t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Flatline vs frequency chart
> At 03:20 PM 8/25/2006, André Cantin wrote:
> >If you were to install a flat line set in the NF4 at a constant distance
> >from let's say the butt end of the clu
At 03:20 PM 8/25/2006, André Cantin wrote:
If you were to install a flat line set in the NF4 at a constant distance
from let's say the butt end of the club would the Nf4 record the same load
or a different load for each club?
My analysis (see
http://www.tutelman.com/golfclubs/frequency.php )
y and brought him along to work for
Brunswick.
TOM
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Tutelman
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 11:44 AM
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Flatline vs frequency chart
In the early 1970s, J
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 2:43 PM
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Flatline vs frequency chart
> In the early 1970s, Joseph Braly was the chief
> scientist for Brunswick Shafts, which eventually
> became Royal Precision. He came up with the idea
> of frequency matching at that time, and ra
In the early 1970s, Joseph Braly was the chief
scientist for Brunswick Shafts, which eventually
became Royal Precision. He came up with the idea
of frequency matching at that time, and ran a
bunch of human-golfer tests to see what frequency
really meant. The outcome of these tests was that
di
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of André Cantin
Sent: Friday, August 25, 2006 8:04 AM
To: ShopTalk@mail.msen.com
Subject: ShopTalk: Flatline vs frequency chart
I was in the Canadian GW store yesterday and had a good conversation with
one of the managers who took the Rifle training before they went b
Hi Andre,
Yes, when you shorten a shaft the frequency goes up (hence it's
stiffer?). Because the butt section is stiffer than the tip section
trimming the butt leaves you with a softer shaft than if you trimmed the
same amount from the tip - but the shaft is still stiffer than it was at
the
I was in the Canadian GW store yesterday and had a good conversation with
one of the managers who took the Rifle training before they went belly up.
According to him a flat line(single frequency) set does not produce the same
flex across the set. In his opinion the short irons are softer in flex th
In a message dated 9/1/2002 7:32:54 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hello Dean, thanks for the response.
Krell is a little above what my wife will approve. I checked Rotel and they
didn't have anything that was 6.1 without adding an additional amplifier.
I would like to consid
; with a Rotel receiver. They work great together...
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Behalf Of Mark A. Patton
> Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 3:14 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Flatline
>
>
t
with a Rotel receiver. They work great together...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Mark A. Patton
Sent: Sunday, September 01, 2002 3:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Flatline
Well don't use the TPS 5-Iron as the bench
Damn, that last post meant to go to Mark privately. Forgot to replace
the address. Sorry...
gt; Thanks again for all of the comments and feedback. I'll be sure to let you
> know how this comes out.
>
> Cub
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mark A. Patton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, August 30, 20
sure to let you
know how this comes out.
Cub
- Original Message -
From: "Mark A. Patton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, August 30, 2002 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Flatline
> Steve
>
> Have read the responses through this evenin
Gary,
Close. I'll be cutting the all to the same freq, but varying the lengths by
1/2" or 1/4" from the 3 - 9 iron.
Cub
- Original Message -
From: "Gary Tarbet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 31, 2002 11:14 AM
Have been in and out of this discussion on flatline sets but keep seeing
reference to the only difference between clubs being the loft on the
clubheads. When I was taught to do flatline sets the difference was in
the way you trimmed the tips. For example if the 3 iron was your
longest iron you w
Steve
Have read the responses through this evening, but how about this:
Presuming a std iron set of 3-9
Determine your preferred middle iron (lets use a 6 for this example) as well as
the freq for your preferred shaft (I have a good thought this is a known fact to
you)
Build some demo 3s and 9s
Wednesday, August 28, 2002 8:22 PM
Subject: ShopTalk: Flatline
> I've discounted flat-line freq matching in the past but had a little time
to
> ponder it lately. Besides the fact that the short irons may hit longer and
> higher, wouldn't you lose control all the way around?
ard. i
was pointing out that by using a much more flexible setup, the Rifle shaft
can indeed be used.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tflan
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Flatline
Al,
The Tommy Armour clubs were the EQL's. Made somewhere around 1992 I believe. Never really caught on but that doesn't necessarily mean they were bad clubs.
Rich "Mac" McHattie
Mac's Golf
I run into this quite often. I usually buy 1 iron blanks, so I can trim
them to whatever frequency I want, which makes it easy to trim to the
correct flex while still giving the impression to the customer that they
are hitting a stiffer flex.
On probably 90% of the sets I have built in the la
g, using the same
labels, often does the trick for the guy who can't hit the stiffer shaft but
insists on having it in the head.
TFlan
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Pogor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 9:34 PM
S
- Original Message -
From: Childers, Tedd A <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 10:07 AM
> Tough to get the swingweights the same or close to the same on a set with
> all the clubs the same length.
Agreed!
> Also, the distance gaps between clubs gets
> much closer, sinc
Also, the lie angles would all have to be adjusted.
Dan Neubecker
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: Childers, Tedd A [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:07 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: RE: ShopTalk: Flatline
&
the
ballflight was correct. It seems they've fixed this with the project X - they produce
very good ballflight.
>
> From: "Childers, Tedd A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2002/08/29 Thu AM 09:16:24 EDT
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PRO
that is
the same length for all clubs.
Tedd
-Original Message-
From: Steve "Cub" Culbreth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Flatline
Mike,
Excellent post! That's the kind of empirical data I
onversions were developed over
time by testing with very good players.
Tedd
-Original Message-
From: Steve "Cub" Culbreth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Flatline
Mike,
Excellent post! That
Cub,
I have been playing a set of Golfsmith Tour Cavity irons on Dynamic shafts
at a 2 CPM/club slope for about 3-4 years now, and have been very happy with
them. The reason I went to this set-up is a s follows.
I was working at a golf range, and the clubmaker/head pro there was a big
propone
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 5:42 PM
>Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Flatline
>
>
> > Cub,
> > I have played and still have a set of Wilson Staff, system 45s? with Ti
> > shafts flatlined at 310. Used that set to sh
MAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve "Cub" Culbreth
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Flatline
Mike,
Excellent post! That's the kind of empirical data I am looking for. No need
to worry
about me using Rifles.
AIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 5:42 PM
Subject: Re: ShopTalk: Flatline
> Cub,
> I have played and still have a set of Wilson Staff, system 45s? with Ti
> shafts flatlined at 310. Used that set to shoot all of my par games. Did
> I
ginal Message -
From: "Michael Pogor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 4:08 PM
Subject: RE: ShopTalk: Flatline
> Cub,
> I've used flat-line clubs for the past ten years. My hdcp was 4 when I
> changed, and now hove
Cub,
I have played and still have a set of Wilson Staff, system 45s? with Ti
shafts flatlined at 310. Used that set to shoot all of my par games. Did
I like them? You bet. Why don't I play them? I became a professional
club maker. ;-)
Al
At 08:22 PM 8/28/2002, you wrote:
>I've discounte
flat-lining to
leave well enough alone.
Hope this helps,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Steve "Cub" Culbreth
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2002 8:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ShopTalk: Flatline
I've discounted fla
I've discounted flat-line freq matching in the past but had a little time to
ponder it lately. Besides the fact that the short irons may hit longer and
higher, wouldn't you lose control all the way around? I mean, using a 4cpm
slope we try to maintain the feel and playing flex throughout the set.
36 matches
Mail list logo
