Re: IMAP Development Pointers

2003-09-05 Thread Kris Bravo
Ed and Noel, You can still consider me in for working on parts of the IMAP implementation. I've been buried on a political tracking tool since last poking around in the existing experimental code. The only other experience I have with James beyond just using the server was to have wrote my own

RE: IMAP Development Pointers

2003-09-05 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> In fact I was under the impression that INBOX is a reserved folder name, > that it should always be there, and you are not allowed to create > subfolders of it. I don't think many enforce the no-subfolder of INBOX > rule, and I may just be remembering wrong. I haven't read the IMAP RFCs. I do

Re: IMAP Development Pointers

2003-09-05 Thread Serge Knystautas
Kervin L. Pierre wrote: I believe that it is up to the client that is making those mailboxes. I use mozilla, and it creates those mailboxes under the INBOX mailbox. Here is some hierarchy of multiple mailboxes on my cyrus imap server ... [EMAIL PROTECTED] (\HasNoChildren) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (\Ha

RE: IMAP Development Pointers

2003-09-05 Thread Edward Flick
unintended bonus, kewl -Original Message- From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 2:57 PM To: James Developers List Subject: RE: IMAP Development Pointers > in the IMAP4rev1 RFC, it shows instances of there being subfolders of > INBOX, but INBOX i

RE: IMAP Development Pointers

2003-09-05 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> in the IMAP4rev1 RFC, it shows instances of there being subfolders of > INBOX, but INBOX is special in that it always exists, and when you do > a rename of INBOX it just create a new folder and moves the contents > of INBOX into it. And re-recreates a new INBOX? So if I have INBOX and rename it

RE: IMAP Development Pointers

2003-09-05 Thread Edward Flick
Kervin, just so you know that was Surge that wrote that. I wrote a response which your post gives a perfect example to. -Original Message- From: Kervin L. Pierre [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 4:03 PM To: James Developers List Subject: Re: IMAP Development Poin

Re: IMAP Development Pointers

2003-09-05 Thread Kervin L. Pierre
Edward Flick wrote: In fact I was under the impression that INBOX is a reserved folder name, True that it should always be there, and you are not allowed to create subfolders of it. You are allowed. Anyway, the mail servers I am familiar with do place INBOX at the same left as Sent, Draft, an

RE: IMAP Development Pointers

2003-09-05 Thread Edward Flick
Well, in the IMAP4rev1 RFC, it shows instances of there being subfolders of INBOX, but INBOX is special in that it always exists, and when you do a rename of INBOX it just create a new folder and moves the contents of INBOX into it. -Original Message- From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: IMAP Development Pointers

2003-09-05 Thread Serge Knystautas
Noel J. Bergman wrote: There is no hierarchy. They are just names. The hierarchy is a fiction. Just adopt a convention for how IMAP wants to map the names into a hierarchy. No one said that user.folder should be interpreted as a child of the inbox. It could be a peer. In terms of the actual stor

RE: IMAP Development Pointers

2003-09-05 Thread Noel J. Bergman
> I just thought about this under the format where you say > .select("user.folder") does that automatically assume a > folder under the INBOX? If so how do you select a folder > that isn't under the inbox? There is no hierarchy. They are just names. The hierarchy is a fiction. Just adopt a conv

RE: IMAP Development Pointers

2003-09-05 Thread Edward Flick
Hey, sorry I just thought about this under the format where you say .select("user.folder") does that automatically assume a folder under the INBOX? If so how do you select a folder that isn't under the inbox? -Original Message- From: Jason Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, Sept

RE: IMAP Development Pointers

2003-09-05 Thread Edward Flick
Is it not possible to keep a copy of the message on the server, or am I misunderstanding what you mean by that. -Original Message- From: Jason Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 9:02 AM To: 'James Developers List' Subject: RE: IMAP Development Pointers > --

RE: IMAP Development Pointers

2003-09-05 Thread Jason Webb
> -Original Message- > From: Edward Flick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 05 September 2003 15:02 > To: James Developers List > Subject: RE: IMAP Development Pointers > > > That sounds fine to me. I mainly just want something > working. What locking mechanism are you using with th

RE: IMAP Development Pointers

2003-09-05 Thread Edward Flick
That sounds fine to me. I mainly just want something working. What locking mechanism are you using with the mbox store, though? And how does it recover from power loss mid-spool? Just wondering. Ed -Original Message- From: Jason Webb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, September 0

RE: IMAP Development Pointers

2003-09-05 Thread Jason Webb
> -Original Message- > From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 04 September 2003 23:54 > To: James Developers List > Cc: Darrell DeBoer; Kris Bravo; Joe Cheng; Maxwell > Grender-Jones; Nawwar Kasrawi; Christian Myrvold; Kenny > Smith; Peter Svensson; Sascha Kulawik > Su