Yes, here in Europe we have Cents too ;-)
Holger Reichert
www.holysword.de
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 15. Januar 2002 19:56
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: RE: RE: Security for new
: Dienstag, 15. Januar 2002 19:56
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: RE: RE: Security for new small company
Check Point (small office, Internet Gateway for 25 users, etc) and Cisco
(PIX 506, etc) have solutions for branch offices and small business. I think
that later the company
-Original Message-
From: David Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 January 2002 00:21
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: RE: Security for new small company
I agree whole heartedly!
Sincerely,
David Ellis
Systems Engineer
Tecnomatix - Unicam Inc.
Two
:38 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Security for new small company
In regards to your statement about a netgear router. A device that does
nat and port forwarding is not a firewall.
It is not a true firewall, though it is marketed as one.
Easily hackable.
Can you point us
I also like the GB-100 and GB-1000 by GnatBox, nice
hardware device with great features, good price, very
reliable.
I have used both over the past year.
--- Brad Bendily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3Com has some hardware Firewall products that are
meant to be used
in a small office
-rich direction.
-Original Message-
From: David Ellis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 2:31 PM
To: 'Chip McClure'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Security for new small company
Hi, In regards to your statement about a netgear router. A device that does
nat
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 2:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RE: Security for new small company
I think that the better solution for your issue are CheckPoint and Cisco
solution, because these solutions are scalable, manageable
Check Point (small office, Internet Gateway for 25 users, etc) and Cisco (PIX 506,
etc) have solutions for branch offices and small business. I think that later the
company will not have problem with security.
Cheers
Kleber
Vachon, Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In regards to your statement
that will update IDS signatures - good for the
money.
Toby
-Original Message-
From: Burt0n [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2002 3:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Security for new small company
Hi,
I must admit i did wonder about a watchguard
Hi,
I must admit i did wonder about a watchguard or sonicwall. Are these products seen as
being adequate though?
Thanks
Ben
On Thu, 10 January 2002, Kleber S Oliveira wrote:
Subject: RE: Security for new small company
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben), [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL
for new small company
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Ben,
A lot of it depends on your budget for the resources you need. If you plan
on keeping the DSL connection to your office, not expanding to a
fractional or full T1, I'd reccomend the Netgear line of firewall /
routers. I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Ben,
A lot of it depends on your budget for the resources you need. If you plan
on keeping the DSL connection to your office, not expanding to a
fractional or full T1, I'd reccomend the Netgear line of firewall /
routers. I personally use a
Hello Ben,
You could buy Watchguard (SOHO) or Cisco PIX (506). These fw are for small companies
or branch offices that have small throughput.
But if you want to create a DMZ with the mail server and website you could buy a Cisco
PIX 515R that has three or more ethernet interfaces to do it.
13 matches
Mail list logo
