Title: Re: ShopTalk: Backweighting
I still have a copy of the article. Some of those
sets are MOI matched as well. There is a 0 handicap, a 1,6 handicap, a 2
handicap,a 12 or so and a 14 I believe. I have never tried backweighting
but apparently it helps the golfer with quick hands
Title: Backweighting
GS also recommends cutting the shaft a 1/2 shorter
if using the CForce grip.
http://www.golfsmith.com/products/181750
And here is more on the topic:
http://www.balance-certified.com/pages.php?page=02/11/19/0150711
Take some leave some.
A 1/2 inch bolt also fits the ID of most graphite shafts and a 9/16 bolt
fits the ID of steel shafts. As you said, a couple wraps of
electrical tape to tighten the fit works great. Cut the bolt to the
length to get the weight you want. I use long bolts to get
unthreaded shaft weights.
Regards,
At 08:44 PM 8/14/2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think back weighting is all about feel.
I have to believe this is the case. That's
because there's nothing in physics that says
there will be a big difference in result, given
the same swing. I've run Max's SwingPerfect
program, which uses
--- Dave Tutelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is your belief based on? I'm not baiting you,
I'd simply like to know.
:-)
Fair enough. It's just a gut feeling. I guess it's
based on the fact that even among good golfers, a
specification or feature that helps or is liked by one
golfer,
: Tuesday, August 15, 2006 2:10 PM
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Subject: RE: ShopTalk: Backweighting
--- Dave Tutelman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is your belief based on? I'm not baiting you,
I'd simply like to know.
:-)
Fair enough. It's just a gut feeling. I guess it's
based on the fact
What's difficult to do in the models is to accurately model all of the
possible variations in muscle contraction that are possible. Most of the
force/torque models in the physics models are relatively simple (constant,
triangular, square, sloped, etc.). Whereas we humans can apply a very
At 02:10 PM 8/15/2006, Don M wrote:
I guess it's
based on the fact that even among good golfers, a
specification or feature that helps or is liked by one
golfer, hurts or is disliked by another. The human
element seems to play such a huge role that attempts
to reduce it to science seem to me to
At 04:22 PM 8/15/2006, Alan Brooks wrote:
What's difficult to do in the models is to accurately model all of
the possible variations in muscle contraction that are
possible. Most of the force/torque models in the physics models are
relatively simple (constant, triangular, square, sloped,
Hi Dave,
At 06:22 PM 8/15/2006 -0400, you wrote:
At 04:22 PM 8/15/2006, Alan Brooks wrote:
What's difficult to do in the models is to accurately model all of the
possible variations in muscle contraction that are possible. Most of the
force/torque models in the physics models are relatively
Try this for starters. http://www.myostrichgolf.com/clubmakers/product_info.php?products_id=227
This subject is discussed at great length at www.freegolfinfo.com and www.4GEA.com
both of these forums are free to join. Once in you can do a search for the threads.
I hope this helps.
Arnie
Title: Backweighting
I think back weighting is all about feel. I
havent tried it on anything other than a putter, but for me, 75 gms in
the grip end of my putter (Rife 2 Bar, Mallet) provides great feel the extra
weight seems to really stabilize my hands. Especially noticeable on short
Title: Re: ShopTalk: Backweighting
Brother Arnie:
but he's been a dedicated shoptalker just about from day one and
would like to hear it from his peers at shoptalk. There's no other
forum with the same depth of experience or concentration of
knowledge. Tim from myostrich hangs out here from
13 matches
Mail list logo
