[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-3845?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Benoit Tellier closed JAMES-3845.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> HP Solution Center Download Wind
MAILBOX-266 Find a temporary solution for Guice chaotic initialization
Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/james-project/repo
Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/james-project/commit/1d43ec8e
Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/james-project/tree/1d43ec8e
Diff
at documents how you can
enable, disable stuff.
>>> Thx,
>>> Eric
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/11/2012 06:25 AM, Eric Charles wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/10/2012 09:18 PM, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
&g
, how to configure
to enable, disable,...).
Thx,
Eric
On 05/11/2012 06:25 AM, Eric Charles wrote:
On 05/10/2012 09:18 PM, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote:
Hello Eric,
2012/5/10 Eric Charles:
Hi Ioan,
Alternative solution could be servo [1].
I didn't look at jetm yet but there are probably other
>
>>> Hello Eric,
>>>
>>> 2012/5/10 Eric Charles:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Ioan,
>>>>
>>>> Alternative solution could be servo [1].
>>>> I didn't look at jetm yet but there are probably others.
>>>
>>>
sable,...).
Thx,
Eric
On 05/11/2012 06:25 AM, Eric Charles wrote:
On 05/10/2012 09:18 PM, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote:
Hello Eric,
2012/5/10 Eric Charles:
Hi Ioan,
Alternative solution could be servo [1].
I didn't look at jetm yet but there are probably others.
Took a quick look at servo, and
On 05/10/2012 09:18 PM, Ioan Eugen Stan wrote:
Hello Eric,
2012/5/10 Eric Charles:
Hi Ioan,
Alternative solution could be servo [1].
I didn't look at jetm yet but there are probably others.
Took a quick look at servo, and has a lot of potential. It's very new
so a lot of people d
Hello Eric,
2012/5/10 Eric Charles :
> Hi Ioan,
>
> Alternative solution could be servo [1].
> I didn't look at jetm yet but there are probably others.
Took a quick look at servo, and has a lot of potential. It's very new
so a lot of people didn't hear about it. I&
Hi Ioan,
Alternative solution could be servo [1].
I didn't look at jetm yet but there are probably others.
Although MAILBOX-152 is created since long, I think it's worth to talk
and announce on mailing list when introducing such components. Everybody
could then propose alternat
Hi,
I've committed the changes needed to add jetm performance monitoring.
It uses Spring AOP and can be enabled/ disa bled by configuration for
every bean that we create.
The project home-page shows some stuff that you can do with it:
http://jetm.void.fm/views/monitoring_examples.html
It's in th
at present, that can come later.
Regards,
Simon
Stefano
2009/11/21 Simon Funnell :
Hi,
Sorry, I will keep it under 'Solution' for now.
Norman Maurer wrote:
Im still not agree with you about that. Imho logging should be part of the
"main code". And why is this any bett
t none of them is
using it for logging. I think there something to learn there.
Stefano
2009/11/21 Simon Funnell :
> Hi,
>
> Sorry, I will keep it under 'Solution' for now.
>
> Norman Maurer wrote:
>>
>> Im still not agree with you about that. Imho logging sh
Hi,
Sorry, I will keep it under 'Solution' for now.
Norman Maurer wrote:
Im still not agree with you about that. Imho logging should be part of
the "main code". And why is this any better then injecting the Logger
like every other object. In trunk we even use JSR2
tions, they are
> flawed. Nothing do with me or anyone, its a just a fact. The solution is to
> write methods without logging code, then add it later with a decent aspect
> orientated framework or the like. Its really that simple.
I think I'm with Norman and Stefano on this.
In my opi
ing operations, they are flawed. Nothing do with me or
anyone, its a just a fact. The solution is to write methods without
logging code, then add it later with a decent aspect orientated
framework or the like. Its really that simple.
Im still not agree with you about that. Imho logging should be part
solution is to write methods without logging code, then add it
later with a decent aspect orientated framework or the like. Its really
that simple.
Are you not bored of explicitly writing logging code in every component?
All I am asking is for you to embrace best practice :) but I respect the
solution of using a *local* stage folder used as "remote
repository" for every project dependency fix most of the security concerns.
The only thing we now download from remote repositories are m2 plugins.
> Find a solution for maven2 dependencies to be able to create an offici
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-1?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stefano Bagnara resolved MIME4J-1.
--
Resolution: Fixed
I hope the current solution is enough.
We now use a local stage repository
> into a superclass. this would perform a null check on the logger and
> > the isXXXEnabled. it would also provide pre-parameterized calls:
> >
> > info(Object one)
> > info(Object one, Object two)
> > ...
>
> Without even valuating your solution: I can'
ovide pre-parameterized calls:
>
> info(Object one)
> info(Object one, Object two)
> ...
Without even valuating your solution: I can't see the problem you're
trying to solve.
readability and ease of coding
(which is why the ne
roposal" is anyway a "small" refactoring and it is something
mechanical to search&replace current concatenations with a similar
approach and will be also easy to come back to the former solution.
Stefano
-
To
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> I think we should wait to refactor this component until we'll switch to
> java 5 as the required jvm so we can introduce a Logger interface with
> the mixin's methods we need.
Can you illustrate the pattern you have in mind for such a future approach?
--- Noel
ject one)
> info(Object one, Object two)
> ...
Without even valuating your solution: I can't see the problem you're
trying to solve.
Why should we do optimization when there is not a known measurable
performance enhancement?
What does it cost doing just log.info("My message from "
On 11/18/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I don't like this approach.
most people don't like this approach the first time they see it: it feels wrong
but give it time and think about it carefully before rushing to judgement
I think we should wait to refactor this component unti
I don't like this approach.
I think we should wait to refactor this component until we'll switch to
java 5 as the required jvm so we can introduce a Logger interface with
the mixin's methods we need.
If you want to avoid complex evaluation for debugging you will have to
use the isEnabled
On 11/18/06, robert burrell donkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/17/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> > On 11/17/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> Output code 2 from jdk 1.4
> >> > String s2 = s + "test" + s1 + "test" + i;
>
On 11/17/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Bernd Fondermann wrote:
> On 11/17/06, Stefano Bagnara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Output code 2 from jdk 1.4
>> > String s2 = s + "test" + s1 + "test" + i;
>>
>> Output code 2 from jdk 1.5
>> > String s2 = (new StringBuilde
Find a solution for maven2 dependencies to be able to create an official
release.
-
Key: JSPF-27
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JSPF-27
Project: jSPF
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-1?page=all ]
Stefano Bagnara reassigned MIME4J-1:
Assignee: Stefano Bagnara
> Find a solution for maven2 dependencies to be able to create an official
> r
Find a solution for maven2 dependencies to be able to create an official
release.
-
Key: MIME4J-1
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MIME4J-1
Project: Mime4j
There is a thread in general@james.apache.org on this subject right now.
Feel free to participate.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The solution is to authenticate messages in James by digital signatures with
an authority, this solution is the idea for my Thesis in the University. So
I want to know if there is any developer working in this solution or anyone
can help me developing this solution.
Or someone has an idea to be
On Fri, Jun 03, 2005 at 09:55:08PM +0200, Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> > > I have no rights to close jira issues, you can mark as resolved the
> > > following:
> >
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-380
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-379
> > > http://issues.apache.org/j
> > I have no rights to close jira issues, you can mark as resolved the
> > following:
>
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-380
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-379
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-377
> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-375
> > h
Stefano Bagnara wrote:
> Just created the JIRA issue and uploaded the patch
I merged it with some changes. We only need one copy of the rbl list, and
don't need to massage it for each connection.
Please review the committed changes.
--- Noel
---
> I have no rights to close jira issues, you can mark as resolved the
> following:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-380
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-379
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-377
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JAMES-375
> http://issues.apa
> > I'm adding an
> >
> > servername
> > servername
> configuration to
> > the smtp handler.
>
> You may find it convenient to move the check method into the
> configuration class as part of your changes. And the outer
> tag should be , right? :-)
, right.
Just created the JIRA
> I'm adding an
>
> servername
> servername
>
> configuration to the smtp handler.
You may find it convenient to move the check method into the configuration
class as part of your changes. And the outer tag should be ,
right? :-)
--- Noel
-
> OK, guys ... give it a whirl. Build from source and adjust
> the list of DNSRBL to suit your environment.
>
> Feedback solicited. As would be a patch to make this user
> configurable.
Working on this:
I'm adding an
servername
servername
configuration to the smtp handler.
Ste
OK, guys ... give it a whirl. Build from source and adjust the list of
DNSRBL to suit your environment.
Feedback solicited. As would be a patch to make this user configurable.
--- Noel
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
+1 from me too
Vincenzo
Jason Webb wrote:
+1 from me as well
-Original Message-
From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 31 May 2005 16:37
To: James Developers List
Subject: Re: Short term, but immediate, solution to spam volume.
On 5/31/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EM
Hontvari Jozsef wrote:
Hey! It is great to hear from you. Haven't seen much of you lately.
> Maybe it helps, I have attached the source which we use for about a
> year.
Please review my version (ATTACHED FOR FEEDBACK FROM ALL). Quite similar to
yours, borrowing from the DNS RBL matcher.
Why
I forgot to mention: It doesn't check for abuse@, only postmaster@ and
the email address used in the error message is hard coded.
Hontvari Jozsef wrote:
Maybe it helps, I have attached the source which we use for about a
year. I cannot create a standard patch because my last workspace is
bas
Maybe it helps, I have attached the source which we use for about a
year. I cannot create a standard patch because my last workspace is
based on the now non-existent cvs repository.
The code must be inserted before these lines into the SMTPHandler.java file:
if (authRequired) {
+1 from me as well
> -Original Message-
> From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 31 May 2005 16:37
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: Short term, but immediate, solution to spam volume.
>
> On 5/31/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
+1 from me as well
> -Original Message-
> From: Serge Knystautas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 31 May 2005 16:37
> To: James Developers List
> Subject: Re: Short term, but immediate, solution to spam volume.
>
> On 5/31/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
On 5/31/05, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I propose an interm measure to add support for a DNSRBL in the SMTP handler,
> which will set a flag such that RCPT TO will fail except for postmaster
> (RFC2821) and abuse (RFC2142). Once a single message to has been accepted
> for that con
Do to the incredibly high volume generated by Microsoft Windows spambots, I
feel that we need to allow somewhat more aggressive measures in the near
term, as in *NOW*.
I propose an interm measure to add support for a DNSRBL in the SMTP handler,
which will set a flag such that RCPT TO will fail exc
48 matches
Mail list logo
