. Thank you all very much

Re: User proc uses all RAM+swap = kernel panic - shouldn't OS not allow?

2012-09-14 Thread Stephan Wiesand
On Sep 13, 2012, at 18:59 , Chris Schanzle wrote: In our experience, if memory is allocated and never touched, it's like you never allocated it at all (with respect to swap). Allocated but untouched pages will not be swapped. Right, but they do count as committed. Thus, once

User proc uses all RAM+swap = kernel panic - shouldn't OS not allow?

2012-09-13 Thread Winnie Lacesso
Greetings, Several times over past few years I've seen user processes go mad (programming error) use all RAM, then all swap (as ganglia so vividly shows), then the box ends up at a kernel panic. (Server OS is SL5.x 64-bit BTW) What's puzzling is, shouldn't the OS by default not allow users

Re: User proc uses all RAM+swap = kernel panic - shouldn't OS not allow?

2012-09-13 Thread Stephan Wiesand
Hello Winnie, On Sep 13, 2012, at 16:01 , Winnie Lacesso wrote: Several times over past few years I've seen user processes go mad (programming error) use all RAM, then all swap (as ganglia so vividly shows), then the box ends up at a kernel panic. (Server OS is SL5.x 64-bit BTW) we

Re: User proc uses all RAM+swap = kernel panic - shouldn't OS not allow?

2012-09-13 Thread Chris Schanzle
On 09/13/2012 10:32 AM, Stephan Wiesand wrote: Hello Winnie, On Sep 13, 2012, at 16:01 , Winnie Lacesso wrote: Several times over past few years I've seen user processes go mad (programming error) use all RAM, then all swap (as ganglia so vividly shows), then the box ends up at a kernel

Re: User proc uses all RAM+swap = kernel panic - shouldn't OS not allow?

2012-09-13 Thread Konstantin Olchanski
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:32:00PM +0200, Stephan Wiesand wrote: Hello Winnie, On Sep 13, 2012, at 16:01 , Winnie Lacesso wrote: Several times over past few years I've seen user processes go mad (programming error) use all RAM, then all swap (as ganglia so vividly shows

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Password required in single-user mode? (solved)

2012-08-26 Thread David Sommerseth
On 08/23/2012 03:18 PM, Pat Riehecky wrote: On 08/18/2012 03:57 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: Hi, I've been running Scientific Linux since the 6.0 days, and single-user mode have basically behaved how I have expected it those few times I needed it. As I usually set up my boxes root accounts

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Password required in single-user mode?

2012-08-23 Thread Pat Riehecky
On 08/18/2012 03:57 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: Hi, I've been running Scientific Linux since the 6.0 days, and single-user mode have basically behaved how I have expected it those few times I needed it. As I usually set up my boxes root accounts with passwords disabled, single-user mode

Re: [SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-USERS] Password required in single-user mode?

2012-08-23 Thread Stephan Wiesand
Hi, On Aug 23, 2012, at 15:18 , Pat Riehecky riehe...@fnal.gov wrote: On 08/18/2012 03:57 PM, David Sommerseth wrote: Hi, I've been running Scientific Linux since the 6.0 days, and single-user mode have basically behaved how I have expected it those few times I needed it. As I usually

Password required in single-user mode?

2012-08-18 Thread David Sommerseth
Hi, I've been running Scientific Linux since the 6.0 days, and single-user mode have basically behaved how I have expected it those few times I needed it. As I usually set up my boxes root accounts with passwords disabled, single-user mode needs to be without root password. Today, after

Re: single user mode

2012-06-23 Thread David Sommerseth
. is the behaviour not different here.? The system should boot in single user mode , it does but then it asks for root password for maintenace.or press Ctrl-D to continue. i tried typing '1 or s instead of single , but still it prompts for the password. my kernel is 2.6.32-131.0.15.el6.i686 Try booting

Launch User Groups GUI

2012-06-18 Thread Wil Irwin
Hi- Sorry for such a simple question; couldn't find the answer through search: How do you launch the Users Groups GUI from the command line? (I need it for some remote management-- doing what I need to do directly via the command line is too tedious.) Thanks, Wil

new user

2012-04-14 Thread Carl Friedberg
Greetings, I've just started out with Sceintific Linux 6.2 I have a question: how do I register for the scientificlinux.org website (a link, please)? I can see where to log in, but there's no link there for those (like me) who need an account. Another question: Is there a Scientific Linux

Re: new user

2012-04-14 Thread Tam Nguyen
Hi Carl, please go here: http://listserv.fnal.gov/scripts/wa.exe?SUBED1=scientific-linux-usersA=1 This is not a wiki but similarly in-line to your search: http://www.dedoimedo.com/computers/scientific-linux-repos.html a little deep into yum and rpm

Re: XFCE: user switching

2012-03-04 Thread Andrew Z
another session of google gave me http://askubuntu.com/questions/79318/how-can-i-switch-users-from-within-xfce quote: Note: The next version of XFCE, 4.10, will include a Switch User button in the Actions plugin, and deprecate the session menuhttps://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8358#c1

Re: XFCE: user switching

2012-03-04 Thread Andrew Z
of google gave me http://askubuntu.com/questions/79318/how-can-i-switch-users-from-within-xfce quote: Note: The next version of XFCE, 4.10, will include a Switch User button in the Actions plugin, and deprecate the session menuhttps://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8358#c1 . Guys haven't

XFCE: user switching

2012-03-03 Thread Andrew Z
Hello, how do i add switch user capability to XFCE? it seemed that in 4.8 (at least ubuntu team) had to add it. But i can't find any solution for RH. it seemed that i need to have xfswitch, but found nothing in the regular repos. The closest i found is this one - ftp://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux

Re: XFCE: user switching

2012-03-03 Thread Todd And Margo Chester
On 03/03/2012 08:51 PM, Andrew Z wrote: Hello, how do i add switch user capability to XFCE? it seemed that in 4.8 (at least ubuntu team) had to add it. But i can't find any solution for RH. it seemed that i need to have xfswitch, but found nothing in the regular repos. The closest i found

Re: XFCE: user switching

2012-03-03 Thread g
On 03/04/2012 04:51 AM, Andrew Z wrote: Hello, how do i add switch user capability to XFCE? it seemed that in 4.8 (at least ubuntu team) had to add it. But i can't find any solution for RH. it seemed that i need to have xfswitch, but found nothing in the regular repos. The closest i

Re: ~user

2011-11-21 Thread Mike Zanker
On 21 November 2011 07:28, Dr. Sunil M. Dogra smdo...@gmail.com wrote: May be a easy question. I have web-server and now would like to create users so that they have personal pages like http://www.myserver.com/~user Please suggest ? Not really SL-specific but an Apache httpd question

Re: ~user

2011-11-21 Thread Dr. Sunil M. Dogra
. Steven Yellin On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, Dr. Sunil M. Dogra wrote: Hi, May be a easy question. I have web-server and now would like to create users so that they have personal pages like http://www.myserver.com/~user Please suggest ? Thank you With best Regards sunil

Re: ~user

2011-11-21 Thread Dr. Sunil M. Dogra
to create users so that they have personal pages like http://www.myserver.com/~user Please suggest ? Thank you With best Regards sunil Depending on what it is exactly you have in mind you may also find The Apache Cookbook by O'Reily to be extremely helpful. it's not a step-by-step per

Re: ~user

2011-11-21 Thread Steven J. Yellin
wrote: Hi, May be a easy question. I have web-server and now would like to create users so that they have personal pages like http://www.myserver.com/~user Please suggest ? Thank you With best Regards sunil

Re: ~user

2011-11-21 Thread Christopher Tooley
Hello! As far as I know, changing *only* ~smd/public_html to 755 should be sufficient. Changing your home directory to readable/executable by all is not very private unless you're on a machine that has only one user. :) -Chris On 2011-11-21, at 9:14 AM, Steven J. Yellin wrote: Try

Re: ~user

2011-11-21 Thread zxq9
to readable/executable by all is not very private unless you're on a machine that has only one user. :) -Chris On 2011-11-21, at 9:14 AM, Steven J. Yellin wrote: Try changing permissions on the smd directory (and smd/public_html if necessary) with 'chmod 755 smd', provided you're willing to let

Re: ~user

2011-11-21 Thread Steven J. Yellin
to readable/executable by all is not very private unless you're on a machine that has only one user. :) -Chris On 2011-11-21, at 9:14 AM, Steven J. Yellin wrote: Try changing permissions on the smd directory (and smd/public_html if necessary) with 'chmod 755 smd', provided you're willing

~user

2011-11-20 Thread Dr. Sunil M. Dogra
Hi, May be a easy question. I have web-server and now would like to create users so that they have personal pages like http://www.myserver.com/~user Please suggest ? Thank you With best Regards sunil

Re: ~user

2011-11-20 Thread Denis Fateyev
personal pages like http://www.myserver.com/~user Please suggest ? Thank you With best Regards sunil

Re: ~user

2011-11-20 Thread Steven J. Yellin
://www.myserver.com/~user Please suggest ? Thank you With best Regards sunil

Re: LDAP problems with short user names in SL6.1

2011-08-27 Thread Jan van Eldik
apparently doesn't like some of my users names. Specifically, I have a user named BJ (real birth name; doesn't stand for anything; yes, he has heard all the jokes) and another user who prefers to use his initials as his login name. For a very long time this has worked just fine with this old LDAP system

Re: LDAP problems with short user names in SL6.1

2011-08-27 Thread ~Stack~
On 08/27/2011 12:37 PM, Jan van Eldik wrote: Sounds very much like https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706860 , which contains a workaround that we have successfully deployed. hth, cheers, Jan I went through and read a bunch of LDAP bugs but I didn't find that one. Thank you for

LDAP problems with short user names in SL6.1

2011-08-26 Thread ~Stack~
majority of my users, this roll out went smoothly and they love 6.1. Problem: LDAP apparently doesn't like some of my users names. Specifically, I have a user named BJ (real birth name; doesn't stand for anything; yes, he has heard all the jokes) and another user who prefers to use his initials

New user.

2011-06-02 Thread Steven Haigh
Hi all, Just wanted to say G'day to fellow SL users. I installed SL6 last night for the first time ever and was quite impressed. I've been a long time CentOS / Fedora / Redhat user so I'm quite at home. Within 6 hours I had recompiled Xen for SL6, and checked out and built a new kernel

Re: User interfaces for mysql

2010-12-09 Thread Mark Stodola
Larry, Could you elaborate on this. I'm having trouble following what exactly you are trying to accomplish. If you want to provide a web interface to a mysql database using php, this is certainly possible. You'll need apache, php, php-mysql all installed and functioning. If you've written

Re: User interfaces for mysql

2010-12-09 Thread James Fait
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 16:31 -0500, Larry Linder wrote: Have a nice set of html interfaces for humans. Planed to use php scripts to insert data into data base. However there is a catch to this scheme the php is a server side script and will not execute - or at least I couldn't get it to

Re: user account

2010-04-29 Thread Tim Edwards
On 29/04/10 07:53, vivek chal wrote: hi all, i have a user account named globus and i want to give it all the administrative privileges What is the command to do it. As root run 'visudo' and add a line like this: globus ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD: ALL This will give globus the ability

Re: user account

2010-04-29 Thread Steven Timm
send those lines under separate cover if necessary. Also I have never been able to make that feature work without disabling SELinux altogether. Steve On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, vivek chal wrote: hi all, i have a user account named globus and i want to give it all the administrative privileges

Re: user account

2010-04-29 Thread Steven Timm
. Steve On Thu, 29 Apr 2010, Tim Edwards wrote: On 29/04/10 07:53, vivek chal wrote: hi all, i have a user account named globus and i want to give it all the administrative privileges What is the command to do it. As root run 'visudo' and add a line like this: globus ALL=(ALL) NOPASSWD

Re: (New user) SL 5.4-Any rpms for madwifi-hal?

2010-03-07 Thread Ibidem
Well, Those modules didn't get wireless working...and when I tried blacklisting ath5k, the mouse stopped working (?). But I realized that the rpms are for standard madwifi. (I had been asking about a newer version with some different code that allows using AR5007 chipsets, madwifi-hal-10.5.6; it

Re: (New user) SL 5.4-Any rpms for madwifi-hal?

2010-03-04 Thread Troy Dawson
Ibidem wrote: Hello all, I've recently started using SL 5.4 (installed from mini-livecd) on my Aspire One, with kernels 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 (original) and 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 (updated). Ath5k is functional on the live cd, halfway working on the old kernel, somewhat better on the updated kernel;

(New user) SL 5.4-Any rpms for madwifi-hal?

2010-03-03 Thread Ibidem
Hello all, I've recently started using SL 5.4 (installed from mini-livecd) on my Aspire One, with kernels 2.6.18-164.6.1.el5 (original) and 2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 (updated). Ath5k is functional on the live cd, halfway working on the old kernel, somewhat better on the updated kernel; but it comes

Re: Updates and long-running user processs

2009-06-18 Thread John Summerfield
Jon Peatfield wrote: BTW the default reboot/shutdown procedures in el5/sl5 don't give user processes very long to checkpoint themselves, and I *think* that networking may have been turned off by the time they get signalled. We That's too silly for words. How likely is it that users

Killing user jobs, WAS: Re: Updates and long-running user processs

2009-06-18 Thread Jon Peatfield
On Thu, 18 Jun 2009, John Summerfield wrote: Jon Peatfield wrote: BTW the default reboot/shutdown procedures in el5/sl5 don't give user processes very long to checkpoint themselves, and I *think* that networking may have been turned off by the time they get signalled. We That's too

Re: Updates and long-running user processs

2009-06-17 Thread Jon Peatfield
rebooted into an updated kernel. User-writing code often check-points, so the actual calculation time lost is not significant, but calculations in commercial packages such as Mathematica and Maple are often less good about check-pointing. How do people balance the disruption of killing user

Re: Updates and long-running user processs

2009-06-16 Thread John Summerfield
Brandon Galbraith wrote: Or run your services/calculations in a VM on Xen that you can snapshot, upgrade the host, and then bring the VMs back up. There are some things you just can't get around (like reboots for core components). That adds a layer of complexity, where's the benefit? Real or

Re: Updates and long-running user processs

2009-06-16 Thread Brandon Galbraith
I'm simply stating that if you use Xen, you can hot migrate the service and keep it running. If you must update/upgrade services users are using on the virtual image (Firefox, etc), then yes, Xen is overkill and adds complexity. In some cases, downtime is unavoidable. -brandon On Tue, Jun 16,

Re: Updates and long-running user processs

2009-06-16 Thread Dr Andrew C Aitchison
On Mon, 15 Jun 2009, Brandon Galbraith wrote: Or run your services/calculations in a VM on Xen that you can snapshot, upgrade the host, and then bring the VMs back up. There are some things you just can't get around (like reboots for core components). That is worth considering, though

Re: Updates and long-running user processs

2009-06-16 Thread Brandon Galbraith
I agree. In a perfect world, services would be distributed with Xen in VM containers across separate physical machines to ensure high availability, calculations would take place using code that intelligently checkpointed (as well as distributed the work appropriately over a cluster to remove

Updates and long-running user processs

2009-06-15 Thread Dr Andrew C Aitchison
will be running when they are updated. Some time later these applications may try to load and run plugins which have been removed/updated. Second, I have users with long running calculations (often weeks or more) which would be interrupted if the machine were rebooted into an updated kernel. User-writing code

Re: Updates and long-running user processs

2009-06-15 Thread Ken Teh
have users with long running calculations (often weeks or more) which would be interrupted if the machine were rebooted into an updated kernel. User-writing code often check-points, so the actual calculation time lost is not significant, but calculations in commercial packages such as Mathematica

Re: Updates and long-running user processs

2009-06-15 Thread Ken Teh
and run plugins which have been removed/updated. Second, I have users with long running calculations (often weeks or more) which would be interrupted if the machine were rebooted into an updated kernel. User-writing code often check-points, so the actual calculation time lost is not significant

Re: Updates and long-running user processs

2009-06-15 Thread John Summerfield
restart it. Second, I have users with long running calculations (often weeks or more) which would be interrupted if the machine were rebooted into an updated kernel. User-writing code often check-points, so the actual calculation time lost is not significant, but calculations in commercial packages

Re: mysql-server on SL5.2: missing user mysql

2008-12-19 Thread Faye Gibbins
that there's no user:group mysql:mysql, which is indeed the case on a freshly installed box. This was the output of `yum install` command: Installing: mysql-server ### [10/11] warning: user mysql does not exist - using root warning: user mysql does not exist - using

mysql-server on SL5.2: missing user mysql

2008-12-12 Thread Jan Kundrát
### [10/11] warning: user mysql does not exist - using root warning: user mysql does not exist - using root warning: user mysql does not exist - using root Although this box was converted to LDAP using a custom cfengine setup, other RPMs (httpd) create their users without

Re: SL52: firefox 3 not reading user lpoptions file

2008-11-13 Thread Art Wildman
The prefs.js user.js files in the Firefox Profile are where the printer settings should be stored, just make sure the Firefox clients are closed when making edits as settings are cached saved upon closing mozilla apps. There have been many mozilla bugs filed over the years about persistent

SL52: firefox 3 not reading user lpoptions file

2008-11-05 Thread scientificlinux
Printing from firefox 3 for us is not reading in customisations users have made to their printer settings stored in their $HOME/.cups/lpoptions (or $HOME/.lpoptions) file. This is not the case for firefox 2. You can pick the options you desire from the firefox print dialogue box, but you have to

Re: SL52: firefox 3 not reading user lpoptions file

2008-11-05 Thread Jon Peatfield
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Printing from firefox 3 for us is not reading in customisations users have made to their printer settings stored in their $HOME/.cups/lpoptions (or $HOME/.lpoptions) file. This is not the case for firefox 2. You can pick the options you desire from

Re: SL52: firefox 3 not reading user lpoptions file

2008-11-05 Thread Troy Dawson
Things changed alot with Firefox 3. You'll probably also notice that it doesn't use the bookmarks.html file anymore, and a wide variety of things. I personally don't know where it puts personal printing options. Have you looked at through the mozilla website yet? Troy [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: SL52: firefox 3 not reading user lpoptions file

2008-11-05 Thread Franchisseur Robert
-- Le (On) 2008-11-05 -0600 à (at) 15:22:06 Troy Dawson écrivit (wrote): -- Things changed alot with Firefox 3. You'll probably also notice that it doesn't use the bookmarks.html file anymore, and a wide variety of things. I personally don't know where it puts personal printing options.

Re: latest firefox update and AFS user

2008-02-22 Thread Urs Beyerle
Beyerle Urs wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hallo, We have observed a strange problem with the latest firefox update in SL4 and SL5. If the user has his firefox profile on AFS, he can not open a New Window (Ctrl+N) in firefox anymore. Even more strange this does not effect all users

Re: latest firefox update and AFS user

2008-02-18 Thread Beyerle Urs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hallo, We have observed a strange problem with the latest firefox update in SL4 and SL5. If the user has his firefox profile on AFS, he can not open a New Window (Ctrl+N) in firefox anymore. Even more strange this does not effect all users - it also depends

Re: nfs /home/user setup problems

2008-01-24 Thread Raymond Frey
OK folks, I figured this out there was one rogue file with a wrong userid which I missed the first time through. Thanks

Re: create user on install bug 5.0

2007-12-15 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Dec 12, 2007 10:33 AM, James Harrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, I just set up a Dell Precision 390 with Scientific Linux 5.0. When adding an initial user account, I wasn't thinking and used an all numeric user ID, which Scientific Linux rightly complained might be confused

problem with cd ~user

2007-11-01 Thread Zhi-Wei Lu
Hi, After a power outage last night, one of my SL 4.5 (x86_64) server failed to do cd ~user however, cd /home/user still works fine Does anyone see problem like this before? I am using autofs via ldap to mount home directory. This prevents apache to mount user home directory (http

Re: problem with cd ~user

2007-11-01 Thread Brett Viren
Zhi-Wei Lu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: After a power outage last night, one of my SL 4.5 (x86_64) server failed to do cd ~user however, cd /home/user still works fine Any filesystem damage? Any files found in lost+found/ sub directories? Does anyone see problem like this before? I am