[GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-06-25 Thread Eric Charles
Hi Echo and Mihai, I hope you are having fun with your GSoC and I'm sure you mentor is helping you as it must. As a few people on the mailing list, I would love to have a deeper look into your commits [1] and [2]. So, don't be shy and shot you questions, issues, choices... here so we can s

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-06-25 Thread Mihai Soloi
Hi Eric, I've commit on the second link, i am having some problems with Lucene IndexReader checksum, I've emailed the dev list at Lucene. I am hoping for a kind person's help :). It's a nice feeling being part of a comunity. All the best, Mihai On 25.06.2012 21:30, Eric Charles wrote: Hi Ec

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-06-26 Thread Eric Charles
Hi Mihai, Thx to ping us. I guess you are refering to: http://markmail.org/message/5fjwb3aiaezzsy26 Maybe you could write (if it's not done) a unit test that proves the exception, and post it as additional information on the lucene mailing list. Hopefully, someone will clone your repo, run t

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-06-26 Thread Mihai Soloi
Hi Eric, There is a test written you can run it to replicate the exception with: mvn test -Dtest=org.apache.james.mailbox.lucene.hbase.IndexingTest I've ran it with the debug, and watched what happens to all of the bytes. Now I got an answer from mr. Mike McCandles and Robert Muir suggesting

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-06-26 Thread Eric Charles
Hi Mihai, Lucene4-Alpha is on its way to be released and it would be great that you develop on the snapshots (waiting on the official release). There are some changes in the API, so better to no refactor after, and to benefit from goodies such as AppendingCodec and other features you can rea

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-06-26 Thread Mihai Soloi
Thank you Eric, I will try to use the SNAPSHOT versions from now on, I thought that they may be changing to fast and that's why I stayed away from them so far. On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 9:30 PM, Eric Charles wrote: > Hi Mihai, > > Lucene4-Alpha is on its way to be released and it would be great t

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-06-27 Thread Ioan Eugen Stan
Thanks Eric, Always very helpful. Good luck Mihai. Cheers, 2012/6/26 Eric Charles : > Hi Mihai, > > Lucene4-Alpha is on its way to be released and it would be great that you > develop on the snapshots (waiting on the official release). > > There are some changes in the API, so better to no refac

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-06-27 Thread Eric Charles
The vote for Lucene4-Alpha (take 2) is open atm. IMHO The API will not change, so you can safely use the snapshots (except well to impact your current code base on lucene3). Thx, Eric On 06/26/2012 08:36 PM, Mihai Soloi wrote: Thank you Eric, I will try to use the SNAPSHOT versions from now

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-01 Thread echo
Hi I am very sorry for my late reply, but renting and networking troubles really perplexed me(I have graduated from my institute and moved to another city). Fortunately both of them looks good now. As soon as I can access the internet, I wrote this email. Yes, I will commit my code to the list and

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-02 Thread Manuel Carrasco Moñino
Ok Echo, so now that your connection problems have been fixed and until the mid-term day, please report every day and commit your code every daty as well (although it was broken), - Manolo On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 6:56 PM, echo wrote: > Hi > I am very sorry for my late reply, but renting and net

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-02 Thread echo
Now the inbox activity is working, the only problem is that I must click the refresh button after click the inbox folder.(Even though I put the code "display.reloadData()" ). If this issue can be solved, the other folders will follow the INBOX folder's method. I want to use MailInboxPlace(#inbox) t

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-03 Thread Manuel Carrasco Moñino
1.- I've checked out the code and I had to enclose between literal("") the css rules starting with '-' in the AppLayoutImpl.ui.xml in order to make it compile ie: background: -moz-linear-gradient(#eaeaea, #fafafa); background: literal("-moz-linear-gradient(#eaeaea, #fafafa)"); 2.- The places seems

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-03 Thread echo
Hi, there > 1.- I've checked out the code and I had to enclose between literal("") the > css rules starting with '-' in the AppLayoutImpl.ui.xml in order to make it > compile ie: > background: -moz-linear-gradient(#eaeaea, #fafafa); > background: literal("-moz-linear-gradient(#eaeaea, #fafafa)");

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-03 Thread echo
Hi manolo *The Hupa-evo repo has been updated just now:* 1. Except contacts part and INBOX like part, which will be considered next, almost all of the activities and places have been completed and can be used by EXCPERT user because of more flaws. 2. The [MessageSendActivity]s share the MessageSen

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-04 Thread Manuel Carrasco Moñino
I've tested the app in gmail and it seems work although many things are broken. Related with your problems: #1 I dont know why hupa-evo only works with the folder 'Inbox' which makes fail demo mode which uses the name Mock-Inbox. If you replace Mock-Inbox by Inbox in the url, the right panel is sho

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-04 Thread echo
qujickly reply for I see the code a bit messy, It is difficult to figure out which is new and > what is old/legacy, I think you could create a new namespace for all the > new stuff (for instance evo) and follow some conventions either: all > classes related with an activity in a folder (view, acti

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-04 Thread echo
Hi, manolo On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 8:52 PM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino wrote: > I've tested the app in gmail and it seems work although many things are > broken. > Related with your problems: > #1 I dont know why hupa-evo only works with the folder 'Inbox' which makes > fail demo mode which uses the n

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-04 Thread Manuel Carrasco Moñino
First try this 1 - checkout last hupa. 2 - copy the exanple properties file to your home 3 - change the property IMAPServerAddress=hupa.demo 4 - go to the folder client 5 - run 'mvn clean package gwt:run -Pdemo' 6 - open your browser and go to the devel url This script works to me: cd /tmp rm -r

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-04 Thread Manuel Carrasco Moñino
looks good On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 4:58 PM, echo wrote: > qujickly reply for > > I see the code a bit messy, It is difficult to figure out which is new and > > what is old/legacy, I think you could create a new namespace for all the > > new stuff (for instance evo) and follow some conventions eit

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-04 Thread echo
Hi, there On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino wrote: > First try this > > 1 - checkout last hupa. > 2 - copy the exanple properties file to your home > 3 - change the property IMAPServerAddress=hupa.demo > 4 - go to the folder client > 5 - run 'mvn clean package gwt:run -Pdemo

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-04 Thread Manuel Carrasco Moñino
Yes RF is much more productive than GWT-RPC. And you are right does not match the command pattern. There are many advantages of using RF, it is light, it is easy to serialize entities into strings and cache messages in localstorage so as the user can work offline, etc. The project is almost ready t

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-04 Thread echo
Hi, Yes RF is much more productive than GWT-RPC. > And you are right does not match the command pattern. > There are many advantages of using RF, it is light, it is easy to serialize > entities into strings and cache messages in localstorage so as the user can > work offline, etc. > The project is

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-04 Thread echo
Hi there, > #1 I dont know why hupa-evo only works with the folder 'Inbox' which makes > fail demo mode which uses the name Mock-Inbox. If you replace Mock-Inbox by > Inbox in the url, the right panel is shown but it fails to show messages > because in the server the folder name is different. Try

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-04 Thread Manuel Carrasco Moñino
One more thing, I've seen that you are getting a good knowledge of gin !, so I think you could remove many boilerplate code in constructors if you annotate classes attributes like this: Before private final Displayable display; private final EventBus eventBus; private fina

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-05 Thread echo
Hi manolo, a problem Do we need to run the 5th command over and over again after some source codes are updated? While I found it is slow to compile and run one time(1min+). On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Manuel Carrasco Moñino wrote: > First try this > > 1 - checkout last hupa. > 2 - copy the e

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-05 Thread Manuel Carrasco Moñino
No !! , when you are running dev-mode you just reload your browser and it recompiles the differences. Actually this script is just to test the first time that your environment works, then you should import the project in eclipse being the 5th command equivalent to the run as gwt web project. On

Re: [GSoC2012] Feeback so far?

2012-07-05 Thread Manuel Carrasco Moñino
Another thing If you prefer to launch dev mode from command line run the 5th command but without clean and package just 'mvn gwt:run -Pdemo'. The package option is used the first time to copy the stuff from the webapp. This option compiles the java code to javascript which is only needed when you a