[jira] [Commented] (JSPF-55) Add helper classes for supporting SRS

2012-06-12 Thread Hontvari Jozsef (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPF-55?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13293937#comment-13293937 ] Hontvari Jozsef commented on JSPF-55: - I have implemented SRS in Mireka a while ago

[jira] Commented: (JAMES-901) build error

2009-05-08 Thread Hontvari Jozsef (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12707277#action_12707277 ] Hontvari Jozsef commented on JAMES-901: --- I met the same problem 1-2 years ago and if I

compile 2.3.1

2008-04-28 Thread Hontvari Jozsef
The current 2.3.1 cannot be compiled using ant compile-main, because mordred PoolConnEntry assumes a very old version of java.sql.Connection. Is this correct? compile-main: [javac] ...\src\java\org\apache\james\util\mordred\PoolConnEntry.java:37 :

Re: Road Forward

2008-04-17 Thread Hontvari Jozsef
Robert Burrell Donkin írta: 1. i know that quite a lot of the IMAP/mailbox stuff is junk (both mine code and the old stuff). IMAP/mailbox is most of trunk. so yes, a substantial quantity of code in trunk is junk. a more important issue is that it's difficult to gain consensus on the production

Re: Road Forward

2008-04-15 Thread Hontvari Jozsef
Considering the low frequency of releases and the small number of new features, the version management structure of James seems to be an overkill. (Or maybe I just don't understand the system.) Although I don't think this is new for anybody here is the simplest procedure: The trunk receives

[jira] Commented: (JAMES-52) 8bitmime capabilities missing

2005-06-11 Thread Hontvari Jozsef (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-52?page=comments#action_12313376 ] Hontvari Jozsef commented on JAMES-52: -- I think this is simply a bug in IIS. If IIS supports 8bitmime then it must be able to forward (and convert) it to non-8bitmime mail

Re: Short term, but immediate, solution to spam volume.

2005-05-31 Thread Hontvari Jozsef
I forgot to mention: It doesn't check for abuse@, only postmaster@ and the email address used in the error message is hard coded. Hontvari Jozsef wrote: Maybe it helps, I have attached the source which we use for about a year. I cannot create a standard patch because my last workspace

Re: [VOTE] POJO pattern

2005-04-11 Thread Hontvari Jozsef
the merging process, which took almost 2 years (until now) will kill James, if it hasn't killed it already. Nobody knows which is the real head branch, etc. It would be better if you rename 2.1(?), which is the production version (almost), and officially abandon the current head. If somebody

Re: Test Build posted - JAMES-264 mail loop

2004-08-15 Thread Hontvari Jozsef
If someone would try to use the email list mailets with non-local users then he will very soon change his mind because of the catastrophic JAMES-264 UNRESOLVED mail list loop caused by using Return-Path bug. In the description of the issue I included a quick fix, which consists of about 5 lines.

Re: Test Build posted - JAMES-264 mail loop

2004-08-15 Thread Hontvari Jozsef
There are is reference to an email in the first (and also in the last) sentence of the description, that email includes both the fix and the analysis, which may answer your question. Related email thread: http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]msgNo=11183 - Original Message

InaccurateTimeoutWatchdog

2004-03-24 Thread Hontvari Jozsef
It seems to me that this line is not correct: if (timeToSleep 0) { I think it should be =. Otherwise if timeToSleep is (accidentally) 0, the following wait() will wait undefinitely, according to its specification. - To

Re: 8BITMIME support

2004-02-20 Thread Hontvari Jozsef
I was thinking about this too, I guess most of the work comes from the requirement, that if you accept 8bitmime, then you have to be able to convert it to 7bit, because a recipient server may not support 8bitmime. - Original Message - From: Craig Raw [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] RemoteDelivery multiple delay times

2003-10-29 Thread Hontvari Jozsef
I am not against this patch, actually this was one of the most important missing features for me. The current configuration is better in one (and only one) issue, it does provide feedback after about a day to the sender. I have no idea about the implementation of DSN, but sending bounces to a

Re: [PATCH] RemoteDelivery multiple delay times

2003-10-29 Thread Hontvari Jozsef
(on bounces I also mean failed attempts, before the configured retry attemps ended, this event could be used for such a notification) - Original Message - From: Hontvari Jozsef [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: James Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:43 PM

[PATCH] GenericListServ, reversePath can be specified

2003-10-29 Thread Hontvari Jozsef
This is a small patch which makes possible to specify a reversePath in descendant classes. Until now postmaster was used always and the bounces got on my nerves :) It is against the 2.1 branch. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [PATCH] GenericListServ, reversePath can be specified

2003-10-29 Thread Hontvari Jozsef
Now again in zip. - Original Message - From: Hontvari Jozsef [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: James Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:38 PM Subject: [PATCH] GenericListServ, reversePath can be specified This is a small patch which makes possible to specify

default log configuration

2003-07-12 Thread Hontvari Jozsef
James has about 10 log files now, and I usually have no idea in which one should I look for a specific entry - even after using james for a few moths and having some practice with the source code. The mail software I used before only had one log file, and I found that better. Finally I changed